Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2018 11:32:20 GMT
Good thing I don't support Trump then.  Yeah, you don't support him. You just voted for him, which is a totally different thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Dec 28, 2018 12:42:54 GMT
Good thing I don't support Trump then. Yeah, you don't support him. You just voted for him, which is a totally different thing. I did not watch the video. Are you talking about people whose genetic material is merely a copy (actual clones) or people whose ideas are merely copies (metaphorical clones)? |
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Dec 28, 2018 13:50:03 GMT
The worst part about clones is that when you try to kill the evil one, it always ends up being a conundrum where you have to decide which one is the original and which one is the clone.
God damn clones!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Dec 28, 2018 14:21:47 GMT
Yeah, you don't support him. You just voted for him, which is a totally different thing. I did not watch the video. Are you talking about people whose genetic material is merely a copy (actual clones) or people whose ideas are merely copies (metaphorical clones)? I'm guessing this reply was meant for me. Actual clones. Genetic copies of people. Graham is on my ignore list. It's a short list. Matter of fact it's so short that he's the only one on it. He's been trying to convince me that if I cast my vote for someone I must be in support of the one I am voting for. The concept of voting for the one perceived to be the lesser evil is too complicated for him to understand. |
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Dec 28, 2018 15:15:51 GMT
Never underestimate the power of Human ignorance and stupidity. Especially when dealing with the likes of Erjen, who has justly earned his title of The Most Gullible Man in the World. Though to be clear - ignorance and stupidity are not flaws in and of themselves. When I used to teach, I had a lot of respect for stupid kids who nevertheless tried their hardest and did their best to learn what they could. What I look down on are those who are deliberately ignorant and reject anything that would reduce that ignorance, because they want to believe in stupid things and so reflexively refuse anything that would prevent it. That's contemptible and at least borderline evil, IMO. Yes. I call it 'wilful ignorance' and it is really something I cannot understand when there is such access to information in this modern day and age. I cannot understand that on subjects he clings to ( and there are many in conspiracy theory world) when there are plausible, relatively simple scientific explanations that even a fairly stupid person could understand, and he.they reject knowledge. The whole chemtrail thing is a perfect example for him and Heeeeey has recently exhibited similar behaviour in her quasi scientific bog standard scientifically illiterate mistakes. To me it actually beggars belief and as you say, is borderline evil. I feel like this about ANYONE who supports Trump. It is anti-intellectual, grossly immoral, and evil in its manifestations of racism bigotry and myopic selfishness and meanness. Now her highness -- an atheist -- thinks she's the judge of what's immoral and evil. LOL. IMO, evil is stating with all authority and absoluteness that there is no God or afterlife as if you could bet all your materialistic possessions on it. Even some of the other pompous asses here have conceded that at most, they simply don't know. I can respect that. What I cannot respect is some twit stating anything with absolution. You think that just because some studies have 'proven' consciousness' exists in the brain, that that disproves God and the soul. I don't think even the scientists who conducted those studies are that narrow and closed minded. Awareness is not the same thing as consciousness. Those studies did not find 'awareness' in the brain because 'awareness' is not in the brain. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2018 16:05:13 GMT
Schrodinger Wave Equation Revelation 21:22 ESV
And I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb.WTF?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2018 17:08:05 GMT
I did not watch the video. Are you talking about people whose genetic material is merely a copy (actual clones) or people whose ideas are merely copies (metaphorical clones)? I'm guessing this reply was meant for me. Actual clones. Genetic copies of people. Graham is on my ignore list. It's a short list. Matter of fact it's so short that he's the only one on it. Whoooo, suck it everyone else! I win! Nope, it's just a damn lie. Arlon would understand that of course, lying is one of his hobbies. If you vote for a person you are giving them your support. You are supporting them. Your motivations are utterly irrelevant. The fact that you're now ashamed of who you voted for because he's turned out to be an incompetent moron is neither here nor there. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2018 17:09:54 GMT
Schrodinger Wave Equation Revelation 21:22 ESV
And I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb.WTF? They're all like that. Not one of the quotations has anything to do with what it's alleged to be about. The quotes about cloning, for instance, have absolutely nothing to do with cloning. |
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Dec 28, 2018 18:18:52 GMT
Schrodinger Wave Equation Revelation 21:22 ESV
And I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb.WTF? The best thing is that if you put in a search term that it doesn't recognize, it'll ask you to be patient while it auto-generates content to match your query. And then in about 10 seconds a new category is created! I haven't tried vulgar search terms, and I wonder if it does any kind of filtering to weed those out. |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2018 19:59:51 GMT
Yes. I call it 'wilful ignorance' and it is really something I cannot understand when there is such access to information in this modern day and age. I cannot understand that on subjects he clings to ( and there are many in conspiracy theory world) when there are plausible, relatively simple scientific explanations that even a fairly stupid person could understand, and he.they reject knowledge. The whole chemtrail thing is a perfect example for him and Heeeeey has recently exhibited similar behaviour in her quasi scientific bog standard scientifically illiterate mistakes. To me it actually beggars belief and as you say, is borderline evil. I feel like this about ANYONE who supports Trump. It is anti-intellectual, grossly immoral, and evil in its manifestations of racism bigotry and myopic selfishness and meanness. Now her highness -- an atheist -- thinks she's the judge of what's immoral and evil. LOL. IMO, evil is stating with all authority and absoluteness that there is no God or afterlife as if you could bet all your materialistic possessions on it.Even some of the other pompous asses here have conceded that at most, they simply don't know. I can respect that. What I cannot respect is some twit stating anything with absolution. You think that just because some studies have 'proven' consciousness' exists in the brain, that that disproves God and the soul. I don't think even the scientists who conducted those studies are that narrow and closed minded. Awareness is not the same thing as consciousness. Those studies did not find 'awareness' in the brain because 'awareness' is not in the brain. Said no-one on this thread, particularly not me, ever. What don't you understand about me being an agnostic atheist, as stated at all times, forever on this and the last board? The rest is just your usual anti-intellectual drivel we have grown tired of listening too as it begs too many real scientific questions of which you are totally unaware. |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2018 20:06:34 GMT
Schrodinger Wave Equation Revelation 21:22 ESV
And I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb.WTF? The best thing is that if you put in a search term that it doesn't recognize, it'll ask you to be patient while it auto-generates content to match your query. And then in about 10 seconds a new category is created! I haven't tried vulgar search terms, and I wonder if it does any kind of filtering to weed those out. I love it! Here is a good one www.openbible.info/topics/jesus_dna |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Dec 28, 2018 20:10:20 GMT
Now her highness -- an atheist -- thinks she's the judge of what's immoral and evil. LOL. IMO, evil is stating with all authority and absoluteness that there is no God or afterlife as if you could bet all your materialistic possessions on it.Even some of the other pompous asses here have conceded that at most, they simply don't know. I can respect that. What I cannot respect is some twit stating anything with absolution. You think that just because some studies have 'proven' consciousness' exists in the brain, that that disproves God and the soul. I don't think even the scientists who conducted those studies are that narrow and closed minded. Awareness is not the same thing as consciousness. Those studies did not find 'awareness' in the brain because 'awareness' is not in the brain. Said no-one on this thread, particularly not me, ever. What don't you understand about me being an agnostic atheist, as stated at all times, forever on this and the last board? The rest is just your usual anti-intellectual drivel we have grown tired of listening too as it begs too many real scientific questions of which you are totally unaware. goz, the first time you and I talked to each other on the old board....and I'm going on the premise that you're the original goz and not a clone......you made the statement that God didn't exist. I asked you how you knew God didn't exist, and you said, "Logic." What's "agnostic" about this? To say God doesn't exist is blasphemy, and it's a one-way ticket to hell, and if you're the same goz who participated in the above-mentioned conversation a few years ago then you've already bought your ticket. |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2018 22:30:43 GMT
Said no-one on this thread, particularly not me, ever. What don't you understand about me being an agnostic atheist, as stated at all times, forever on this and the last board? The rest is just your usual anti-intellectual drivel we have grown tired of listening too as it begs too many real scientific questions of which you are totally unaware. goz, the first time you and I talked to each other on the old board....and I'm going on the premise that you're the original goz and not a clone......you made the statement that God didn't exist. I asked you how you knew God didn't exist, and you said, "Logic." What's "agnostic" about this? To say God doesn't exist is blasphemy, and it's a one-way ticket to hell, and if you're the same goz who participated in the above-mentioned conversation a few years ago then you've already bought your ticket. No, I said ( and have always said) that you would have to prove that there was a God, and the presumption therefore that there wasn't because no-one has ever been able to prove it. That is what an agnostic atheist is. I do however claim there is no such thing as heaven or hell, or in fact an afterlife, because of logic, because the body and brain are dead. Due to the above 'logic' there is no such thing as blasphemy. |
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Dec 28, 2018 22:38:26 GMT
goz, the first time you and I talked to each other on the old board....and I'm going on the premise that you're the original goz and not a clone......you made the statement that God didn't exist. I asked you how you knew God didn't exist, and you said, "Logic." What's "agnostic" about this? To say God doesn't exist is blasphemy, and it's a one-way ticket to hell, and if you're the same goz who participated in the above-mentioned conversation a few years ago then you've already bought your ticket. No, I said ( and have always said) that you would have to prove that there was a God, and the presumption therefore that there wasn't because no-one has ever been able to prove it. That is what an agnostic atheist is. I do however claim there is no such thing as heaven or hell, or in fact an afterlife, because of logic, because the body and brain are dead. Due to the above 'logic' there is no such thing as blasphemy. There is nothing 'logical' about that deduction based on evolving science. It's sheer stupidity to close the book in regards to an afterlife based on 'studies'. It's nothing more than shallow presumptuousness on your part, seeing as how you are shallow and materialistic. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Dec 28, 2018 22:43:34 GMT
goz, the first time you and I talked to each other on the old board....and I'm going on the premise that you're the original goz and not a clone......you made the statement that God didn't exist. I asked you how you knew God didn't exist, and you said, "Logic." What's "agnostic" about this? To say God doesn't exist is blasphemy, and it's a one-way ticket to hell, and if you're the same goz who participated in the above-mentioned conversation a few years ago then you've already bought your ticket. No, I said ( and have always said) that you would have to prove that there was a God, and the presumption therefore that there wasn't because no-one has ever been able to prove it. That is what an agnostic atheist is. I do however claim there is no such thing as heaven or hell, or in fact an afterlife, because of logic, because the body and brain are dead. Due to the above 'logic' there is no such thing as blasphemy. Your logic is brain-dead. I've seen hell. It's real. No proof. Only my testimony. If you don't want to believe it that's your choice. Since I was born I've never seen Heaven that I can remember, but recently I met someone on the Internet who did, someone who was clinically dead for a few minutes. Her description of it reminded me of that movie "Saved by the Light." Sorry. I'm rambling again. Should have just said that your logic is brain-dead and left it at that.  |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2018 23:04:57 GMT
No, I said ( and have always said) that you would have to prove that there was a God, and the presumption therefore that there wasn't because no-one has ever been able to prove it. That is what an agnostic atheist is. I do however claim there is no such thing as heaven or hell, or in fact an afterlife, because of logic, because the body and brain are dead. Due to the above 'logic' there is no such thing as blasphemy. Your logic is brain-dead. I've seen hell. It's real. No proof. Only my testimony. If you don't want to believe it that's your choice. Since I was born I've never seen Heaven that I can remember, but recently I met someone on the Internet who did, someone who was clinically dead for a few minutes. Her description of it reminded me of that movie "Saved by the Light." Sorry. I'm rambling again. Should have just said that your logic is brain-dead and left it at that. You are still alive ergo you have not seen hell. |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2018 23:08:34 GMT
No, I said ( and have always said) that you would have to prove that there was a God, and the presumption therefore that there wasn't because no-one has ever been able to prove it. That is what an agnostic atheist is. I do however claim there is no such thing as heaven or hell, or in fact an afterlife, because of logic, because the body and brain are dead. Due to the above 'logic' there is no such thing as blasphemy. There is nothing 'logical' about that deduction based on evolving science. It's sheer stupidity to close the book in regards to an afterlife based on 'studies'. It's nothing more than shallow presumptuousness on your part, seeing as how you are shallow and materialistic. Look, we have been through this nonsense of yours ad nauseum and you have not been able to provide ANY 'evolving science.' or anything else of substance. You are a scientific ignoramus. An afterlife is not possible. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Dec 28, 2018 23:11:58 GMT
Your logic is brain-dead. I've seen hell. It's real. No proof. Only my testimony. If you don't want to believe it that's your choice. Since I was born I've never seen Heaven that I can remember, but recently I met someone on the Internet who did, someone who was clinically dead for a few minutes. Her description of it reminded me of that movie "Saved by the Light." Sorry. I'm rambling again. Should have just said that your logic is brain-dead and left it at that. You are still alive ergo you have not seen hell. Haven't you ever heard of things called remote viewing and astral projection? Besides, according to your logic even a dead person can't see hell because there is no hell and no afterlife. Sometimes Goz, I wonder why you even condescend to talk with us little people here, when someone with your connections could be hobnobbing with the Crowned Heads of Europe instead. |
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Dec 28, 2018 23:17:14 GMT
There is nothing 'logical' about that deduction based on evolving science. It's sheer stupidity to close the book in regards to an afterlife based on 'studies'. It's nothing more than shallow presumptuousness on your part, seeing as how you are shallow and materialistic. Look, we have been through this nonsense of yours ad nauseum and you have not been able to provide ANY 'evolving science.' or anything else of substance. You are a scientific ignoramus. An afterlife is not possible. Would you bet all your material possessions on that?
I don't know of any real scientists who are as arrogant as you are to be so absolute about something they can't possibly know for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Dec 28, 2018 23:22:19 GMT
The best thing is that if you put in a search term that it doesn't recognize, it'll ask you to be patient while it auto-generates content to match your query. And then in about 10 seconds a new category is created! I haven't tried vulgar search terms, and I wonder if it does any kind of filtering to weed those out. I love it! Here is a good one www.openbible.info/topics/jesus_dna50 Bible verses about Michelin Tires! |
|
