|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 9, 2017 18:03:23 GMT
There isnt much to argue about over Batman's intent to murder Superman. Batman was the villain, no two doubts about it. There isn't anything to argue about
In BvS. Civil War however provokes a lot of thought.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 9, 2017 18:04:01 GMT
No he didn't. Zack Synder himself Didn't realize what a negative reaction that scene would get and backtracked without giving a clear answer.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 9, 2017 18:04:44 GMT
Snyder thinks Superman slamming a normal human through a wall at super speed won't kill him? Yikes. No wonder Superman is a sociopath in the DCEU. He's being directed by one. Superman didn't slam him through the wall. Superman punched a hole through the wall and pulled him through the wall.
Nope, everything shown indicated that Superman flew him through the wall. If it was intended otherwise, Snyder was bad at showing it.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Dec 9, 2017 18:08:14 GMT
Snyder thinks Superman slamming a normal human through a wall at super speed won't kill him? Yikes. No wonder Superman is a sociopath in the DCEU. He's being directed by one. Superman didn't slam him through the wall. Superman punched a hole through the wall and pulled him through the wall. Like Snyder said, the man isn't dead.
And this once again shows the hypocrisy of MCU fans. MCU fans want to claim that Superman killed that guy even though the Director who filmed that scene confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy yet MCU fans are so quick to believe Josh Whedon's claim that the Avengers limited the Chitauri to a 5-city square block area when I've already proven may times that made no sense at all that just 3 people (Hulk, Iron Man, and Thor), 1 of whom can't even fly, could contain hundreds of flying Chitauri inside a 5-city square block area.
But Josh Whedon said it happened so you gullible MCU fans believe that bullshit nonsense. But now that Zack Synder confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy and the evidence supports his comments, you MCU fans refuse to accept it. That's hypocrisy!
He's not dead, but he's obviously permanently injured beyond comprehension and is in such terrible shape he'll eventually die because there is little chance his body can heal on its own and allow him to perform daily required tasks any other human being must do on a regular basis, and the only thing medics can do from that point on is make him comfortable - so that means tense surgeries and lots of medications. The guy will never be the same again, and it's all thanks to Superman. The reason why people are calling BS on Snyder's comment is because in a normal circumstance the dude would be dead as a door nail - those walls are not hollow and they're certainly not cardboard. And people have a problem with this because Superman is better than this - he has heat vision so he can burn the guy's hand, or freeze it with his ice breath. He also has super speed so he can just rush over there easily and just gently punch him to the ground. If Captain America did the same thing Superman did in this scene you'd still call him a "blood thirsty, disgusting, despicable tyrant"... And it's JOSS Whedon, not Josh Whedon.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Dec 9, 2017 18:09:51 GMT
No he didn't. Zack Synder himself has confirmed that Superman didn't kill the guy. The Director of the movie obviously knows more about what happened in that scene he filmed than you do.Zack Snyder confirms Superman didn't kill anyone in BvS"Snyder addressed the issue, explaining that Superman is innocent and also the man is probably gone for good.
Simply put, Snyder said the man is "not dead but not a problem either"Clearly, he does not. lol
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Dec 9, 2017 18:11:27 GMT
Snyder thinks Superman slamming a normal human through a wall at super speed won't kill him? Yikes. No wonder Superman is a sociopath in the DCEU. He's being directed by one. Superman didn't slam him through the wall. Superman punched a hole through the wall and pulled him through the wall. Like Snyder said, the man isn't dead.
And this once again shows the hypocrisy of MCU fans. MCU fans want to claim that Superman killed that guy even though the Director who filmed that scene confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy yet MCU fans are so quick to believe Josh Whedon's claim that the Avengers limited the Chitauri to a 5-city square block area when I've already proven may times that made no sense at all that just 3 people (Hulk, Iron Man, and Thor), 1 of whom can't even fly, could contain hundreds of flying Chitauri inside a 5-city square block area.
But Josh Whedon said it happened so you gullible MCU fans believe that bullshit nonsense. But now that Zack Synder confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy and the evidence supports his comments, you MCU fans refuse to accept it. That's hypocrisy!
Nope. He slammed him. That's not what hypocrisy means. You're trying to makes stuff up that's disproven by what's shown on screen. Superman is clearly shown slamming into the guy and then spearing him through a wall. Please don't deny reality. It's unhealthy.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Dec 9, 2017 18:15:38 GMT
Superman didn't slam him through the wall. Superman punched a hole through the wall and pulled him through the wall.
Nope, everything shown indicated that Superman flew him through the wall. Nope, like I said above, the images posted by seahawksrawk00 confirm what I wrote about Superman punching a hole through the wall and carrying that guy through the hole in the wall. That also confirms the Director's comments that the man isn't dead. If it was intended otherwise, Snyder was bad at showing it. You MCU fans always object when I point out the fact that MCU fans need everything spoon-fed to them, yet your comments only prove that I'm 100% right. In BvS, there was a scene in which Lex sees the Bat-signal in the sky and then calls someone and says "The Knight has arrived." The next scene shows Lois going down an escalator, where the Russian is waiting at the bottom of the escalator. Then the next scene shows Lois in the helicopter with the Russian being taken to the roof of the LexCorp building. Now Snyder never showed a scene of who was on the other end of the call that Lex made or a scene of Lex telling the Russian "Kidnap Lois and bring her to the roof of the LexCorp building now." But anyone with any intelligence doesn't need to be shown that the Russian was at the other end of that call Lex made and Lex told the Russian to bring Lois to the roof the LexCorp building. Only idiots would need a scene to be spoon-feed that to them. Same with Superman punching a hole through the wall and carrying that guy through the wall. Anyone with any intelligence knows that Superman couldn't have flown into that guy without flying through Lois so the only possibility was Superman used his superspeed to get behind the guy and grabbed the guy and then punched a hole through the wall and carried the guy through the hole in the wall, which confirms the Director's comments that the man isn't dead. Only idiots would need to be spoon-fed that.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Dec 9, 2017 18:18:10 GMT
Superman didn't slam him through the wall. Superman punched a hole through the wall and pulled him through the wall. Like Snyder said, the man isn't dead.
And this once again shows the hypocrisy of MCU fans. MCU fans want to claim that Superman killed that guy even though the Director who filmed that scene confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy yet MCU fans are so quick to believe Josh Whedon's claim that the Avengers limited the Chitauri to a 5-city square block area when I've already proven may times that made no sense at all that just 3 people (Hulk, Iron Man, and Thor), 1 of whom can't even fly, could contain hundreds of flying Chitauri inside a 5-city square block area.
But Josh Whedon said it happened so you gullible MCU fans believe that bullshit nonsense. But now that Zack Synder confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy and the evidence supports his comments, you MCU fans refuse to accept it. That's hypocrisy!
Nope. He slammed him. That's not what hypocrisy means. You're trying to makes stuff up that's disproven by what's shown on screen. Superman is clearly shown slamming into the guy and then spearing him through a wall. Please don't deny reality. It's unhealthy. Nope, that's not shown at all. The only thing that's shown is Superman going through the wall after the grabbed the guy. And based on the Director's confirmation that the man isn't dead, it's obvious that Superman used his superspeed to get behind the guy and grab the guy and then punched a hole through the wall and carried the guy through the hole in the wall.
Like I said, this once again shows the hypocrisy of MCU fans. MCU fans want to claim that Superman killed that guy even though the Director who filmed that scene confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy yet MCU fans are so quick to believe Josh Whedon's claim that the Avengers limited the Chitauri to a 5-city square block area when I've already proven may times that made no sense at all that just 3 people (Hulk, Iron Man, and Thor), 1 of whom can't even fly, could contain hundreds of flying Chitauri inside a 5-city square block area.
But Josh Whedon said it happened so you gullible MCU fans believe that bullshit nonsense. But now that Zack Synder confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy and the evidence supports his comments, you MCU fans refuse to accept it. That's hypocrisy!
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Dec 9, 2017 18:21:53 GMT
Nope, everything shown indicated that Superman flew him through the wall. Nope, like I said above, the images posted by seahawksrawk00 confirm what I wrote about Superman punching a hole through the wall and carrying that guy through the hole in the wall. That also confirms the Director's comments that the man isn't dead. If it was intended otherwise, Snyder was bad at showing it. You MCU fans always object when I point out the fact that MCU fans need everything spoon-fed to them, yet your comments only prove that I'm 100% right. In BvS, there was a scene in which Lex sees the Bat-signal in the sky and then calls someone and says "The Knight is here." The next scene shows Lois going down an escalator, where the Russian is waiting at the bottom of the escalator. Then the next scene shows Lois in the helicopter with the Russian being taken to the roof of the LexCorp building. Now Sunder never showed a scene of who was on the other end of the call that Lex made or a scene of Lex telling the Russian "Kidnap Lois and bring her to the roof of the LexCorp building now." But anyone with any intelligence doesn't need to be shown that the Russian was at the other end of that call Lex made and Lex told the Russian to bring Lois to the roof the LexCorp building. Only idiots would need a scene to be spoon-feed that to them. Same with Superman punching a hole through the wall and carrying that guy through the wall. Anyone with any intelligence knows that Superman couldn't have flown into that guy without flying through Lois so the only possibility was Superman used his superspeed to get behind the guy and grabbed the guy and then punched a hole through the wall and carried the guy through the hole in the wall, which confirms the Director's comments that the man isn't dead. Only idiots would need to be spoon-fed that. I never seen anyone complain about that scene. You're welcome to find a post with someone complaining about that, but lying isn't going to help your point. If you need to literally break down a scene frame by frame to come up with a defense, the director clearly didn't do the job correctly. A scene should be clear and concise. No audience should be required to break it down and try to come up theories or possibilities of what happened. If Snyder wants to say that the guy is alive, fine, but doesn't change the fact what we got and what the audience is seeing, clearly shows Superman did drive the guy through the wall, which he would not survive.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Dec 9, 2017 18:28:54 GMT
Superman didn't slam him through the wall. Superman punched a hole through the wall and pulled him through the wall. Like Snyder said, the man isn't dead.
And this once again shows the hypocrisy of MCU fans. MCU fans want to claim that Superman killed that guy even though the Director who filmed that scene confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy yet MCU fans are so quick to believe Josh Whedon's claim that the Avengers limited the Chitauri to a 5-city square block area when I've already proven may times that made no sense at all that just 3 people (Hulk, Iron Man, and Thor), 1 of whom can't even fly, could contain hundreds of flying Chitauri inside a 5-city square block area.
But Josh Whedon said it happened so you gullible MCU fans believe that bullshit nonsense. But now that Zack Synder confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy and the evidence supports his comments, you MCU fans refuse to accept it. That's hypocrisy!
He's not dead That's what I've been explaining to you. he's obviously permanently injured beyond comprehension and is in such terrible shape he'll eventually die because there is little chance his body can heal on its own and allow him to perform daily required tasks any other human being must do on a regular basis Most other human beings aren't warlords and terrorists who hold reporters hostage. The guy will never be the same again, and it's all thanks to Superman. So the guy will never be able to hold another reporter hostage again, thanks to Superman? Well, that's certainly good news. those walls are not hollow and they're certainly not cardboard. Neither were the walls that Strucker bounced off of after Cap kicked his shield (made of the strongest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) into Strucker with such violent force that it sent Strucker flying into that wall before his lifeless body fell to the ground. he has heat vision so he can burn the guy's hand, or freeze it with his ice breath. And if the guy moves his hand at the last second, it could be Lois who gets hit with the heat vision or freeze breath. it's JOSS Whedon, not Josh Whedon. So you're the Spelling Police on these boards. How much is the fine these days for Incorrect Spelling?
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 9, 2017 18:31:56 GMT
Nope, like I said above, the images posted by seahawksrawk00 Show Superman flying in a way that happens if he shoves the guy through the wall. Point out flaws in flawed movies. Like WW killing that terrorist guy unnecessarily.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Dec 9, 2017 18:36:12 GMT
Nope. He slammed him. That's not what hypocrisy means. You're trying to makes stuff up that's disproven by what's shown on screen. Superman is clearly shown slamming into the guy and then spearing him through a wall. Please don't deny reality. It's unhealthy. Nope, that's not shown at all. The only thing that's shown is Superman going through the wall after the grabbed the guy. And based on the Director's confirmation that the man isn't dead, it's obvious that Superman used his superspeed to get behind the guy and grab the guy and then punched a hole through the wall and carried the guy through the hole in the wall.
Like I said, this once again shows the hypocrisy of MCU fans. MCU fans want to claim that Superman killed that guy even though the Director who filmed that scene confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy yet MCU fans are so quick to believe Josh Whedon's claim that the Avengers limited the Chitauri to a 5-city square block area when I've already proven may times that made no sense at all that just 3 people (Hulk, Iron Man, and Thor), 1 of whom can't even fly, could contain hundreds of flying Chitauri inside a 5-city square block area.
But Josh Whedon said it happened so you gullible MCU fans believe that bullshit nonsense. But now that Zack Synder confirmed that Superman didn't kill that guy and the evidence supports his comments, you MCU fans refuse to accept it. That's hypocrisy!
No, he slammed him. Hard and fast. Again, that's not hypocrisy. Don't make up scenes and then meanings to already existing words. Heck, now you're even making up names. Those are signs of a deteriorating mind. I strongly suggest you check out this website: www.hhs.gov/
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Dec 9, 2017 18:41:38 GMT
Nope, like I said above, the images posted by seahawksrawk00 confirm what I wrote about Superman punching a hole through the wall and carrying that guy through the hole in the wall. That also confirms the Director's comments that the man isn't dead. You MCU fans always object when I point out the fact that MCU fans need everything spoon-fed to them, yet your comments only prove that I'm 100% right. In BvS, there was a scene in which Lex sees the Bat-signal in the sky and then calls someone and says "The Knight is here." The next scene shows Lois going down an escalator, where the Russian is waiting at the bottom of the escalator. Then the next scene shows Lois in the helicopter with the Russian being taken to the roof of the LexCorp building. Now Sunder never showed a scene of who was on the other end of the call that Lex made or a scene of Lex telling the Russian "Kidnap Lois and bring her to the roof of the LexCorp building now." But anyone with any intelligence doesn't need to be shown that the Russian was at the other end of that call Lex made and Lex told the Russian to bring Lois to the roof the LexCorp building. Only idiots would need a scene to be spoon-feed that to them. Same with Superman punching a hole through the wall and carrying that guy through the wall. Anyone with any intelligence knows that Superman couldn't have flown into that guy without flying through Lois so the only possibility was Superman used his superspeed to get behind the guy and grabbed the guy and then punched a hole through the wall and carried the guy through the hole in the wall, which confirms the Director's comments that the man isn't dead. Only idiots would need to be spoon-fed that. I never seen anyone complain about that scene. You're welcome to find a post with someone complaining about that, but lying isn't going to help your point. If you need to literally break down a scene frame by frame to come up with a defense, the director clearly didn't do the job correctly. A scene should be clear and concise. No audience should be required to break it down and try to come up theories or possibilities of what happened. And once again, this demonstrates the hypocrisy of MCU fans. Based on your argument, the Director of SMH didn't do his job correctly because it's not only never confirmed that Peter became a hero because Uncle Ben was murdered and he didn't stop it from happening when he had the chance to but also never confirmed that Uncle Ben is even dead. The only reference to Uncle Ben in the whole movie was Peter telling Ned that Aunt May had been through a lot. Which doesn't confirm that Uncle Ben was murdered or is even dead since it's entirely possible that Ben Parker cheated on May with another woman so Ben and May got divorced and May had a hard time getting over that. So SMH never makes it clear that Ben Parker was murdered and that his murder inspired Peter to become a hero. Instead, SMH shows that Peter's entire motivation for being a hero is to try to impress Tony Stark, which is the most shallow reason ever to be a hero and completely betrays the comic-book character. clearly shows Superman did drive the guy through the wall, which he would not survive. No, the scene only shows Superman going through the wall, which supports the Director's claim that the man isn't dead since Superman obviously punched a hole through the wall and carried the guy through the hole in the way that he punched. That's why we never see a dead body, unlike the Strucker scene in Age of Ultron, where we acutally see Strucker's lifeless body lying on the floor after Cap kicked his shield (made of the hardest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) into Strucker with such violent force that it sent Strucker's body bouncing off the wall.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Dec 9, 2017 18:45:00 GMT
Point out flaws in flawed movies. Like WW killing that terrorist guy unnecessarily. It wasn't unnecessary. The guy (who moments earlier had tried to set off a bomb and after Wonder Woman thwarted that plan, tried to shoot 30 to 40 hostages) was holding a machine gun and wearing a long overcoat, in which he could've been carrying more ammo or explosives. So the guy was an threat and needed to be taken out immediately.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 9, 2017 18:53:43 GMT
Point out flaws in flawed movies. Like WW killing that terrorist guy unnecessarily. It wasn't unnecessary. It was. WW could've taken him out to question him with the lasso since he was the leader but she didn't bother. Not only is it unnecessary killing, it's utter incompetence on her part.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 9, 2017 18:54:38 GMT
I never seen anyone complain about that scene. You're welcome to find a post with someone complaining about that, but lying isn't going to help your point. If you need to literally break down a scene frame by frame to come up with a defense, the director clearly didn't do the job correctly. A scene should be clear and concise. No audience should be required to break it down and try to come up theories or possibilities of what happened. And once again, this demonstrates the hypocrisy of MCU fans. Based on your argument, the Director of SMH didn't do his job correctly because it's not only never confirmed that Peter became a hero because Uncle Ben was murdered and he didn't stop it from happening when he had the chance to but also never confirmed that Uncle Ben is even dead. He doesn't need to. We don't need to be spoonfed like that because Spidey's story is well known enough.
Just like how we didn't need to see the Waynes die again except to try and justify "Martha".
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Dec 9, 2017 18:54:57 GMT
And once again, this demonstrates the hypocrisy of MCU fans. Based on your argument, the Director of SMH didn't do his job correctly because it's not only never confirmed that Peter became a hero because Uncle Ben was murdered and he didn't stop it from happening when he had the chance to but also never confirmed that Uncle Ben is even dead. The only reference to Uncle Ben in the whole movie was Peter telling Ned that Aunt May had been through a lot. Which doesn't confirm that Uncle Ben was murdered or is even dead since it's entirely possible that Ben Parker cheated on May with another woman so Ben and May got divorced and May had a hard time getting over that. So SMH never makes it clear that Ben Parker was murdered and that his murder inspired Peter to become a hero. Instead, SMH shows that Peter's entire motivation for being a hero is to try to impress Tony Stark, which is the most shallow reason ever to be a hero and completely betrays the comic-book character. clearly shows Superman did drive the guy through the wall, which he would not survive. No, the scene only shows Superman going through the wall, which supports the Director's claim that the man isn't dead since Superman obviously punched a hole through the wall and carried the guy through the hole in the way that he punched. That's why we never see a dead body, unlike the Strucker scene in Age of Ultron, where we acutally see Strucker's lifeless body lying on the floor after Cap kicked his shield (made of the hardest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) into Strucker with such violent force that it sent Strucker's body bouncing off the wall. I'm not talking about dialogue you dumb fuck, I'm talking about actions that happen in the scene. Dialogue can clearly be interpreted either way, but its pretty obvious Uncle Ben is dead. If you need that information spoon fed to you, then that's your fault because you're a fuckin' moron. Strucker didn't die as he was clearly shown as he was murdered by Ultron later in the film. And no one made a big deal about it either except for you because you're a DC cocksucking fuckin' troll who can't stand the fact that MCU is still successful. We didn't see what happened with the terrorist after Superman drove him through the wall. So yeah, Snyder clearly failed. What the audience got and saw on the screen showed Superman driving the guy through the wall. If Snyder says he's alive, then I guess he's alive, but that's just an indicator that he failed as a director to show the audience what happened.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Dec 9, 2017 19:13:45 GMT
And once again, this demonstrates the hypocrisy of MCU fans. Based on your argument, the Director of SMH didn't do his job correctly because it's not only never confirmed that Peter became a hero because Uncle Ben was murdered and he didn't stop it from happening when he had the chance to but also never confirmed that Uncle Ben is even dead. The only reference to Uncle Ben in the whole movie was Peter telling Ned that Aunt May had been through a lot. Which doesn't confirm that Uncle Ben was murdered or is even dead since it's entirely possible that Ben Parker cheated on May with another woman so Ben and May got divorced and May had a hard time getting over that. So SMH never makes it clear that Ben Parker was murdered and that his murder inspired Peter to become a hero. Instead, SMH shows that Peter's entire motivation for being a hero is to try to impress Tony Stark, which is the most shallow reason ever to be a hero and completely betrays the comic-book character. No, the scene only shows Superman going through the wall, which supports the Director's claim that the man isn't dead since Superman obviously punched a hole through the wall and carried the guy through the hole in the way that he punched. That's why we never see a dead body, unlike the Strucker scene in Age of Ultron, where we acutally see Strucker's lifeless body lying on the floor after Cap kicked his shield (made of the hardest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) into Strucker with such violent force that it sent Strucker's body bouncing off the wall. Strucker didn't die as he was clearly shown as he was murdered by Ultron later in the film. No, Age of Ultron never showed Ultron killing Strucker, because Ultron didn't kill Strucker. The last time we saw Strucker alive was right before Cap kicked his shield (made of the strongest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) into Strucker with such violent force that it sent Strucker bouncing off the wall. After Strucker's lifeless body fell to the floor, we never saw Strucker alive again. We didn't see what happened with the terrorist after Superman drove him through the wall. So yeah, Snyder clearly failed. And we never saw Strucker alive again after Cap kicked his shield (made of the strongest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) into Strucker with such violent force that it sent Strucker bouncing off the wall. SO yeah, Age of Ultron was a clear failure.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Dec 9, 2017 19:21:34 GMT
That's what I've been explaining to you. he's obviously permanently injured beyond comprehension and is in such terrible shape he'll eventually die because there is little chance his body can heal on its own and allow him to perform daily required tasks any other human being must do on a regular basis Most other human beings aren't warlords and terrorists who hold reporters hostage. The guy will never be the same again, and it's all thanks to Superman. So the guy will never be able to hold another reporter hostage again, thanks to Superman? Well, that's certainly good news. those walls are not hollow and they're certainly not cardboard. Neither were the walls that Strucker bounced off of after Cap kicked his shield (made of the strongest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) into Strucker with such violent force that it sent Strucker flying into that wall before his lifeless body fell to the ground. he has heat vision so he can burn the guy's hand, or freeze it with his ice breath. And if the guy moves his hand at the last second, it could be Lois who gets hit with the heat vision or freeze breath. it's JOSS Whedon, not Josh Whedon. So you're the Spelling Police on these boards. How much is the fine these days for Incorrect Spelling? You took the start of my response and twisted my words - Nice try, but its a dud. Try to pick part the whole sentence or paragraph instead of fragments, trust me you'll gain more credibility. We're not talking about the guy being good or bad, we're talking about his wounds from a realistic point of view, since he's, y'know, human. In real life he'd either die or be wounded so bad he'd eventually kick the bucket sooner than later because there is no way he'd be able to recover on his own or with medical aid. We're not particularly happy with either because Superman does not typically approach situations like that. Superman has super speed and his powers are fast-acting, the guy could've been easily subdued. It's nice to hear that you are all in favor with Superman killing people or wounding them to the point where death is the only way out rather than prison but if Captain America punches a guy or uses his shield that knocks a person out he is a monster of the worst kind. And you say you're not biased. Cap didn't kill Strucker, he knocked him out - Ultron killed him. By now you SHOULD know how to pronounce Joss Whedon correctly, you talk about DC and Marvel on a regular basis.
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Dec 9, 2017 19:22:56 GMT
Strucker didn't die as he was clearly shown as he was murdered by Ultron later in the film. No, Age of Ultron never showed Ultron killing Strucker, because Ultron didn't kill Strucker. The last time we saw Strucker alive was right before Cap kicked his shield (made of the strongest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) into Strucker with such violent force that it sent Strucker bouncing off the wall. After Strucker's lifeless body fell to the floor, we never saw Strucker alive again. We didn't see what happened with the terrorist after Superman drove him through the wall. So yeah, Snyder clearly failed. And we never saw Strucker alive again after Cap kicked his shield (made of the strongest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) into Strucker with such violent force that it sent Strucker bouncing off the wall. SO yeah, Age of Ultron was a clear failure. Except we did technically see Strucker after and he was clearly alive as well after he was subdued and captured by Rogers. Why would they put a dead body in a prison cell?
|
|