|
Post by Ass_E9 on Jan 13, 2019 17:53:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by CynicalDreamer2 on Jan 13, 2019 18:26:44 GMT
Impossible
|
|
theshape25
Sophomore
@theshape25
Posts: 877
Likes: 536
|
Post by theshape25 on Jan 13, 2019 19:52:19 GMT
Not sure if it can be called nostalgia since you didn't actually experience the time or place, but I can definitely see someone wishing they were around during a certain period or wish they lived somewhere during a certain time frame.
I wasn't around in the 60s, but I would have loved to have been around then and experienced all the great music that was around at the time.
As far as a certain place, I'm a fan of a lot of 1970s shows that were located in Los Angeles. For some reason late 1970s Los Angeles seemed such a cool place to be. I could be totally wrong about it, but I would have liked to be able to see for myself.
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jan 13, 2019 20:22:14 GMT
Yup.
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Jan 13, 2019 20:41:13 GMT
As far as a certain place, I'm a fan of a lot of 1970s shows that were located in Los Angeles. For some reason late 1970s Los Angeles seemed such a cool place to be. I could be totally wrong about it, but I would have liked to be able to see for myself. I'm sure the personal experiences of many will vary, and there's no denying that, like any period, there were plenty of aspects to the late-'70s that were unpleasant (mortgage rates approaching 13%; car loans over 16%; spending your entire lunch hour in a line of dozens of cars just to fill your gas tank; L.A. air quality was terrible), but being in my mid-late 20s at the time, I can easily say that living in Los Angeles during that period represented the busiest, most adventurous, fascinating and fun time of my life. There seemed to be sort of a party atmosphere about everything (even those gas lines; we were all in the same boat and made the best of it). So, from my point of view, you are absolutely not "totally wrong about it."
|
|
theshape25
Sophomore
@theshape25
Posts: 877
Likes: 536
|
Post by theshape25 on Jan 13, 2019 21:02:39 GMT
...but being in my mid-late 20s at the time, I can easily say that living in Los Angeles during that period represented the busiest, most adventurous, fascinating and fun time of my life. There seemed to be sort of a party atmosphere about everything.... That's exactly what I'm talking about. The tv shows that I watched that were filmed there and movies as well, there just seemed to be some sort of 'vibe" about the place.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Jan 13, 2019 21:42:38 GMT
I find myself curious what it would be like to travel back in time to when I was born 1970 and walk around places, while knowing things about the future. Obviously this is encouraged by watching old movies and tv.
I don't necessarily think it would be better, but one tends to feel safer with the past because it is assumed that with knowledge of future events one would be safer, or more appreciative of things.
Ironic about the nostalgia for 1970s Los Angeles because Vincent Price was feeling nostalgic for 1940s Los Angeles when speaking in 1970 in London:
"Los Angeles was then about 850 000 people. It's now 3 million.... It is a very sinister city now. ..The thing that affects you is that it's not a nice place to live. It's lost its charm. You all, I don't know whether you can understand that, but you live in probably the most exciting city in the world. London is still a place where you can walk down the street. You can't walk down the street in Los Angeles or New York or Chicago. It's very sinister. Don't let it happen to you. Be kind, be generous, be tolerant."
|
|
|
Post by marianne48 on Jan 13, 2019 23:32:53 GMT
I always felt that I was born 10 years too late. I would have loved to experience the 1950s as a small child; the music of that era; the expectations of how great the 1960s were going to be; the small town communities with prosperous neighborhood businesses rather than the strip malls; the Beatles when they were first popular; Palisades Park (local reference), etc. Instead I got the tail end of the Baby Boom era, with Watergate and the Vietnam War and the gas crisis and disco and the recession of the 1970s. When Apollo 11 landed on the moon, I had a vague memory of it, but being only 6 years old at the time, I couldn't appreciate the significance of it. I always felt that I missed out on the really fun years (the Beaver Cleaver childhood innocence era) and got stuck in the jaded '70s years (when people were tired of the Baby Boom kids and looked on them with suspicion--that's why films such as Rosemary's Baby, The Exorcist, and The Omen came out in those years.)
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Jan 13, 2019 23:39:32 GMT
I find myself curious what it would be like to travel back in time to when I was born 1970 and walk around places, while knowing things about the future. Obviously this is encouraged by watching old movies and tv. I don't necessarily think it would be better, but one tends to feel safer with the past because it is assumed that with knowledge of future events one would be safer, or more appreciative of things. Ironic about the nostalgia for 1970s Los Angeles because Vincent Price was feeling nostalgic for 1940s Los Angeles when speaking in 1970 in London: "Los Angeles was then about 850 000 people. It's now 3 million.... It is a very sinister city now. ..The thing that affects you is that it's not a nice place to live. It's lost its charm. You all, I don't know whether you can understand that, but you live in probably the most exciting city in the world. London is still a place where you can walk down the street. You can't walk down the street in Los Angeles or New York or Chicago. It's very sinister. Don't let it happen to you. Be kind, be generous, be tolerant." I'm sure that for the great Vinnie, and anyone else living there in 1940, Los Angeles held more charm than it did 30 or so years later. There were still vast undeveloped areas, and acres and acres of vacant land could be seen even on Wilshire Blvd. But Mr. Price's recollection was a bit off, population-wise: in 1940, it was already over 1.5 million, and the influx of defense workers during the war years and growing families thereafter had brought it to just under 2 million by 1950. It hadn't been under a million since the '20s. For my part, I can say that in my 54 years of living there from the early '50s, I never found it "sinister," and felt very much as Margaret O'Brien as "Tootie" in Meet Me In St. Louis did: "Wasn't I lucky to have been born in my favorite city?"
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Jan 14, 2019 0:57:29 GMT
I'm sure that for the great Vinnie, and anyone else living there in 1940, Los Angeles held more charm than it did 30 or so years later. There were still vast undeveloped areas, and acres and acres of vacant land could be seen even on Wilshire Blvd. But Mr. Price's recollection was a bit off, population-wise: in 1940, it was already over 1.5 million, and the influx of defense workers during the war years and growing families thereafter had brought it to just under 2 million by 1950. It hadn't been under a million since the '20s. Price said one time someone knocked on his door to ask for directions and it was Conrad Veidt and he almost fainted. Maybe he was worried he was going to be put into a trance and mugged.
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Jan 14, 2019 1:08:29 GMT
I'm sure that for the great Vinnie, and anyone else living there in 1940, Los Angeles held more charm than it did 30 or so years later. There were still vast undeveloped areas, and acres and acres of vacant land could be seen even on Wilshire Blvd. But Mr. Price's recollection was a bit off, population-wise: in 1940, it was already over 1.5 million, and the influx of defense workers during the war years and growing families thereafter had brought it to just under 2 million by 1950. It hadn't been under a million since the '20s. Price said one time someone knocked on his door to ask for directions and it was Conrad Veidt and he almost fainted. Maybe he was worried he was going to be put into a trance and mugged. What a delicious experience and story! As the years went by, however, Price was certainly no slouch in the "mesmerize with a look" department. I wonder if he ever sent anyone into the vapors asking for directions.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Jan 14, 2019 1:11:35 GMT
As the years went by, however, Price was certainly no slouch in the "mesmerize with a look" department. I wonder if he ever sent anyone into the vapors asking for directions.
I know Price liked to go to movie theaters showing his films and sit in the back "preferably behind two young girls" and when some fright moment happened he would poke his head between them and say: "my, wasn't that scary?"
It would certainly freak me out.
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Jan 14, 2019 1:27:18 GMT
As the years went by, however, Price was certainly no slouch in the "mesmerize with a look" department. I wonder if he ever sent anyone into the vapors asking for directions. I know Price liked to go to movie theaters showing his films and sit in the back "preferably behind two young girls" and when some fright moment happened he would poke his head between them and say: "my, wasn't that scary?"
It would certainly freak me out.
Oh, I love that. A mischievous sense of humor fits so well into the sort of person I like to imagine him having been.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Jan 14, 2019 1:34:37 GMT
Oh, I love that. A mischievous sense of humor fits so well into the sort of person I like to imagine him having been. Seen this? One of my favorite Price interviews. Anecdotes, jokes, reads a poem, and sings!
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Jan 14, 2019 3:50:45 GMT
That's the premise of Midnight in Paris.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Jan 14, 2019 16:36:51 GMT
Not me. I'm nostalgic for a time that will come after I die. I wish that I'd be alive on the day that people land on Mars. But its becoming clear that probably wont happen in my lifetime.
|
|