Not even in the Ballpark of Mary Sue character. This is a projection of an author for wish fulfillment? Do you see no change or growth from perfect to perfect?
No consequences? How about seeing inside Ultron's plan, realizing his true mission, telling her beloved brother, and losing him fighting the fight?
Flawless? How about panicing and needing Hawkeye to talk her out of hiding?
Can a case be made that there was a consequence avoided because she wasn't brought to justice after switching sides and playing a major part in helping save the world? Sure! But of course as the story has continued, she has had plenty of consequences going forward.
Does that put this character near the realm of the incredibly overcited trope? Not even close.
that is beside the point, and not what I discussed. I stated that if the the character did the things alleged in OP and never faced consequences this would be an textbook example of MS writing as demonstrated by the writer site Springhole as examples, thus in the end: bad writing.
That does not imply that the character as a whole is written as a MS in that particular story.
Irrelevant, also: while common, self-projection is not required for the trope (see Springhole definition).
This is not what facing real consequences means. As the Springhole examples explain: this means facing (real world, such as legal) consequences and having characters react to it realistically and sensibly.
Who talked about being flawless, and what does it have to do with anything in the context of what I discussed? Is flawless even a criteria in the definition I quoted? Besides, some MS types are defined by flaws such as the Anti-Sue and the Jerk-Sue type.
which ones? Quote direct on-topic dialogue:
- When did the character face direct real-world and legal consequences for her action and when was her personal responsibility being addressed at all?
- What was the issue raised/discussed by the other team members?
You are the only one who puts the
character near the realm.
Btw isn't that the same character who magically lost her Easter European accent from one film to the next? This does not make her a MS either, but is bad writing/continuity as well - and a plot hole unless explained (a wizard did it?).