|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 19:58:20 GMT
No, just reading the reviews and comparing what's said with what people usually say when they're giving out 6's.
ok, so 6 is fresh. If that's acceptable for you, then fair enough. It's still a 6.
You have been falsified. You cannot prove your 6/10 claim except for biased conjecture, plus even if you could the rating would be still fresh. This should really make you think on a personal level. Look what IGN's Terry Schwarz, a relatively strict reviewer, said: I am genuinely happy to report #JusticeLeague is a lot of fun. It's not perfect and has its problems, but does the job of making you care about these characters as a team by its end. It's also VERY funny, in lots of unexpected ways. No, that does not should like 6 barely fresh, but 7-8 good. And how about the other reviews that say the plot is thin, the villain is thin, the CGI is bad, etc?
I don't know why you're talking about not being able to prove something. I'm not here for ridiculous chat room banter.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 10, 2017 20:00:55 GMT
General consensus appears to be that it has a paper thin plot, weak CGI but is quite fun. So it sounds as though at least Whedon managed to salvage something from Zack the hack's dumpster fire. Not a fact at all lol. You’re just a hater. Did the same thing when Wonder Woman came out then disappeared once it earned critical acclaim. Just ignore him.
|
|
|
Post by primeone on Nov 10, 2017 20:01:26 GMT
Not a fact at all lol. You’re just a hater. Well, that's kinda what most of the reviews say. But the reviews aren’t saying anything about Zack having big issues and Whedon fixing which was what I was referring to
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 20:02:20 GMT
Yeah, most sound like a 3/5 which is positive overall, but half the time RT puts the 3/5 reviews as a negative. I agree, and for a film that's supposed to be a franchise tentpole, 3/5 is just not all that inspiring, especially when they've been getting 1's and 2's. I mean the franchise RT average is going be like a 50. That's just not good enough. Well it's a step even if it isn't where it should be. I think 'Aquaman' and Matt Reeves 'The Batman' will both be really good. Both directors helming these two projects are talented which is reason to believe that the final product will be great. They just need to stop getting butthole directors that suck at storytelling and their problems will be fixed. Snyder needs to go.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 20:05:23 GMT
Yeah, that's not entirely true. It should be fresh but RT often marks those a rotten. That is when the reviewer states that it should be rotten. RT clarified that many times. But in general 6/10 is a fresh. One of the reviews for Thor Ragnarok (I believe? or maybe is was Blade Runner 2049?) was a 3/5 that was fresh for practically a entire day before changing to a rotten. It's pretty inconsistent.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 20:06:40 GMT
Well, that's kinda what most of the reviews say. But the reviews aren’t saying anything about Zack having big issues and Whedon fixing which was what I was referring to Oh, my bad.
|
|
|
Post by Jedan Archer on Nov 10, 2017 20:08:11 GMT
You have been falsified. You cannot prove your 6/10 claim except for biased conjecture, plus even if you could the rating would be still fresh. This should really make you think on a personal level. Look what IGN's Terry Schwarz, a relatively strict reviewer, said: I am genuinely happy to report #JusticeLeague is a lot of fun. It's not perfect and has its problems, but does the job of making you care about these characters as a team by its end. It's also VERY funny, in lots of unexpected ways. No, that does not should like 6 barely fresh, but 7-8 good. And how about the other reviews that say the plot is thin, the villain is thin, the CGI is bad, etc?
I don't know why you're talking about not being able to prove something. I'm not here for ridiculous chat room banter.
Then stop with making stuff up, making unprovable negative claims and stop with absurd non sequiturs falsifying your own statements. This is called trolling and one of a pretty witless variety. MCU is infamous for weak villains, thin formula plots and some bad CGI. But they still get good ratings because they are so mindlessly funny. QED!
|
|
|
Post by CowherPowerForever on Nov 10, 2017 20:10:45 GMT
The reviews generally sound good. Every movie has flaws, calling them out does not mean the review will be bad.
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Nov 10, 2017 20:17:51 GMT
I already knew that the story line would probably be bad, especially given the run time and I didn't expect any character development to really go into this. So I had my expectations low. For me, as long as there are good character moments between each members, I can enjoy it. I'm just excited to see Wonder Woman on screen again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 20:23:02 GMT
I already knew that the story line would probably be bad, especially given the run time and I didn't expect any character development to really go into this. So I had my expectations low. For me, as long as there are good character moments between each members, I can enjoy it. I'm just excited to see Wonder Woman on screen again. And Batman
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 20:29:26 GMT
The MCU Zealots are panicking. These early reactions are, for the most part, really good. Despite all the "doom and gloom" and hate-mongering over the last year and a half, the final product sounds like it's just fine. Ha!
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 10, 2017 20:30:17 GMT
The MCU Zealots are panicking. These early reactions are, for the most part, really good. Despite all the "doom and gloom" and hate-mongering over the last year and a half, the final product sounds like it's just fine. Ha! Just fine isn't enough for the Justice League's first big adventure, though. You'd think that DC's big guns would warrant something bigger.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 20:31:33 GMT
The MCU Zealots are panicking. These early reactions are, for the most part, really good. Despite all the "doom and gloom" and hate-mongering over the last year and a half, the final product sounds like it's just fine. Ha! Just fine isn't enough for the Justice League's first big adventure, though. You'd think that DC's big guns would warrant something bigger. Just enjoy the movie, loser. Christ.
|
|
barcode
Sophomore
@barcode
Posts: 194
Likes: 108
|
Post by barcode on Nov 10, 2017 20:34:58 GMT
The MCU Zealots are panicking. These early reactions are, for the most part, really good. Despite all the "doom and gloom" and hate-mongering over the last year and a half, the final product sounds like it's just fine. Ha! The movie has been battling BVS backlash eversince. All in all , the reactions have been good so far. Number of Positive (Including Mixed Positive Reactions): 29 Number of Mixed Reactions: 7 Number of Negative Reactions: 1
|
|
|
Post by Jedan Archer on Nov 10, 2017 20:37:42 GMT
The MCU Zealots are panicking. These early reactions are, for the most part, really good. Despite all the "doom and gloom" and hate-mongering over the last year and a half, the final product sounds like it's just fine. Ha!^Word of the day.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 20:37:43 GMT
I agree, and for a film that's supposed to be a franchise tentpole, 3/5 is just not all that inspiring, especially when they've been getting 1's and 2's. I mean the franchise RT average is going be like a 50. That's just not good enough. Well it's a step even if it isn't where it should be. I think 'Aquaman' and Matt Reeves 'The Batman' will both be really good. Both directors helming these two projects are talented which is reason to believe that the final product will be great. They just need to stop getting butthole directors that suck at storytelling and their problems will be fixed. Snyder needs to go. He should have gone after MOS. Marvel actually promoted all the groundbreaking directors, and didn't just stick with whoever they had. That's one of the great things about their product.
IDK, "it's a step" isn't what they wanted to be said about JL. Just think about it, the first ever JL film and we're saying "it'll do" "it's a step". I mean that's kind of a sad reality.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 20:38:18 GMT
The MCU Zealots are panicking. These early reactions are, for the most part, really good. Despite all the "doom and gloom" and hate-mongering over the last year and a half, the final product sounds like it's just fine. Ha!^Word of the day. "it's just fine"
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 20:41:10 GMT
And how about the other reviews that say the plot is thin, the villain is thin, the CGI is bad, etc?
I don't know why you're talking about not being able to prove something. I'm not here for ridiculous chat room banter.
Then stop with making stuff up, making unprovable negative claims and stop with absurd non sequiturs falsifying your own statements. This is called trolling and one of a pretty witless variety. MCU is infamous for weak villains, thin formula plots and some bad CGI. But they still get good ratings because they are so mindlessly funny. QED! I didn't say it was provable. I said I felt the comments matched what people would say when giving a 6.
I'm not trolling, I'm giving an honest impression of what's being said.
What the MCU is famous for is success after success. It's about far more than being funny, and thin plots aren't remotely descriptive of what they've presented. If you really think they've only relied on humor, you have missed what's been going on.
|
|
|
Post by Hitman's Bodyguard on Nov 10, 2017 20:42:23 GMT
As long the movie has a lot of action, and is well choreographed, i really don't care about the rest.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 20:43:29 GMT
As long the movie has a lot of action, and is well choreographed, i really don't care about the rest. Story and character development is less important to you than action and choreography? I've always thought action was only there to enhance a good story, not to be the focus.
|
|