Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2018 14:44:25 GMT
How the fuck is asserting that it's flopping in China baseless? It's a fact, chief. I can think of about a billion reasons why it's performance in China is irrelevant, but I was actually talking about the part where he said Disney was done. But that's not what you said. You said he was saying baseless things about SW movies. Which he was not. If you had said he was saying baseless things about Disney, I wouldn't have responded.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Jan 11, 2018 14:47:02 GMT
I can think of about a billion reasons why it's performance in China is irrelevant, but I was actually talking about the part where he said Disney was done. But that's not what you said. You said he was saying baseless things about SW movies. Which he was not. If you had said he was saying baseless things about Disney, I wouldn't have responded. “This could very well be the end of Star Wars”
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Jan 11, 2018 14:57:01 GMT
I can think of about a billion reasons why it's performance in China is irrelevant, but I was actually talking about the part where he said Disney was done. But that's not what you said. You said he was saying baseless things about SW movies. Which he was not. If you had said he was saying baseless things about Disney, I wouldn't have responded. You have been very insistent the are not a part of a certain crowd here. You're not doing a very good job of proving that you are it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2018 14:57:10 GMT
But that's not what you said. You said he was saying baseless things about SW movies. Which he was not. If you had said he was saying baseless things about Disney, I wouldn't have responded. “This could very well be the end of Star Wars” Which I took to mean as "the end of Star Wars in its current form." Which isn't baseless at all. It's possible I misinterpreted, but it seems like his next quote about the potential need for reboot seems to indicate that he didn't mean there would never be another SW movie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2018 14:58:56 GMT
But that's not what you said. You said he was saying baseless things about SW movies. Which he was not. If you had said he was saying baseless things about Disney, I wouldn't have responded. You have been very insistent the are not a part of a certain crowd here. You're not doing a very good job of proving that you are it. Again. In English please.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Jan 11, 2018 15:00:57 GMT
You have been very insistent the are not a part of a certain crowd here. You're not doing a very good job of proving that you are it. Again. In English please. It’s pretty easy to figure out what he’s saying. No need to be a douche.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2018 15:07:19 GMT
Again. In English please. It’s pretty easy to figure out what he’s saying. No need to be a douche. If it were anyone else, I would not be. I was not a douche with you, was I? But Kuato is a prick to everyone who posts on this board. I've defended him when he was right (I can link to threads if you like), even though he was a prick then, too, but then when he started in on how 98% of the people who post criticism on this board are trolls, then called me a troll, then got proven wrong, then acted like he wasn't talking to me when he got called on it...I've kind of lost any desire to be civil. Besides, I was quoting The Usual Suspects.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2018 15:09:00 GMT
Again. In English please. It’s pretty easy to figure out what he’s saying. No need to be a douche. Also, the use of the word "chief," was intentional in my original response to him, since he's so fond of calling everyone "pal" when he patronizes the fuck out of them with his responses.
|
|