|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Nov 5, 2018 14:06:28 GMT
it was made for 3-D, the 3-D covered up the CG. Without it it looks silly and flat, which it always was. This is incorrect. Nothing that has been made in 3D is better because of it. interesting, how good then that nobody claimed that.
Good that you tell us these things as most people could have sworn that the appeal was the standout use of 3-D - including the reviews gushing that we just have witnessed the future of cinema. Maybe the emperors new clothes?
Also: quote source for your claim please.
you are a funny one. Guess what I benefit from is a screen that can handle your musings, which is why forums like this are the best way to talk to you.
|
|