|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Apr 20, 2018 17:09:04 GMT
That has nothing to do with zionsim, Israel, A woman with Mossad ties was hired to befriend Rose McGowan. I am not even going to link it for you because you are too clownish to bother with. Weinstein had Democrat connections and even after he was caught on a wiretap breaking the law, the New York DA dropped the case. Just to steer it back to horror for a moment--in Weinstein's SCREAM they stuck Sydney's father in the closet just because they could not stand to have the father figure as a positive in the film. Somehow, she dragged him into the closet with his hands tied, instead of doing the more logical thing--and untying him in the kitchen so she had help in fighting the killers. BTW for those with more intellectual faculties than masterofallgoons, also consider PREDATOR for a moment. At the start when Arnie gets off the helicopter he is a macho confident guy who says he didnt assassinate Qaddafi because it violated his moral code. But at the end after his encounter with the alien, he is on the helicopter all worn out, staring off into space. That would be fine by itself, except they also inset a shot of the woman and his general friend looking at him with a "man, that poor guy" look. Why? Because they cannot end it with any sense of Arnie getting on with things, or any kind of positive conclusion (although Danny Glover wasn't treated like that in Predator 2, he did leave the battlefield with some triumph, and telling the white government guy where to go). Political agendas...
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Apr 20, 2018 19:00:10 GMT
That has nothing to do with zionsim, Israel, A woman with Mossad ties was hired to befriend Rose McGowan. I am not even going to link it for you because you are too clownish to bother with. Weinstein had Democrat connections and even after he was caught on a wiretap breaking the law, the New York DA dropped the case. Just to steer it back to horror for a moment--in Weinstein's SCREAM they stuck Sydney's father in the closet just because they could not stand to have the father figure as a positive in the film. Somehow, she dragged him into the closet with his hands tied, instead of doing the more logical thing--and untying him in the kitchen so she had help in fighting the killers. BTW for those with more intellectual faculties than masterofallgoons, also consider PREDATOR for a moment. At the start when Arnie gets off the helicopter he is a macho confident guy who says he didnt assassinate Qaddafi because it violated his moral code. But at the end after his encounter with the alien, he is on the helicopter all worn out, staring off into space. That would be fine by itself, except they also inset a shot of the woman and his general friend looking at him with a "man, that poor guy" look. Why? Because they cannot end it with any sense of Arnie getting on with things, or any kind of positive conclusion (although Danny Glover wasn't treated like that in Predator 2, he did leave the battlefield with some triumph, and telling the white government guy where to go). Political agendas... Jesus... Weinstein is a piece of shit, with loads of power in Hollywood, why? Because he was rich and successful. Not, as your ridiculous theories would suggest, because he made a bunch of failures that continued to lose money, but because he was rich and successful as a filmmaker. So yes he had influence over politics and law enforcement. The recording should have been followed up upon, but it was of him being aggressive and persuasive not of him committing a crime. That should have brought on investigation, but it wouldn't warrant an arrest. Amazing that the stories Weinstein all broke from supposedly liberal papers and publications. Wouldn't that be impossible if they were all on on the vast Jewish conspiracy to lose money but still have influence? Your absurd and poorly analyzed approach to Predator notwithstanding (a movie about a military strong man outlasting foreign combatants and an the ultimate foreigner, an alien), how do you account for his other movies? Like Commando where his military strongman and doting father dispatches of hordes of evil foreigners from South America and drops the squirrelly, jewy schemer guy off of a cliff? Or the Running Man where the wronged military strong man dispatches and destroys the evil media mogul controlling the ideas and thoughts of the public? Or True Lies where the loving patriarch of a nuclear family tracks and destroys the evil middle eastern foreigners who come to attack America, or Collateral Damage, where the evil foreign terrorists kill the living family man's family so he tracks them down and kills them on their own turf? Yes, some films, filmmakers, individuals, and studios have political agendas. Nothing new, and yes most artists are liberals, but to say it's all from one side and all some Jewish conspiracy is laughable. Steering it back to horror, (although I did get a chuckle out of your analysis of Christian backgrounded Wes Craven's scream) Eli Roth must be part of the Jewish conspiracy because he keeps being allowed to make movies. His movies, especially the first few which built his career, were made for small budgets and turned exponential profits, but that's all a smoke screen though, apparently. In your view they must have lost money, happily, even the ones that were independently produced, as a way to perform a Jewish mind control. Even though Cabin Fever is about asshole college kids from the city going to the country and getting fucked because they wouldn't listen to the locals, Hostel is about American kids being ravaged by evil mysterious foreign forces from Eastern Europe, The Green Inferno is about a bunch of idiotic liberal kids from college protesting for the sake of it without knowing what they are talking about and getting destroyed by the scary foreigners because they are blind bleeding heart types, and his Death Wish remake has alpha male Bruce Willis enjoying buying loads of guns and taking revenge on ethnic criminals. Eli Roth has mostly been criticized for being too much of a conservative in his movies. Which is also annoying. There are plenty of reasons to hate liberals (and conservatives) without resorting to inane theories and making stuff and just denying plain facts. And what of the original topic? Chris Columbus, the practicing Catholic who just recently produced The Young Messiah, one of many Christian themed films of recent years, is involved in a remake of his own Christmas film Gremlins. Your argument is that it has nothing to do with making money, that they don't expect anyone to see it, and it's all about Jewish mind control. How is that not fucking stupid ?
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Apr 20, 2018 20:09:54 GMT
but it wouldn't warrant an arrest. ***not what the cops said. They were stunned he wasnt charged. As in the case with Lysette Anthony and the UK rape thing. Weinstein was protected by his media friends.
Amazing that the stories Weinstein all broke from supposedly liberal papers and publications. Wouldn't that be impossible if they were all on on the vast Jewish conspiracy to lose money but still have influence? **Weinstein failed to get Clinton elected. And despite him being outed, they never cast a light on the fact that for 30 years he was being shielded by the very same media. And instead of getting the Gary Hart treatment, they came up with #MeToo as if anyone else had 80 accusers, or assistants setting up victims (as Uma Thurman confirmed). I suspect you must live in Weinstein's anus the way you dance around the facts--Peter Jackson wanted Mira Sorvino for a role in a non Weinstein film and he couldnt use her because his producers cared more about honoring Weinstein's wishes than business.
(a movie about a military strong man outlasting foreign combatants and an the ultimate foreigner, an alien), how do you account for his other movies? Like Commando where his military strongman and doting father dispatches of hordes of evil foreigners from South America and drops the squirrelly, jewy schemer guy off of a cliff? Or the Running Man where the wronged military strong man dispatches and destroys the evil media mogul controlling the ideas and thoughts of the public? Or True Lies where the loving patriarch of a nuclear family tracks and destroys the evil middle eastern foreigners who come to attack America, or Collateral Damage, where the evil foreign terrorists kill the living family man's family so he tracks them down and kills them on their own turf? *** So glad you mentioned it. I fear this will go over your head like the other stuff but what the hey.. The Liberal message to the particulars of the story. So what is the themes in Predator? Dutch is a patriot and career military guy. Not only does he discover his friend Dillon is corrupt (although he changes later on) but the government he works for is corrupt. He loses his multicultural teammates as well. His whole world is shattered. That's the outcome.
In Commando he is a single father who has to rescue his daughter from an ex-team mate, but he also has a non-white romantic interest (this was absent from Predator-no romance, not even hinted at). So yes, he succeeds, but it is Liberal victory. Just because he drops the small mouthy guy off the cliff (his name is Sully btw, not Sullystein or Sullyberg, there's no Jewification of the character even if you see it you anti-semite). As for the Running Man (here we do have the latino romance) the bad guy is a white guy. Typical establishment villain. And the society is presented as a fascist state, not a communist one. Collateral Damage is most interesting though because the message is that the CIA and State Department are the good guys. Who said fantasy is dead? So yes they make the nonwhite woman the bad one, but it does not violate the Liberal code since Arnie replaces his white family with the foreign kid. Mind you, at this same time, there was THE SUM OF ALL FEARS which replaces the arab bad guys with German neo-nazis (who have friends in Damascus).
Yes, some films, filmmakers, individuals, and studios have political agendas. Nothing new, and yes most artists are liberals, but to say it's all from one side and all some Jewish conspiracy is laughable. **Not when there is an absence of an alternative in the major film studios. If you were right, there would be Doug McClure or Stewart Granger in Europe type movies being made now. Where are they? Even Tarantino said that the state of Italian cinema was dismal--that the typical Italian film was something about two brothers (one retarded) taking a road trip of self-discovery. Far cry from the days Henry Silva was making films in Rome.
Eli Roth must be part of the Jewish conspiracy because he keeps being allowed to make movies. *absolutely. Now the light bulb is going off in your head. Woody Allen, who has enjoyed studio welfare for decades, rarely uses blacks in roles--but he can do that. He never ever had to promote his films or go to Oscar ceremonies either. His funding was always assured. Bruce Willis is a Liberal alpha male type. Shorter, not as effeminate as Tom Cruise obviously but he is not a Charlton Heston or Gregory Peck type. And someone like Chris Pratt represents a further downgrade.
But, there are some he-man types out there still. Like Adrian Brody, who was able to beat up a predator alien while Arnie couldnt even hurt one with his best punch. And Shia Labouef, that dreamboat who could jump on the back of a giant robot and defeat it. No, they aren't white in the traditional Western European alpha male sense, they lean closer to Woody Allen's heritage, but for Liberal thinkers, that's there type of heroes.
And what of the original topic? Chris Columbus, the practicing Catholic who just recently produced The Young Messiah, one of many Christian themed films of recent years, is involved in a remake of his own Christmas film Gremlins. Your argument is that it has nothing to do with making money, that they don't expect anyone to see it, and it's all about Jewish mind control. **The Young Messiah--you mean that film directed by an Iranian? The one where the Pharisees are ignored and the Romans are blamed for the trouble? I notice a young Jewish rebel saves Jesus's life. That does not follow the Talmudic traditions where Jesus is supposed to be in hell forever boiling in excrement.
And Gremlins is not a Christian movie--you forgot about the old Asian wise man didnt you? It has nothing to do with Christianity and I think you are too fixated on Middle East religions if you dont mind me saying. Lovecraft and Capote were not bemoaning an absence of Christian material filtered through the big Hebrew companies, they were bemoaning a lack of diversity in styles and themes. You seem to think anything non jewish = Christian and that is a gross oversimplification. Lovecraft said that writers who least represent an Aryan view got advanced placement--I think he means someone like Richard Matheson. Talented writer yes-but his standard theme is anti-traditional--the stories he wrote involved someone facing a foreign alien threat and accepting it. I Am Legend is Dracula in reverse. The Shrinking Man is about someone unable to control his fate and he loses everything-but accepts it. Nightmare at 20 000 Feet is about a mentally ill man who alone has the ability to save the airplane.
There are two movies that perfectly demonstrate the split between tradition and liberal. The Thing From Another World vs The Day the Earth Stood Still. In the former (made by RKO, the mini-major that was founded by Americans, and had a different story catalogue than the majors) you have the working class Kenneth Tobey who arrives to deal with the alien threat uncovered in the ice. There is a scientist in the group who insists that the alien should be studied for the benefit of all. He is treacherous, but his actions are blamed on his passion and fatigue. In the end, the alien is defeated by a combination of the military men's courage and a scientific solution.
Meanwhile the Day the Earth Stood Still is about an alien who arrives to tell humanity to smarten up. Humans are bad, unlike the enlightened aliens, and if they dont find peace, they will be destroyed (there's a Biblical message for you-love God or go to hell). The alien goes to a single mother, and an Einstein-type scientist. In this case, the military is bad, however, surrendering your independence to an alien robot is good. That is not a traditional message. This is what Lovecraft was talking about when he meant Aryan vs exotic.
|
|
|
Post by Spike Del Rey on Apr 20, 2018 21:37:07 GMT
To get this thread back on track, I hope Joe Dante is somehow involved with this. He brought a distinctive feel to the first two movies, and I'm not sure anyone else can replicate that. It's actually present throughout all his movies to one degree or another which is what makes most of them so enjoyable.
|
|
|
Post by Lebowskidoo 🦞 on Aug 7, 2019 21:10:58 GMT
According to the movie, Frances Ha (2012), Frances' roommate, Benji, is submitting a script treatment for Gremlins 3.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 7, 2019 22:40:05 GMT
To get this thread back on track, I hope Joe Dante is somehow involved with this. He brought a distinctive feel to the first two movies, and I'm not sure anyone else can replicate that. It's actually present throughout all his movies to one degree or another which is what makes most of them so enjoyable. Agreed. I was wondering why this was getting bumped so much then I saw the tinfoil soapboxing.
|
|