Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 17:20:35 GMT
My biggest problem with the entire film was that the major "set pieces" had literally nothing to do with the story and were there as fanservice. The airport fight was gratuitous and all of the Spider Man stuff should have been sacrificed to better develop Scarlet Witch. And yet those two things are the only things people talk about in the movie. Gratuitous? The movie was building up to that fight from the very beginning. While it's true that some of the characters were unnecessary (Antman, Spiderman, etc.) for most of the characters in that fight the bad blood had already been brewing for some time and kept getting developed throughout the movie. In short, that fight served a purpose that's key to the story. And if it served a purpose it can't have been gratuitous. It's certainly much better built up than Batman and Superman's fight, in which all the bad blood is entirely one-sided, founded on logical fallacies on Batman's part and impersonal on Superman's part.
|
|
|
Post by LeWildPlatypus on Mar 23, 2017 17:26:33 GMT
Jay Baruchel has just earned my utmost respect. Mocking DC on the internet can be so cheap, it's pretty much the equivalent of Hollywood actors mocking Donald Trump on SNL.
I don't like the direction the DCEU is going in at the moment and it might be somewhat bias as a DC backer to come out and say I've been no fan of anything Marvel post 2014, so it's a relief to read this. BvS was an okay-ish film, despite some of the performances and ending. There are many great films with not so great endings, Warner should just concentrate on making the DCEU as good as it possibly can be and stop trying to replicate the Marvel formula. Suicide Squad was like The Avengers gone wrong.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 17:28:15 GMT
What formula? Making films people like?
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Mar 23, 2017 18:08:37 GMT
My biggest problem with the entire film was that the major "set pieces" had literally nothing to do with the story and were there as fanservice. The airport fight was gratuitous and all of the Spider Man stuff should have been sacrificed to better develop Scarlet Witch. And yet those two things are the only things people talk about in the movie. Gratuitous? The movie was building up to that fight from the very beginning. While it's true that some of the characters were unnecessary (Antman, Spiderman, etc.) for most of the characters in that fight the bad blood had already been brewing for some time and kept getting developed throughout the movie. In short, that fight served a purpose that's key to the story. And if it served a purpose it can't have been gratuitous. The Final fight between Tony, Bucky and Steve was what the movie was building towards, and that was a great payoff. They were the ones who had bad blood. Clint and Natasha? Like you said, Spiderman and Antman weren't needed. Rhodey and Sam had nothing....Vision and Wanda only had issues because of earlier in the film spawning from the Tony/Steve problem. The entire thing should have been cut down to Steve and Bucky going for the Quinjet, Natasha trying to stop them then changing her mind...give a little bit of a fight for T'challa with Nat ultimately stopping him like she did. Then you give a little more development between Vision and Wanda, since they were underserved overall, but no need for them to join the bigger fight.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Mar 23, 2017 18:17:52 GMT
I'm looking between our two comments and I'm not seeing anything to disagreeable between them. I meant for the other poster.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 18:18:37 GMT
"The entire thing should have been cut down to Steve and Bucky going for the Quinjet, Natasha trying to stop them then changing her mind...give a little bit of a fight for T'challa with Nat ultimately stopping him like she did." ...And you just proved that you neither understand the progression of events, the themes, or the characters.
No, there was bad blood brewing between all parties of both sides if you bothered to pay any sort of attention. Are all DC fans this unwilling to admit that Marvel's onto something good with their films?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 18:19:22 GMT
I'm looking between our two comments and I'm not seeing anything to disagreeable between them. I meant for the other poster. Oh, right.
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Mar 23, 2017 18:32:20 GMT
"The entire thing should have been cut down to Steve and Bucky going for the Quinjet, Natasha trying to stop them then changing her mind...give a little bit of a fight for T'challa with Nat ultimately stopping him like she did." ...And you just proved that you neither understand the progression of events, the themes, or the characters. No, there was bad blood brewing between all parties of both sides if you bothered to pay any sort of attention. Are all DC fans this unwilling to admit that Marvel's onto something good with their films? Dude, chill out. I love the Marvel movies. They are far superior in every way. But Civil War was overrated for me...for the reasons I listed. And to follow up on your comment that was needlessly aggressive out of nowhere... ...none of the other people had bad blood brewing from other films. Some had disagreements, but not bad blood brewing. And those disagreements showed up in this film alone, and weren't particularly vitriolic. The main combatants that should have been involved were Tony and T'Challa vs Steve and Bucky, with Nat caught in the middle. You can throw in Sam and Rhodey if you want because of their association with Tony and Steve, but they really weren't part of the argument.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 18:35:35 GMT
"The entire thing should have been cut down to Steve and Bucky going for the Quinjet, Natasha trying to stop them then changing her mind...give a little bit of a fight for T'challa with Nat ultimately stopping him like she did." ...And you just proved that you neither understand the progression of events, the themes, or the characters. No, there was bad blood brewing between all parties of both sides if you bothered to pay any sort of attention. Are all DC fans this unwilling to admit that Marvel's onto something good with their films? Dude, chill out. I love the Marvel movies. They are far superior in every way. But Civil War was overrated for me...for the reasons I listed. And to follow up on your comment that was needlessly aggressive out of nowhere... ...none of the other people had bad blood brewing from other films. Some had disagreements, but not bad blood brewing. And those disagreements showed up in this film alone, and weren't particularly vitriolic. The main combatants that should have been involved were Tony and T'Challa vs Steve and Bucky, with Nat caught in the middle. You can throw in Sam and Rhodey if you want because of their association with Tony and Steve, but they really weren't part of the argument. He gets very butthurt when people have opinions that differ from his. It's his MO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 18:38:20 GMT
"The entire thing should have been cut down to Steve and Bucky going for the Quinjet, Natasha trying to stop them then changing her mind...give a little bit of a fight for T'challa with Nat ultimately stopping him like she did." ...And you just proved that you neither understand the progression of events, the themes, or the characters. No, there was bad blood brewing between all parties of both sides if you bothered to pay any sort of attention. Are all DC fans this unwilling to admit that Marvel's onto something good with their films? Dude, chill out. I love the Marvel movies. They are far superior in every way. But Civil War was overrated for me...for the reasons I listed. And to follow up on your comment that was needlessly aggressive out of nowhere... ...none of the other people had bad blood brewing from other films. Some had disagreements, but not bad blood brewing. And those disagreements showed up in this film alone, and weren't particularly vitriolic. The main combatants that should have been involved were Tony and T'Challa vs Steve and Bucky, with Nat caught in the middle. You can throw in Sam and Rhodey if you want because of their association with Tony and Steve, but they really weren't part of the argument. You are free to find Civil War overrated and even dislike it, but what you're claiming about the airport fight is blatantly untrue. "...none of the other people had bad blood brewing from other films." I'm rewatching the scene right after Secretary Ross gives his presentation to The Avengers right now, and I'm seeing nothing but bad blood brewing between Rhodie and Falcon as they argue. Rhodie is refusing to budge an inch and Falcon is incredulous. Tony's on edge and forcefully making his point while Steve just seems to be at a loss. Of course the disagreements weren't vitriolic... yet. They were still at a place where they respected each other and weren't willing to get rough about it yet. They were ALL a part of the argument because the Accords impact ALL OF THEM. Steve's side was against the Accords and willing to go against the law to do what they felt was right while the Pro-Accords side had their orders to bring them in. I'm not sure how this is going over your head.
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Mar 23, 2017 18:47:13 GMT
Dude, chill out. I love the Marvel movies. They are far superior in every way. But Civil War was overrated for me...for the reasons I listed. And to follow up on your comment that was needlessly aggressive out of nowhere... ...none of the other people had bad blood brewing from other films. Some had disagreements, but not bad blood brewing. And those disagreements showed up in this film alone, and weren't particularly vitriolic. The main combatants that should have been involved were Tony and T'Challa vs Steve and Bucky, with Nat caught in the middle. You can throw in Sam and Rhodey if you want because of their association with Tony and Steve, but they really weren't part of the argument. You are free to find Civil War overrated and even dislike it, but what you're claiming about the airport fight is blatantly untrue. "...none of the other people had bad blood brewing from other films." I'm rewatching the scene right after Secretary Ross gives his presentation to The Avengers right now, and I'm seeing nothing but bad blood brewing between Rhodie and Falcon as they argue. Rhodie is refusing to budge an inch and Falcon is incredulous. Tony's on edge and forcefully making his point while Steve just seems to be at a loss. Of course the disagreements weren't vitriolic... yet. They were still at a place where they respected each other and weren't willing to get rough about it yet. And notice which characters you mentioned...Tony, Steve, Sam and Rhodey...add T'challa and Natasha and we have the exact same characters I mentioned above where it made sense for them to be involved. Do you honestly think I don't understand the plot of the film? What I said, and still believe, is that the Airport fight was gratuitous, and could have been cut down significantly. Every single plot or character important point in that entire section of the film could be handled by those characters alone and in half the time.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Mar 23, 2017 18:52:22 GMT
Not necessarily. After all, none of those characters were islands unto themselves. They had friends, partners, and associates who had their back. It's essentially how World War I got started. The problems between a few quickly became problems among many.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 18:57:46 GMT
You're giving me that impression every time you claim they needed to gut the airport fight. The airport fight is the first confrontation of the two sides when those sides are officially formed. Steve and company are pursuing Zemo, and Tony and company are pursuing them. At this point, they're all fighting for their moral and political ideals and hating every second of it, because it's against people they like. The film is showing us how The Avengers are being torn apart. Zemo's plan is already working. That's the point of the scene. Yes, they could probably have done it without Spider-man and Ant-Man, but they were so entertaining that I don't care.
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Mar 23, 2017 18:59:16 GMT
Not necessarily. After all, none of those characters were islands unto themselves. They had friends, partners, and associates who had their back. It's essentially how World War I got started. The problems between a few quickly became problems among many. Looking at Plot and character important points: Cap and Bucky get the Quinjet and take off to find Zemo, Rhodey is hurt, Natasha changes sides. All you have to do is make Sam be the one to inadvertently hurt Rhodey and all the rest can happen just as it did in the film. Yes, there were Vision and Wanda moments, but as I said earlier, they didn't need to be part of the fight, and pulling Spiderman out of the plot and cutting the Airport fight in half gave room for more development of those two.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Mar 23, 2017 19:07:29 GMT
I would have no trouble with that except I can't see Sam having the weaponry to damage Rhodey's armor enough to injure him. They needed a bigger gun for that. I do think it would've been more effective if it had been someone on Steve's side who did it.
I have to disagree. Wanda was really the catalyst that set the events of the Accords into motion. The audience needed to see where she stood on this and who would she back.
Steve knows there's an army after Bucky. He wouldn't go into battle without proper back up. Tony and Steve both started recruiting because as they learned in Avengers and Age of Ultron, there's strength in numbers.
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Mar 23, 2017 19:08:01 GMT
You're giving me that impression every time you claim they needed to gut the airport fight. The airport fight is the first confrontation of the two sides when those sides are officially formed. Steve and company are pursuing Zemo, and Tony and company are pursuing them. At this point, they're all fighting for their moral and political ideals and hating every second of it, because it's against people they like. The film is showing us how The Avengers are being torn apart. Zemo's plan is already working. That's the point of the scene. Yes... I know... I'm not 12. But it didn't need to be nearly 20 minutes long with no real stakes given the fact that you know none of them really wants to hurt the other. The final fight is the one with all of the tension. And that was the problem for me. For the first time in all of the Marvel films, they chose fanservice over story.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 19:09:08 GMT
You're asking a lot of Falcon here.
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Mar 23, 2017 19:16:30 GMT
You're asking a lot of Falcon here. But not like it can't be done... A small emp grenade, a fancy flight maneuver, damage Rhodey's armor earlier with Steve's shield and have Sam accidentally hit him in a weak spot, have a minor call-back to Ant Man and give Sam a couple of the shrinking disks... with a minimum effort the writers can find a way for Falcon to beat War Machine at least once.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 19:17:15 GMT
Yes... I know... I'm not 12. But it didn't need to be nearly 20 minutes long with no real stakes given the fact that you know none of them really wants to hurt the other. The final fight is the one with all of the tension. You are making it incredibly difficult to keep taking your arguments seriously when you fail to understand the tragedy of people who like each other being forced to fight and risk hurting one another. That's the tragedy of Rhodie's injury! They worked so hard to either bypass/capture each other without unnecessary harm only to fail! Of course there were stakes!! Did you not see where the captured Team Cap members ended up?! They ended in a maximum security prison for supervillains without a lawyer or trial! Nor were they ever going to be given those things despite the worst things they could be arrested for at the time were aggravated assault and property damage, because Secretary Ross is a terrible person who lusts for power! The outcome of that fight is dire in every imaginable way. That "fan service" amounted to so little screentime as to be a non-issue, plus what happened with Ant-Man and Spider-man is going to matter in future films.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 19:18:47 GMT
You're asking a lot of Falcon here. But not like it can't be done... A small emp grenade, a fancy flight maneuver, damage Rhodey's armor earlier with Steve's shield and have Sam accidentally hit him in a weak spot, have a minor call-back to Ant Man and give Sam a couple of the shrinking disks... with a minimum effort the writers can find a way for Falcon to beat War Machine at least once. Your way negates Vision even further when he still has big things to do in the future. Even if he was a periphery in this film, he still matters.
|
|