jesserebel
Sophomore
@jesserebel
Posts: 350
Likes: 92
|
Post by jesserebel on Oct 6, 2018 1:13:37 GMT
I went in to this film with overall low expectations, expecting a film pushing an agenda and hammering it in peoples brains that all cops are evil and all black people saints, but that is not what was given. It was VERY honest, very mutual, very heartbreaking, very heavy and very powerful. A lot of why this is so so GOOD is due to Amandla Stenbergs beautiful and powerful performance as Starr. She delivers in every scene and never lets down once.
Her tears felt genuine and her words always honest and sincere. You always felt her, always. The script was fantastic (minus a few things here and there) and the directing great.
I loved how not only Police Brutality was covered and denounced, but so was black on black crime, poor areas turning to selling drugs etc. to make money, black on white racism (Starr is dating a white guy played by KJ Apa and when he meets her father he is not happy at all that his daughter is with a white guy and is very nasty to him and angry with his daughter. He later says that he guesses he wasn't a good example of a BLACK man cause if he was she would be with a black man and she lets him know he wasn't, he was a good example of a MAN in general and skin color shouldn't matter, its the person themselves that matters), as well as white people who use incidents like a black teen being killed to make themselves look good even if they don't truly care (Starr goes to an almost all white Private school and the white students use her black friends death as an excuse to cut class is the guise of "Black Lives Matter") and white people using black culture to look cool.
The film also says bluntly how the hate we give affects the children and the hate we give causes them to have hate and anger with time as they get older. Its an ongoing thing and the way to stop it is to stop hating others and start being kinder, more compassionate toward others etc.
Its actually very powerful. The audience was very mixed in race and age. A lot of black teens were there, as well as some white and a few black and white adults also. This one white woman brought like 6 white kids with her to see it and after as they were leaving she was asking them their thoughts, opinions and what they felt the message of the film was etc.. it is definitely a film that can be shown to educate EVERYONE in a positive way.
9/10
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 6, 2018 1:25:27 GMT
Makes you wonder about the low IMDB rating then.
|
|
jesserebel
Sophomore
@jesserebel
Posts: 350
Likes: 92
|
Post by jesserebel on Oct 6, 2018 1:32:33 GMT
Makes you wonder about the low IMDB rating then. Racists down voting it without seeing it. They always do that to films with black casts... remember when they were trying to do it to Black Panther but it was stopped? The film just went into LIMITED release today and it already has terrible ratings there. Tells you a lot. Look at the Rotten Tomatoes score and Metacritic score etc... theyre high. And its deserved.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2018 1:50:41 GMT
I had very neutral expectations, and got a film pushing an agenda. An agenda I don't necessarily disagree with, but one handled in a clumsy and hamfisted way.
If I'm being honest, the movie presents a very ambiguous cop killing, but treats it in an unambiguous way. White people haven't been shot before for pulling out mysterious objects in front of cops? The one scene where the opposite side gets any voice is when Uncle Common and Starr are talking in the kitchen. And even then, Common gets checkmated too easily. "Would you shoot a white guy in a suit in a Mercedes in a suburban neighborhood or say 'get your hands up?'" Is it that he's white that he wouldn't be immedietely shot, or the 14 other variables?
To me, Archie served no point but as a token for white audiences. You act like it's a major plot point that her dad was mildly mean, but he's over it before the scene is over. I also couldn't care less that there was a one dimensional black villain. Score levelling doesn't matter to me.
I think Fruitvale Station and Detroit are much better, more nuanced films about race related police brutality. This was an after school special that had the opposite effect it was going for. I support BLM, and here I am defending the cop in the movie. RIP to the screenwriter, though.
|
|
jesserebel
Sophomore
@jesserebel
Posts: 350
Likes: 92
|
Post by jesserebel on Oct 6, 2018 2:03:35 GMT
I had very neutral expectations, and got a film pushing an agenda. An agenda I don't necessarily disagree with, but one handled in a clumsy and hamfisted way. If I'm being honest, the movie presents a very ambiguous cop killing, but treats it in an unambiguous way. White people haven't been shot before for pulling out mysterious objects in front of cops? The one scene where the opposite side gets any voice is when Uncle Common and Starr are talking in the kitchen. And even then, Common gets checkmated too easily. "Would you shoot a white guy in a suit in a Mercedes in a suburban neighborhood or say 'get your hands up?'" Is it that he's white that he wouldn't be immedietely shot, or the 14 other variables? To me, Archie served no point but as a token for white audiences. You act like it's a major plot point that her dad was mildly mean, but he's over it before the scene is over. I also couldn't care less that there was a one dimensional black villain. Score levelling doesn't matter to me. I think Fruitvale Station and Detroit are much better, more nuanced films about race related police brutality. This was an after school special that had the opposite effect it was going for. I support BLM, and here I am defending the cop in the movie. RIP to the screenwriter, though. KJ Apa was a token white dude in a movie with other white characters? He wasn't the sole white character, he was the most sympathetic and understanding though. Her so called friend played by Sabrina Carpenter portrayed a very different character than he did and he shows that there are white people that genuinely care and try to understand and listen to what minorities are trying to say. We see him trying to connect with her numerous times and trying to understand her and "see her" as he says later in the film. Meanwhile her friend was not like that at all and was not sympathetic to the black teen that was murdered, but instead was for the cop being questioned about the killing and sided with the cop instead. In what way was the film sloppy and pushing an agenda? The movie BLATANTLY speaks against black on black crime and makes it a motive to show black cops abusing power also, showing its not just white cops that do it. If there was an agenda black on black crime would never be brought up and all the cops would have been white men. Yes, white people have been shot for things but not to the same capacity black men have. Black men get shot for just walking sometimes. You can deny it all you want. Fruitvale Station and Detroit were also true stories. This was a fictional story of things that really happen. Her dad became ok with her dating a white guy cause of her comment about him being a good man, not a good BLACK man. She looks for character, not skin color. I think he respected that. But we never saw him interact with Chris again so what do we know? He even hated that his name was Chris. How was the cop killing ambiguous? We see exactly what happened.... unless you mean that the cop genuinely made a mistake and didn't mean to kill an unarmed teen. That is true, but the media in reality would try to destroy him even if that were the case.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2018 3:31:55 GMT
Yes, white people have been shot for things but not to the same capacity black men have. Black men get shot for just walking sometimes. You can deny it all you want. First off, I said I supported BLM and that I just didn't agree with the case the film presents, so you can f**k right off with that sh*t. Second, make a movie about that then. Not a movie where a drug dealer gets pulled over in a neighborhood where there'd just been a shooting, argues with the cop, then starts waving a comb around to troll them. And yes, that's what I meant by ambiguous. Yet the film, except for 20 seconds when Common defends him, treats it as clear-cut, textbook police brutality and racism. Archie was the token *sympathetic* white guy. Sorry my post wasn't as spelled out and obvious as the movie for you. But yeah, he's just there to make white people feel comfortable and have an avatar to slap themselves onto in the midst of all the racist and stupid whites like her friend. Between that and your black-on-black crime comments, you're very preoccupied with what I called keeping score. I don't need the film to pat me on the back and say "not all white people are bad and not all black people are good" so I can sleep at night. It's that these things were so transparent that turned me off. I don't know what Fruitvale Station and Detroit being based on true stories has to do with anything. They're better movies because they're better movies.
|
|
jesserebel
Sophomore
@jesserebel
Posts: 350
Likes: 92
|
Post by jesserebel on Oct 6, 2018 4:10:12 GMT
First off, I said I supported BLM and that I just didn't agree with the case the film presents, so you can f**k right off with that sh*t. Second, make a movie about that then. Not a movie where a drug dealer gets pulled over in a neighborhood where there'd just been a shooting, argues with the cop, then starts waving a comb around to troll them. And yes, that's what I meant by ambiguous. Yet the film, except for 20 seconds when Common defends him, treats it as clear-cut, textbook police brutality and racism. Archie was the token *sympathetic* white guy. Sorry my post wasn't as spelled out and obvious as the movie for you. But yeah, he's just there to make white people feel comfortable and have an avatar to slap themselves onto in the midst of all the racist and stupid whites like her friend. Between that and your black-on-black crime comments, you're very preoccupied with what I called keeping score. I don't need the film to pat me on the back and say "not all white people are bad and not all black people are good" so I can sleep at night. It's that these things were so transparent that turned me off. I don't know what Fruitvale Station and Detroit being based on true stories has to do with anything. They're better movies because they're better movies. Did you watch the film or are you an angry white man thats going based off stuff you read on the internet? Cause he barely mouthed off to the cop, he was mostly quiet. All he did was ask why the cop pulled him over when he did nothing wrong, which he didn't. Then the cop threatened him and told him to get out of the car when he wouldn't turn down his music cause, like he said, he did nothing wrong and the cop refused to answer his question. He then turns down the music when the cop starts screaming and being aggressive and gets out of the car. Starr then begins to record what is going on when the cop screams at her in a threatening way that she better stop recording him and she drops the phone out of fear. The cop walks away, he leans in the car and is talking to Starr, who begs him to go back in the position the cop left him in. He doesn't want to but eventually does but as he goes out of leaning in the window he picks up his brush and as he puts it to his own head (NO WAVING AROUND) he is instantly shot by the cop NUMEROUS times. Not once. Not in the leg or arm. In the stomach and chest. Now the cop may have truly believed he pulled a gun out of the car but as someone from a family of cops there are ways to make sure he doesn't without MURDERING him. Funny how I have about 70 years worth of cops in my family and not one has had to unjustly kill someone. Cause they always followed proper procedures. These new cops are scared of every little thing. KJ Apa (his name is NOT Archie. This isnt Riverdale) is there to show that caring, sympathetic white people DO exist. Not every white person is a raging racist or just indifferent to black people. Some genuinely care, and as someone who is friends with a white guy who is dating his first black woman (theyre together now almost 2 years), he is exactly the depiction of what "Archie" is. Thats the kind of person they are showing exist. You may know these people do exist and don't need to see it on film, but there are many people out there that don't. This film is being aimed at teenagers, and the majority of those teens that will go see it are probably gonna be black. Its good to show them that there ARE white people that would side with them and have their backs and wish them the best, as well as white people that don't, in some cases its someone that you think is your friend but the truth comes out later... You're bitching hard about a movie geared toward teenagers as if its fucking Schindlers List or something. PS I am white. Blue eyes, golden haired Michigan boy. Thank God I was raised right. Also, you bring up the fact that he was dealing drugs as if thats why the cop pulled him over. He had no drugs on him and wasn't dealing that moment. He was just trying to get Starr home. You're part of the problem. Also there was a reason he resorted to selling drugs. His grandmother was diagnosed with cancer and fired from her job cause she was old and sick so there was no income. He was a minor so he's not getting any big paying jobs, so he did what he felt he needed to to take care of his siblings and grandmother. Its a sad reality.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2018 5:25:31 GMT
First off, I said I supported BLM and that I just didn't agree with the case the film presents, so you can f**k right off with that sh*t. Second, make a movie about that then. Not a movie where a drug dealer gets pulled over in a neighborhood where there'd just been a shooting, argues with the cop, then starts waving a comb around to troll them. And yes, that's what I meant by ambiguous. Yet the film, except for 20 seconds when Common defends him, treats it as clear-cut, textbook police brutality and racism. Archie was the token *sympathetic* white guy. Sorry my post wasn't as spelled out and obvious as the movie for you. But yeah, he's just there to make white people feel comfortable and have an avatar to slap themselves onto in the midst of all the racist and stupid whites like her friend. Between that and your black-on-black crime comments, you're very preoccupied with what I called keeping score. I don't need the film to pat me on the back and say "not all white people are bad and not all black people are good" so I can sleep at night. It's that these things were so transparent that turned me off. I don't know what Fruitvale Station and Detroit being based on true stories has to do with anything. They're better movies because they're better movies. Did you watch the film or are you an angry white man thats going based off stuff you read on the internet? Cause he barely mouthed off to the cop, he was mostly quiet. All he did was ask why the cop pulled him over when he did nothing wrong, which he didn't. Then the cop threatened him and told him to get out of the car when he wouldn't turn down his music cause, like he said, he did nothing wrong and the cop refused to answer his question. He then turns down the music when the cop starts screaming and being aggressive and gets out of the car. Starr then begins to record what is going on when the cop screams at her in a threatening way that she better stop recording him and she drops the phone out of fear. The cop walks away, he leans in the car and is talking to Starr, who begs him to go back in the position the cop left him in. He doesn't want to but eventually does but as he goes out of leaning in the window he picks up his brush and as he puts it to his own head (NO WAVING AROUND) he is instantly shot by the cop NUMEROUS times. Not once. Not in the leg or arm. In the stomach and chest. Now the cop may have truly believed he pulled a gun out of the car but as someone from a family of cops there are ways to make sure he doesn't without MURDERING him. Funny how I have about 70 years worth of cops in my family and not one has had to unjustly kill someone. Cause they always followed proper procedures. These new cops are scared of every little thing. KJ Apa (his name is NOT Archie. This isnt Riverdale) is there to show that caring, sympathetic white people DO exist. Not every white person is a raging racist or just indifferent to black people. Some genuinely care, and as someone who is friends with a white guy who is dating his first black woman (theyre together now almost 2 years), he is exactly the depiction of what "Archie" is. Thats the kind of person they are showing exist. You may know these people do exist and don't need to see it on film, but there are many people out there that don't. This film is being aimed at teenagers, and the majority of those teens that will go see it are probably gonna be black. Its good to show them that there ARE white people that would side with them and have their backs and wish them the best, as well as white people that don't, in some cases its someone that you think is your friend but the truth comes out later... You're bitching hard about a movie geared toward teenagers as if its fucking Schindlers List or something. PS I am white. Blue eyes, golden haired Michigan boy. Thank God I was raised right. Also, you bring up the fact that he was dealing drugs as if thats why the cop pulled him over. He had no drugs on him and wasn't dealing that moment. He was just trying to get Starr home. You're part of the problem. Also there was a reason he resorted to selling drugs. His grandmother was diagnosed with cancer and fired from her job cause she was old and sick so there was no income. He was a minor so he's not getting any big paying jobs, so he did what he felt he needed to to take care of his siblings and grandmother. Its a sad reality. And this is why the movie has 100% on Rotten Tomatoes. I said I support BLM, I just praised two movies with the same theme, and yet I'm still being called a racist because I didn't love this one movie. So your new defense is that it's not Schindler's List, and it's for kids who have never met a decent white person. Well, I'm not a kid, and I've dated black girls and my brother is married to one, so I know dudes like Archie exist already, so what exactly should the appeal of this movie be for me? He got pulled over for not signaling a lane change, which has happened to my 50 year old mother, btw. And I bring up the fact that his character is a drug dealer because it deflates the movie's point that the cop was completely unjustified in assuming he might be a criminal if he was in fact a criminal. Why couldn't he just be a regular kid minding his own business? Wouldn't that serve the movie's point more? Wouldn't it line up with cases like Trayvon Martin? Why'd he have to get into an argument with the cop and start brandishing objects in his hand? They gave the cop a laundry list of reasons to be hair triggered, then acted like he was evil to be hair triggered. That's my problem. Black people have been murdered by cops over much less, so they didn't need to go so out of their way in explaining why the cop fired. And you don't need to explain to me you're an Aryan white boy, I already figure as much since you keep going on and on about the film's depiction of black-on-black violence.
|
|
jesserebel
Sophomore
@jesserebel
Posts: 350
Likes: 92
|
Post by jesserebel on Oct 6, 2018 17:38:42 GMT
Did you watch the film or are you an angry white man thats going based off stuff you read on the internet? Cause he barely mouthed off to the cop, he was mostly quiet. All he did was ask why the cop pulled him over when he did nothing wrong, which he didn't. Then the cop threatened him and told him to get out of the car when he wouldn't turn down his music cause, like he said, he did nothing wrong and the cop refused to answer his question. He then turns down the music when the cop starts screaming and being aggressive and gets out of the car. Starr then begins to record what is going on when the cop screams at her in a threatening way that she better stop recording him and she drops the phone out of fear. The cop walks away, he leans in the car and is talking to Starr, who begs him to go back in the position the cop left him in. He doesn't want to but eventually does but as he goes out of leaning in the window he picks up his brush and as he puts it to his own head (NO WAVING AROUND) he is instantly shot by the cop NUMEROUS times. Not once. Not in the leg or arm. In the stomach and chest. Now the cop may have truly believed he pulled a gun out of the car but as someone from a family of cops there are ways to make sure he doesn't without MURDERING him. Funny how I have about 70 years worth of cops in my family and not one has had to unjustly kill someone. Cause they always followed proper procedures. These new cops are scared of every little thing. KJ Apa (his name is NOT Archie. This isnt Riverdale) is there to show that caring, sympathetic white people DO exist. Not every white person is a raging racist or just indifferent to black people. Some genuinely care, and as someone who is friends with a white guy who is dating his first black woman (theyre together now almost 2 years), he is exactly the depiction of what "Archie" is. Thats the kind of person they are showing exist. You may know these people do exist and don't need to see it on film, but there are many people out there that don't. This film is being aimed at teenagers, and the majority of those teens that will go see it are probably gonna be black. Its good to show them that there ARE white people that would side with them and have their backs and wish them the best, as well as white people that don't, in some cases its someone that you think is your friend but the truth comes out later... You're bitching hard about a movie geared toward teenagers as if its fucking Schindlers List or something. PS I am white. Blue eyes, golden haired Michigan boy. Thank God I was raised right. Also, you bring up the fact that he was dealing drugs as if thats why the cop pulled him over. He had no drugs on him and wasn't dealing that moment. He was just trying to get Starr home. You're part of the problem. Also there was a reason he resorted to selling drugs. His grandmother was diagnosed with cancer and fired from her job cause she was old and sick so there was no income. He was a minor so he's not getting any big paying jobs, so he did what he felt he needed to to take care of his siblings and grandmother. Its a sad reality. And this is why the movie has 100% on Rotten Tomatoes. I said I support BLM, I just praised two movies with the same theme, and yet I'm still being called a racist because I didn't love this one movie. So your new defense is that it's not Schindler's List, and it's for kids who have never met a decent white person. Well, I'm not a kid, and I've dated black girls and my brother is married to one, so I know dudes like Archie exist already, so what exactly should the appeal of this movie be for me? He got pulled over for not signaling a lane change, which has happened to my 50 year old mother, btw. And I bring up the fact that his character is a drug dealer because it deflates the movie's point that the cop was completely unjustified in assuming he might be a criminal if he was in fact a criminal. Why couldn't he just be a regular kid minding his own business? Wouldn't that serve the movie's point more? Wouldn't it line up with cases like Trayvon Martin? Why'd he have to get into an argument with the cop and start brandishing objects in his hand? They gave the cop a laundry list of reasons to be hair triggered, then acted like he was evil to be hair triggered. That's my problem. Black people have been murdered by cops over much less, so they didn't need to go so out of their way in explaining why the cop fired. And you don't need to explain to me you're an Aryan white boy, I already figure as much since you keep going on and on about the film's depiction of black-on-black violence. And what are you, sir? If you are an Aryan white male also, pot meet kettle. My point is that the film was never meant to appeal to you. If it did, good, but you are not the demographic the film cares about. Neither am I. Im a 27 year old white guy form Michigan. They aren't trying to get me to the theater. They want my 16 year old brother to go. However, seems the movie did bring some adults in. I never said you were racist. He argued with the cop cause he was pulled over for something that is nonsense. He did nothing wrong. You can keep saying we white people are treated the same by cops, its bullshit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2018 19:08:27 GMT
And this is why the movie has 100% on Rotten Tomatoes. I said I support BLM, I just praised two movies with the same theme, and yet I'm still being called a racist because I didn't love this one movie. So your new defense is that it's not Schindler's List, and it's for kids who have never met a decent white person. Well, I'm not a kid, and I've dated black girls and my brother is married to one, so I know dudes like Archie exist already, so what exactly should the appeal of this movie be for me? He got pulled over for not signaling a lane change, which has happened to my 50 year old mother, btw. And I bring up the fact that his character is a drug dealer because it deflates the movie's point that the cop was completely unjustified in assuming he might be a criminal if he was in fact a criminal. Why couldn't he just be a regular kid minding his own business? Wouldn't that serve the movie's point more? Wouldn't it line up with cases like Trayvon Martin? Why'd he have to get into an argument with the cop and start brandishing objects in his hand? They gave the cop a laundry list of reasons to be hair triggered, then acted like he was evil to be hair triggered. That's my problem. Black people have been murdered by cops over much less, so they didn't need to go so out of their way in explaining why the cop fired. And you don't need to explain to me you're an Aryan white boy, I already figure as much since you keep going on and on about the film's depiction of black-on-black violence. And what are you, sir? If you are an Aryan white male also, pot meet kettle. My point is that the film was never meant to appeal to you. If it did, good, but you are not the demographic the film cares about. Neither am I. Im a 27 year old white guy form Michigan. They aren't trying to get me to the theater. They want my 16 year old brother to go. However, seems the movie did bring some adults in. He argued with the cop cause he was pulled over for something that is nonsense. He did nothing wrong. You can keep saying we white people are treated the same by cops, its bullshit. An Aryan white male who doesn't need token good white males and bad black males in order to enjoy a film. I got a pass to the screening, so I think someone cared about me going. My Lord, I never said blacks and whites are treated equally by the cops. I said the film didn't do a good job presenting the inequity. What aren't you understanding here? And are you calling me a liar about my mom getting stopped for not signaling a lane change? That happened, I was there. We didn't argue, whether it was "nonsense" or not, and I've never heard anyone actually encourage arguing with a cop let alone someone with a family of them. Note I bring it up not deemphasize racial profiling and police brutality, but that * this specific movie titled The Hate U Give that we are currently talking about* did not construct a scenario I found adequate in portraying it. If old, pasty white women like my mom get stopped for the same sh*t, and people of all colors get shot for arguing and brandishing objects around cops, then it simply isn't a very compelling example of what it's talking about. Look up Eric Garner sometime if you want to see how light and sanitized this movie really is.
|
|
jesserebel
Sophomore
@jesserebel
Posts: 350
Likes: 92
|
Post by jesserebel on Oct 6, 2018 19:36:49 GMT
And what are you, sir? If you are an Aryan white male also, pot meet kettle. My point is that the film was never meant to appeal to you. If it did, good, but you are not the demographic the film cares about. Neither am I. Im a 27 year old white guy form Michigan. They aren't trying to get me to the theater. They want my 16 year old brother to go. However, seems the movie did bring some adults in. He argued with the cop cause he was pulled over for something that is nonsense. He did nothing wrong. You can keep saying we white people are treated the same by cops, its bullshit. An Aryan white male who doesn't need token good white males and bad black males in order to enjoy a film. I got a pass to the screening, so I think someone cared about me going. My Lord, I never said blacks and whites are treated equally by the cops. I said the film didn't do a good job presenting the inequity. What aren't you understanding here? And are you calling me a liar about my mom getting stopped for not signaling a lane change? That happened, I was there. We didn't argue, whether it was "nonsense" or not, and I've never heard anyone actually encourage arguing with a cop let alone someone with a family of them. Note I bring it up not deemphasize racial profiling and police brutality, but that * this specific movie titled The Hate U Give that we are currently talking about* did not construct a scenario I found adequate in portraying it. If old, pasty white women like my mom get stopped for the same sh*t, and people of all colors get shot for arguing and brandishing objects around cops, then it simply isn't a very compelling example of what it's talking about. Look up Eric Garner sometime if you want to see how light and sanitized this movie really is. No, I am an Aryan white man that doesn't see the good white guy as a token, but just as a good white guy. That says a lot about YOU, not me. And not all the black males in the film were bad, you racist piece of shit. I doubt that happened to your mom, cause I do stupid shit myself all the time and have only been stopped once. Good lie though. Arguing with a cop is not punishable by death... neither is changing lanes without signal. And him asking questions is not arguing... you wanna talk about me being white while you're defending the white cop murderer and labeling all the black males as bad and upset there was a good white guy in a film as well as basically saying ASKING QUESTIONS is arguing and deserves death... look in the mirror you white trash. You're those little boys that think the cop is always right. I know theyre human and many times wrong also.
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Oct 6, 2018 19:47:49 GMT
This thread is cracking me up. Do either of you see the irony?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2018 19:50:59 GMT
An Aryan white male who doesn't need token good white males and bad black males in order to enjoy a film. I got a pass to the screening, so I think someone cared about me going. My Lord, I never said blacks and whites are treated equally by the cops. I said the film didn't do a good job presenting the inequity. What aren't you understanding here? And are you calling me a liar about my mom getting stopped for not signaling a lane change? That happened, I was there. We didn't argue, whether it was "nonsense" or not, and I've never heard anyone actually encourage arguing with a cop let alone someone with a family of them. Note I bring it up not deemphasize racial profiling and police brutality, but that * this specific movie titled The Hate U Give that we are currently talking about* did not construct a scenario I found adequate in portraying it. If old, pasty white women like my mom get stopped for the same sh*t, and people of all colors get shot for arguing and brandishing objects around cops, then it simply isn't a very compelling example of what it's talking about. Look up Eric Garner sometime if you want to see how light and sanitized this movie really is. No, I am an Aryan white man that doesn't see the good white guy as a token, but just as a good white guy. That says a lot about YOU, not me. And not all the black males in the film were bad, you racist piece of shit. I doubt that happened to your mom, cause I do stupid shit myself all the time and have only been stopped once. Good lie though. Arguing with a cop is not punishable by death... neither is changing lanes without signal. And him asking questions is not arguing... you wanna talk about me being white while you're defending the white cop murderer and labeling all the black males as bad and upset there was a good white guy in a film as well as basically saying ASKING QUESTIONS is arguing and deserves death... look in the mirror you white trash. You're those little boys that think the cop is always right. I know theyre human and many times wrong also. Remind me again where I said all the black males in this film were bad? You are bar none the dumbest, most ill-read motherf*cker I've ever seen on this website. F*ck you, and f*ck your supposed pig family you virtue signaling cracker.
|
|