|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Aug 9, 2018 22:31:05 GMT
your speculations are without base and nonsensical: 1. Child rape jokes are as old as pedophilia, same as racists or antisemites make jokes about killing/humiliating races/Jews. 2. Gunn does not make fun about pedos (this is clearly evidenced by his tweets), but he makes jokes about raping children and endorses pedos. Who finds the rape of children or engaging in pedophile acts (such as passive shower urinating) amusing? Guess who. - I give you a joke ABOUT pedos: Eg Deadpool: "All I said is that Marvel tries selling toys to 8-year olds and pedophiles." - Now Gunn: Eagle snatches kid is what I call it when getting lucky. I fucked the shit out of the pussy boy next to me. Feels like a 3 year old urinating on me. Which joke will only a pedo find funny? You only need the intelligence age of a 12 year old to get the vast difference. Pedos hate Gunn? lol, is the a official condemnation of Gunn by Nambla or any other pedo. No. So you're saying you know what pedos find funny? nope. But normal people find child rape unfunny. People who joke and brag about criminal acts and about the victims of crime are usually criminals. De-humanizing and humiliating the victim is an common psychological mechanism to play down and facilitate the criminal act. Rapist and murderers will often joke how pathetically the victim begged for it' life and objectify them as mere objects (pussy boy). It's basic criminal psychology. that made me laugh, an article told you that, Red? Not a clinical/field study or verified statistic? Maybe a garbage-tier Gunn defense article written by a click bait nerd media journalist to pander to fanboys? And that particular article seriously asserted that pedos don't joke about child rape, and do not like Gunn? Don't believe everything you read, it's one of the basic convenience fallacies. Be critical of simplistic truths contradicting common sense and try to falsify them. If you must know, I base my assertions on: - psychological classes I took at university (sexual psycho-pathology) - criminology classes - court cases I attended or followed - books I read - docs I watch - articles I read - common sense and knowledge of human psyche - logical thinking and methodology |
|
|
|
Post by RedDeadFallout on Aug 9, 2018 22:48:36 GMT
So you're saying you know what pedos find funny? nope. But normal people find child rape unfunny. People who joke and brag about criminal acts and about the victims of crime are usually criminals. De-humanizing and humiliating the victim is an common psychological mechanism to play down and facilitate the criminal act. Rapist and murderers will often joke how pathetically the victim begged for it' life and objectify them as mere objects (pussy boy). It's basic criminal psychology. that made me laugh, an article told you that, Red? Not a clinical/field study or verified statistic? Maybe a garbage-tier Gunn defense article written by a click bait nerd media journalist to pander to fanboys? And that particular article seriously asserted that pedos don't joke about child rape, and do not like Gunn? Don't believe everything you read, it's one of the basic convenience fallacies. Be critical of simplistic truths contradicting common sense and try to falsify them. If you must know, I base my assertions on: - psychological classes I took at university (sexual psycho-pathology) - criminology classes - court cases I attended or followed - books I read - docs I watch - articles I read - common sense and knowledge of human psyche - logical thinking and methodology You have no idea what I've read and only idiot would expect people online to believe they've done that much research. |
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Aug 9, 2018 23:00:37 GMT
I find it funny how Tristan has a notepad with Gunn’s jokes saved to his computer. You just know if anyone but James “raccoon turds” Gunn had made those jokes he wouldn’t be so committed to it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2018 2:40:40 GMT
Ha! I got to tip it 25/24 in favour of no!
Gunn has a majority! That's more than Trump got in the election!
Rehire Gunn! Rehire Gunn! The people have spoken!
|
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Aug 10, 2018 9:23:28 GMT
I find it funny how Tristan has a notepad with Gunn’s jokes saved to his computer. You just know if anyone but James “raccoon turds” Gunn had made those jokes he wouldn’t be so committed to it. You find pedo jokes funny so this is one is not surprising. You are just easily amused to put it friendly.
Yet, with all your defending and deflecting of child rape fantasies, you whine and fret like a little girl when called "zombie brains". That is what I find funny.
|
|
kanekikun
Sophomore
@kanekikun
Posts: 236
Likes: 18
|
Post by kanekikun on Aug 10, 2018 11:41:56 GMT
other directors have done worse and are fine, gunn shouldnt suffer for this.
|
|
ryboto
Sophomore
@ryboto
Posts: 776
Likes: 724
 
|
Post by ryboto on Aug 10, 2018 11:59:05 GMT
 Tie thanks to numerous socks mysteriously appearing within the last week. What are you MCU fanboys trying to prove? That deep down we are all as ugly as you are? Anyways, congrats, you succeeded! But James "did you create a penis" Gunn will remain fired. He will remain a creep who made countless child rape and other depraved comments. He will remain someone who endorsed convicted pedos. As an award, some updated material of the King of the Hacks, the Poet of Pedophilia, the Philosopher of the Vile: Maybe this guy really belongs to MCU. You sound kind of butthurt. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Aug 10, 2018 19:01:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Aug 10, 2018 19:16:50 GMT
just watched it, good video. |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Aug 10, 2018 21:45:48 GMT
Unable to watch this while at work but does this mean Feige finally spoke out about Gunn? |
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Aug 10, 2018 21:53:20 GMT
Unable to watch this while at work but does this mean Feige finally spoke out about Gunn? Apparently Iger and Horne fired Gunn without talking with Feige. |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Aug 10, 2018 21:56:21 GMT
Unable to watch this while at work but does this mean Feige finally spoke out about Gunn? Apparently Iger and Horne fired Gunn without talking with Feige. Oh wow... well that's kind of a shitty move. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Aug 11, 2018 2:59:51 GMT
Apparently Iger and Horne fired Gunn without talking with Feige. Oh wow... well that's kind of a shitty move. How is that a shitty move? Feige works for Iger and Horne. Iger and Horne don't work for Feige and don't need to talk to Feige before firing Gunn. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Aug 11, 2018 3:04:04 GMT
just watched it, good video. I like that WB won't hire that scumbag pedophile Gunn. |
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Aug 11, 2018 3:13:54 GMT
I find it funny how Tristan has a notepad with Gunn’s jokes saved to his computer. You just know if anyone but James “raccoon turds” Gunn had made those jokes he wouldn’t be so committed to it. You find pedo jokes funny so this is one is not surprising. You are just easily amused to put it friendly.
Yet, with all your defending and deflecting of child rape fantasies, you whine and fret like a little girl when called "zombie brains". That is what I find funny.
The fallacy is strong with this one.  |
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Aug 11, 2018 3:18:56 GMT
Oh wow... well that's kind of a shitty move. How is that a shitty move? Feige works for Iger and Horne. Iger and Horne don't work for Feige and don't need to talk to Feige before firing Gunn. Kevin Feige is the President of Marvel Studios LLC. A company that's a subsidiary of Disney. Iger and Horn are CEO and Chairman of Disney respectively. Disney being the parent company and yes they have the right to fire anybody they want. Gunn was an employee of Marvel Studios. Usually when you have people in positions of power under you, you don't normally step over them or go around them if you respect them. And you may not like Feige, but he has made Disney a shit ton of money. There should be respect there. If Marvel Studios wasn't a separate company as in it's day to day operations and was instead just a division of Disney then yeah you have a point. Before I went on my own I worked for a subsidiary of Blue Cross Blue Shield. It was almost the same situation as Disney is to Marvel Studios. My last year there our new President was bypassed 3 times on firings. One day we all show up to work and the Vp of Actuary, VP of ARU, and VP of Claims were fired without the President's knowledge. Each time BCBS was in their right to do it, but each time it was taken as a slap in the face of our President by the employees. To cut out a person in the chain of command is a shitty move. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Aug 11, 2018 3:31:24 GMT
How is that a shitty move? Feige works for Iger and Horne. Iger and Horne don't work for Feige and don't need to talk to Feige before firing Gunn. Kevin Feige is the President of Marvel Studios LLC. A company that's a subsidiary of Disney. Iger and Horn are CEO and Chairman of Disney respectively. Disney being the parent company and yes they have the right to fire anybody they want. Gunn was an employee of Marvel Studios. Usually when you have people in positions of power under you, you don't normally step over them or go around them if you respect them. And you may not like Feige, but he has made Disney a shit ton of money. There should be respect there. If Marvel Studios wasn't a separate company as in it's day to day operations and was instead just a division of Disney then yeah you have a point. Before I went on my own I worked for a subsidiary of Blue Cross Blue Shield. It was almost the same situation as Disney is to Marvel Studios. My last year there our new President was bypassed 3 times on firings. One day we all show up to work and the Vp of Actuary, VP of ARU, and VP of Claims were fired without the President's knowledge. Each time BCBS was in their right to do it, but each time it was taken as a slap in the face of our President by the employees. To cut out a person in the chain of command is a shitty move. Not if that person in the chain of command refuses to do his job and fire the person he's told to fire. Feige is really lucky that Iger and Horned didn't fire him for refusing to do his job. Back in 2006, the senior execs at my company wanted our division head to fire a bunch of people. But our division head didn't want to do it. So he announced his sudden "retirement" (or rather, the company forced him to "retire" and paid him a severance package to go away). Then the company brought in a new division head. Shortly after that, it was announced that staff would be let go and the new division head would meet with each individual employee and inform them if they would be staying or leaving. Feige is really lucky that Iger and Horne just fired Gunn instead of firing Feige for refusing to do what he's told and then bringing in a replacement to fire Gunn. |
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Aug 11, 2018 3:36:04 GMT
Kevin Feige is the President of Marvel Studios LLC. A company that's a subsidiary of Disney. Iger and Horn are CEO and Chairman of Disney respectively. Disney being the parent company and yes they have the right to fire anybody they want. Gunn was an employee of Marvel Studios. Usually when you have people in positions of power under you, you don't normally step over them or go around them if you respect them. And you may not like Feige, but he has made Disney a shit ton of money. There should be respect there. If Marvel Studios wasn't a separate company as in it's day to day operations and was instead just a division of Disney then yeah you have a point. Before I went on my own I worked for a subsidiary of Blue Cross Blue Shield. It was almost the same situation as Disney is to Marvel Studios. My last year there our new President was bypassed 3 times on firings. One day we all show up to work and the Vp of Actuary, VP of ARU, and VP of Claims were fired without the President's knowledge. Each time BCBS was in their right to do it, but each time it was taken as a slap in the face of our President by the employees. To cut out a person in the chain of command is a shitty move. Not if that person in the chain of command refuses to do his job and fire the person he's told to fire. Feige is really lucky that Iger and Horned didn't fire him for refusing to do his job. Back in 2006, the senior execs at my company wanted our division head to fire a bunch of people. But our division head didn't want to do it. So he announced his sudden "retirement" (or rather, the company forced him to "retire" and paid him a severance package to go away). Then the company brought in a new division head. Shortly after that, it was announced that staff would be let go and the new division head would meet with each individual employee and inform them if they would be staying or leaving. Feige is really lucky that Iger and Horne just fired Gunn instead of firing Feige for refusing to do what he's told and then bringing in a replacement to fire Gunn. Wait there is a report out that Iger and Horn told Feige to fire him and he refused? Please tell me you have proof of this. |
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Aug 11, 2018 5:31:16 GMT
just watched it, good video. I like that WB won't hire that scumbag pedophile Gunn. Well, he did write Scooby-Doo 1 & 2, and those were produced by WB. |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Aug 11, 2018 15:21:39 GMT
Oh wow... well that's kind of a shitty move. How is that a shitty move? Feige works for Iger and Horne. Iger and Horne don't work for Feige and don't need to talk to Feige before firing Gunn. Because firing someone without informing the head of the division that person works under is a shitty move. |
|
