theshape25
Sophomore
@theshape25
Posts: 877
Likes: 536
|
Post by theshape25 on Oct 21, 2018 4:50:33 GMT
I was completely sober and I liked it. To each his own. Then again the version I saw had Jamie Lee Curtis in it. Had I seen the version you saw with Jodie Foster I may not have liked it either. Yeah the Jodie Foster one was terrible,... the Jamie Lee Curtis one on the other hand was great. Luckily my theater got the JLC version!
|
|
|
Post by Heretic the Musk Whisperer on Oct 21, 2018 4:51:39 GMT
He isn't recreating the Loomis role. He was a student of Loomis and took over when he died. In fact he does a pretty un-Loomis like thing in the movie. I'm just going by the review. It's all over the place. Dude, I'm telling you. This film is too. Romantic teen comedy/ feminism empowerment/ slasher/ parody. This film has absolutely no focus whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny-Come-Lately on Oct 21, 2018 4:59:36 GMT
I'm just going by the review. It's all over the place. Dude, I'm telling you. This film is too. Romantic teen comedy/ feminism empowerment/ slasher/ parody. This film has absolutely no focus whatsoever. I read your review again. Kind of sounds like H20. The Jodie Foster thing probably made it seem you weren't a reliable reviewer. You might be right and I'll have the same opinion as you.
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Oct 21, 2018 5:14:17 GMT
We come from different camps on the Politics Board but this? I love this review. I honestly dont know who this film was made for or how anyone could enjoy it. Its straight garbage. One dude implied the brains being stomped was a good scene. Oh please. If I painted a jackolatern with flesh paint and filled it with Spaghetti-O's and stomped on it it'd be more convincing than that shot. I'm not a horror movie fan and I avoid them at the theatres. Sometimes I'll watch it on TV out of curiosity though I don't really feel like doing that anymore. Maybe I got it out of my system. I appreciate the spoilers since I really don't care for watching brains getting stomped on no matter how fake it looks. Thanks to you I will definitely avoid being curious about this one at all. And no. I am not being sarcastic. I am being sincere with my appreciation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 6:53:51 GMT
There's a Omar Sharif doppelganger recreating Donald Pleasance's role? You're not kidding, stay away. He isn't recreating the Loomis role. He was a student of Loomis and took over when he died. In fact he does a pretty un-Loomis like thing in the movie. Laurie even calls him "the new Loomis". Sure, he does a 180 at the end (though it lasts for 35 seconds) but still. That said, I'm pretty sure this poster is trolling. Jodie Foster is a mistake impossible to believe, and the only Harold around Haddonfield likes mayonnaise on his sandwich. Or sometimes mustard.
|
|
northernlad
Sophomore
@northernlad
Posts: 898
Likes: 620
|
Post by northernlad on Oct 21, 2018 13:32:50 GMT
That's a surprise. I thought it was Jamie Lee Curtis. LOL...Can't stop laughing!
|
|
theshape25
Sophomore
@theshape25
Posts: 877
Likes: 536
|
Post by theshape25 on Oct 21, 2018 13:33:03 GMT
He isn't recreating the Loomis role. He was a student of Loomis and took over when he died. In fact he does a pretty un-Loomis like thing in the movie. Laurie even calls him "the new Loomis". Sure, he does a 180 at the end (though it lasts for 35 seconds) but still. That said, I'm pretty sure this poster is trolling. Jodie Foster is a mustaje impossible to believe, and the only Harold around Haddonfield likes mayonnaise on his sandwich. Or sometimes mustard. I'm not denying that he was the "new Loomis" in the sense that he was Michael's doctor, but I don't agree that he was trying to mimic Loomis from the 1978 film. He sounded nothing like him. He acted nothing like him.In the 1978 film Loomis was the one shooting Michael and trying to stop him. In this movie Sartain was telling the police not to hurt him and trying to protect him.
|
|
northernlad
Sophomore
@northernlad
Posts: 898
Likes: 620
|
Post by northernlad on Oct 21, 2018 13:43:56 GMT
Laurie even calls him "the new Loomis". Sure, he does a 180 at the end (though it lasts for 35 seconds) but still. That said, I'm pretty sure this poster is trolling. Jodie Foster is a mustaje impossible to believe, and the only Harold around Haddonfield likes mayonnaise on his sandwich. Or sometimes mustard. I'm not denying that he was the "new Loomis" in the sense that he was Michael's doctor, but I don't agree that he was trying to mimic Loomis from the 1978 film. He sounded nothing like him. He acted nothing like him.In the 1978 film Loomis was the one shooting Michael and trying to stop him. In this movie Sartain was telling the police not to hurt him and trying to protect him. Agreed. If you saw the movie, this guy was in no way a "new Loomis". The writers never wrote him as such because of what happened in the movie. In fact he was a villain. No way in hell was Loomis ever a villain.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 15:46:57 GMT
LMAO!!! Your critique is obviously unreasonably harsh, however reading your points, I cannot outright refute them. Your stance is valid. I thought it was actually pretty good. The setup was great especially with Laurie's character. I w ish I could've seen Micharls face but they still didn't show it. I bet it's the same face as Jogsaw. It got boring around the middle, ESPECIALLY when Albert einstein went wacko, so by the time you got to the end, what felt like could have been a really pumped ending, ended up being just pretty good. Still considering the source material being basically a b horror movie, it was a pretty solid attempt at elevating the franchise to something more. 6.8 out of 10
|
|
|
Post by Heretic the Musk Whisperer on Oct 22, 2018 16:01:04 GMT
LMAO!!! Your critique is obviously unreasonably harsh, however reading your points, I cannot outright refute them. Your stance is valid. I thought it was actually pretty good. The setup was great especially with Laurie's character. I w ish I could've seen Micharls face but they still didn't show it. I bet it's the same face as Jogsaw. It got boring around the middle, ESPECIALLY when Albert einstein went wacko, so by the time you got to the end, what felt like could have been a really pumped ending, ended up being just pretty good. Still considering the source material being basically a b horror movie, it was a pretty solid attempt at elevating the franchise to something more. 6.8 out of 10 Lol. It is harsh.
Showing so much of Michael's face irritated me personally. That was always one of the allures of Halloween to me. That the killer is faceless.
|
|
theshape25
Sophomore
@theshape25
Posts: 877
Likes: 536
|
Post by theshape25 on Oct 22, 2018 16:35:01 GMT
LMAO!!! Your critique is obviously unreasonably harsh, however reading your points, I cannot outright refute them. Your stance is valid. I thought it was actually pretty good. The setup was great especially with Laurie's character. I w ish I could've seen Micharls face but they still didn't show it. I bet it's the same face as Jogsaw. It got boring around the middle, ESPECIALLY when Albert einstein went wacko, so by the time you got to the end, what felt like could have been a really pumped ending, ended up being just pretty good. Still considering the source material being basically a b horror movie, it was a pretty solid attempt at elevating the franchise to something more. 6.8 out of 10 Lol. It is harsh.
Showing so much of Michael's face irritated me personally. That was always one of the allures of Halloween to me. That the killer is faceless.
We saw more of Michael's face in the 1978 movie than we do in this one. They literally showed a clear shot of it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2018 17:49:16 GMT
Lol. It is harsh.
Showing so much of Michael's face irritated me personally. That was always one of the allures of Halloween to me. That the killer is faceless.
We saw more of Michael's face in the 1978 movie than we do in this one. They literally showed a clear shot of it. liar
|
|
theshape25
Sophomore
@theshape25
Posts: 877
Likes: 536
|
Post by theshape25 on Oct 22, 2018 18:18:33 GMT
We saw more of Michael's face in the 1978 movie than we do in this one. They literally showed a clear shot of it. liar Feel free to tell me which one shows more of his face?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2018 2:43:14 GMT
Feel free to tell me which one shows more of his face? the 1978 looks like a mask.
|
|
theshape25
Sophomore
@theshape25
Posts: 877
Likes: 536
|
Post by theshape25 on Oct 23, 2018 3:12:13 GMT
Feel free to tell me which one shows more of his face? the 1978 looks like a mask.
|
|
agentsparky
Sophomore
@agentsparky
Posts: 207
Likes: 84
|
Post by agentsparky on Oct 27, 2018 19:15:35 GMT
Remember in Halloween Ressurection how Busta Rhymes got in a kung fu fight with Michael Myers? Well this film makes that one look like The Shinning. I don't think so In fact, IMO H5,H:Ressurection and the two Rob Zombie's Halloween movies were the worst in the entire franchise. I purposely watch bad movies. I've seen over 85 of the bottom 100 films on IMDb. This is easily the worst film I've seen in 5 years, and easily the worst Ive ever seen in theaters. How proud you must be for those accomplishments. Okay, first of all, the plot. It starts with two British podcasters who interview Myers in an insane asylum. They pull out a mask that somehow they borrowed form an attorney general and the other inmates start howling like wolves to the moon. I wish I was joking here, but I'm not. Perhaps you're not joking but you are certainly over exaggerating and anyone and everyone that saw the first teaser trailer knows that to be the case. Ok, so Harold Loomis was an integral part of Halloween as a protagonist. So they have to mention him even though Donald Pleasance is dead. Ok. Cool. So theres a new doctor. This new Doctor is like if you hired a professional Omar Shariff impersonator to do a Loomis impression. Oh, and he starts killing for no reason in the film. I'm not kidding about this. It was clearly explained in the movie that MM's unexplainable evil and the Dr's not being unable to diagnosis it was what drove him mad and he went crazy. So after 40 minutes of meaningless scenes that could have been cut from the movie, we finally get to the plot.; 40 minutes? ? I don't know which version your local theater played or perhaps you're over exaggerating again. Want to see how Michael escaped? Too bad. It's not shown. I didn't want to see how Michael escapes just like the original Halloween didn't show how Michael escaped. Us old schooler's like to use our imagination. Sometimes less is more. Want to see electro music montages of teenagers at a Halloween dance? Oh goody, because there is like 20 minutes of that. I too thought those scenes could have been trimmed down but as usual, you're once again over exaggerating by saying that it was 20 minutes screen time. So the granddaughter of Laurie catches her boyfriend, who is dressed as Bonnie and she is dressed as Clyde (see the gender bender they did) Yes, I too found that plot element to be a bit too woke for my taste and slightly too political but it didn't ruin my enjoyment of the movie. kissing some unnamed girl and leaves the dance. Oh goody, you may say. Surely he will die. Nope. We never see him again the whole film. I too was hoping the boyfriend would get his come-up-ance from Michael. Perhaps in the sequel he will. And let's not ignore the fact Michael Myers is literally a 70 year old man in this who can bench press a small house. In fact, the only other character with supernatural strength is Jodie Fosters character Laurie who is like a 65 year old woman. First of all, the original movie already establishes that Michael is supernatural and as for the characters' ages, I take it that basic math is not your strong points. Laurie is 57 in this movie and Michael is 61..... unless once again, you're over exaggerating Oh and the soundtrack sucks ass and half the film is literally out of focus. The soundtrack was some of the best elements of this movie. John Carpenter comes through again and delivers. How does a film with this budget suck so bad at cinematography?And theres a serial killer on the loose yet only one cop is aware. This movie like the original was intended to be low budget and to have a low budget look and feel. As for the cinematography, I would have loved to have Dean Kundly return. However, David Gordon Green stated on numerous times that the cinematographer intentional was filming using Kundly's style. Meanwhile, the rest of the police force is sitting literally on a dirt road talking about sandwich bread. That was an obvious homage to those bumbling cops from H5 and I too didn't care for it but it was under 40 seconds of screen time and it did not ruin my enjoyment of the movie. I'm not joking about this. This is literally what happens.1/10 No you just over and over and over and over exaggerating things out of proportion. Dont even check this one out on TV. Why do you care whether or not people are seeing this movie. Seems like you either have an agenda or simply bitter.
|
|
|
Post by Heretic the Musk Whisperer on Oct 27, 2018 19:30:56 GMT
Remember in Halloween Ressurection how Busta Rhymes got in a kung fu fight with Michael Myers? Well this film makes that one look like The Shinning. I don't think so In fact, IMO H5,H:Ressurection and the two Rob Zombie's Halloween movies were the worst in the entire franchise. I purposely watch bad movies. I've seen over 85 of the bottom 100 films on IMDb. This is easily the worst film I've seen in 5 years, and easily the worst Ive ever seen in theaters. How proud you must be for those accomplishments. Okay, first of all, the plot. It starts with two British podcasters who interview Myers in an insane asylum. They pull out a mask that somehow they borrowed form an attorney general and the other inmates start howling like wolves to the moon. I wish I was joking here, but I'm not. Perhaps you're not joking but you are certainly over exaggerating and anyone and everyone that saw the first teaser trailer knows that to be the case. Ok, so Harold Loomis was an integral part of Halloween as a protagonist. So they have to mention him even though Donald Pleasance is dead. Ok. Cool. So theres a new doctor. This new Doctor is like if you hired a professional Omar Shariff impersonator to do a Loomis impression. Oh, and he starts killing for no reason in the film. I'm not kidding about this. It was clearly explained in the movie that MM's unexplainable evil and the Dr's not being unable to diagnosis it was what drove him mad and he went crazy. So after 40 minutes of meaningless scenes that could have been cut from the movie, we finally get to the plot.; 40 minutes? ? I don't know which version your local theater played or perhaps you're over exaggerating again. Want to see how Michael escaped? Too bad. It's not shown. I didn't want to see how Michael escapes just like the original Halloween didn't show how Michael escaped. Us old schooler's like to use our imagination. Sometimes less is more. Want to see electro music montages of teenagers at a Halloween dance? Oh goody, because there is like 20 minutes of that. I too thought those scenes could have been trimmed down but as usual, you're once again over exaggerating by saying that it was 20 minutes screen time. So the granddaughter of Laurie catches her boyfriend, who is dressed as Bonnie and she is dressed as Clyde (see the gender bender they did) Yes, I too found that plot element to be a bit too woke for my taste and slightly too political but it didn't ruin my enjoyment of the movie. kissing some unnamed girl and leaves the dance. Oh goody, you may say. Surely he will die. Nope. We never see him again the whole film. I too was hoping the boyfriend would get his come-up-ance from Michael. Perhaps in the sequel he will. And let's not ignore the fact Michael Myers is literally a 70 year old man in this who can bench press a small house. In fact, the only other character with supernatural strength is Jodie Fosters character Laurie who is like a 65 year old woman. First of all, the original movie already establishes that Michael is supernatural and as for the characters' ages, I take it that basic math is not your strong points. Laurie is 57 in this movie and Michael is 61..... unless once again, you're over exaggerating Oh and the soundtrack sucks ass and half the film is literally out of focus. The soundtrack was some of the best elements of this movie. John Carpenter comes through again and delivers. How does a film with this budget suck so bad at cinematography?And theres a serial killer on the loose yet only one cop is aware. This movie like the original was intended to be low budget and to have a low budget look and feel. As for the cinematography, I would have loved to have Dean Kundly return. However, David Gordon Green stated on numerous times that the cinematographer intentional was filming using Kundly's style. Meanwhile, the rest of the police force is sitting literally on a dirt road talking about sandwich bread. That was an obvious homage to those bumbling cops from H5 and I too didn't care for it but it was under 40 seconds of screen time and it did not ruin my enjoyment of the movie. I'm not joking about this. This is literally what happens.1/10 No you just over and over and over and over exaggerating things out of proportion. Dont even check this one out on TV. Why do you care whether or not people are seeing this movie. Seems like you either have an agenda or simply bitter. You're damn right I have an agenda. I'm the last guy in the USA that wants quality in cinema. Well, not quite...but it feels that way. Films that suck, like this one does, will rightfully be ranked as the pile of turds they are by me. Strange you mention "less is more" as a quality for this film...because the kills are all shown and bloody. There is literally no subtlety in this film. None. And why do I care if others watch it? Because its crap. And if crap makes money, Hollywood will continue copycatting it until they are milking from a dead cow. Sorry, but I demand quality in cinema.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2018 21:01:25 GMT
Remember in Halloween Ressurection how Busta Rhymes got in a kung fu fight with Michael Myers? Well this film makes that one look like The Shinning. I've never seen any of them except the first one, but I don't feel like I have much of a choice now but to watch this so-called kung fu fight between Busta Rhymes and Mike Myers. That's just too funny and attractive a prospect to miss.
Don't worry though, the writing writes itself. If I really wanted to see it and treat it like it were special I wouldn't have come in this thread knowing there were spoilers. I'm as sure as 10 dimes buys a dollar that if I ever watch this movie, it'll be by accident. Like on an airplane or at the gym with the sound off and someone's hiding the remote and I'm too into the treadmill to get off and look.
|
|
agentsparky
Sophomore
@agentsparky
Posts: 207
Likes: 84
|
Post by agentsparky on Oct 27, 2018 21:15:37 GMT
Remember in Halloween Ressurection how Busta Rhymes got in a kung fu fight with Michael Myers? Well this film makes that one look like The Shinning. I purposely watch bad movies. I've seen over 85 of the bottom 100 films on IMDb. This is easily the worst film I've seen in 5 years, and easily the worst Ive ever seen in theaters. I'm ashamed of having sat through all of it. Okay, first of all, the plot. It starts with two British podcasters who interview Myers in an insane asylum. They pull out a mask that somehow they borrowed form an attorney general and the other inmates start howling like wolves to the moon. I wish I was joking here, but I'm not. Ok, so Harold Loomis was an integral part of Halloween as a protagonist. So they have to mention him even though Donald Pleasance is dead. Ok. Cool. So theres a new doctor. This new Doctor is like if you hired a professional Omar Shariff impersonator to do a Loomis impression. Oh, and he starts killing for no reason in the film. I'm not kidding about this. So after 40 minutes of meaningless scenes that could have been cut from the movie, we finally get to the plot. Want to see how Michael escaped? Too bad. It's not shown. Want to see electro music montages of teenagers at a Halloween dance? Oh goody, because there is like 20 minutes of that. So the granddaughter of Laurie catches her boyfriend, who is dressed as Bonnie and she is dressed as Clyde (see the gender bender they did), kissing some unnamed girl and leaves the dance. Oh goody, you may say. Surely he will die. Nope. We never see him again the whole film. Good lord, Laurie is an idiot in this film. So she has 40 years to prepare for this event yet doesnt evem lock the front door. Then she knows Michael is in the house. Unfortunately, despite her preparations, one of the rooms has a bunch of mannequins that look exactly like Michael in it. And guess where he is hiding? You guessed it. And let's not ignore the fact Michael Myers is literally a 70 year old man in this who can bench press a small house. In fact, the only other character with supernatural strength is Jodie Fosters character Laurie who is like a 65 year old woman. Oh and the soundtrack sucks ass and half the film is literally out of focus. How does a film with this budget suck so bad at cinematography? And theres a serial killer on the loose yet only one cop is aware. Meanwhile, the rest of the police force is sitting literally on a dirt road talking about sandwich bread. I'm not joking about this. This is literally what happens. 1/10 Dont even check this one out on TV. We come from different camps on the Politics Board but this? I love this review. I seem to remember you and your comments from the politics board and if memory serves, anyone and everyone that leans slightly right of Lenin, Stalin and Marx is a racist alt right Nazi in your mind including classic old school Liberals.
|
|
agentsparky
Sophomore
@agentsparky
Posts: 207
Likes: 84
|
Post by agentsparky on Oct 27, 2018 22:05:26 GMT
Yeah the Jodie Foster one was terrible,... the Jamie Lee Curtis one on the other hand was great. Luckily my theater got the JLC version! I get the feeling that several years from now, the Jodie Foster cut of Halloween 2018 will be the most sought out holy grail among fandom since the H6 producer's cut was before it's bluray release or the Donner cut of Superman II before it's DVD release.
|
|