|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 2, 2018 2:22:05 GMT
Enjoy.  Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I find stuff like this very interesting. Don't you? Or is "Cultural Marxism" more your speed? |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jan 2, 2018 3:03:19 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I find stuff like this very interesting. Don't you? Or is "Cultural Marxism" more your speed? You would, because it is archetypal bullshit and claptrap! |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 2, 2018 3:06:07 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I find stuff like this very interesting. Don't you? Or is "Cultural Marxism" more your speed? You would, because it is archetypal bullshit and claptrap! You watched all five of it minutes then? Amazing. |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jan 2, 2018 4:39:06 GMT
You would, because it is archetypal bullshit and claptrap! You watched all five of it minutes then? Amazing. 20-25 seconds and I always regret clicking your links! |
|
|
|
Post by yougotastewgoinbaby on Jan 2, 2018 5:47:19 GMT
An age of baseness and debauchery...
Does this mean that we can expect some hardcore belly dancing from molarmaya in this brave new Age of Pisces?
|
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Jan 2, 2018 11:05:27 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I find stuff like this very interesting. Don't you? Or is "Cultural Marxism" more your speed? "The Age of Monotheism, Spirituality, and the Fish" 😎 |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jan 2, 2018 13:58:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 2, 2018 16:05:46 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I find stuff like this very interesting. Don't you? Or is "Cultural Marxism" more your speed? "The Age of Monotheism, Spirituality, and the Fish" 😎 Do you think you're gonna like the Age of Aquarius any better? |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jan 2, 2018 17:39:37 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I find stuff like this very interesting. Don't you? Or is "Cultural Marxism" more your speed? So the whole video was a single image, is there any source for what he was talking about? I am sorry to say, but this seems like yet another case of someone just sharing their opinion as opposed to actually having anything to present. |
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Jan 2, 2018 17:42:27 GMT
"The Age of Monotheism, Spirituality, and the Fish" 😎 Do you think you're gonna like the Age of Aquarius any better? Of various predictions, this one I think is more keeping with the thread: "Proponents of medieval astrology suggest that the Pisces world where religion is the opiate of the masses will be replaced in the Aquarian Age by a world ruled by secretive, power-hungry elites seeking absolute power over others; that knowledge in the Aquarian Age will only be valued for its ability to win wars; that knowledge and science will be abused, not industry and trade; and that the Aquarian Age will be a Dark Age in which religion is considered offensive." |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 2, 2018 18:15:36 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I find stuff like this very interesting. Don't you? Or is "Cultural Marxism" more your speed? So the whole video was a single image, is there any source for what he was talking about? I am sorry to say, but this seems like yet another case of someone just sharing their opinion as opposed to actually having anything to present. The source is astrology, which I admit to not knowing much about. There are many videos about the transition from Pisces to Aquarius, and they don't all agree with each other. I picked this one to start the thread with, but opposing viewpoints are welcome. |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jan 2, 2018 18:26:33 GMT
So the whole video was a single image, is there any source for what he was talking about? I am sorry to say, but this seems like yet another case of someone just sharing their opinion as opposed to actually having anything to present. The source is astrology, which I admit to not knowing much about. There are many videos about the transition from Pisces to Aquarius, and they don't all agree with each other. I picked this one to start the thread with, but opposing viewpoints are welcome. I realise that the source in the broadest possible sense is astrology, what I am saying i that this guy is just talking and not referencing any kind of source at all, I must confess I find this is a common theme in the videos you post. The net result is that the viewer ends up believing that this is either just the authors unfounded opinion, or the source for this material was so embarrassing the author did not want to mention it. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 2, 2018 18:34:54 GMT
The source is astrology, which I admit to not knowing much about. There are many videos about the transition from Pisces to Aquarius, and they don't all agree with each other. I picked this one to start the thread with, but opposing viewpoints are welcome. I realise that the source in the broadest possible sense is astrology, what I am saying i that this guy is just talking and not referencing any kind of source at all, I must confess I find this is a common theme in the videos you post. The net result is that the viewer ends up believing that this is either just the authors unfounded opinion, or the source for this material was so embarrassing the author did not want to mention it. If the guy who posted the video is big-time into astrology, then perhaps he's the source. It would be his interpretation based on his knowledge of the field. You don't have to agree with it. You can even make fun of it if you want, and you probably will, because it didn't come from an official government source or a mainstream media outlet. Those predictions at the end of the presentation seem to have been realized, regardless of the source, but I don't think he said when they were originally made. I took it that precooked meals would have been in the realm of science-fiction when that prediction was made. |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jan 2, 2018 19:08:52 GMT
I realise that the source in the broadest possible sense is astrology, what I am saying i that this guy is just talking and not referencing any kind of source at all, I must confess I find this is a common theme in the videos you post. The net result is that the viewer ends up believing that this is either just the authors unfounded opinion, or the source for this material was so embarrassing the author did not want to mention it. If the guy who posted the video is big-time into astrology, then perhaps he's the source. It would be his interpretation based on his knowledge of the field. You don't have to agree with it. You can even make fun of it if you want, and you probably will, because it didn't come from an official government source or a mainstream media outlet. Those predictions at the end of the presentation seem to have been realized, regardless of the source, but I don't think he said when they were originally made. I took it that precooked meals would have been in the realm of science-fiction when that prediction was made. If. In the age of everyone being able to post whatever on the internet, sourcing is important, or alternatively the guy should say that he is qualified and so is the source. Anthony Beevor is perhaps the greatest living WW2 historian, but he still cites sources. I won't make fun of what the guy predicts, the question is what is so bad or good about what he has predicted coming to pass? I find it hard to see the end of days tied up too closely with the advent of microwave dinners. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 2, 2018 19:21:59 GMT
If the guy who posted the video is big-time into astrology, then perhaps he's the source. It would be his interpretation based on his knowledge of the field. You don't have to agree with it. You can even make fun of it if you want, and you probably will, because it didn't come from an official government source or a mainstream media outlet. Those predictions at the end of the presentation seem to have been realized, regardless of the source, but I don't think he said when they were originally made. I took it that precooked meals would have been in the realm of science-fiction when that prediction was made. If. In the age of everyone being able to post whatever on the internet, sourcing is important, or alternatively the guy should say that he is qualified and so is the source. Anthony Beevor is perhaps the greatest living WW2 historian, but he still cites sources. I won't make fun of what the guy predicts, the question is what is so bad or good about what he has predicted coming to pass? I find it hard to see the end of days tied up too closely with the advent of microwave dinners. Anthony Beevor? I'll look him up. And hopefully he isn't the one who told you that the firebombing of Dresden was a strategic necessity. |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jan 2, 2018 19:25:50 GMT
If. In the age of everyone being able to post whatever on the internet, sourcing is important, or alternatively the guy should say that he is qualified and so is the source. Anthony Beevor is perhaps the greatest living WW2 historian, but he still cites sources. I won't make fun of what the guy predicts, the question is what is so bad or good about what he has predicted coming to pass? I find it hard to see the end of days tied up too closely with the advent of microwave dinners. Anthony Beevor? I'll look him up. And hopefully he isn't the one who told you that the firebombing of Dresden was a strategic necessity. You should, I just read his Ardennes offensive book. I am not convinced I have ever argued it was, with the available information at the time it was a strategic bombing, but we have the luxury of all the facts afterwards. |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jan 3, 2018 2:57:27 GMT
So the whole video was a single image, is there any source for what he was talking about? I am sorry to say, but this seems like yet another case of someone just sharing their opinion as opposed to actually having anything to present. The source is astrology, which I admit to not knowing much about. There are many videos about the transition from Pisces to Aquarius, and they don't all agree with each other. I picked this one to start the thread with, but opposing viewpoints are welcome. Astrology is unscientific bunkum. 'Astrology consists of a number of belief systems that hold that there is a relationship between astronomical phenomena and events or descriptions of personality in the human world. Astrology has been rejected by the scientific community as having no explanatory power for describing the universe.' |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 3, 2018 7:47:31 GMT
The source is astrology, which I admit to not knowing much about. There are many videos about the transition from Pisces to Aquarius, and they don't all agree with each other. I picked this one to start the thread with, but opposing viewpoints are welcome. Astrology is unscientific bunkum. 'Astrology consists of a number of belief systems that hold that there is a relationship between astronomical phenomena and events or descriptions of personality in the human world. Astrology has been rejected by the scientific community as having no explanatory power for describing the universe.' Piss on the scientific community. |
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jan 3, 2018 7:53:58 GMT
Astrology is unscientific bunkum. 'Astrology consists of a number of belief systems that hold that there is a relationship between astronomical phenomena and events or descriptions of personality in the human world. Astrology has been rejected by the scientific community as having no explanatory power for describing the universe.' Piss on the scientific community. Yeah, what good use is science for? I'll expect your reply to arrive chiseled in stone and delivered on horseback in a few weeks. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 3, 2018 7:56:55 GMT
Piss on the scientific community. Yeah, what good use is science for? I'll expect your reply to arrive chiseled in stone and delivered on horseback in a few weeks. Stop making a fool of yourself. Science =/= the "scientific community." |
|
