|
Post by Catman on Nov 13, 2018 14:53:38 GMT
This is like watching an animal caught in a trap chew its foot off trying to escape.
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 13, 2018 15:51:30 GMT
^^^Imbecile who has no business being in the science field in any meaningful capacity. Says the idiot who keeps posting one bit of unscientific bullshit after another after another after another, non stop. "Imagination is more important than knowledge"--Einstein.
You're a shining example of why.
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Nov 13, 2018 15:53:39 GMT
This is like watching an animal caught in a trap chew its foot off trying to escape. Or like a cat in a bag.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Nov 13, 2018 18:46:56 GMT
What about the attitude of the atheists who are here for the expressed purpose of ridiculing believers? I simply headed them off at the pass. We are NOT ridiculing believers for their beliefs, we are ridiculing stupid people who know nothing about science, pretending that they do and then extrapolating their total nonsensical rubbish onto the knowledge that decades of research has found and which is doing people with brain disease lots of good and adding to the general human knowledge bank. Such knowledge is also powering psychological and philosophical understanding, and whilst people are free to 'believe' what they like, they discount the accumulating bank of scientific knowledge at their peril. People like you are too stupid to know the difference between facts and fiction. All you do, whilst wallowing in your abysmal ignorance, is make a total fool of yourself, whilst casting aspersions at posters who have more knowledge and wisdom than you could ever aspire to. She has a great excuse for rudeness: "I knew they were going to be rude anyway, so I just decided to be rude first." This excuse also comes in handy for closing her mind to anything anyone has to say before they even say it, as well.
She must be a real hit at parties.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Nov 13, 2018 18:48:09 GMT
Says the idiot who keeps posting one bit of unscientific bullshit after another after another after another, non stop. "Imagination is more important than knowledge"--Einstein.
You're a shining example of why.
Einstein, however, did not say that imagination was a substitute for knowledge, though you've decided to twist his words to imply he said just that.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 13, 2018 19:39:21 GMT
You were referring to the studies in your head. Nobody gives a shit about those. I am only familiar with his actual work, none of which shows that people record every moment of their lives. He discovered evidence that it does. What is your reasoning as to why people have said their life flashed before their eyes, or why there are documented cases of people who remember every moment of their life, idiot? Marilu Henner is one of them. For someone who thinks he knows about the brain, you sure underestimate its abilities. This probably a waste of time as you are intent at gnawing your foot, having shot yourself in it, and I doubt you can actually read and comprehend, however www.livescience.com/16019-death-experiences-explained.html[/ur]www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4170360/It-s-true-life-really-flash-eyes.html
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 13, 2018 20:22:21 GMT
You're right. It IS a waste of my time reading that crap. "Researchers CLAIM..." Where does it say researchers have PROVED? GTFO.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Nov 13, 2018 20:57:57 GMT
"Researchers CLAIM..." Where does it say researchers have PROVED? GTFO. There is no "proof" in science. Literally the only field where you find "proof" is mathematics and logic. More evidence that you are fucking clueless about absolutely anything and everything related to science.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 13, 2018 21:05:05 GMT
You're right. It IS a waste of my time reading that crap. "Researchers CLAIM..." Where does it say researchers have PROVED? GTFO. Maybe you can post proof of your claim then, that there is a soul and life after death. I actually chose the simple links to dumb it down for you. There is scientific evidence that consciousness dies with the brain. Consider how medically certified brain death is the criteria for death and certain patients can become organ donors. Here is another article for you to not read. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772257/The fascinating details of all these steps are in the article.
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 13, 2018 21:25:59 GMT
You're right. It IS a waste of my time reading that crap. "Researchers CLAIM..." Where does it say researchers have PROVED? GTFO. Maybe you can post proof of your claim then, that there is a soul and life after death. I actually chose the simple links to dumb it down for you. There is scientific evidence that consciousness dies with the brain. Consider how medically certified brain death is the criteria for death and certain patients can become organ donors. Here is another article for you to not read. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772257/The fascinating details of all these steps are in the article. When have I ever claimed the body doesn't die and that organs can't be transplanted, etc.?
I said that the body is not the soul. The soul and the consciousness survives the death of the body and goes into a less dense frequency. The material world and the body are the densest frequency in the universe. Levels of density in the energy field have been proven as has consciousness apart from the body.
Just for laughs, what would YOU consider to be proof of a soul?
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 13, 2018 21:29:00 GMT
"Researchers CLAIM..." Where does it say researchers have PROVED? GTFO. There is no "proof" in science. Literally the only field where you find "proof" is mathematics and logic. More evidence that you are fucking clueless about absolutely anything and everything related to science. Then how the fuck do you know anything that science claims is true, idiot? You're the one here defending scientific findings.
Btw, mathematics was DISCOVERED, not invented. Why is mathematics everywhere in the universe? Happenstance?
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Nov 13, 2018 21:59:36 GMT
There is no "proof" in science. Literally the only field where you find "proof" is mathematics and logic. More evidence that you are fucking clueless about absolutely anything and everything related to science. Then how the fuck do you know anything that science claims is true, idiot? You're the one here defending scientific findings.
Btw, mathematics was DISCOVERED, not invented. Why is mathematics everywhere in the universe? Happenstance?
That may be the single stupidest sentence you've posted on this thread yet, and considering the amount of detritus you've produced here, that's saying one hell of a lot.
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 13, 2018 22:02:12 GMT
Then how the fuck do you know anything that science claims is true, idiot? You're the one here defending scientific findings.
Btw, mathematics was DISCOVERED, not invented. Why is mathematics everywhere in the universe? Happenstance?
That mey be the single stupidest sentence you've posted on this thread yet, and considering the amount of detritus you've produced here, that's saying one hell of a lot. Coming from you that's a compliment.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 13, 2018 22:07:51 GMT
Maybe you can post proof of your claim then, that there is a soul and life after death. I actually chose the simple links to dumb it down for you. There is scientific evidence that consciousness dies with the brain. Consider how medically certified brain death is the criteria for death and certain patients can become organ donors. Here is another article for you to not read. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772257/The fascinating details of all these steps are in the article. When have I ever claimed the body doesn't die and that organs can't be transplanted, etc.?
I said that the body is not the soul. The soul and the consciousness survives the death of the body and goes into a less dense frequency. The material world and the body are the densest frequency in the universe. Levels of density in the energy field have been proven as has consciousness apart from the body.
Just for laughs, what would YOU consider to be proof of a soul?
It is impossible to 'prove' something which does not exist. In the case of the 'soul' there is not even a shred of evidence. For those who find this poster tiresome, here is a helpful thread summary of Heeeey's 'claims'. 1. Things she claims are NOT the soul or consciousness. atoms, molecules, particles, chemicals...AGAIN not atoms 2. Things she at first said WERE the soul/consciousness. atoms, energy, energy(again) vibration and frequency, electricity, then like electricity. matter is frozen light, quotes: then consciousness is a 'different level of energy'...'it is related to energy, which it is'.. 'it is related to energy and consciousness is energy'...'everything is energy and consciousness is energy'...'consciousness is the Five Senses'...'dense frequencies'...'the soul need to function in these dense frequencies'...'The soul could be likened to electricity'...'matter is frozen light'... wait....now it is...'a less dense frequency'.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Nov 13, 2018 22:08:37 GMT
That may be the single stupidest sentence you've posted on this thread yet, and considering the amount of detritus you've produced here, that's saying one hell of a lot. Coming from you that's a compliment. You should take it as such, considering the far worse, and more accurate, things I could have posted regarding the mindlessness of that statement. Be glad I was being kind.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Nov 13, 2018 22:12:41 GMT
When have I ever claimed the body doesn't die and that organs can't be transplanted, etc.?
I said that the body is not the soul. The soul and the consciousness survives the death of the body and goes into a less dense frequency. The material world and the body are the densest frequency in the universe. Levels of density in the energy field have been proven as has consciousness apart from the body.
Just for laughs, what would YOU consider to be proof of a soul?
It is impossible to 'prove' something which does not exist. In the case of the 'soul' there is not even a shred of evidence. For those who find this poster tiresome, here is a helpful thread summary of Heeeey's 'claims'. 1. Things she claims are NOT the soul or consciousness. atoms, molecules, particles, chemicals...AGAIN not atoms 2. Things she at first said WERE the soul/consciousness. atoms, energy, energy(again) vibration and frequency, electricity, then like electricity. matter is frozen light, quotes: then consciousness is a 'different level of energy'...'it is related to energy, which it is'.. 'it is related to energy and consciousness is energy'...'everything is energy and consciousness is energy'...'consciousness is the Five Senses'...'dense frequencies'...'the soul need to function in these dense frequencies'...'The soul could be likened to electricity'...'matter is frozen light'... wait....now it is...'a less dense frequency'. Just as I said earlier--she constantly contradicts herself; what's slightly frightening is that, speaking of 'consciousness', I don't think she has any consciousness that she's doing so. She comes across as a more dense frequency, by which I mean the frequency of her denseness.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 13, 2018 22:22:33 GMT
There is no "proof" in science. Literally the only field where you find "proof" is mathematics and logic. More evidence that you are fucking clueless about absolutely anything and everything related to science. Then how the fuck do you know anything that science claims is true, idiot? You're the one here defending scientific findings.
Btw, mathematics was DISCOVERED, not invented. Why is mathematics everywhere in the universe? Happenstance?
...are you typing on a computer or electronic device? ![](https://s26.postimg.cc/480s321zt/eyes.gif)
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Nov 14, 2018 12:43:53 GMT
Then how the fuck do you know anything that science claims is true, idiot? You're the one here defending scientific findings. In science, you make observations, look for patterns in them, then you construct a model to explain the patterns. A good model will both predict further patterns and also tell you about things you should not be able to observe happening. Then you do experiments on the basis of those ideas. If you see what the model predicted, then you have increasing confidence that your model is accurate. If you don't, then you revise the model and keep going with more experiments. If you see what the model said you shouldn't see, you either abandon the model or make more revisions, then keep going. You never, ever reach a place of absolute certainty.
There, science 101. And I'm sure it all went right over your head. No, mathematics is constructed by humans as a tool to make models of patterns. Or just for fun.Patterns are everywhere, shit for brains. Big difference. There are no plus sings on Neptune.
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 14, 2018 13:18:13 GMT
Then how the fuck do you know anything that science claims is true, idiot? You're the one here defending scientific findings. In science, you make observations, look for patterns in them, then you construct a model to explain the patterns. A good model will both predict further patterns and also tell you about things you should not be able to observe happening. Then you do experiments on the basis of those ideas. If you see what the model predicted, then you have increasing confidence that your model is accurate. If you don't, then you revise the model and keep going with more experiments. If you see what the model said you shouldn't see, you either abandon the model or make more revisions, then keep going. You never, ever reach a place of absolute certainty.
There, science 101. And I'm sure it all went right over your head. No, mathematics is constructed by humans as a tool to make models of patterns. Or just for fun.Patterns are everywhere, shit for brains. Big difference. There are no plus sings on Neptune. There is one difinitive pattern though. Notice how you said mathematics is constructed by humans (duh) but wasn't invented by humans. It was discovered embedded everywhere because there is a higher intelligence which can be found everywhere except between your ears, dumbass.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Nov 14, 2018 13:51:26 GMT
Notice how you said mathematics is constructed by humans (duh) but wasn't invented by humans. Same thing, shit for brains. Yes, I understand you are fond of this fantasy. I only care about ideas that are actually supported by evidence. This isn't something a fuckwit like you would understand.
|
|