|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 29, 2017 16:52:49 GMT
Well, then, pic your average, random southern baptist - most are coherent enough to acknowledge Obama opening up this avenue for bringing more peeps into the fold. But then most don't sit staring at fantasy vids non-stop in their downtime to the extent that their outlook has become so extreme that acknowledging even the simplest shade of grey is impossible. People aren't naturally binary in their thinking, (hell, even Trump, in rejecting the TPP, has done some small good, and many liberals can acknowledge that) - but those non-stop McDonald's videos surely trained you into black/white thinking. It's anyone's guess who spends more time trying to contradict the tone and content of their own posts - you or Rape-Tum-Tugger. Once again, it's perfectly okay for you to generalize, and if someone tries to call attention to an issue, it's perfectly okay to accuse that person of being terrified and/or fearmongering. Regarding the TPP, is the American public now allowed to know what was in it? Or, like Nancy Pelosi thinks, would we have had to pass it first before we could find out what's in it? |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 17:08:49 GMT
 Again: he's *literally* labeled Obama the anti-christ and Hillary a "demon", so it looks like "generalize" needs to be added to "Erjen's Big Book Of Definitions Only He Uses". The treaty was made public on 5 November 2015. If you actually read you'd know this. "No one knows what's in it!" is a Youtube vid hoax.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 29, 2017 17:27:40 GMT
Again: he's *literally* labeled Obama the anti-christ and Hillary a "demon", so it looks like "generalize" needs to be added to "Erjen's Big Book Of Definitions Only He Uses". The treaty was made public on 5 November 2015. If you actually read you'd know this. "No one knows what's in it!" is a Youtube vid hoax. Buddy, are you telling me she didn't say it? |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
 
|
Post by PanLeo on Mar 29, 2017 17:34:58 GMT
... the new influx of missionaries on the heels of the US lessening travel restrictions. Right. I wish you'd stop wasting your time trying to engage me. You're a lamentable case of an eagerness to argue with no time to follow the topic. You're better off debating the existence of the term "evolutionary force". You think that is why? Seriously? Provide evidence. If me callin you out on your american propaganda about Cuba that you constantly spout is a "lamentable case of an eagerness to argue with no time to follow the topic." then sure that would be correct. I never debated the term "evolutionary force". You cant even get that right. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 17:41:04 GMT
Again: he's *literally* labeled Obama the anti-christ and Hillary a "demon", so it looks like "generalize" needs to be added to "Erjen's Big Book Of Definitions Only He Uses". The treaty was made public on 5 November 2015. If you actually read you'd know this. "No one knows what's in it!" is a Youtube vid hoax. Buddy, are you telling me she didn't say it? There's the Youtube. Yeah, and she offered a whole paragraph of context for that comment, which Youtube University did its best to cull from every mention of it: “You’ve heard about the controversies within the bill, the process about the bill, one or the other. But I don’t know if you have heard that it is legislation for the future, not just about health care for America, but about a healthier America, where preventive care is not something that you have to pay a deductible for or out of pocket. Prevention, prevention, prevention—it’s about diet, not diabetes. It’s going to be very, very exciting. So, that’s why I was saying we have to pass a bill so we can see so that we can show you what it is and what it isn’t,” Pelosi continued. “It is none of these things. It’s not going to be any of these things.” She recognized that her comment was “a good statement to take out of context.” But the minority leader added, “But the fact is, until you have a bill, you can’t really, we can’t really debunk what they’re saying....” The woman literally said we'd need to see it in effect to see its effects in response to people speculating what it would be used for. She made the comment to a group that had the bill details in their hands. But you didn't get that part of the story because you watch Youtube conspiracy vids, and they have to tailor what they feature to suit the conspiracy. They had you believing the house votes on bills sight unseen. 8th grade Social Studies classes know better. Again:The treaty was made public on 5 November 2015 . And you're still wondering if people have access to it. You're that out of touch. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 29, 2017 17:51:56 GMT
Buddy, are you telling me she didn't say it? There's the Youtube. Yeah, and she offered a whole paragraph of context for that comment, which Youtube University did its best to cull from every mention of it: “You’ve heard about the controversies within the bill, the process about the bill, one or the other. But I don’t know if you have heard that it is legislation for the future, not just about health care for America, but about a healthier America, where preventive care is not something that you have to pay a deductible for or out of pocket. Prevention, prevention, prevention—it’s about diet, not diabetes. It’s going to be very, very exciting. So, that’s why I was saying we have to pass a bill so we can see so that we can show you what it is and what it isn’t,” Pelosi continued. “It is none of these things. It’s not going to be any of these things.” She recognized that her comment was “a good statement to take out of context.” But the minority leader added, “But the fact is, until you have a bill, you can’t really, we can’t really debunk what they’re saying....” The woman literally said we'd need to see it in effect to see its effects in response to people speculating what it would be used for. She made the comment to a group that had the bill details in their hands. But you didn't get that part of the story because you watch Youtube conspiracy vids, and they have to tailor what they feature to suit the conspiracy. They had you believing the house votes on bills sight unseen. 8th grade Social Studies classes know better. Again:The treaty was made public on 5 November 2015 . And you're still wondering if people have access to it. You're that out of touch. Dude, the woman thinks Bush is still the President. And Maxine Waters doesn't know the difference between Korea and the Crimea. People can look at the facts and decide for themselves. They don't need you to digest it for them. Let's face it. It's just not a good time to be a "progressive" right now. Obama is out and Trump is in. Syria didn't fall to the jihadists like you wanted it to. And every day more people wake up and realize they were had on the manmade "global warming" deal. But try to look on the bright side. You've still got Pope Francis.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 18:09:40 GMT
Because current US protestant mission sites are filled with this:
Why are you even trying to argue a situation with which you've no familiarity? This is like watching you cite "Dr. Drew" and make up medical terms all over again. I'm surrounded by churches booking non-stop window-of-opportunity trips to spread the protestant word in Catholic Cuba and you're arguing like you know feck all about what's going on in the church community here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 18:16:33 GMT
Discard the topic and babble about Waters. OK.
That would why I provided actual quotes with context in response to your question. Thanks for clearing up that people could read it, I guess. It's certainly apparent you never did - you're asking if we have access to details years after we gained it.
Au contraire. With a "conservative" president enjoying the worst rating in US history given his time in office, tanking entirely in effecting his basic campaign promises, and just doing a dandy job both motivating protest AND turning the conservative caucus into an arena of chaos (and helping us get those votes for the midterms in doing so!) I'd say it's the perfect time to be a lefty.
And Trump's team doing their best to delete climate data rather than building a case against it... that's gold.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 29, 2017 18:23:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 18:28:56 GMT
Nah. Checks and balances. Working as intended. He's doing a great job sinking himself, though. We'll still be here long after he's been strung up to dry.  I can certainly see why you'd want that! But I think we'll keep up those streams of protests, letters and calls currently burying our reps into taking action, just as they're doing now! But hey at least he's taking action to bring jobs back to... oh, shit, no... wait, he's not. Sorry, voter block. You seem to be losing the struggle with the formatting system. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 29, 2017 18:32:04 GMT
Nah. Checks and balances. Working as intended. He's doing a great job sinking himself, though. We'll still be here long after he's been strung up to dry. I can certainly see why you'd want that! But I think we'll keep up those streams of protests, letters and calls currently burying our reps into taking action, just as they're doing now! But hey at least he's taking action to bring jobs back to... oh, shit, no... wait, he's not. Sorry, voter block. You seem to be losing the struggle with the formatting system. I went to fix an error and deleted the whole thing. How about that, laughing boy? |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Mar 29, 2017 19:15:39 GMT
Because current US protestant mission sites are filled with this: Why are you even trying to argue a situation with which you've no familiarity? This is like watching you cite "Dr. Drew" and make up medical terms all over again. I'm surrounded by churches booking non-stop window-of-opportunity trips to spread the protestant word in Catholic Cuba and you're arguing like you know feck all about what's going on in the church community here. I never denied missionaries came/are coming to Cuba. That is not evidence that they are responsible for or largely responsible for the rise of evangelism. Do I have to explain the concept of a coincidence to you as well? |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 19:39:52 GMT
Because current US protestant mission sites are filled with this: Why are you even trying to argue a situation with which you've no familiarity? This is like watching you cite "Dr. Drew" and make up medical terms all over again. I'm surrounded by churches booking non-stop window-of-opportunity trips to spread the protestant word in Catholic Cuba and you're arguing like you know feck all about what's going on in the church community here. I never denied missionaries came/are coming to Cuba. That is not evidence that they are responsible for or largely responsible for the rise of evangelism. Do I have to explain the concept of a coincidence to you as well? Ah. The current surge in evangelists in Cuba is only coincidental with the current surge in evangelism. It must be the NON-evangelists out there witnessing. Begone, dude. You're silly. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Mar 29, 2017 20:06:20 GMT
I never denied missionaries came/are coming to Cuba. That is not evidence that they are responsible for or largely responsible for the rise of evangelism. Do I have to explain the concept of a coincidence to you as well? Ah. The current surge in evangelists in Cuba is only coincidental with the current surge in evangelism. It must be the NON-evangelists out there witnessing. Begone, dude. You're silly. I asked for evidence that the rise in evangelism is due to missionaries instead of it being just caused by increased Cuban interest in religion due to government actions. This isnt that hard. Repeating yourself ad nauseum is not a very good argument. Neither is the Proof by assertion fallacy or the appeal to ridicule fallacy. |
|
