|
Post by hitchcockthelegend on Jan 21, 2019 3:32:00 GMT
Kirk Douglas - www.imdb.com/name/nm0000018/?ref_=nv_sr_1
Michael Douglas - www.imdb.com/name/nm0000140/?ref_=nv_sr_1
I was surprised that I was surprised at just how many films I have seen that feature Kirk or Michael Douglas! It started because I had recently watched There Was a Crooked Man... and afterwards started sifting through my collection looking for The Vikings to watch, and it sort of went from there where I counted off how many I have seen, and also how many I own in various home entertainment formats. Both men have produced classics of their own respective generation - open to debate of course, but I think both men can rightly be proud of the mark they have left on cinema.
The following are my personal preferences, the 10 I choose to keep. Naturally I want yours as well.
Kirk's 10 I Love >
Out of the Past Champion Ace in the Hole Detective Story 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea Paths of Glory The Vikings Spartacus The Last Sunset Lonely Are the Brave
Not Seen and Want To (and own a few as well!) >
I Walk Alone (1947) A Letter to Three Wives (1949) The Bad and the Beautiful (1952) Lust for Life (1956) The Devil's Disciple (1959) Town Without Pity (1961) Seven Days in May (1964) The Man from Snowy River (1982)
The One That Deserves More Love > Along the Great Divide (1951) - www.imdb.com/review/rw3372227/?ref_=tt_urv 8/10
The One To Avoid > The Big Trees (1952)
Michael's 10 I Love >
The China Syndrome Romancing the Stone Fatal Attraction Wall Street Black Rain Basic Instinct Falling Down The Game Wonder Boys Traffic
Not Seen and Want To) >
Coma (1978) The Star Chamber (1983) The American President (1995) King of California (2007) Solitary Man (2009) Behind the Candelabra (2013)
The One That Deserves More Love > Black Rain - www.imdb.com/review/rw2729053/?ref_=tt_urv 8/10
The One To Avoid > Ghosts of Girlfriends Past (2009)
So anything welcomed on Pop and Son Douglas in the spirit of good conversation, chronic list making, recommendations and etc!
|
|
|
Post by OldAussie on Jan 21, 2019 3:58:23 GMT
Seven Days in May The Bad and the Beautiful
MUST SEE! Both are in my top 30 films of all time!
|
|
biker1
Junior Member
@biker1
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 743
|
Post by biker1 on Jan 21, 2019 4:33:54 GMT
Kirk Douglas 10 out of the past champion ace in the hole lonely are the brave seven days in may paths of glory the bad and the beautiful young man with a horn spartacus gunfight at the o.k. corral
Michael Douglas 10 wall street falling down the china syndrome romancing the stone fatal attraction basic instinct behind the candelabra traffic coma the ghost and the darkness
|
|
|
Post by timshelboy on Jan 21, 2019 12:05:28 GMT
Yes both of them major stars of their eras and I reckon I have seen 90% plus of each
Best to worst Top Tens
Kirk SEVEN DAYS IN MAY ( I envy you watching this for the first time - a knockout film) ACE IN THE HOLE THE GLASS MENAGERIE A LETTER TO THREE WIVES THE BAD AND THE BEAUTIFUL SPARTACUS THE ARRANGEMENT (Shamefully underrated - both the movie and his performance - far more vulnerable than usual)
OUT OF THE PAST YOUNG MAN WITH A HORN THE LIST OF ADRIAN MESSENGER
And I could actually recommend at least another ten! HMs to {unranked) MAN WITHOUT A STAR, IN HARMS WAY, CHAMPION, IS PARIS BURNING (although he has nothing cameo) ,20000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA, GUNFIGHT AT THE OK CORRAL, DETECTIVE STORY, THE VIKINGS, LUST FOR LIFE, PATHS OF GLORY and TWO WEEKS IN ANOTHER TOWN
Avoid (like the plague) - HOLOCAUST 2000 sucks big time
Michael (actually surprised how easy it was to find ten I liked that much) BASIC INSTINCT BEHIND THE CANDELABRA (a total joy) WONDER BOYS (ditto - real breath of fresh air in a CV overcluttered with wannabe "controversial"sex thrillers*) THE CHINA SYNDROME FATAL ATTRACTION FALLING DOWN ROMANCING THE STONE THE GAME THE WAR OF THE ROSES TRAFFIC
AVOID - DISCLOSURE was pretty poor
* loved the in joke in 1997's IN & OUT - where Michael gets an Oscar nomination for a film called PRIMARY URGES Would love to see that one!
|
|
|
Post by hitchcockthelegend on Jan 21, 2019 15:50:55 GMT
Seven Days in May The Bad and the Beautiful MUST SEE! Both are in my top 30 films of all time! Duly noted dear boy!
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Jan 21, 2019 19:33:01 GMT
Kirk Douglas:
The Strange Love of Martha Ivers Out of the Past Young Man with a Horn The Big Sky 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea Lust for Life Gunfight at the O.K. Corral Paths of Glory The Vikings Spartacus Seven Days in May In Harm's Way The Heroes of Telemark The War Wagon There Was a Crooked Man... The Final Countdown The Man from Snowy River Tough Guys Diamonds
Michael Douglas:
Coma The China Syndrome Romancing the Stone Fatal Attraction Wall Street Black Rain Falling Down The American President The In-Laws The Sentinel
The movies mentioned are the ones I've liked to thinking they are great. The movies I have not mentioned, I haven't seen, or I have seen but didn't like, or I might have seen but isn't sure.
|
|
|
Post by hitchcockthelegend on Jan 21, 2019 22:06:33 GMT
Kirk Douglas 10 out of the past champion ace in the hole lonely are the brave seven days in may paths of glory the bad and the beautiful young man with a horn spartacus gunfight at the o.k. corralMichael Douglas 10 wall street falling down the china syndrome romancing the stone fatal attraction basic instinct behind the candelabra traffic coma the ghost and the darknessNice one biker. I will have to give another try to The Ghost and the Darkness as it has been many years since I saw it last. Something bugged me about it, maybe the CGI? So I'll have to go in again.
Young Man of Music/Man With a Horn I really liked, though Kirk takes some getting used to as a musician, but I gave it a strong 8/10 on review.
|
|
biker1
Junior Member
@biker1
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 743
|
Post by biker1 on Jan 21, 2019 23:03:21 GMT
I couldn't think of an obvious #10 for MD, but the ghost and the darkness definitely improved on second viewing - some years back. I don't really like the comedy drama he does war of the roses, wonder boys, the american president, the king of california - they get good reviews, just not my thing.
Actually, the game or the star chamber could suffice just as well as ghost..
|
|
|
Post by hitchcockthelegend on Jan 22, 2019 3:29:00 GMT
Yes both of them major stars of their eras and I reckon I have seen 90% plus of each
Best to worst Top Tens
Kirk SEVEN DAYS IN MAY ( I envy you watching this for the first time - a knockout film)
THE ARRANGEMENT (Shamefully underrated - both the movie and his performance - far more vulnerable than usual)
And I could actually recommend at least another ten! HMs to {unranked) MAN WITHOUT A STAR, IN HARMS WAY, CHAMPION, IS PARIS BURNING (although he has nothing cameo) ,20000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA, GUNFIGHT AT THE OK CORRAL, DETECTIVE STORY, THE VIKINGS, LUST FOR LIFE, PATHS OF GLORY and TWO WEEKS IN ANOTHER TOWN
Avoid (like the plague) - HOLOCAUST 2000 sucks big time
Michael (actually surprised how easy it was to find ten I liked that much) BASIC INSTINCT BEHIND THE CANDELABRA (a total joy) WONDER BOYS (ditto - real breath of fresh air in a CV overcluttered with wannabe "controversial"sex thrillers*) THE CHINA SYNDROME FATAL ATTRACTION FALLING DOWN ROMANCING THE STONE THE GAME THE WAR OF THE ROSES TRAFFIC
AVOID - DISCLOSURE was pretty poor
* loved the in joke in 1997's IN & OUT - where Michael gets an Oscar nomination for a film called PRIMARY URGES Would love to see that one!
Oh I defo look forward to Seven days In May, what a cast list!
That's uncanny you put forward The Arrangement so strongly, because it caught my attention the other day because I was going to do a Richard Boon thread and he's in it! It completely slipped my mind. I honestly hadn't heard of it before - and I love Dunaway as well!! I wonder if it's unseen over the years due to accessibility? I don't recall it showing on British TV, and there is no British DVD release I can see.
Yep, I found it hard to leave a few out of Kirk's top ten, OK Corall in particular.
Indeed, Michael's are more easy to put down. I have actually grown to like Disclosure, I really like how it seized the day as regards the time it was made. Now I'm more on board with the film it is and not what I had initially hoped it would be - and what the trailers hinted at it would be! I was surprised my review went down really well on line as I expected most to feel the way you do about it. >
Sexual harassment is about power. When did I have the power? When?
Disclosure is directed by Barry Levinson and co-adapted to screenplay by Paul Attanasio and Michael Crichton from Crichton's own novel of the same name. It stars Michael Douglas, Demi Moore, Donald Sutherland, Roma Maffia, Dylan Baker, Caroline Goodall and Rosemary Forsyth. Music is scored by Ennio Morricone.
Tom Sanders (Douglas) is an executive at DigiCom, a high-tech computer company, who hopes that now it's finally his time to get promotion. Passed over for an outsider, he's further irked when it turns out to be Meredith Johnson (Moore), an old passionate flame of his from years previously. When Meredith arranges for a meeting between the two later that evening, Tom finds himself sexually harassed by her. Spurning her aggressive overtures, Tom is shocked to learn the next day that she has filed a charge of sexual harassment against him. He naturally counters the charge, but this opens up a can of worms for both him and the future of DigiCom.
The 1990s practically belonged to Michael Crichton, it seemed for a time that everything he wrote was adapted to the big screen for some form of entertainment. With Jurassic Park still warm and still garnering bucket loads of cash, two other Crichton adaptations worked their way into theatres; both of which were a world away from the family friendly extravaganza of Jurassic Park. One was Rising Sun, a messy wasted potential of a movie, the other was Disclosure, a zeitgeist snatcher that seized the moment.
The topic, and the novelty of flipping the gender aggressor, was always going to make Disclosure of much interest, thus the film and the novel made big money: aided still further by the hot casting of Douglas and Moore, who were still draw cards in the early 90s. Crichton, after being displeased with other adaptations of his work, got big say on the screenplay as a written project. So with director Levinson in tow, he set about pushing the buttons of his audience, attempting to continue the heated debates that were brought about previously from Douglas' Fatal Attraction and Basic Instinct. If it's Crichton's or Levinson's fault that it didn't work out that way? I'm not sure, but fact is, is that Disclosure really wasn't that potent back then, and certainly now it's not even lukewarm.
There's too much techno babble going on, and an over keenness to stick the nose up at the big business vultures picking the flesh off of the lesser minions. Entering the last half hour of the film, it's easy to forget there has actually been a sexual harassment case! Here's the crux of the matter, if going in to it for a first time viewing expecting this to be a powder-keg of sexual harassment muckiness and legal intrigue, then you are in for a big disappointment. I know, because I was one of the paying patrons at the theatre back in 94! You sense that one of the makers got a bit carried away
Yet the film still has much going for it if stripped of that expectation, not least that it packs a pile of tension in that last half hour and the finale is rather rewarding. I'd go as far to say I'm a fan of the film, but it's not the film I originally went to see! There's a trio of interesting and differing female characters at the front of the narrative, even if Moore's stair-master vixen isn't exactly developed beyond being a bitch, and the virtual reality sequences have an appealing charm about them. The cast are turning in good ones, with a notable shout out to Caroline Goodall who wisely underplays it as the wife. While the interior set design (Gary Lewis/Joseph Hodges) for the DigiCom HQ is wonderful with its 90s excess of glass meeting mirrors and open spaces. Which leaves us with what?
A film that is not what you expect! Which in this case is both disappointing and a surprise. 7/10
Top post Tim, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by timshelboy on Jan 22, 2019 10:53:06 GMT
Oh I defo look forward to Seven days In May, what a cast list!
That's uncanny you put forward The Arrangement so strongly, because it caught my attention the other day because I was going to do a Richard Boon thread and he's in it! It completely slipped my mind. I honestly hadn't heard of it before - and I love Dunaway as well!! I wonder if it's unseen over the years due to accessibility? I don't recall it showing on British TV, and there is no British DVD release I can see.
Yep, I found it hard to leave a few out of Kirk's top ten, OK Corall in particular.
Indeed, Michael's are more easy to put down. I have actually grown to like Disclosure, I really like how it seized the day as regards the time it was made. Now I'm more on board with the film it is and not what I had initially hoped it would be - and what the trailers hinted at it would be! I was surprised my review went down really well on line as I expected most to feel the way you do about it. >
Sexual harassment is about power. When did I have the power? When?
Disclosure is directed by Barry Levinson and co-adapted to screenplay by Paul Attanasio and Michael Crichton from Crichton's own novel of the same name. It stars Michael Douglas, Demi Moore, Donald Sutherland, Roma Maffia, Dylan Baker, Caroline Goodall and Rosemary Forsyth. Music is scored by Ennio Morricone.
Tom Sanders (Douglas) is an executive at DigiCom, a high-tech computer company, who hopes that now it's finally his time to get promotion. Passed over for an outsider, he's further irked when it turns out to be Meredith Johnson (Moore), an old passionate flame of his from years previously. When Meredith arranges for a meeting between the two later that evening, Tom finds himself sexually harassed by her. Spurning her aggressive overtures, Tom is shocked to learn the next day that she has filed a charge of sexual harassment against him. He naturally counters the charge, but this opens up a can of worms for both him and the future of DigiCom.
The 1990s practically belonged to Michael Crichton, it seemed for a time that everything he wrote was adapted to the big screen for some form of entertainment. With Jurassic Park still warm and still garnering bucket loads of cash, two other Crichton adaptations worked their way into theatres; both of which were a world away from the family friendly extravaganza of Jurassic Park. One was Rising Sun, a messy wasted potential of a movie, the other was Disclosure, a zeitgeist snatcher that seized the moment.
The topic, and the novelty of flipping the gender aggressor, was always going to make Disclosure of much interest, thus the film and the novel made big money: aided still further by the hot casting of Douglas and Moore, who were still draw cards in the early 90s. Crichton, after being displeased with other adaptations of his work, got big say on the screenplay as a written project. So with director Levinson in tow, he set about pushing the buttons of his audience, attempting to continue the heated debates that were brought about previously from Douglas' Fatal Attraction and Basic Instinct. If it's Crichton's or Levinson's fault that it didn't work out that way? I'm not sure, but fact is, is that Disclosure really wasn't that potent back then, and certainly now it's not even lukewarm.
There's too much techno babble going on, and an over keenness to stick the nose up at the big business vultures picking the flesh off of the lesser minions. Entering the last half hour of the film, it's easy to forget there has actually been a sexual harassment case! Here's the crux of the matter, if going in to it for a first time viewing expecting this to be a powder-keg of sexual harassment muckiness and legal intrigue, then you are in for a big disappointment. I know, because I was one of the paying patrons at the theatre back in 94! You sense that one of the makers got a bit carried away
Yet the film still has much going for it if stripped of that expectation, not least that it packs a pile of tension in that last half hour and the finale is rather rewarding. I'd go as far to say I'm a fan of the film, but it's not the film I originally went to see! There's a trio of interesting and differing female characters at the front of the narrative, even if Moore's stair-master vixen isn't exactly developed beyond being a bitch, and the virtual reality sequences have an appealing charm about them. The cast are turning in good ones, with a notable shout out to Caroline Goodall who wisely underplays it as the wife. While the interior set design (Gary Lewis/Joseph Hodges) for the DigiCom HQ is wonderful with its 90s excess of glass meeting mirrors and open spaces. Which leaves us with what?
A film that is not what you expect! Which in this case is both disappointing and a surprise. 7/10
Top post Tim, thanks.
Cheers Hitch THE ARRANGEMENT has very few admirers ( Leslie Halliwell is the only other one I know) but to me it looks better every passing year. . I dug it out for a rewatch only last week. Sorry to say Boone's barnstorming turn is the weakest link and the Dunaway character a bit of a pill (but she looks stunning). Kerr is exceptional too and there is a wonderful David Amram score. Hope you like it when you do see it. Here is a link to an online version but I can't check language - it could be Greek or something! THE ARRANGEMENT The book impressive too. Michael's equivalent role would be FALLING DOWN. Michael had an uncanny knack of choosing projects that grabbed headlines/publicity, and DISCLOSURE was certainly one of them.
|
|
|
Post by hitchcockthelegend on Jan 22, 2019 15:07:13 GMT
I couldn't think of an obvious #10 for MD, but the ghost and the darkness definitely improved on second viewing - some years back. I don't really like the comedy drama he does war of the roses, wonder boys, the american president, the king of california - they get good reviews, just not my thing. Actually, the game or the star chamber could suffice just as well as ghost.. The War of the Roses just baffled me in how popular it was at the time, but that's more about me than the film itself, it just isn't to my taste.
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Jan 23, 2019 7:20:05 GMT
Kirks output gets underrated as well.
|
|
|
Post by hitchcockthelegend on Jan 23, 2019 14:01:41 GMT
I couldn't think of an obvious #10 for MD, but the ghost and the darkness definitely improved on second viewing - some years back. I don't really like the comedy drama he does war of the roses, wonder boys, the american president, the king of california - they get good reviews, just not my thing. Actually, the game or the star chamber could suffice just as well as ghost.. The Ghost and the Darkness. Re-watched last night, much better than I remember, some ace technical qualities. Now I know what bothered me about it all those years ago Douglas is pretty much just a supporting player whose ending is bafflingly undramatic. I guess because that's the one character who is not based on reality they didn't give it much depth.
|
|
|
Post by hitchcockthelegend on Jan 23, 2019 14:09:03 GMT
Kirks output gets underrated as well. Tis why we are here, to ensure that is not the case
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Jan 23, 2019 18:58:46 GMT
Kirks output gets underrated as well. Tis why we are here, to ensure that is not the case [ Id argue better then Brando as well.
|
|