|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Apr 10, 2018 1:41:46 GMT
Why don’t mods just ban people like DC-fan and summers8? Technically they're not doing anything that goes against the Terms of Service aka the following. "You represent and warrant that you shall not use the Website or Services to upload, post, transmit, display, perform or distribute any content, information or materials that: (a) are libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic; (b) constitute child pornography; (c) solicit personal information from or exploit in a sexual or violent manner anyone under the age of 18; (d) incite, encourage or threaten physical harm against another; (e) promote or glorify racial intolerance, use hate and/or racist terms, or signify hate towards any person or group of people; (f) glamorize the use of hard core illegal substances and drugs; (g)" Essentially from most of you guys perspective they're just annoying trolls who hate on the Marvel movies but it's not exactly against the rules. They should make trolling against the rules if they want this site to still alive.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Apr 10, 2018 1:42:35 GMT
All the X-Films have for Oscars is Logan's Pity Nomination. The other MCU films have their Noms too. None of them were for a screenplay and how was it a pity nom? It was Jackman's and Stewarts' last times in their roles, a Swan Song performance. The Academy figured after 17 years of being those characters they had to recognize it SOMEHOW so they gave it a nom in a category where there weren't many good entries anyways. It's like how Unforgiven is seen as some grand deconstruction of the Western and got Oscar Noms and Wins when in truth there had been good Western Deconstructions for 20 years by then. But it had Clint Eastwood's name attached (along with Morgan Freeman, Richard Harris and Gene Hackman) it was their last Western after their long history in them so the Academy was extra generous.
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Apr 10, 2018 1:55:12 GMT
None of them were for a screenplay and how was it a pity nom? It was Jackman's and Stewarts' last times in their roles, a Swan Song performance. The Academy figured after 17 years of being those characters they had to recognize it SOMEHOW so they gave it a nom in a category where there weren't many good entries anyways. It's like how Unforgiven is seen as some grand deconstruction of the Western and got Oscar Noms and Wins when in truth there had been good Western Deconstructions for 20 years by then. But it had Clint Eastwood's name attached (along with Morgan Freeman, Richard Harris and Gene Hackman) it was their last Western after their long history in them so the Academy was extra generous. So they reward the screenplay and not the actors? Your argument makes no sense. And no, it wasn’t Stewart’s last role as Xavier.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Apr 10, 2018 2:17:36 GMT
Why don’t mods just ban people like DC-fan and summers8? Technically they're not doing anything that goes against the Terms of Service aka the following. "You represent and warrant that you shall not use the Website or Services to upload, post, transmit, display, perform or distribute any content, information or materials that: (a) are libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic; (b) constitute child pornography; (c) solicit personal information from or exploit in a sexual or violent manner anyone under the age of 18; (d) incite, encourage or threaten physical harm against another; (e) promote or glorify racial intolerance, use hate and/or racist terms, or signify hate towards any person or group of people; (f) glamorize the use of hard core illegal substances and drugs; (g)" Essentially from most of you guys perspective they're just annoying trolls who hate on the Marvel movies but it's not exactly against the rules. I'm not a troll.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Apr 10, 2018 2:18:31 GMT
Technically they're not doing anything that goes against the Terms of Service aka the following. "You represent and warrant that you shall not use the Website or Services to upload, post, transmit, display, perform or distribute any content, information or materials that: (a) are libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic; (b) constitute child pornography; (c) solicit personal information from or exploit in a sexual or violent manner anyone under the age of 18; (d) incite, encourage or threaten physical harm against another; (e) promote or glorify racial intolerance, use hate and/or racist terms, or signify hate towards any person or group of people; (f) glamorize the use of hard core illegal substances and drugs; (g)" Essentially from most of you guys perspective they're just annoying trolls who hate on the Marvel movies but it's not exactly against the rules. They should make trolling against the rules if they want this site to still alive. If trolling were against the rules, then most of the MCU fans here would be banned since it's MCU fans who do most of the trolling.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Apr 10, 2018 2:46:14 GMT
It was Jackman's and Stewarts' last times in their roles, a Swan Song performance. The Academy figured after 17 years of being those characters they had to recognize it SOMEHOW so they gave it a nom in a category where there weren't many good entries anyways. It's like how Unforgiven is seen as some grand deconstruction of the Western and got Oscar Noms and Wins when in truth there had been good Western Deconstructions for 20 years by then. But it had Clint Eastwood's name attached (along with Morgan Freeman, Richard Harris and Gene Hackman) it was their last Western after their long history in them so the Academy was extra generous. So they reward the screenplay and not the actors? Yes, because their bias against CBMs meant that they were never going to nominate them for major awards. Not unless they pull a Heath Ledger and...well, you know.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Apr 10, 2018 2:46:36 GMT
Technically they're not doing anything that goes against the Terms of Service aka the following. "You represent and warrant that you shall not use the Website or Services to upload, post, transmit, display, perform or distribute any content, information or materials that: (a) are libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic; (b) constitute child pornography; (c) solicit personal information from or exploit in a sexual or violent manner anyone under the age of 18; (d) incite, encourage or threaten physical harm against another; (e) promote or glorify racial intolerance, use hate and/or racist terms, or signify hate towards any person or group of people; (f) glamorize the use of hard core illegal substances and drugs; (g)" Essentially from most of you guys perspective they're just annoying trolls who hate on the Marvel movies but it's not exactly against the rules. I'm not a troll. Try again, Ken Yan.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Apr 10, 2018 3:12:31 GMT
You need to see it from their perspective and things that you do that cause them to perceive it that way; "liking" every comment that is anti-MCU, repeating certain statements back to back, only making threads when to speak negatively about the series, the way you title certain threads etc. You're going to a sub board for a particular series where naturally there will be a lot of fans and you bring a constant negative attitude towards it that people won't appreciate even if you are free to have that opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Apr 10, 2018 3:14:54 GMT
So they reward the screenplay and not the actors? Yes, because their bias against CBMs meant that they were never going to nominate them for major awards. Not unless they pull a Heath Ledger and...well, you know. A screenplay nom is a major award and there is also the Incredibles. You’re being intellectually dishonest.
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Apr 10, 2018 3:22:59 GMT
You need to see it from their perspective and things that you do that cause them to perceive it that way; "liking" every comment that is anti-MCU, repeating certain statements back to back, only making threads when to speak negatively about the series, the way you title certain threads etc. You're going to a sub board for a particular series where naturally there will be a lot of fans and you bring a constant negative attitude towards it that people won't appreciate even if you are free to have that opinion. If he wasn’t a troll and just not care about the MCU he wouldn’t even be on this board that much.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Apr 10, 2018 3:26:09 GMT
Yes, because their bias against CBMs meant that they were never going to nominate them for major awards. Not unless they pull a Heath Ledger and...well, you know. A screenplay nom is a major award and there is also the Incredibles. You’re being intellectually dishonest. The Incredibles is Pixar, and they always gets Oscar Noms (and wins). Logan was just lucky this year didn't have a lot of competition in that category.
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Apr 10, 2018 16:49:40 GMT
They should make trolling against the rules if they want this site to still alive. If trolling were against the rules, then most of the MCU fans here would be banned since it's MCU fans who do most of the trolling. Pot calling the kettle black, You should have been banned long ago.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Apr 10, 2018 18:25:03 GMT
"liking" every comment that is anti-MCU So "liking" a post written by someone else is considered trolling? The fact is MCU fans are so fanatical that they attack everyone who says anything negative about MCU. Back in 2014 on the old IMDb boards, someone wrote a post saying that Scarlett Johannson is over-rated and isn't hot. I replied to that post saying that I agreed that Scarlett Johannson isn't hot. 1 MCU fan got so pissed off at me for agreeing with someone else's post saying that Scarlett Johannson isn't hot that he started monitoring my posting history and following me around the many different message boards that I posted on IMDb and replied to all my posts attacking me with vicious insults (similar to many of the vicious insults I've received on these boards), even on posts that had nothing to do with MCU or DCEU or CBMs. Several regular posters on those boards got so sick and tired of that crazed MCU fan's tactics that they told him to stop doing that, but he still refused to stop. That's how fanatical many MCU fans get whenever anyone says anything negative about MCU. You're going to a sub board for a particular series where naturally there will be a lot of fans and you bring a constant negative attitude towards it that people won't appreciate even if you are free to have that opinion. It's MCU fans who are starting the arguments. For example, last year I started a thread on the DCEU board and posted a link to an article about Wonder Woman being nominated for Best Theatrical Motion Picture. All I did was post a link in the thread and I didn't say anything about MCU and the article didn't say anything about MCU either. But MCU fans started attacking me for simply posting a thread on the DCEU board about a DCEU movie being nominated for a prestigious award. Speaking of the DCEU board, MCU fans such as formersamhmd like to blame DC fans for starting arguments, but it's really MCU fans who love to start bait threads and arguments on the DCEU board by constantly posting threads on the DCEU board that have nothing to do with DCEU (e.g. how much box office MCU is making, etc.). Here's a board in the Television section of this forum for the Arrowverse TV shows: imdb2.freeforums.net/board/231/arrowNotice that there are no bait threads or argument threads on the Arrow board. That's because there are no MCU fans trolling that board. It's when MCU fans troll on DC boards like they do on the DCEU boards that arguments start. Because MCU fans are constantly going to the DCEU board and starting bait threads and arguments and then acting like they're the victims when they're the ones who are starting the arguments.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Apr 10, 2018 18:35:50 GMT
So "liking" a post written by someone else is considered trolling? In itself no, but you will always "like" comments that say anything even remotely against the MCU. If you don't like the movies then that's fine but you only ever slate them. You never have anything positive to say over the course of an 18 movie franchise. You clearly like the DC movies but you won't make threads on that board in order to spread a bit of positivity. You have in the past posted links for certain information regarding the MCU but only if it is negative information. People shouldn't be attacking you at all for not liking the movies as not everyone will like everything and the need to constantly bring up DC or X-men when anything negative is said is very annoying but I can see why it frustrates people.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Apr 10, 2018 18:42:13 GMT
So "liking" a post written by someone else is considered trolling? You never have anything positive to say over the course of an 18 movie franchise. That's no true. I've said many times that Daredevil and Luke Cage are good and Iron Fist isn't as bad as the reviews said.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Apr 11, 2018 11:49:52 GMT
You never have anything positive to say over the course of an 18 movie franchise. That's no true. It is, there's not any proof of anything positive you've ever said about any MCU film or TV show.
|
|