|
Post by Aj_June on Oct 31, 2018 4:41:07 GMT
It's questions like the OP that make atheists look stupid. Yes, because atheists are incapable of sarcasm or even just silly joke rhetoric. We all know that's reserved for those fun-loving religious folk. Just to inform - the OP is actually a theist.
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Oct 31, 2018 4:59:25 GMT
that very first snowflake
after centuries of inbred convoluted treason's there rose a thorn among the houses of exasperated reasons where once men wallowed in commanding every season but as weather goes so shall every snow be sewn with those who see them as nothing more than shameless bores outlived beyond their seasons.
sjw 10/30/18 inspired at this very moment in time by the wake in awakening.
from the 'benevolent series' of poems
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Oct 31, 2018 14:52:16 GMT
Yes, because atheists are incapable of sarcasm or even just silly joke rhetoric. We all know that's reserved for those fun-loving religious folk. Just to inform - the OP is actually a theist. Is he a mono-theist? Because he's mono-tonous.
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Oct 31, 2018 15:35:03 GMT
Just to inform - the OP is actually a theist. Is he a mono-theist? Because he's mono-tonous. Amy, are you so out of touch with reality and people that you don't realize that you, Oakes, and Opiate are the summation of Monotony. Goz, she can at least deviate from the usual brainwashed patter at times. But you three sheep are like a Trinity of Monotony. I'm pretty sure I've stated before how dull you sheep are. I'll give Opiate the prize among you three for being able to say absolutely nothing and be completely incoherent in the most words. You've got some catching up to do. Don't feel too proud about being part of the Trinity of Monotony. That's just on this board. There are millions of sheep out there like yourself, who have been so spoiled that you struggle to find something to hate and falsely accuse. I don't blame you for being a worshiper of Western culture in the darkest age of knowledge and Psychiatry that the human race ever saw, because you're totally brainwashed by it, incapable of original thought. You're still dull. No offense.
|
|
|
Post by geode on Oct 31, 2018 17:14:54 GMT
Given that if Jesus did exist it's much more likely that Aramiac would be his mother tongue - I'm not sure why you're worried about your Hebrew skills. Still. You get a bonus point for realising that it wasn't English! You know that you just stamped RETARD on your forehead, don't you? You, Oakes, and Goz keep proving you're ignorant trolls. Jesus spoke Hebrew, most likely, according to historians. At least the objective ones who don't want to discount the testimony of more identified witnesses than any other ancient person to his existence. If you wackos didn't give in to sheer unprovoked hatred so much, maybe you'd be taken seriously outside of your lynch mobs. That's the biggest difference between theists and atheists. Most theists actually research and learn. Most atheists are just part of the ignorant masses, sheep following Western culture and going on sheer emotion. You should have at least looked it up. Hebrew was his first and mother tongue, almost surely. Saying different is going against probability. I don't mind you betting on a long shot, but at least admit it's a long shot. You three sure tried to change the subject awful fast, blinded by your hate. You see, Christians don't hate. We leave that to the "theist haters". I guess that's why it's so fun to make fun of you feeble minded folks. I should be sorry. I guess I'm not a good Christian. But you just established, undeniably, that you three are the trolls, not me. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. That's the nicest thing that anyone's ever done for me. No, he didn't indicate that he is a retard. It appears that he is more knowledible about this subject than you are since he knew that Jesus most likely primarily spoke Aramaic. I believe that it is the consensus of historians that this was the primary language of the people in First Century Judea. Josephus wrote that this was the case. Jesus would have known at least some Hebrew due to his participation in religious rituals. It is thought that he may have known some Greek. fhistorians
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Oct 31, 2018 17:35:02 GMT
You know that you just stamped RETARD on your forehead, don't you? You, Oakes, and Goz keep proving you're ignorant trolls. Jesus spoke Hebrew, most likely, according to historians. At least the objective ones who don't want to discount the testimony of more identified witnesses than any other ancient person to his existence. If you wackos didn't give in to sheer unprovoked hatred so much, maybe you'd be taken seriously outside of your lynch mobs. That's the biggest difference between theists and atheists. Most theists actually research and learn. Most atheists are just part of the ignorant masses, sheep following Western culture and going on sheer emotion. You should have at least looked it up. Hebrew was his first and mother tongue, almost surely. Saying different is going against probability. I don't mind you betting on a long shot, but at least admit it's a long shot. You three sure tried to change the subject awful fast, blinded by your hate. You see, Christians don't hate. We leave that to the "theist haters". I guess that's why it's so fun to make fun of you feeble minded folks. I should be sorry. I guess I'm not a good Christian. But you just established, undeniably, that you three are the trolls, not me. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. That's the nicest thing that anyone's ever done for me. No, he didn't indicate that he is a retard. It appears that he is more knowledible about this subject than you are since he knew that Jesus most likely primarily spoke Aramaic. I believe that it is the consensus of historians that this was the primary language of the people in First Century Judea. Josephus wrote that this was the case. Jesus would have known at least some Hebrew due to his participation in religious rituals. It is thought that he may have known some Greek. fhistorians It's the consensus of historians today that Hebrew was the primary language, and Aramaic just a secondary language. Since you claim to have done the research, and you're obviously incorrect, your assessment of "he is more knowledgeable about this subject than you are" is not only a lie, but also unprovoked and unfounded hatred. You're a sick person with a desire to find hate, cause hate, and serve Satan. Satan gives no rewards, by the way, so that makes you a retard, doesn't it? Glad you agree.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Oct 31, 2018 17:40:49 GMT
Is he a mono-theist? Because he's mono-tonous. Amy, are you so out of touch with reality and people that you don't realize that you, Oakes, and Opiate are the summation of Monotony. Goz, she can at least deviate from the usual brainwashed patter at times. But you three sheep are like a Trinity of Monotony. I'm pretty sure I've stated before how dull you sheep are. I'll give Opiate the prize among you three for being able to say absolutely nothing and be completely incoherent in the most words. You've got some catching up to do. Don't feel too proud about being part of the Trinity of Monotony. That's just on this board. There are millions of sheep out there like yourself, who have been so spoiled that you struggle to find something to hate and falsely accuse. I don't blame you for being a worshiper of Western culture in the darkest age of knowledge and Psychiatry that the human race ever saw, because you're totally brainwashed by it, incapable of original thought. You're still dull. No offense. Golly, I'm crushed. Being insulted by someone with your credentials is just about the worstest thing that could have happened to me ever. I guess I'll just have to end it all now. Bye.
I guess you must live in fear of Goz, though--which is probably wise .
BTW, I didn't know you were over a thousand years old. Congratulations, you don't sound too senile for your age.
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Oct 31, 2018 17:55:04 GMT
amyghost
"worstest" ?? Really?
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Oct 31, 2018 18:31:29 GMT
drystyx
He/she is smiling.
|
|
|
Post by geode on Oct 31, 2018 19:40:13 GMT
No, he didn't indicate that he is a retard. It appears that he is more knowledible about this subject than you are since he knew that Jesus most likely primarily spoke Aramaic. I believe that it is the consensus of historians that this was the primary language of the people in First Century Judea. Josephus wrote that this was the case. Jesus would have known at least some Hebrew due to his participation in religious rituals. It is thought that he may have known some Greek. fhistorians It's the consensus of historians today that Hebrew was the primary language, and Aramaic just a secondary language. Since you claim to have done the research, and you're obviously incorrect, your assessment of "he is more knowledgeable about this subject than you are" is not only a lie, but also unprovoked and unfounded hatred. You're a sick person with a desire to find hate, cause hate, and serve Satan. Satan gives no rewards, by the way, so that makes you a retard, doesn't it? Glad you agree. You obviously are just trolling.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Oct 31, 2018 20:55:24 GMT
amyghost
"worstest" ?? Really?
Really. Or maybe I should say 'Realz'.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Oct 31, 2018 20:57:04 GMT
drystyx
He/she is smiling. You shouldn't abuse animals to serve your twisted purposes, Maya .
|
|
|
Post by OpiateOfTheMasses on Oct 31, 2018 22:22:38 GMT
At that Hebrew was only commonly spoken by academics and scholars. If Jesus was a common carpenter his mother tongue would not have been this elitist language.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Oct 31, 2018 23:10:56 GMT
Amy, are you so out of touch with reality and people that you don't realize that you, Oakes, and Opiate are the summation of Monotony. Goz, she can at least deviate from the usual brainwashed patter at times. But you three sheep are like a Trinity of Monotony. I'm pretty sure I've stated before how dull you sheep are. I'll give Opiate the prize among you three for being able to say absolutely nothing and be completely incoherent in the most words. You've got some catching up to do. Don't feel too proud about being part of the Trinity of Monotony. That's just on this board. There are millions of sheep out there like yourself, who have been so spoiled that you struggle to find something to hate and falsely accuse. I don't blame you for being a worshiper of Western culture in the darkest age of knowledge and Psychiatry that the human race ever saw, because you're totally brainwashed by it, incapable of original thought. You're still dull. No offense. Golly, I'm crushed. Being insulted by someone with your credentials is just about the worstest thing that could have happened to me ever. I guess I'll just have to end it all now. Bye.
I guess you must live in fear of Goz, though--which is probably wise .
BTW, I didn't know you were over a thousand years old. Congratulations, you don't sound too senile for your age.
my internet virtual tongue...…...
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Nov 4, 2018 2:51:21 GMT
No, he didn't indicate that he is a retard. It appears that he is more knowledible about this subject than you are since he knew that Jesus most likely primarily spoke Aramaic. I believe that it is the consensus of historians that this was the primary language of the people in First Century Judea. Josephus wrote that this was the case. Jesus would have known at least some Hebrew due to his participation in religious rituals. It is thought that he may have known some Greek. fhistorians It's the consensus of historians today that Hebrew was the primary language, and Aramaic just a secondary language. No, this is not correct. It is the consensus of historians today that Jesus's first language would have been Aramaic, which was the common language of Judea at the time. His second language would have been Koine Greek, the lingua franca through most of the Roman empire at the time.
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Nov 4, 2018 22:58:10 GMT
It's the consensus of historians today that Hebrew was the primary language, and Aramaic just a secondary language. No, this is not correct. It is the consensus of historians today that Jesus's first language would have been Aramaic, which was the common language of Judea at the time. His second language would have been Koine Greek, the lingua franca through most of the Roman empire at the time. You're lying, and everyone knows you're lying, because your only motivation is hijacking the thread to change the subject. And that means you have absolutely zero credibility. You can get a thousand liars to spread your hate and try to form a lynch mob, but it just makes you a pack of demon possessed lunatics with no self control.
Your kind of hate and poison is totally insane. Grow up.
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Nov 5, 2018 18:03:06 GMT
No, this is not correct. It is the consensus of historians today that Jesus's first language would have been Aramaic, which was the common language of Judea at the time. His second language would have been Koine Greek, the lingua franca through most of the Roman empire at the time. You're lying, and everyone knows you're lying, because your only motivation is hijacking the thread to change the subject. And that means you have absolutely zero credibility. You can get a thousand liars to spread your hate and try to form a lynch mob, but it just makes you a pack of demon possessed lunatics with no self control.
Your kind of hate and poison is totally insane. Grow up.
Changing the subject to what? I addressed your claim directly. And I'm not asking you to take my word for it: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_of_JesusThere, that took me all of 30 seconds. Now let's see you source your claims. By the way, everyone reading your post can see that you are very obviously projecting when you accuse me - or anyone else, for that matter - of being out of control, full of hatred and insane. You are positively unhinged. That is, if you were serious. I am going to provide you with an out, here: You were being facetious, right? This is just your way of conceding the point?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 6, 2018 0:30:51 GMT
No, this is not correct. It is the consensus of historians today that Jesus's first language would have been Aramaic, which was the common language of Judea at the time. His second language would have been Koine Greek, the lingua franca through most of the Roman empire at the time. You're lying, and everyone knows you're lying, because your only motivation is hijacking the thread to change the subject. And that means you have absolutely zero credibility. You can get a thousand liars to spread your hate and try to form a lynch mob, but it just makes you a pack of demon possessed lunatics with no self control.
Your kind of hate and poison is totally insane. Grow up.
***knock knock knock*** ….anybody home? ...just a few quick points. people are not necessarily 'lying' because you disagree with them, nor are they changing the subject by answering with a different point of view, nor are they demon possessed, nor are they trying to form a lynch mob, nor are they (usually) insane. You're welcome!
|
|