|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 28, 2017 18:38:17 GMT
You pip.  |
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Mar 28, 2017 18:46:35 GMT
Wrong forum. Marvel has its own board.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 28, 2017 18:49:56 GMT
Wrong forum. Marvel has its own board. No, see -- you're supposed to freak out and get into a protracted argument over this. |
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Mar 28, 2017 18:51:52 GMT
Ahhhh. My mistake.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 28, 2017 20:10:12 GMT
Gross.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 20:27:32 GMT
That trailer stunk, and it sounds like the internet knows it.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 28, 2017 21:29:36 GMT
That trailer stunk, and it sounds like the internet knows it. But he has armpit webbing! And it's only the third reboot of Spider-Man 1 in fifteen years and the second in five years! You don't think that's a recipe for a blockbuster? |
|
chatterer
Sophomore
@chatterer
Posts: 272
Likes: 112
 
|
Post by chatterer on Mar 29, 2017 12:11:06 GMT
Keeping the ferry together scene how original.....oh wait Spiderman 2 train scene.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 17:48:14 GMT
Will be no doubt better than justice league Actually, the Internet is saying the Spidey trailer gave away too much, it looks like they aren't relying on Spider-Man to tell the story so they have Iron Man, the suit looks too cgi'd and they preferred Garfield's TASM2 suit, and lots of people saying they miss Garfield. |
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 29, 2017 17:59:22 GMT
so, furiousstyles77 what's your favorite flavor of ice cream? I'm between mint chocolate chip and rum raisin. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 18:07:27 GMT
Will be no doubt better than justice league Actually, the Internet is saying the Spidey trailer gave away too much, it looks like they aren't relying on Spider-Man to tell the story so they have Iron Man, the suit looks too cgi'd and they preferred Garfield's TASM2 suit, and lots of people saying they miss Garfield. The internet also loves to whine about The Force Awakens, and yet it's generally a well-received movie in real life. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 29, 2017 18:35:10 GMT
Actually, the Internet is saying the Spidey trailer gave away too much, it looks like they aren't relying on Spider-Man to tell the story so they have Iron Man, the suit looks too cgi'd and they preferred Garfield's TASM2 suit, and lots of people saying they miss Garfield. The internet also loves to whine about The Force Awakens, and yet it's generally a well-received movie in real life. Doesn't make it a good one, and doesn't mean that a majority of Star Wars fans like it just because the unwashed masses were duped by a few sound effects and a rehashed script. But you're right: Disney paid off the majority of critics to make sure it was given the appearance of being well-received, and that translated to big money at the box office. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 18:37:19 GMT
The internet also loves to whine about The Force Awakens, and yet it's generally a well-received movie in real life. Doesn't make it a good one, and doesn't mean that a majority of Star Wars fans like it just because the unwashed masses were duped by a few sound effects and a rehashed script. But you're right: Disney paid off the majority of critics to make sure it was given the appearance of being well-received, and that translated to big money at the box office. Congratulations on proving my point for me. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 20:28:16 GMT
Actually, the Internet is saying the Spidey trailer gave away too much, it looks like they aren't relying on Spider-Man to tell the story so they have Iron Man, the suit looks too cgi'd and they preferred Garfield's TASM2 suit, and lots of people saying they miss Garfield. The internet also loves to whine about The Force Awakens, and yet it's generally a well-received movie in real life. Okay, with that logic, when people make criticisms of the DC movies, why do you automatically think it's bad news for the DCEU? It it goes both ways. Plus, people seemed pretty mad about "Ghostbusters" (2016) and look at that bomb. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 29, 2017 20:29:57 GMT
Doesn't make it a good one, and doesn't mean that a majority of Star Wars fans like it just because the unwashed masses were duped by a few sound effects and a rehashed script. But you're right: Disney paid off the majority of critics to make sure it was given the appearance of being well-received, and that translated to big money at the box office. Congratulations on proving my point for me. Was your point that you like shitty movies? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 20:47:46 GMT
The internet also loves to whine about The Force Awakens, and yet it's generally a well-received movie in real life. Okay, with that logic, when people make criticisms of the DC movies, why do you automatically think it's bad news for the DCEU? It it goes both ways. Plus, people seemed pretty mad about "Ghostbusters" (2016) and look at that bomb. Because The Force Awakens made two billion and there have been no issues behind the scenes apart from the tragic passing of Carrie Fisher (and Debbie Reynolds). Whereas BvS got panned, under-performed, and we all watched WB go into a panic mode. If things were so dire for the new Star Wars trilogy, Disney wouldn't be going full steam ahead with their gameplan still intact. We'd be seeing reports of a lot of behind-the-scenes drama by now. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 29, 2017 21:08:26 GMT
Okay, with that logic, when people make criticisms of the DC movies, why do you automatically think it's bad news for the DCEU? It it goes both ways. Plus, people seemed pretty mad about "Ghostbusters" (2016) and look at that bomb. Because The Force Awakens made two billion and there have been no issues behind the scenes apart from the tragic passing of Carrie Fisher (and Debbie Reynolds). Whereas BvS got panned, under-performed, and we all watched WB go into a panic mode. If things were so dire for the new Star Wars trilogy, Disney wouldn't be going full steam ahead with their gameplan still intact. We'd be seeing reports of a lot of behind-the-scenes drama by now.Probably, but not necessarily. Disney seems to keep a pretty tight lid on that sort of stuff; they've always been very disciplined in that respect. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 21:23:51 GMT
Because The Force Awakens made two billion and there have been no issues behind the scenes apart from the tragic passing of Carrie Fisher (and Debbie Reynolds). Whereas BvS got panned, under-performed, and we all watched WB go into a panic mode. If things were so dire for the new Star Wars trilogy, Disney wouldn't be going full steam ahead with their gameplan still intact. We'd be seeing reports of a lot of behind-the-scenes drama by now.Probably, but not necessarily. Disney seems to keep a pretty tight lid on that sort of stuff; they've always been very disciplined in that respect. If something was going horribly wrong behind the scenes, we'd at least be seeing a re-scheduling of The Last Jedi's release date. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 29, 2017 21:31:18 GMT
Probably, but not necessarily. Disney seems to keep a pretty tight lid on that sort of stuff; they've always been very disciplined in that respect. If something was going horribly wrong behind the scenes, we'd at least be seeing a re-scheduling of The Last Jedi's release date. It in no way proves there's anything resembling discord at Lucasfilm, but wasn't it pushed back from May 2017 to December? Or was that TFA? One of them was pushed from spring to Christmas. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 21:32:48 GMT
To my knowledge, the new Star Wars were always intended to be Christmas releases.
|
|
