|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 10:40:11 GMT
You assumptions are stupid and you are demanding those people to have certain morality when in fact they are behaving based on natural evolutionary traits. Seeing outsiders they have never met as threats. I have demanded nothing. All I have said is that I don't think it is right that a non-violent person should be perceived as a threat. It is you that is making assumptions of me due to your emotional commitment to this matter. Again with the assumptions about me. Again, all I am saying is, regardless of culture, a non-violent person should not be perceived as a threat. Show me the words I have used that says I am being disrespectful to someone. Anybody for that matter? The liberals on this thread are only arguing this way because the victim was a Christian preacher. They’re looking at every angle to try to justify what that tribe did. If the young man was a Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu etc I guarantee they would be on your side complaining about how harsh and over the top those savages responded to a non-violent non-threatening situation. In other words when it’s a Christian they’ll put themselves in the tribe’s shoes. When it’s a non-Christian they’ll put themselves in the victim’s shoes. The likes of AJ, Toast, Father Dougal, Prog etc truly are a pathetic bunch.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 10:41:54 GMT
The only reason these people have been left alone is that the island is tiny and not thought to have any worthwhile natural resources or to be of any strategic military value. And this justifies the murder of an outsider who visited in peace how exactly?
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 10:45:48 GMT
He wasn't non-violent... He deliberately invaded their land. He planned to destroy their culture. He planned to bend them to his will. He took pathogens that could kill them all (genocide). None of that can be considered violent behaviour Dougal you absolute dipshit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2018 10:50:04 GMT
He wasn't non-violent... He deliberately invaded their land. He planned to destroy their culture. He planned to bend them to his will. He took pathogens that could kill them all (genocide). None of that can be considered violent behaviour Dougal you absolute dipshit. I consider that violence. I expect most other people do. You're out of your depth kid.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Nov 24, 2018 11:19:01 GMT
I have demanded nothing. All I have said is that I don't think it is right that a non-violent person should be perceived as a threat. It is you that is making assumptions of me due to your emotional commitment to this matter. Again with the assumptions about me. Again, all I am saying is, regardless of culture, a non-violent person should not be perceived as a threat. Show me the words I have used that says I am being disrespectful to someone. Anybody for that matter? The liberals on this thread are only arguing this way because the victim was a Christian preacher. They’re looking at every angle to try to justify what that tribe did. If the young man was a Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu etc I guarantee they would be on your side complaining about how harsh and over the top those savages responded to a non-violent non-threatening situation. In other words when it’s a Christian they’ll put themselves in the tribe’s shoes. When it’s a non-Christian they’ll put themselves in the victim’s shoes. The likes of AJ, Toast, Father Dougal, Prog etc truly are a pathetic bunch. And as predicted, you need to pull shit out of your ass so you can be seen as a victim. I would laugh at anyone who approached these people when they consider themselves above local laws. I sympathize with people killed when they wind up at such places by accident. Like a group of fishermen whose boat wound up crashing into one such island, and they were killed. A helicopter crew trying to recover the bodies were forced to abandon them when they came under attack. From this guy's perspective, he thought he was doing God's work, but he was given explicit warnings. If he had not chose to abandon reason, he would still be alive. There are other tribes who would have been more welcoming, but he chose one he was told not to approach, who attack on sight. I suppose if you touched an electric fence with warnings not to do so, it would be the fence's fault if you were fried.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 12:16:12 GMT
None of that can be considered violent behaviour Dougal you absolute dipshit. I consider that violence. I expect most other people do. You're out of your depth kid. You can redefine words to suit your narrative as much as you like, it’s not going to change reality.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2018 12:27:10 GMT
I consider that violence. I expect most other people do. You're out of your depth kid. You can redefine words to suit your narrative as much as you like, it’s not going to change reality. There's actual reality, and then there's 'Cody's World®'... Population, you.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 12:39:16 GMT
The liberals on this thread are only arguing this way because the victim was a Christian preacher. They’re looking at every angle to try to justify what that tribe did. If the young man was a Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu etc I guarantee they would be on your side complaining about how harsh and over the top those savages responded to a non-violent non-threatening situation. In other words when it’s a Christian they’ll put themselves in the tribe’s shoes. When it’s a non-Christian they’ll put themselves in the victim’s shoes. The likes of AJ, Toast, Father Dougal, Prog etc truly are a pathetic bunch. And as predicted, you need to pull shit out of your ass so you can be seen as a victim. I would laugh at anyone who approached these people when they consider themselves above local laws. I sympathize with people killed when they wind up at such places by accident. Like a group of fishermen whose boat wound up crashing into one such island, and they were killed. A helicopter crew trying to recover the bodies were forced to abandon them when they came under attack. From this guy's perspective, he thought he was doing God's work, but he was given explicit warnings. If he had not chose to abandon reason, he would still be alive. There are other tribes who would have been more welcoming, but he chose one he was told not to approach, who attack on sight. I suppose if you touched an electric fence with warnings not to do so, it would be the fence's fault if you were fried. The article doesn’t confirm his motive for visiting the Island. He’s even described as a ”keen traveller and adventurer.”. So he may have just been curious to get up close and learn about how these people function their lives. It even says he visited the island 4 or 5 times before which would indicate that he wasn’t expecting his life to be in such danger.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Nov 24, 2018 12:54:26 GMT
And as predicted, you need to pull shit out of your ass so you can be seen as a victim. I would laugh at anyone who approached these people when they consider themselves above local laws. I sympathize with people killed when they wind up at such places by accident. Like a group of fishermen whose boat wound up crashing into one such island, and they were killed. A helicopter crew trying to recover the bodies were forced to abandon them when they came under attack. From this guy's perspective, he thought he was doing God's work, but he was given explicit warnings. If he had not chose to abandon reason, he would still be alive. There are other tribes who would have been more welcoming, but he chose one he was told not to approach, who attack on sight. I suppose if you touched an electric fence with warnings not to do so, it would be the fence's fault if you were fried. The article doesn’t confirm his motive for visiting the Island. He’s even described as a ”keen traveller and adventurer.”. So he may have just been curious to get up close and learn about how these people function their lives. It even says he visited the island 4 or 5 times before which would indicate that he wasn’t expecting his life to be in such danger. This article from Christianity Today not only confirms his motive, but reveals he had been fired on in a previous visit. “It's worth it to declare Jesus to these people.”
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 13:01:50 GMT
The article doesn’t confirm his motive for visiting the Island. He’s even described as a ”keen traveller and adventurer.”. So he may have just been curious to get up close and learn about how these people function their lives. It even says he visited the island 4 or 5 times before which would indicate that he wasn’t expecting his life to be in such danger. This article from Christianity Today not only confirms his motive, but reveals he had been fired on in a previous visit. “It's worth it to declare Jesus to these people.”Sounds like a great man. His courage and faith should be commended.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2018 13:07:36 GMT
Sounds like a great man. His courage and faith should be commended. Sounds like he had a diseased brain. The people who brainwashed him in to doing this should be held accountable... for endangering an entire tribe, breaking Indian law, and for this young man's death.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Nov 24, 2018 14:18:32 GMT
Sounds like a great man. His courage and faith should be commended. No, he sounds like a completely deranged idiot who should be nominated for a Darwin award for his rank stupidity. Tell me, pumpkin: given that no one on the planet can speak this tribe's language other than members of the tribe, how was he supposed to bring them to Jesus in the first place?
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 14:28:31 GMT
Sounds like a great man. His courage and faith should be commended. No, he sounds like a completely deranged idiot who should be nominated for a Darwin award for his rank stupidity. Tell me, pumpkin: given that no one on the planet can speak this tribe's language other than members of the tribe, how was he supposed to bring them to Jesus in the first place? There are conflicting reports of his exact motivations. Some articles say he was not a missionary and just an explorer looking for some adventure. Andaman Director of the General Police Dependra Pathak told the News Minute, an Indian news website, he was told that Chau lived in the US state of Alabama and was "some kind of paramedic". "People thought he is a missionary because he had mentioned his position on God and that he was a believer on social media or somewhere online. But in a strict sense, he was not a missionary. "He was an adventurer. His intention was to meet the aborigines."
I doubt his main intention for meeting these people was to spread the gospel.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2018 14:35:42 GMT
No, he sounds like a completely deranged idiot who should be nominated for a Darwin award for his rank stupidity. Tell me, pumpkin: given that no one on the planet can speak this tribe's language other than members of the tribe, how was he supposed to bring them to Jesus in the first place? There are conflicting reports of his exact motivations. Some articles say he was not a missionary and just an explorer looking for some adventure. Andaman Director of the General Police Dependra Pathak told the News Minute, an Indian news website, he was told that Chau lived in the US state of Alabama and was "some kind of paramedic". "People thought he is a missionary because he had mentioned his position on God and that he was a believer on social media or somewhere online. But in a strict sense, he was not a missionary. "He was an adventurer. His intention was to meet the aborigines."
I doubt his main intention for meeting these people was to spread the gospel. Either way still makes him a selfish, dangerous, deluded nonce. He got his wish, he met these people... and they righteously killed his stupid ass dead with arrows. Look... Whether he went there to convert the indigenous people to his brand of Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Satanism, or any other supernatural belief you care to name... Or, if he just went there for a laugh. He was a wrong un. He endangered their culture, and their very existence. He got what he deserved. No sympathy here.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 14:51:24 GMT
There are conflicting reports of his exact motivations. Some articles say he was not a missionary and just an explorer looking for some adventure. Andaman Director of the General Police Dependra Pathak told the News Minute, an Indian news website, he was told that Chau lived in the US state of Alabama and was "some kind of paramedic". "People thought he is a missionary because he had mentioned his position on God and that he was a believer on social media or somewhere online. But in a strict sense, he was not a missionary. "He was an adventurer. His intention was to meet the aborigines."
I doubt his main intention for meeting these people was to spread the gospel. Either way still makes him a selfish, dangerous, deluded nonce. He got his wish, he met these people... and they righteously killed his stupid ass dead with arrows. Look... Whether he went there to convert the indigenous people to his brand of Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Satanism, or any other supernatural belief you care to name... Or, if he just went there for a laugh. He was a wrong un. He endangered their culture, and their very existence. He got what he deserved. No sympathy here. You certainly give the sterotype of Irish people and low IQ some veracity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2018 14:52:33 GMT
Either way still makes him a selfish, dangerous, deluded nonce. He got his wish, he met these people... and they righteously killed his stupid ass dead with arrows. Look... Whether he went there to convert the indigenous people to his brand of Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Satanism, or any other supernatural belief you care to name... Or, if he just went there for a laugh. He was a wrong un. He endangered their culture, and their very existence. He got what he deserved. No sympathy here. You certainly give the sterotype of Irish people and low IQ some veracity. Nice touch of the old racism there.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 14:56:50 GMT
You certainly give the sterotype of Irish people and low IQ some veracity. Nice touch of the old racism there. Irish is not a race.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2018 14:58:35 GMT
Nice touch of the old racism there. Irish is not a race. It is a race. Check with race equality legislation... You're probably no old enough to remember 'No blacks, no Irish, no dogs' signs. Stay classy, ya racist wee fanny.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Nov 24, 2018 15:04:53 GMT
It is a race. Check with race equality legislation... You're probably no old enough to remember 'No blacks, no Irish, no dogs' signs. Stay classy, ya racist wee fanny. It’s a nationality...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2018 15:09:51 GMT
It is a race. Check with race equality legislation... You're probably no old enough to remember 'No blacks, no Irish, no dogs' signs. Stay classy, ya racist wee fanny. It’s a nationality... All races are artificial dick brain. There is only one race of people, homo sapiens sapiens... We've moved on from defining race by skin colour. Race is a social construct, not a biological one. Hence it now encompasses minorities discriminated against on the basis of other characteristics than just skin colour. You can quote me on that. Prejudicing People because they are Irish, or Irish descent is racism these days.
|
|