Hey, fresh is fresh 🍅

rotten or fresh on RT, what's the consequence? I would not lose to much sleep over that. Opinions, opinions.

As has been been remarked by Scorsese and Co, the best novel art and entertainment are typically divisive, not pandering. Even Star Wars was originally barely in the fresh, and widely misunderstood as trash destroying serious filmmaking.
screenrant.com/worst-original-reviews-star-wars-a-new-hope/

The Tomatometer is a pretty random metric anyway, eg the CW DC-shows are in the 90%, Black lightning is at 93 and 96 respectively. Good yes, but that good?

Or why is Bumblebee in the high 90s? It's a pretty derivative film without unique scenes or world building?

Aquaman is a derivative action adventure a la KingArthur/MoS too, but it got outstanding cinematography, action and world building. It's unique as it's the first film that managed to pull off the underwater worldbuilding believably (including dialogue). In a few years people will likely barely talk about Bumblebee, but Aquaqman will be discussed for the reasons above.

It can be proven that critic reviews have a substantial effect on box office. That directly effects the studio’s motivation for sequels, expanding the shared universe, how they perceive James Wan, Jason Momoa, even Aquaman himself. Not in every instance do reviews translate into immediate box office boon, but the sequel will feel the weight of its success. Batman Begins didn’t single handledly save Batman’s reputation at the box office, but it did get people interested in Dark Knight. Bumblebee will do the same for the next one.

Granted, you should never form your own personal opinion on Rotten Tomatoes, but you can’t deny the extraordinary impact they can have on a franchise.