|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Nov 11, 2018 22:04:26 GMT
What are some urban legends, ghosts and other odd goodies things known be in films. Fake or not. I know of these. The Fire Hand n Licence to Kill.  The Hanging Munchkin in the Wizard of Oz The Three Men and a Baby ghost. The odd kid pointing to his crotch in Back to the Future 3 Aladdin" Subliminal Message" |
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Nov 11, 2018 22:09:46 GMT
The dead kid in Three Men and a Baby was the first to come to mind. It was actually just a cardboard cutout of Ted Danson. Nothing scary about that.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Nov 11, 2018 22:28:24 GMT
The dead kid in Three Men and a Baby was the first to come to mind. It was actually just a cardboard cutout of Ted Danson. Nothing scary about that. Yeah but when I first saw that clip it creeped the hell out of me. I never seen the film though. |
|
|
|
Post by gbone on Nov 11, 2018 23:09:01 GMT
Teen Wolf penis shot
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Nov 11, 2018 23:28:07 GMT
To this day Lynch still won't reveal how he created the mutant baby in Eraserhead or even really talk much about it in general
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Nov 11, 2018 23:34:43 GMT
It's been so long but I think I remember dust or sand being kicked up in a shot on the Lion King that said something perverted. Also, I think the movie poster or a shot in the film shows a castle with a tower that is shaped like male genitalia.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Nov 11, 2018 23:40:39 GMT
It's been so long but I think I remember dust or sand being kicked up in a shot on the Lion King that said something perverted. Also, I think the movie poster or a shot in the film shows a castle with a tower that is shaped like male genitalia. That is The Little Mermaid, not The Lion King. |
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Nov 11, 2018 23:43:08 GMT
Nude woman in "Rescuers Down Under" (that's one's true)
brief glimpse of Jessica Rabbit's vag in "Who Killed Roger Rabbit" (that's ones also true)
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Nov 11, 2018 23:43:54 GMT
It's been so long but I think I remember dust or sand being kicked up in a shot on the Lion King that said something perverted. Also, I think the movie poster or a shot in the film shows a castle with a tower that is shaped like male genitalia. That is The Little Mermaid, not The Lion King. Yeah, sorry, I'm just about done with a pint of Weihenstephaner korbinian and I left out some detail in my post. haha. Thanks for the assist. |
|
|
|
Post by gbone on Nov 12, 2018 1:25:26 GMT
To this day Lynch still won't reveal how he created the mutant baby in Eraserhead or even really talk much about it in general Everyone thought it was a calf fetus but never confirmed. That’s one F’d up movie. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 12, 2018 1:40:05 GMT
Wow, the fire hand is new to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by gbone on Nov 12, 2018 1:49:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by alpha128 on Nov 12, 2018 2:41:54 GMT
The "Hanging Munchkin" in the Wizard of Oz is really a large bird.
|
|
|
|
Post by HorrorMetal on Nov 12, 2018 16:43:05 GMT
Great idea for a thread! The "man with his junk out" in Teen Wolf is actually a blonde haired woman with an unzipped fly and badly adjusted belt, as seen in the full screen VHS.
The "hanging munchkin" in Wizard of Oz, as already pointed out, is just a large bird spreading its wings. Every version I own of that movie (VHS and DVD) clearly depicts this. But there's one thing I don't understand about that version of the scene that actually looks like a hanging munchkin, as shown in the video in the original post.
It's been revealed that this is actually a remastered version, altered from the original. This is shown to be true in the YouTube video posted above that debunked the myth. But is that just an edited YouTube video or is there ACTUALLY a home video release that has that same footage? And if so, does that mean that a distributor put that in as a joke or what? I mean they clearly edited the crane out, although you can still see part of its wings, and put the munchkin in. So, how did this happen exactly? Anyone who can shed some light on this would be much appreciated.
EDIT: Pretty sure the altered footage featuring the hanging munchkin came from a fake video that was made in 2011 to further this old rumor. They photoshopped the hanging body overtop the large bird, and you can still see traces of it in the edited version. Pretty sure this version of the shot was never seen before that. If anyone has any other info, let me know.
|
|
|
|
Post by marianne48 on Nov 13, 2018 1:19:14 GMT
A scene in Charlie Chaplin's 1928 film The Circus includes a brief appearance by a woman who is holding a rectangular device up to the side of her face in the manner of someone using a cell phone. Before a reasonably sensible explanation could be
put forward by historians who identified the object as a type of hearing aid apparatus commonly used back then, hysterical types claimed that the woman was a time traveler who went back in time, cell phone in hand, to appear as an extra in the film. The fact that this theory made the news and had to be "debunked" shows how willingly some people will accept the bizarre over common sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by pennypacker on Nov 13, 2018 2:59:04 GMT
Elvis being in Home Alone--does that count?
|
|
|
|
Post by rateater on Nov 13, 2018 4:17:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Nov 13, 2018 5:49:55 GMT
Elvis being in Home Alone--does that count? I was going to put that but it slipped my mind. |
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Nov 13, 2018 6:32:34 GMT
A scene in Charlie Chaplin's 1928 film The Circus includes a brief appearance by a woman who is holding a rectangular device up to the side of her face in the manner of someone using a cell phone. Before a reasonably sensible explanation could be put forward by historians who identified the object as a type of hearing aid apparatus commonly used back then, hysterical types claimed that the woman was a time traveler who went back in time, cell phone in hand, to appear as an extra in the film. The fact that this theory made the news and had to be "debunked" shows how willingly some people will accept the bizarre over common sense.Her being a time traveler is far more interesting, that's why. I'd like to believe she is a time traveler. Common sense tells me she isn't, but the wonder in me wants to believe that she is a time traveler. |
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Nov 13, 2018 9:15:11 GMT
Nude woman in "Rescuers Down Under" (that's one's true) The Rescuers 1977.
Sounds like it could have been a publicity gimmick. I remember people saying Disney, after the 80s takeover, had pornography holdings.
|
|
