|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Oct 22, 2018 6:11:24 GMT
Inspired by a few recent posts on the Classic Film Board. Where do you stand on the ambiguous and divisive ending to the Coen's neo-noir-ish western.
Personally I love the open ended-ness and ambiguity of it. It works perfectly with the arbitrary-ness/existentialism of the rest of the film.
|
|
|
Post by OldAussie on Oct 22, 2018 8:22:59 GMT
Yay
|
|
theshape25
Sophomore
@theshape25
Posts: 877
Likes: 536
|
Post by theshape25 on Oct 22, 2018 8:33:04 GMT
Inspired by a few recent posts on the Classic Film Board. Where do you stand on the ambiguous and divisive ending to the Coen's neo-noir-ish western. Personally I love the open ended-ness and ambiguity of it. It works perfectly with the arbitrary-ness/existentialism of the rest of the film. That's how I feel as well. Sometimes I like it when they don't spell an ending out leaving us to draw our own conclusions.
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Oct 22, 2018 9:34:25 GMT
I’m fine with everything but Llewelyn end. It still feels cheap to me. I know it’s deliberately anticlimactic...I just don’t like that.
|
|
|
Post by kevin on Oct 22, 2018 11:56:51 GMT
Meh when I first watched it, now it's a yay.
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Oct 22, 2018 13:16:39 GMT
I liked it since the story was actually about Chigurh.
He's like the good guy who does things in such a way that no matter the adversity he prevails. It's just that he's the bad guy.
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Oct 22, 2018 18:10:00 GMT
It's a "meh" for now since I have it only watched it once.
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Oct 22, 2018 18:14:49 GMT
I voted "Yey" simply for the fact that they ended the film exactly as Cormac McCarthy ended his novel - with the same dialog and abrupt finish - instead of changing it for a safer and more audience pleasing stopping point.
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Oct 22, 2018 19:18:06 GMT
Nay. That ending pretty much ruined the movie.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 22, 2018 19:44:45 GMT
disliked it, strongly so. Nay.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 22, 2018 23:41:47 GMT
Moss's fate annoys me but I liked Bell's monologue and how Chigurh leaves the story, like the Grim Reaper.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2018 23:49:55 GMT
Big yay.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2018 1:51:50 GMT
I'm not sure the film could have ended any other way and conveyed the point that this kind of stuff has always gone on, and will continue to do so.
I guess if they had some grand desire to have Anton get his full reward, there would have had to have been the next problem already developed walk by his body and pick up their own form of chaos from there. And that would have added too much to an already whole lot going on.
It works incredibly well as is.
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Oct 23, 2018 10:53:13 GMT
I voted "Yey" simply for the fact that they ended the film exactly as Cormac McCarthy ended his novel - with the same dialog and abrupt finish - instead of changing it for a safer and more audience pleasing stopping point. I was under the impression that in the novel, there was a whole other (not quite related) section. Or did you just mean the film ended the same way as the part of the novel featuring these particular charaters did?
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Oct 23, 2018 14:21:39 GMT
I voted "Yey" simply for the fact that they ended the film exactly as Cormac McCarthy ended his novel - with the same dialog and abrupt finish - instead of changing it for a safer and more audience pleasing stopping point. I was under the impression that in the novel, there was a whole other (not quite related) section. Or did you just mean the film ended the same way as the part of the novel featuring these particular charaters did? I didn't read the entire novel but still wanted to know if the film's ending was the Coen's or the book's. I found the novel on the shelf at the public library and turned to the last page. Unless I am very much deceived, the last paragraph of the book was the description of the dream, finishing with the line: "And then I woke up" - just like the movie. I don't know when I will get back around to the library to double check it so I hope someone reading this thread will have read it or can look it up.
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Oct 23, 2018 14:24:22 GMT
meh
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Oct 23, 2018 20:21:14 GMT
I was under the impression that in the novel, there was a whole other (not quite related) section. Or did you just mean the film ended the same way as the part of the novel featuring these particular charaters did? I didn't read the entire novel but still wanted to know if the film's ending was the Coen's or the book's. I found the novel on the shelf at the public library and turned to the last page. Unless I am very much deceived, the last paragraph of the book was the description of the dream, finishing with the line: "And then I woke up" - just like the movie. I don't know when I will get back around to the library to double check it so I hope someone reading this thread will have read it or can look it up. No problem. I thought I'd read something about that. It may have been a different McCarthy book or something in an earlier script. I just checked Wikipedia and they mention another character from later in the book was excised. It may have even been that I was thinking of.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2018 20:50:59 GMT
|
|