Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2018 22:20:01 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2018 22:29:41 GMT
Also, allowing for the player really not having served out his ban, OK, they should be punished, but what's the point of putting them in a three goal hole? You've just destroyed the second leg as a competition and it's now largely a waste of time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Aug 30, 2018 1:06:54 GMT
Changing the result to a 3-0 loss for the infringing team isn't that uncommon. I've seen it done quite a few times in the past ... though maybe not so close to the start of the 2nd leg.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Aug 30, 2018 1:09:42 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2018 1:11:52 GMT
To bad Santos have fans that care more about ruining things for them than supporting them.
But yeah its a common penalty.
|
|
|
|
Post by hoskotafe3 on Aug 30, 2018 4:56:16 GMT
Out of interest, if Santos absolutely smash it in game 1, win 6-1, does that become a 6-4 win or still an 0-3 loss?
|
|
|
|
Post by Excellent Bulletproof Vest on Aug 30, 2018 8:55:01 GMT
Out of interest, if Santos absolutely smash it in game 1, win 6-1, does that become a 6-4 win or still an 0-3 loss? I don't know for sure, but I'm pretty confident it would still be a 3-0 loss, that seems to be the standard punishment. The size of the win really doesn't matter because they got the win through using an ineligible player. Something similar happened to Celtic once. They were hammered 4-1 in the first match, in the second match there were 2-0 down - 6-1 down on aggregate - then the opposing team brought on an ineligible player for two minutes. The match was converted to a 3-0 win for Celtic, meaning the aggregate score was 4-4 and Celtic went through on an away goals tie breaker. It was one of the most unfair decisions in history. At the time everyone thought Celtic would give up the spot to their opponents, or at least request a rematch, but shamelessly they carried on into the next round. I assume the rules aren't set in stone though. If a team wins 4-0 in the first game then loses 3-0 in the second game while fielding several ineligible players I think something different would have to be done. |
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Aug 30, 2018 11:33:02 GMT
Out of interest, if Santos absolutely smash it in game 1, win 6-1, does that become a 6-4 win or still an 0-3 loss? That's irrelevant - still would be a 0-3 loss. It's not done for every infringement by any means (and probably isn't applied consistently) but the original result doesn't matter. Although, having said that, presumably had they LOST 4-0 then THAT scoreline would still stand! |
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Aug 30, 2018 11:34:14 GMT
Out of interest, if Santos absolutely smash it in game 1, win 6-1, does that become a 6-4 win or still an 0-3 loss? I don't know for sure, but I'm pretty confident it would still be a 3-0 loss, that seems to be the standard punishment. The size of the win really doesn't matter because they got the win through using an ineligible player. Something similar happened to Celtic once. They were hammered 4-1 in the first match, in the second match there were 2-0 down - 6-1 down on aggregate - then the opposing team brought on an ineligible player for two minutes. The match was converted to a 3-0 win for Celtic, meaning the aggregate score was 4-4 and Celtic went through on an away goals tie breaker. It was one of the most unfair decisions in history. At the time everyone thought Celtic would give up the spot to their opponents, or at least request a rematch, but shamelessly they carried on into the next round.I assume the rules aren't set in stone though. If a team wins 4-0 in the first game then loses 3-0 in the second game while fielding several ineligible players I think something different would have to be done. LOL. Translation: "No one thought that except me." |
|
|
|
Post by hoskotafe3 on Aug 30, 2018 11:45:30 GMT
Yeah, I can't imagine too many teams being altruistic in that situation. "Learn to count," would be more like it. And a Scotsman giving a sucker a break? No way...
|
|
