Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2017 1:51:50 GMT
They're already included subliminally. After an admission like that, you might want to get a professional to look you over.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2017 5:22:06 GMT
The moment pedophilia gets accepted as anything more than deviancy is when I'm leaving modern society and living with the animals in the wild!
|
|
|
Post by springheeljack1837 on Apr 10, 2017 7:58:37 GMT
This thread made visiting the LGBT section well worth the trip 😂
|
|
|
Post by springheeljack1837 on Apr 10, 2017 8:06:58 GMT
You're very boring for a troll. Please do better if you want to get a rise out of me. Yes, you are boring and your closed and inflexible simple mind set is predictable. Look, you also resort to the misused troll insult, when you don't like getting called out and get upset about what you are hearing. Your own narrow sighted projection of things is yours to contend and deal with. Fool! I don't see any trolling there, I see some interesting questions which also occurred to me while reading one of your other posts. Have you been one of HairyButtcheek's socks this entire time? Tisk tisk
|
|
|
Post by springheeljack1837 on Apr 10, 2017 21:25:11 GMT
I don't see any trolling there, I see some interesting questions which also occurred to me while reading one of your other posts. Have you been one of HairyButtcheek's socks this entire time? Tisk tisk Another typical and boring asinine retort, about sock accounts. Well guess what, I think you are a troll and sock of a 1001 accounts of hairybuttcheeks. I think I fucked up, my comment was aimed at SaucyJacky, not you. Was just messing with her for using Hairy's method of labelling everyone who disagrees with him a troll. Jacky's cool though so it was like a friendly punch to the ribs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2017 11:29:47 GMT
Considering the majority of pedophiles are heterosexual we could start a heterosexual section for them instead.
|
|
|
Post by Nostalgias4Geeks🌈 on May 6, 2017 9:15:36 GMT
Straight and to the point. I like it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2017 8:15:19 GMT
Or should they be given their own message board section? Discuss: No. They should be added to the PWNTGTHAD(people who need to go to hell and die)section along with Casey Anthony.
|
|
|
Post by Nostalgias4Geeks🌈 on May 15, 2017 8:38:27 GMT
P IS NOT A SEXUALITY AND NEITHER IS T. They are both in a sense a form of mental illness. LGB and H for Hetero— or should that be B for Breeder—are all "genuine" sexualitites. I would say you would have more in common with P and T, due to what could be perceived as your own mental disorder. Sheeesh! i wasnt arguing that P was a sexuality..i said it has more in common with LGB than T so like you say "P IS NOT A SEXUALITY AND NEITHER IS T" but P is dependent on sexual attraction so it has more in common with LGB...thanks! You're making no sense. You're obviously being willfully ignorant. Who cares if it's dependent on sexual attraction. Some people are attracted to dogs, should we add them too? Or the guy that fucked cars? Maybe car fucking should be part of the lgb? Get real please. Your argument is going nowhere. Heterosexuality is also dependent on attraction, but it isn't part of the LGB. I wonder why?
|
|
|
Post by Nostalgias4Geeks🌈 on May 15, 2017 9:06:05 GMT
You're making no sense. You're obviously being willfully ignorant. Who cares if it's dependent on sexual attraction. Some people are attracted to dogs, should we add them too? Or the guy that fucked cars? Maybe car fucking should be part of the lgb? Get real please. Your argument is going nowhere. Heterosexuality is also dependent on attraction, but it isn't part of the LGB. I wonder why? P has to do with who you are sexually attracted to. T has nothing to do with who you are sexually attracted to. P has more in common with LGB than T...makes sense unless you are the one being willfully ignorant So you're trolling then?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2017 11:33:39 GMT
Considering the majority of pedophiles are heterosexual we could start a heterosexual section for them instead. Exactly! But we know how much superior and in denial heterosexuals like to vilify homosexuality as being deviant and not "normal". I guess being in the majority, they will just have to take responsibility for all the pedophiles they breed, especially the deviant heterosexual ones which make up the majority. Yes. We do. They are saying all the same crap now to try and prevent same sex marriages from becoming legalised here in Australia and every year we have backwards assholes comparing it to pedophilia and bestiality but a lot of them certainly don't mind watching lesbian porn behind closed doors with their pants down.
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on May 15, 2017 11:45:47 GMT
LGB are about who you are sexually attracted to.. T has nothing to do with who you are sexually attracted to.. so P has more in common with the others more than T The grouping isn't a taxonomic division of "who you are sexually attracted to." It's a grouping of marginalized sexual/gender categories that are relatively common and not considered ethically problematic academically.
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on May 15, 2017 13:14:51 GMT
The grouping isn't a taxonomic division of "who you are sexually attracted to." It's a grouping of marginalized sexual/gender categories that are relatively common and not considered ethically problematic academically. sexual attraction is what defines most of those groups...i am just saying something has more in common with the others than trans trans has nothing to do with sexual attraction. It's not what defines the "LGBTQetc." grouping however. If you want to propose an addition to LGBTQetc., you need to understand why those are lumped together and some other things are not.
|
|
|
Post by Nostalgias4Geeks🌈 on May 16, 2017 4:27:15 GMT
Trans, like you have mentioned IS NOT a sexuality. It doesn't do any favors for the gay community. And calling something out for what it actually is, a self-loathing mental disorder, is not the same as being a prejudiced bigot and attempting to vilify a natural sexuality by lumping it into the P category. You are one of the most obstinate posters I have encountered here, and perhaps more deranged than I initially gave you credit for. You have had plenty of reasoning explained to you and you have NO VALID argument. L is dependent on sexual attraction. G is dependent on sexual attraction. B is dependent on sexual attraction. T has nothing to do with sexual attraction. P is dependent on sexual attraction. you cant counter that because its true Who Fucking Cares. Quit Being A Twat. This thread is about adding pedophilia to lgbt. Either you agree with it or not. Otherwise you're just babbling.
|
|
|
Post by Nostalgias4Geeks🌈 on May 16, 2017 7:53:01 GMT
Who Fucking Cares. Quit Being A Twat. This thread is about adding pedophilia to lgbt. Either you agree with it or not. Otherwise you're just babbling. best way to show you dont care is to not respond...try that? toasted was the one that responded to my month old post so apparently someone cares. That's fine, but isn't it kind of rude to group gays with pedophiles when there's literally no more similarity than heterosexuality? You're comparing the two when there doesn't need to be a comparison, and I think you're doing it just to get on toasted's nerves
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on May 16, 2017 11:04:02 GMT
It's not what defines the "LGBTQetc." grouping however. If you want to propose an addition to LGBTQetc., you need to understand why those are lumped together and some other things are not. im not proposing anything...have you read all my posts in this thread or were you so busy trying rush to toasteds aid you skipped that step? P has more in common with LGB than T because T has nothing to do with sexual attraction. i never said P should be added and dont even think T should be in there.. Someone doesn't understand conditionals.
|
|
|
Post by Nostalgias4Geeks🌈 on May 16, 2017 19:33:54 GMT
Aren't you insulting gays by saying they have more in common with P? You also take umbrage to someone responding to a month old post. Why? Not only don't you understand concepts, you don't understand the use of this board. Do you even understand your life? am i also insulting heterosexuals? in the post you quoted i say the same about them.. you play the victim way to often. When you're relating homosexuals to pedophiles it's common for someone to take offense. That isn't "playing the victim". You're being insulting on purpose.
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on May 16, 2017 23:09:37 GMT
am i also insulting heterosexuals? in the post you quoted i say the same about them.. you play the victim way to often. Homosexuals have been the victim of bigoted and prejudiced homophobic pricks like you throughout the sands of time. You don't care and that is your prerogative, but don't play the heterosexual "victim" then when it gets thrown back at you and imply that f@gs should just shut the f<>k up after centuries of being forced to hide their true feelings and be told that they are wrong, BY HETEROSEXUALS. And pedophiles have been the victims of pedophobia by people like you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2017 13:03:17 GMT
Yes. We do. They are saying all the same crap now to try and prevent same sex marriages from becoming legalised here in Australia and every year we have backwards assholes comparing it to pedophilia and bestiality but a lot of them certainly don't mind watching lesbian porn behind closed doors with their pants down. That is just the biased and bigoted hetero double standards that permeates our hypocritical, confused and confounded society. Many in denial and insecure, alpha douchy het males are threatened by male homosexuality, "not" female homosexuality. That is what gives them their kicks and jollies, and lesbianism isn't a threat to their so called manhood. They are "normal" remember, they f<>k females, or at least attempt to get laid. Any female with any sense of self-worth, would or should steer clear of these backwards A holes. Ahhh....The Alpha male term is something I often see used on websites by guys who say they are MRA, MGTOW and PUA and I never heard of it until recently. According to some of them lesbians are the biggest threat to them ‘cause we have been ruining their social hierarchy and stealing 'their women' and in their social hierarchy and it is the Alpha males that are supposed to get all the women while Betas get what they call leftovers and Omegas get nobody but with the increase of lesbians and bisexual women which they claim feminism encourages to screw them over we can get more women and sex than Alpha males by turning them into lesbians too and they can’t have sex with us so we are wiping them out and I have never read something more ridiculous in my whole life but this is an example of what I have seen them write online and are mentally unstable. Some of them encourage other men to break up lesbians in relationships, stop lesbians from hitting on their women, force lesbians into having sex with them by any means necessary and put lesbians in their places and show them alpha males are in charge.
I have been tempted to write back to some of the stupid comments they make on comment sections and forums but I don't ‘cause I think that is what they want and are looking to get a reaction out of us. The PUA guys have very twisted and warped views and they are the most sexist guys I have seen on the internet. They encourage other men to be emotionally and physically abusive to establish control and dominance over their partners and to rape women on dates ‘cause when we knock them back we are really saying yes, we want to have sex with them and we have had PUA guys in the news headlines this year and last year that tried to set up live tours in Australia to spread these things and they have been banned by the government from touring Australia. Our Prime Minister has even called them disturbing in interviews and a number of serial killers and rapists in America have admitted to being members of PUA sites which is not surprising at all ‘cause they sound like they are psychos.
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on May 17, 2017 19:13:05 GMT
That is just the biased and bigoted hetero double standards that permeates our hypocritical, confused and confounded society. Many in denial and insecure, alpha douchy het males are threatened by male homosexuality, "not" female homosexuality. That is what gives them their kicks and jollies, and lesbianism isn't a threat to their so called manhood. They are "normal" remember, they f<>k females, or at least attempt to get laid. Any female with any sense of self-worth, would or should steer clear of these backwards A holes. Ahhh....The Alpha male term is something I often see used on websites by guys who say they are MRA, MGTOW and PUA and I never heard of it until recently. According to some of them lesbians are the biggest threat to them ‘cause we have been ruining their social hierarchy and stealing 'their women' and in their social hierarchy and it is the Alpha males that are supposed to get all the women while Betas get what they call leftovers and Omegas get nobody but with the increase of lesbians and bisexual women which they claim feminism encourages to screw them over we can get more women and sex than Alpha males by turning them into lesbians too and they can’t have sex with us so we are wiping them out and I have never read something more ridiculous in my whole life but this is an example of what I have seen them write online and are mentally unstable. Some of them encourage other men to break up lesbians in relationships, stop lesbians from hitting on their women, force lesbians into having sex with them by any means necessary and put lesbians in their places and show them alpha males are in charge.
I have been tempted to write back to some of the stupid comments they make on comment sections and forums but I don't ‘cause I think that is what they want and are looking to get a reaction out of us. The PUA guys have very twisted and warped views and they are the most sexist guys I have seen on the internet. They encourage other men to be emotionally and physically abusive to establish control and dominance over their partners and to rape women on dates ‘cause when we knock them back we are really saying yes, we want to have sex with them and we have had PUA guys in the news headlines this year and last year that tried to set up live tours in Australia to spread these things and they have been banned by the government from touring Australia. Our Prime Minister has even called them disturbing in interviews and a number of serial killers and rapists in America have admitted to being members of PUA sites which is not surprising at all ‘cause they sound like they are psychos. Those terms come from nature shows. They are used to describe biological phenomena in the animal kingdom. We also don't like to talk about race in polite society but that doesn't mean dog breeds no longer exist. Science is oppressive.
|
|