|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 18, 2017 17:30:32 GMT
RT sabotages JL with fake reviews
It can no longer be dismissed as pure speculation that RT is biased against DC. When RT is posting fake reviews using the account of someone who hadn't posted a review, that's clear evidence that RT is biased against DC. |
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 18, 2017 17:47:29 GMT
You do know that most of the movie going public don't go to RT before seeing a movie right? Maybe it was the trailers they saw before the movies they saw or the tv spots. Maybe people didn't like BvS and MoS and decided not to see a movie that continues on from those movies. Maybe people are not fans of the current "Dallas Cowboys"...
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Nov 18, 2017 17:53:54 GMT
RT sabotages JL with fake reviews
It can no longer be dismissed as pure speculation that RT is biased against DC. When RT is posting fake reviews using the account of someone who hadn't posted a review, that's clear evidence that RT is biased against DC. Then why did Wonder Woman get a 92%?? |
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Nov 18, 2017 18:06:44 GMT
You do know that most of the movie going public don't go to RT before seeing a movie right? Maybe it was the trailers they saw before the movies they saw or the tv spots. Maybe people didn't like BvS and MoS and decided not to see a movie that continues on from those movies. Maybe people are not fans of the current "Dallas Cowboys"... This, all of this. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Nov 18, 2017 18:10:17 GMT
It was the Russians!
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Nov 18, 2017 18:12:03 GMT
If they are positive, then they are fake.
|
|
|
|
Post by CowherPowerForever on Nov 18, 2017 18:13:21 GMT
As Deadline.com pointed out, the fan reception for the movie is great, but not enough are showing up. If they did this would be so huge.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Nov 18, 2017 18:20:48 GMT
RT sabotages JL with fake reviews
It can no longer be dismissed as pure speculation that RT is biased against DC. When RT is posting fake reviews using the account of someone who hadn't posted a review, that's clear evidence that RT is biased against DC. It wasn’t a “fake” review. It was the review the critic wrote. RT automatically posted it before he manually submitted it to RT. How on earth do you manage to get every single freakin’ thing wrong, cupcake? Is it by sheer repetition that you’ve perfected the art of idiot-trolling? |
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 18, 2017 18:28:13 GMT
As Deadline.com pointed out, the fan reception for the movie is great, but not enough are showing up. If they did this would be so huge. I think the fan reception is more that it's more pleasing than the other movies. MoS and BvS were so dower. When Superman started smiling and joking I felt like Robin on that one episode of Batman when Superman was impersonating him. Or this:  |
|
|
|
Post by CowherPowerForever on Nov 18, 2017 18:33:18 GMT
I think the fan reception is more that it's more pleasing than the other movies. MoS and BvS were so dower. When Superman started smiling and joking I felt like Robin on that one episode of Batman when Superman was impersonating him. Or this: Either way, the marks the fans are giving it are enough to keep it going strong for awhile. However, with a soft opening like this it just won't be nearly as much as expected. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 18, 2017 18:37:31 GMT
How on earth do you manage to get every single freakin’ thing wrong, cupcake? He's old and really bad at his IT job, so he takes it out on Marvel. |
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Nov 18, 2017 19:34:54 GMT
Doesn't Warner Bros. own Rotten Tomatoes? Why would they intentionally sabotage a major release of theirs?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2017 1:03:08 GMT
Doesn't Warner Bros. own Rotten Tomatoes? Why would they intentionally sabotage a major release of theirs? Yes, they do. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 19, 2017 6:12:42 GMT
Doesn't Warner Bros. own Rotten Tomatoes? Why would they intentionally sabotage a major release of theirs? WB doesn't control RT. WB's "ownership" of RT is nothing more than investing in a minority share of the stocks. I've invested in stocks of companies such as Cisco, Microsoft, Visa, and many others, so technically I'm an "owner" of those companies but I have practically no say at all in how those companies are run. Same with WB's "ownership" of RT. Its nothing more than an investment in another company's stock. Corporations do that all the time. They buy stock and invest in other companies, but that doesn't mean they can control how those companies are run. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2017 6:35:56 GMT
Doesn't Warner Bros. own Rotten Tomatoes? Why would they intentionally sabotage a major release of theirs? WB doesn't control RT. WB's "ownership" of RT is nothing more than investing in a minority share of the stocks. I've invested in stocks of companies such as Cisco, Microsoft, Visa, and many others, so technically I'm an "owner" of those companies but I have practically no say at all in how those companies are run. Same with WB's "ownership" of RT. Its nothing more than an investment in another company's stock. Corporations do that all the time. They buy stock and invest in other companies, but that doesn't mean they can control how those companies are run. Sabotaging one of its own investors would be the absolutely stupidest things they could do. All WB would have to do is withdraw with investment and sue them, as would be their right. The fact WB is doing neither of those things is very telling. Just stop being such a sore loser. The DCEU tried its hands and lost. |
|
