|
Post by DC-Fan on Feb 1, 2019 0:52:46 GMT
So basically this thread doesn't apply to Minnesota and you're too dumb to understand it. But I'll explain it to you more slowly. 1. This Rams team under Sean McVay and with these young players haven't won a Super Bowl yet. 2. This Rams team under Sean MvCay is playing in their 1st Super Bowl (something which didn't happen for Minnesota and thus this thread doesn't apply to Minnesota). 3. The Rams survived playoff elimination due to 1 memorable play. So the question is: Will that 1 memorable play propel this young, talented Rams team to multiple Super Bowl wins over the next few years, similar to what the Immaculate Reception did for the Steelers, Dwight Clark's lucky catch did for the 49ers, nd Walt Coleman's blown call on Brady's fumble (as well as SpyGate and DeflateGate) did for the Patriots? You call me dumb but yet you keep including the patriots even though they don't fall into your own oddly specific pattern. They were not the beneficiaries of a lucky play by your definition The Patriots were the beneficiaries of a blown call. It also happened to the Yankees. A Yankee batter hits a deep fly ball that the outfielder is going to catch, but a fan reaches over the wall and interferes with the ball. The batter should've been ruled out due to fan interference, but the umpire ruled it a home run. Next thing we know, the Yankees go on to win 4 World Series in 5 years. Same with the Patriots. Brady fumbles and the Raiders recover Brady's fumble and only need to kneel down a few times to win. But referee Walt Coleman blows the call and inexplicably reverses Brady's fumble and reverses a Patriots' playoff loss to the Raiders, under orders from Roger Goodell, who is Robert Kraft's best friend.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Feb 1, 2019 0:54:26 GMT
Roger Goodell - From intern to COOIn 1987, Goodell was appointed assistant to the president of the American Football Conference, Lamar Hunt, and under the tutelage of Commissioner Paul Tagliabue filled a variety of football and business operations roles, culminating with his appointment as the NFL's Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in December 2001. As the NFL's COO, Goodell took responsibility for the league's football operations and officiatingThat's right. Roger Goodell, Robert Kraft's best friend, was in charge of officiating when Walt Coleman made the blown call on Brady's fumble. That explains why Coleman inexplicable reversed Brady's fumble and basically reversed a Patriots' playoff loss to the Raiders. Oh, I see. And two weeks into his new roll he probably helped the man who probably got him the promotion, all under the nose of then Commissioner Paul Tagliabue. 1. Goodell just got promoted to be in charge of officiating so naturally he wanted to test the limits of his powers and a playoff game was the perfect opportunity to do so. 2. Why would Tagliabue care? Al Davis sued the NFL so the rest of the NFL owners hated Al Davis. They wanted to send Al Davis a message that he can't poke the bear and expect no repercussions.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Feb 1, 2019 1:13:21 GMT
You call me dumb but yet you keep including the patriots even though they don't fall into your own oddly specific pattern. They were not the beneficiaries of a lucky play by your definition The Patriots were the beneficiaries of a blown call. It also happened to the Yankees. A Yankee batter hits a deep fly ball that the outfielder is going to catch, but a fan reaches over the wall and interferes with the ball. The batter should've been ruled out due to fan interference, but the umpire ruled it a home run. Next thing we know, the Yankees go on to win 4 World Series in 5 years. Same with the Patriots. Brady fumbles and the Raiders recover Brady's fumble and only need to kneel down a few times to win. But referee Walt Coleman blows the call and inexplicably reverses Brady's fumble and reverses a Patriots' playoff loss to the Raiders, under orders from Roger Goodell, who is Robert Kraft's best friend. Brady didn't fumble. He made a throwing motion and got hit, dropping the ball. If it was a fumble, Venateri would have missed the field goal. The football gods would not have allowed the incorrect call to stand. After all... BALL DON'T LIE! -DC-Fan
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Feb 1, 2019 1:48:48 GMT
The Patriots were the beneficiaries of a blown call. It also happened to the Yankees. A Yankee batter hits a deep fly ball that the outfielder is going to catch, but a fan reaches over the wall and interferes with the ball. The batter should've been ruled out due to fan interference, but the umpire ruled it a home run. Next thing we know, the Yankees go on to win 4 World Series in 5 years. Same with the Patriots. Brady fumbles and the Raiders recover Brady's fumble and only need to kneel down a few times to win. But referee Walt Coleman blows the call and inexplicably reverses Brady's fumble and reverses a Patriots' playoff loss to the Raiders, under orders from Roger Goodell, who is Robert Kraft's best friend. Brady didn't fumble. He made a throwing motion and got hit, dropping the ball. Brady made a throwing motion and then stopped. The ball was knocked out of Brady's hands after his throwing motion had stopped so that was a fumble and a blown call by Walt Coleman.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Feb 1, 2019 2:29:07 GMT
Brady didn't fumble. He made a throwing motion and got hit, dropping the ball. Brady made a throwing motion and then stopped. The ball was knocked out of Brady's hands after his throwing motion had stopped so that was a fumble and a blown call by Walt Coleman. Ball don't lie
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 1, 2019 6:29:03 GMT
Brady made a throwing motion and then stopped. The ball was knocked out of Brady's hands after his throwing motion had stopped so that was a fumble and a blown call by Walt Coleman. Ball don't lie ... and DC-Fan does. The rule clearly states that once forward motion begins, it is considered a foward pass and loss of possesion is an incomplete pass. The only mention of a fumble occuring is after the ball has been tucked into his body. Which clearly never happened.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Feb 1, 2019 7:20:21 GMT
... and DC-Fan does. The rule clearly states that once forward motion begins, it is considered a foward pass and loss of possesion is an incomplete pass. The only mention of a fumble occuring is after the ball has been tucked into his body. Which clearly never happened. Looks like you, me, and the ball have something in common. We all three are very familiar with NFL Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, Note 2.
|
|
ctown28
Sophomore
@ctown28
Posts: 507
Likes: 391
|
Post by ctown28 on Feb 1, 2019 14:49:38 GMT
Oh, I see. And two weeks into his new roll he probably helped the man who probably got him the promotion, all under the nose of then Commissioner Paul Tagliabue. 1. Goodell just got promoted to be in charge of officiating so naturally he wanted to test the limits of his powers and a playoff game was the perfect opportunity to do so. 2. Why would Tagliabue care? Al Davis sued the NFL so the rest of the NFL owners hated Al Davis. They wanted to send Al Davis a message that he can't poke the bear and expect no repercussions. So how did Goodell pull this off? Did he jump into his DeLorean, hit 88 miles an hour and go back in time to get the tuck rule inserted into the rule book and then come back? That’s the only explanation for that rule being there. It was the correct call of a bad rule
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Feb 2, 2019 6:42:07 GMT
1. Goodell just got promoted to be in charge of officiating so naturally he wanted to test the limits of his powers and a playoff game was the perfect opportunity to do so. 2. Why would Tagliabue care? Al Davis sued the NFL so the rest of the NFL owners hated Al Davis. They wanted to send Al Davis a message that he can't poke the bear and expect no repercussions. So how did Goodell pull this off? Did he jump into his DeLorean, hit 88 miles an hour and go back in time to get the tuck rule inserted into the rule book and then come back? That’s the only explanation for that rule being there. It was the correct call of a bad rule No, it was an incorrect call because the rule didn't apply on that play. Just like the PI rule doesn't apply on plays when the ball is tipped. So if a Rams lineman did tip Brees' pass, then the Rams defender can hit the Saints receiver and PI wouldn't apply. Even referee Walt Coleman knew the rule didn't apply because when he reversed Brady's fumble, he didn't mention the Tuck Rule at all and instead lied and claimed that the QB's arm was moving forward when the fumble occurred even though replays clearly showed Brady's arm had already stopped and wasn't moving forward when he fumbled. That was as clear as the replay showing the Chiefs defender hitting Brady on the shoulder and not the head as the refs claimed when they called that phantom Roughing the Passer on the Chiefs that gave the Pats 15 yards and an automatic 1st down.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Feb 2, 2019 6:48:29 GMT
1. Goodell just got promoted to be in charge of officiating so naturally he wanted to test the limits of his powers and a playoff game was the perfect opportunity to do so. 2. Why would Tagliabue care? Al Davis sued the NFL so the rest of the NFL owners hated Al Davis. They wanted to send Al Davis a message that he can't poke the bear and expect no repercussions. So how did Goodell pull this off? You claim that Goodell is corrupt and conspired with Ted Wells and Professor Marlow and the US 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals to railroad Brady in DeflateGate. Well, if Goodell was corrupt, then it's reasonable that he was also corrupt in 2001 and ordered the refs to help the Pats, whose owner is his best friend and got him the job of Commish.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Feb 2, 2019 6:50:20 GMT
So how did Goodell pull this off? Did he jump into his DeLorean, hit 88 miles an hour and go back in time to get the tuck rule inserted into the rule book and then come back? That’s the only explanation for that rule being there. It was the correct call of a bad rule No, it was an incorrect call because the rule didn't apply on that play. Just like the PI rule doesn't apply on plays when the ball is tipped. So if a Rams lineman did tip Brees' pass, then the Rams defender can hit the Saints receiver and PI wouldn't apply. Even referee Walt Coleman knee the rule didn't apply because when he reversed Brady's fumble, he didn't mention the Tuck Rule at all and instaed lied and claimed that the QB's arm aas moving forward when the fumble occurred even though replays clearly showed Brady's arm had already stopped and wasn't moving forward when he fumbled. That was as clear as the replay showing the Chiefs defender hitting Brady on the shoulder and not the head as the refs claimed when they called that phantom Roughing the Passer on the Chiefs that gave the Pats 15 yards and an automatic 1st down. Incorrect. The rule was applied correctly. Many officials have said so. And as an aside, in case you were unaware, the BALL DON'T LIE, and the ball had no issues with finding its way through the uprights just a few short minutes after the correct call was correctly called by a great referee.
|
|
|
Post by sdm3 on Feb 2, 2019 7:01:50 GMT
...I’m confused. How does one claim to understand that DC-Fan is trolling, yet still engage in this with him again and again and again?
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Feb 2, 2019 7:05:36 GMT
...I’m confused. How does one claim to understand that DC-Fan is trolling, yet still engage in this with him again and again and again? Because if he is trolling, it's an easy win. And I need this, man. I reallyyyyy need this.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 2, 2019 15:23:37 GMT
No, it was an incorrect call because the rule didn't apply on that play. NFL Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, Note 2. is in play every single time forward motion begins. The rule clearly states that the ball must be first tucked "into the body" before an incomplete pass can turn into a fumble. That is the one, and only, criteria that can lead to a fumble, according to the rule. If you need help with reading comprehension, maybe we can find you a tutor, cupcake.
|
|
flyerzzrul
Sophomore
@flyerzzrul
Posts: 856
Likes: 534
|
Post by flyerzzrul on Feb 2, 2019 18:19:49 GMT
I guarantee the Rams will win the next 5 Super Bowls. Since we already got a jinx thread going on, why not go full in? Good idea! DC will start to make good movies. Dak Prescott will win 7 super bowls on his way to a HOF career
|
|
|
Post by poutinep on Feb 2, 2019 18:42:38 GMT
Brady didn't fumble. He made a throwing motion and got hit, dropping the ball. Brady made a throwing motion and then stopped. The ball was knocked out of Brady's hands after his throwing motion had stopped so that was a fumble and a blown call by Walt Coleman. NFL Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, Note 2. When [an offensive] player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.
Brady was in the process of tucking the ball back towards his body when he fumbled. Therefore, incomplete pass. Bad rule, correctly enforced.
What do you think Brady was doing? Was he committed to a pass? Was he tucking the ball?
This is the play when the rule was first invoked (earlier that same season), he wasn't as close to having tucked the ball as Brady was though.
It was also cited in Redskins vs. Broncos (2005), and Chiefs vs. Ravens (2011) but I can't find clips of those plays...
I don't expect you to learn anything or change your mind though because you clearly have a learning disability.
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Feb 2, 2019 23:54:31 GMT
Tom Brady is Not Gonna Lose Back To Back Super Bowls!
|
|
|
Post by shadyvsesham on Feb 4, 2019 3:54:22 GMT
This didnt age well...did it?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 4, 2019 3:56:52 GMT
This didnt age well...did it? Brought to you by Always Wrong!
|
|
GiantFan1980
Junior Member
@scifi1980
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 4,498
|
Post by GiantFan1980 on Feb 4, 2019 4:23:58 GMT
|
|