|
|
Post by hi224 on Dec 20, 2018 5:19:26 GMT
sucks we will never know at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Dec 20, 2018 5:28:34 GMT
Probably.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Dec 20, 2018 17:10:54 GMT
It would have been interesting at the least.
|
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Dec 20, 2018 18:34:18 GMT
May well have been.
|
|
|
|
Post by bravomailer on Dec 20, 2018 18:53:22 GMT
Maybe Barry Lyndon with Napoleonic attire and sets.   |
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Dec 20, 2018 23:41:59 GMT
Who in your opinion would Kubrick have casted as "the Little Corporal?"
I'm also wondering about Wellington (if it had included the battle of Waterloo)?
If not, the Battle of Austerlitz would have been good to focus on perhaps....
Would the movie have ended in Napoleon's ultimate defeat, or end on a more triumphant note?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Dec 21, 2018 1:38:40 GMT
Would it have been better than Barry Lyndon? I'm guessing we would have only got one of them either way.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Dec 21, 2018 5:11:00 GMT
Who in your opinion would Kubrick have casted as "the Little Corporal?" I'm also wondering about Wellington (if it had included the battle of Waterloo)? If not, the Battle of Austerlitz would have been good to focus on perhaps.... Would the movie have ended in Napoleon's ultimate defeat, or end on a more triumphant note? Knowing Kubrick, probably the former as well or somewhere more bittersweet actually. |
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Dec 21, 2018 5:11:22 GMT
Who in your opinion would Kubrick have casted as "the Little Corporal?" I'm also wondering about Wellington (if it had included the battle of Waterloo)? If not, the Battle of Austerlitz would have been good to focus on perhaps.... Would the movie have ended in Napoleon's ultimate defeat, or end on a more triumphant note? Also wasn't Keitel attached at some point perhaps?. |
|
