|
|
Post by janntosh on Jan 28, 2019 17:08:52 GMT
Days? Or is it just a romantic notion? Like riding in a horse and carriage when cars exist
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Jan 28, 2019 18:33:28 GMT
Days? Or is it just a romantic notion? Like riding in a horse and carriage when cars exist The truth is that its a matter of preference. Even people who are extremely knowledgeable about this disagree and that's why you wont get a conclusive answer.
In my personal opinion video has advanced to the point that it can achieve film level results. That plus its advantages in NOT to having to be processed and transferred make video the more advantageous of the two. One cant shoot something and moments later edit it on a laptop. How can you beat that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Jan 28, 2019 18:43:46 GMT
Days? Or is it just a romantic notion? Like riding in a horse and carriage when cars exist In my personal opinion video has advanced to the point that it can achieve film level results.
Blade Runner 2049 - Shot digitally Dunkirk - Shot on film
Both look spectacular.
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Jan 28, 2019 18:56:41 GMT
In my personal opinion video has advanced to the point that it can achieve film level results.
Blade Runner 2049 - Shot digitally Dunkirk - Shot on film
Both look spectacular.
That's my point. |
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Jan 28, 2019 19:19:13 GMT
In my personal opinion video has advanced to the point that it can achieve film level results.
Blade Runner 2049 - Shot digitally Dunkirk - Shot on film
Both look spectacular.
Funny that you used two of my favorite films from the past few years to illustrate your point. I did see Dunkirk projected in 70mm on film. It was amazing. But BR 2049 was beautiful as well. I do think there is still a slight edge of a movie "filmed" on film and projected on film. Of course the print needs to be pristine which obviously isn't an issue with digital. This is a good article that came out shortly before Dunkirk premiered. Dunkirk film |
|
