Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2018 18:21:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Jul 9, 2018 19:45:14 GMT
They'll make it back easily with movies like Dumbo, Episode 9, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 9, 2018 19:53:29 GMT
I'm sure they'll be fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Jul 9, 2018 19:59:15 GMT
I'm sure they'll be fine. Disney will be fine, Kathleen Kennedy and her SJW minions won't. That's the important thing. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 9, 2018 20:04:57 GMT
I'm sure they'll be fine. Disney will be fine, Kathleen Kennedy and her SJW minions won't. That's the important thing. Doubtful. |
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Jul 9, 2018 20:20:50 GMT
Disney will be fine, Kathleen Kennedy and her SJW minions won't. That's the important thing. Doubtful. If she's not gone by Star Wars Celebration in March, episode 9 will be boycotted just like "Solo." |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jul 9, 2018 20:51:18 GMT
Pretty sure Wrinkle in Time has it beat.
|
|
|
|
Post by alpha128 on Jul 9, 2018 22:51:00 GMT
SOLO A STAR WARS STORY. How much will Disney lose on this thing? 200 million?  $50-$80 million according to the Hollywood Reporter. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2018 22:53:30 GMT
SOLO A STAR WARS STORY. How much will Disney lose on this thing? 200 million? $50-$80 million according to the Hollywood Reporter. Chump change nowadays. |
|
|
|
Post by alpha128 on Jul 9, 2018 22:58:24 GMT
If the rumors are true, it's big enough to cost Kathleen Kennedy her job. |
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Jul 10, 2018 2:46:40 GMT
Don't be ridiculous, noob. |
|
|
|
Post by rudeboy on Jul 10, 2018 3:17:22 GMT
Pretty sure Wrinkle in Time has it beat. Perhaps, but Solo's budget was more than twice that of A Wrinkle in Time. Solo is certainly the most high-profile flop and something of a disaster - but, as already noted, Disney will recover quickly with Mary Poppins 2 etc. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2018 3:32:35 GMT
SOLO A STAR WARS STORY. How much will Disney lose on this thing? 200 million? Movie gross so far +315 million
original budget -250 million reshoot costs -200 million advertising costs -100 million Theatres' take of the profits -200 million
By my calculations they will lose 450 million.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jul 10, 2018 3:41:19 GMT
SOLO A STAR WARS STORY. How much will Disney lose on this thing? 200 million? Movie gross so far +315 million
original budget -250 million reshoot costs -200 million advertising costs -100 million Theatres' take of the profits -200 million
By my calculations they will lose 450 million.
Not sure where you got those numbers, these are from Variety: "Analysts project “Solo” could end its run with approximately $400 million to $450 million in revenues, a dreadful result for a film that cost $250 million to produce and $150 million to promote." |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2018 3:51:33 GMT
Movie gross so far +315 million
original budget -250 million reshoot costs -200 million advertising costs -100 million Theatres' take of the profits -200 million
By my calculations they will lose 450 million.
Not sure where you got those numbers, these are from Variety: "Analysts project “Solo” could end its run with approximately $400 million to $450 million in revenues, a dreadful result for a film that cost $250 million to produce and $150 million to promote."They didn't factor in the reshoot costs or the theaters' take costs. Their numbers are way off. It's a much bigger disaster than variety claims it is by a number of 300 million. |
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Jul 10, 2018 4:06:52 GMT
Kathleen Kennedy thought she could say "I'm not interested in catering to male Star Wars fans" and get away with it. Those male fans funded Star Wars for FORTY years. How stupid could she possibly be? It's Star Wars not "Twilight!"
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jul 10, 2018 4:22:02 GMT
Not sure where you got those numbers, these are from Variety: "Analysts project “Solo” could end its run with approximately $400 million to $450 million in revenues, a dreadful result for a film that cost $250 million to produce and $150 million to promote."Yes, they did, it was 125 the first time, then another 125 the second time. |
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Jul 10, 2018 4:37:24 GMT
SOLO A STAR WARS STORY. How much will Disney lose on this thing? 200 million? LOL, I actually liked " SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY". |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jul 10, 2018 11:11:53 GMT
SOLO A STAR WARS STORY. How much will Disney lose on this thing? 200 million? Movie gross so far +315 million
original budget -250 million reshoot costs -200 million advertising costs -100 million Theatres' take of the profits -200 million
By my calculations they will lose 450 million.
Your calculations are way off. 250 million was including reshoots. |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jul 10, 2018 11:23:16 GMT
Not sure where you got those numbers, these are from Variety: "Analysts project “Solo” could end its run with approximately $400 million to $450 million in revenues, a dreadful result for a film that cost $250 million to produce and $150 million to promote."They didn't factor in the reshoot costs or the theaters' take costs. Their numbers are way off. It's a much bigger disaster than variety claims it is by a number of 300 million. Yes they did Solo was not supposed to be the most expensive SW movie ever and none of them has cost 250-275 million. |
|
