|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Feb 1, 2019 1:10:58 GMT
Will SB LIII be the beginning of multiple Super Bowl losses over the next few years for the Rams?
The Rams have a winning percentage above 68% and have made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while.
The 1990 Bills had a winning percentage above 68% and lost in the superbowl, then lost the next 3 superbowls as well. They made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while.
The 1986 Broncos had a winning percentage above 68% and lost in the superbowl, then lost 2 of the next 3 superbowls as well. They made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while.
All signs point to yes?
|
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Feb 1, 2019 15:20:58 GMT
They will lose Sunday I think, but there is far from a guarantee that they will ever be back in the Bowl. The Eagles, Saints, Falcons, etc. all have teams that are just as good as the Rams. The NFC will be competitive for years to come.
|
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Feb 1, 2019 19:14:51 GMT
You know what you're totally right. It was very stoopid of me to try to draw comparisons and show a pattern. Whether they win or lose Sunday, the achievements of teams from 10 or 20 or 30 years ago will have no effect on what's to come.
I have come to my senses. Now, if only others would.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Feb 1, 2019 20:58:29 GMT
Will SB LIII be the beginning of multiple Super Bowl losses over the next few years for the Rams? The Rams have a winning percentage above 68% and have made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while. The 1990 Bills had a winning percentage above 68% and lost in the superbowl, then lost the next 3 superbowls as well. They made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while. The 1986 Broncos had a winning percentage above 68% and lost in the superbowl, then lost 2 of the next 3 superbowls as well. They made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while. All signs point to yes? Knowing Los Angeles's Luck in Sports lately, I really wouldn't be surprised if that happened. Heck, I still think that the Dodgers need to Fire Dave Roberts but instead they gave him a Contract Extension. |
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Feb 4, 2019 4:00:25 GMT
Will SB LIII be the beginning of multiple Super Bowl losses over the next few years for the Rams? The Rams have a winning percentage above 68% and have made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while. The 1990 Bills had a winning percentage above 68% and lost in the superbowl, then lost the next 3 superbowls as well. They made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while. The 1986 Broncos had a winning percentage above 68% and lost in the superbowl, then lost 2 of the next 3 superbowls as well. They made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while. All signs point to yes? I've still got a chance to be right. And I'm 100% more likely to be right than the thread this thread mocks. |
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Feb 4, 2019 4:34:01 GMT
Guess this thread is where the LA Rams retire those throwback blue unis eh? lols
|
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Feb 4, 2019 4:42:17 GMT
Will SB LIII be the beginning of multiple Super Bowl losses over the next few years for the Rams? The Rams have a winning percentage above 68% and have made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while. The 1990 Bills had a winning percentage above 68% and lost in the superbowl, then lost the next 3 superbowls as well. They made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while. The 1986 Broncos had a winning percentage above 68% and lost in the superbowl, then lost 2 of the next 3 superbowls as well. They made it to the superbowl with a pro bowl running back for the first time in a while. All signs point to yes? Bills are a bad example. They had a high winning percentage because they were miles above the rest of the AFC. The Rams aren't miles above the NFC. They still have to get through Chicago, New Orleans, the Iggles and Seattle, not to mention teams like Minnesota, Dallas or someone else who could come out of nowhere (like the Bears did). The Bills cheerleaders could have made the playoffs in those years. Not to say the Bills weren't a great team, they were. Not as good as Washington or Dallas (they should have beat the Giants.) |
|
