|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 13, 2018 15:53:34 GMT
'Short-sighted' (or one word depending on how you look at it).
These people have no capacity to see beyond peer reviews.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Nov 13, 2018 15:59:41 GMT
'Short-sighted' (or one word depending on how you look at it).
These people have no capacity to see beyond peer reviews.
We have a concern with having accurate beliefs about reality, something you clearly don't value one bit.
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Nov 13, 2018 16:08:53 GMT
To see what?
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Nov 13, 2018 17:00:24 GMT
Two come to mind when I think of narcissistic types who think their opinions are 100% fact.
FUCK YOURSELF
😇
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 13, 2018 17:30:13 GMT
'Short-sighted' (or one word depending on how you look at it).
These people have no capacity to see beyond peer reviews.
We have a concern with having accurate beliefs about reality, something you clearly don't value one bit. I have no doubt you'd be telling Einstein he was full of shit.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Nov 13, 2018 17:35:02 GMT
I have no doubt you'd be telling Einstein he was full of shit. I can't think of anything he ever said that I'd disagree with when it comes to science or philosophy, at least when he was being serious and not making pithy statements for the press. You, however, are always full of shit.
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 13, 2018 17:38:46 GMT
I have no doubt you'd be telling Einstein he was full of shit. I can't think of anything he ever said that I'd disagree with when it comes to science or philosophy, at least when he was being serious and not making pithy statements for the press. You, however, are always full of shit. Liar.
You would've been right there among the naysayers up until he 'proved' his theory.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Nov 13, 2018 17:45:24 GMT
'Short-sighted' (or one word depending on how you look at it).
These people have no capacity to see beyond peer reviews.
Human Beings?
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Nov 13, 2018 17:50:22 GMT
Liar.
You would've been right there among the naysayers up until he 'proved' his theory.
Take your medication. You're oozing more crazy than what is normal even for you.
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Nov 13, 2018 18:45:00 GMT
Atheists - fact based. As opposed to faith based believers.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Nov 13, 2018 22:32:49 GMT
Liar. You would've been right there among the naysayers up until he 'proved' his theory.
Take your medication. You're oozing more crazy than what is normal even for you. I don't think it's medication she needs. It's attention. In fact, I have a theory about heeeeey 's trolling on this board. heeeeey is a regular on the Politics board. And on the Politics board, there's this contest at this time of the year, where some posters vote for the "Douche Bag Of The Year" (DBOTY). Those who get elected wear DBOTY as a badge of honor, and heeeeey is the defending champion. This year however, she is not the front runner. So I'm guessing this infecting of the RFS board is part of her attempt to defend her title; since people aren't paying that much attention to her on the Politics board anymore. I don't know if it will work.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Nov 14, 2018 1:13:17 GMT
Should I do the obvious and throw that observation back at you?
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Nov 14, 2018 12:46:38 GMT
Take your medication. You're oozing more crazy than what is normal even for you. I don't think it's medication she needs. It's attention. In fact, I have a theory about heeeeey 's trolling on this board. heeeeey is a regular on the Politics board. And on the Politics board, there's this contest at this time of the year, where some posters vote for the "Douche Bag Of The Year" (DBOTY). Those who get elected wear DBOTY as a badge of honor, and heeeeey is the defending champion. This year however, she is not the front runner. So I'm guessing this infecting of the RFS board is part of her attempt to defend her title; since people aren't paying that much attention to her on the Politics board anymore. I don't know if it will work. I was curious about what that awards acronym meant, but I was too lazy to investigate. Your theory looks sound, by the way.
|
|
|
Post by rizdek on Nov 14, 2018 12:58:29 GMT
'Short-sighted' (or one word depending on how you look at it).
These people have no capacity to see beyond peer reviews.
Why do you think that? What about atheists who do see beyond peer reviews?
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Nov 14, 2018 13:28:29 GMT
I can't think of anything he ever said that I'd disagree with when it comes to science or philosophy, at least when he was being serious and not making pithy statements for the press. You, however, are always full of shit. Liar.
You would've been right there among the naysayers up until he 'proved' his theory.
Science in general, including Einstein's activities as a scientist, does not accept that something is the case merely because it was suggested. Evidential support is required, and everything is accepted as potentially falsifiable, otherwise it's not science at all.
|
|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel on Nov 14, 2018 14:17:14 GMT
'Short-sighted' (or one word depending on how you look at it).
These people have no capacity to see beyond peer reviews.
What a ridiculous thing to say. It's not like atheists are people who don't brush their teeth and they'll later regret it.
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 14, 2018 14:57:20 GMT
'Short-sighted' (or one word depending on how you look at it).
These people have no capacity to see beyond peer reviews.
What a ridiculous thing to say. It's not like atheists are people who don't brush their teeth and they'll later regret it. Oh, let me guess-- the professor is an atheist. Amazing how many of you smug 'thereisnogod'ers' are ironically in the academic field. Bunch of arrogant twits.
|
|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel on Nov 14, 2018 15:12:45 GMT
What a ridiculous thing to say. It's not like atheists are people who don't brush their teeth and they'll later regret it. Oh, let me guess-- the professor is an atheist. Amazing how many of you smug 'thereisnogod'ers' are ironically in the academic field. Bunch of arrogant twits. LOL. I was raised by working class, blue collar ATHEISTS. Pigeon hole all you want. I couldn't care less.
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Nov 14, 2018 15:41:19 GMT
as opposed to the myriad of four letter words that come to mind when you think of the religious?
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Nov 14, 2018 20:14:52 GMT
You've got to remember that when you speak of atheists, you speak of feeble minded people who just follow the consensus like sheep, and have wishful thinking. They want to believe that Magic is there and yet not there. They want to say Nature wrote the laws of Motion and Physics and then say Nature didn't make the laws. They need a great deal of drugs to perpetuate their fantasy world since its an Oxymoron.
No doubt they'll come at you with a noose, except they can't get off their couches or out of their cubicles. Too dangerous in the woods out there for them. So they'll spit their tobacco at you and snarl like Chill Wills when he said "this here's the man who ran away from the Alamo". Then they'll congratulate each other, which is exactly what you said in your post.
And there is the deductive reasoning based on fact which we see every day here. But be nice to them. They live in glass houses.
|
|