Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2018 0:19:27 GMT
Thor fangirl of course likes Ragnarok. It's my least fav Thor which go descending. I expected the first to suck but it was wonderful. The second was good in exploring the brothers' relationship & highlighting Mjolnir. The 3rd was fun, but we didnt need to destroy Mjolnir. I felt in places the director doesn't get Thor. BP felt a bit bloated/self important. I'm sure that is what some loved about it, but it wasn't as fun as a Marvel movie shoukd be.
You're not allowed to say that. That's racist. You must now send Bob Iger a check for $20. Don't you mean 10 dollars?
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on May 22, 2018 1:44:35 GMT
You're not allowed to say that. That's racist. You must now send Bob Iger a check for $20. Don't you mean 10 dollars? YES. Thank you. That is the correct amount.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on May 22, 2018 12:47:21 GMT
I'd give a slight edge to Black Panther I think.
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on May 22, 2018 15:27:08 GMT
Black Panther hands down.
Ragnarok was fine, but favored comedy over story and character.
And I am ALL FOR comedy, but it was too heavy handed for me. The Grandmaster and Hela were great performances, but their characters had little to no development. The Grandmaster never felt like a threat, and Hela had no real depth. Thor having a conceited streak is great for comedic moments, but moments like his reaction to his hair were ridiculous and out of character. Banner also kinda became a bumbling sidekick, not a guy who's "always angry". Again, I get him being out of place on an alien planet, but it didn't work for me. It was almost always a case of "Do I tell a good story" vs. "Do I tell a good joke" and they always chose the joke.
Keep the comedy, keep Korg, keep Thor's cockiness, but put the story and characters first. A Thor film shouldn't be funnier than a Guardians one.
Black Panther, on the other hand, had everything in the exact right proportions.
|
|