Another Religion Forum, For All Of You Guys

That might actually mean something if you could cite a single example of either, but you can't so...

Meanwhile there is a thread from yesterday where you made a complete foll of yourself and then ran away without ever having a clue what happened.

This is a quote from you in another post.
"At least they try not to be complete imbeciles:



"Evolution is just a theory, right?

There is an evolutionary theory that tries to explain the observable fact of evolution. Similarly, there are gravitational theories that try to explain the observable fact of gravity. Gravity and evolution, as natural forces,are not open to debate. Why and exactly how they happen, however, are. If there is something wrong about the current evolutionary theory, it does not mean that evolution doesn't happen. Similarly, if there is something wrong with the current gravitational theory, we all won't float away into space."



But then immediately following that one:



"Does evolution state that man comes from apes?

No. The theory of evolution attempts to trace modern life backwards through the "family tree." If we treat species like individuals on a family tree, the chimpanzee (the closest living human relative) is our 230 thousandth cousin, 10,000 times removed. The dragonfly, on the other hand, is our 300 millionth cousin, 110 million times removed."



How do you go from being entirely correct to entirely wrong from one question to the next?
"

Your Lie: you said I wanted you to whisper to me.

Your cowardice: you failing to explain how your pretending I was talking to myself, instead of you, was not childish. You ran away from both exchanges.


Let the dodging begin. 

Contradiction? When did I ever mention contradiction?. You agreed that evoluton was a natural force which is hillarious considering the post I originally respoded to.

WTF are you even talking about? Evolution is a natural force and humans are apes and therefore are descended from apes. How is there anything hilarious in any of that?

This the only way force is used in science.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force

No, that's how force is used in physics. The article you quoted even makes that clear IN THE FIRST TWO WORDS. You really need to give up now.

Give an example of force as it is used in other sciences.

Genetic drift being caused by "stochastic forces" does not mean evolution itself is a force. Secondly when you gravity and evolution are natural forces why are you using two different definitions of force? I might as well say both feathers and the rays from the sun are light. Unless of course you arent, in which case what definition of force are you using?