Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2017 20:43:22 GMT
......pushed back into 2018 because it would effect the yearly bonuses in his paycheck. How do DC fans feel about this?  |
|
|
|
Post by MooseNugget on Nov 30, 2017 21:29:55 GMT
I'm more of a Marvel guy. But I'll say that I did enjoy Wonder Woman and thought it was a step in the right direction for the DCEU.
Sometimes people want to make something perfect but it only makes the thing as little as 5 or 10% better. I hope that's the case here.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Nov 30, 2017 23:53:10 GMT
What is there to feel?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2017 0:56:48 GMT
Well, you would have to assume the movie would have been substantially better had they been allowed more time to work on it. Wouldn't you have preferred that? Aren't you annoyed that there are people working at WB who are more concerned with lining their own pockets than providing movie fans with a quality product? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2017 1:43:21 GMT
So Time Warner is being run by an idiot.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Dec 1, 2017 1:46:24 GMT
Well, you would have to assume the movie would have been substantially better had they been allowed more time to work on it. Wouldn't you have preferred that? Aren't you annoyed that there are people working at WB who are more concerned with lining their own pockets than providing movie fans with a quality product? What could there have been to work on, exactly? |
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Dec 1, 2017 1:49:54 GMT
Nobody should be surprised, Disney refused to delay Star Wars before
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2017 1:56:27 GMT
Well, you would have to assume the movie would have been substantially better had they been allowed more time to work on it. Wouldn't you have preferred that? Aren't you annoyed that there are people working at WB who are more concerned with lining their own pockets than providing movie fans with a quality product? What could there have been to work on, exactly? CGI and editing at the very least. Maybe they could have found a 130 minute version that hung together so much better than the suits would have had to okay it? Who knows? |
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Dec 1, 2017 16:36:01 GMT
It is a business after all. If they can't produce products in a timely manner than they aren't very good at what they do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2017 17:07:32 GMT
It is a business after all. If they can't produce products in a timely manner than they aren't very good at what they do. That's the understatement of the year. I'm no Hack Snyder fan but having read what was cut out of this movie, his original version sounded significantly better than the homogenized made by committee turd they released into theaters.  |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 2, 2017 0:31:24 GMT
Well, you would have to assume the movie would have been substantially better had they been allowed more time to work on it. Wouldn't you have preferred that? Aren't you annoyed that there are people working at WB who are more concerned with lining their own pockets than providing movie fans with a quality product? What could there have been to work on, exactly? Are you serious? Did you see the movie? Hee hee hee... |
|
