|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 1:17:12 GMT
As many of you know, I believe that angels exist, but that doesn't mean I believe that every anomalous phenomenon must be the work of an angel. If anyone wants to know why I'm having a hard time buying this, I'll be more than happy to explain. Enjoy.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 1:55:46 GMT
Why even post this stuff if EVEN you don't believe it?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 1:58:24 GMT
Why even post this stuff if EVEN you don't believe it? To debunk it. Next question.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 2:07:04 GMT
Why even post this stuff if EVEN you don't believe it? To debunk it. Next question. Why? If no-one else has ever heard of it? (apart from the dope who presumably made such a stupid vid)
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 2:09:11 GMT
To debunk it. Next question. Why? If no-one else has ever heard of it? (apart from the dope who presumably made such a stupid vid) Goz, in what year was the patent for the telescope applied for?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 2:13:01 GMT
Why? If no-one else has ever heard of it? (apart from the dope who presumably made such a stupid vid) Goz, in what year was the patent for the telescope applied for? Dunno and can't be arsed to find out!
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 2:19:03 GMT
Goz, in what year was the patent for the telescope applied for? Dunno and can't be arsed to find out! 1608, more than four hundred and ten years ago, although they existed before then. Isn't that what got Galileo in hot water, because he was looking at Jupiter's satellites with a telescope? IIRC the four large ones are named the Galileans, after him. Is this not so, O Great Goz?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 2:21:17 GMT
Dunno and can't be arsed to find out! 1608, more than four hundred and ten years ago, although they existed before then. Isn't that what got Galileo in hot water, because he was looking at Jupiter's satellites with a telescope? IIRC the four large ones are named the Galileans, after him. Is this not so, O Great Goz? Dunno and can't be arsed to find out, and if I did I wouldn't look it up on YouTube unless it was a proper mainstream properly researched documentary from a reputable source.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 2:24:17 GMT
1608, more than four hundred and ten years ago, although they existed before then. Isn't that what got Galileo in hot water, because he was looking at Jupiter's satellites with a telescope? IIRC the four large ones are named the Galileans, after him. Is this not so, O Great Goz? Dunno and can't be arsed to find out, and if I did I wouldn't look it up on YouTube unless it was a proper mainstream properly researched documentary from a reputable source. Don't you think it's a little fishy that people have been watching the nighttime skies with telescopes for over four centuries and only now are they talking about seeing angel faces in the stars? I think it's fishy, but maybe that's because I'm such a "conspiracy theorist."
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 3:37:30 GMT
Dunno and can't be arsed to find out, and if I did I wouldn't look it up on YouTube unless it was a proper mainstream properly researched documentary from a reputable source. Don't you think it's a little fishy that people have been watching the nighttime skies with telescopes for over four centuries and only now are they talking about seeing angel faces in the stars? I think it's fishy, but maybe that's because I'm such a "conspiracy theorist." Well we have had toast for about that long and people have only just started seeing Jesus!
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 3:41:14 GMT
Don't you think it's a little fishy that people have been watching the nighttime skies with telescopes for over four centuries and only now are they talking about seeing angel faces in the stars? I think it's fishy, but maybe that's because I'm such a "conspiracy theorist." Well we have had toast for about that long and people have only just started seeing Jesus! Observe as Goz does the best she could do within the parameters provided for her and the intellect that she evolved with.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 4:08:12 GMT
Well we have had toast for about that long and people have only just started seeing Jesus! Observe as Goz does the best she could do within the parameters provided for her and the intellect that she evolved with. At least he is not blonde haired and blue eyed! Come to think of it, that would be pretty hard to achieve. It would have to be a bit like 'negative 'toast. Maybe it would be 'demon or devil toast, with Jesus depicted in negative as blond?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 4:14:08 GMT
Observe as Goz does the best she could do within the parameters provided for her and the intellect that she evolved with. At least he is not blonde haired and blue eyed! Come to think of it, that would be pretty hard to achieve. It would have to be a bit like 'negative 'toast. Maybe it would be 'demon or devil toast, with Jesus depicted in negative as blond? There are no reliable reports that Jesus was blond. Maybe He was, but what difference does it make? Am I supposed to abandon Him because I have red hair and He has blond? It is illogical, Goz.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 4:17:31 GMT
At least he is not blonde haired and blue eyed! Come to think of it, that would be pretty hard to achieve. It would have to be a bit like 'negative 'toast. Maybe it would be 'demon or devil toast, with Jesus depicted in negative as blond? There are no reliable reports that Jesus was blond. Maybe He was, but what difference does it make? Am I supposed to abandon Him because I have red hair and He has blond? It is illogical, Goz. ...and THAT is precisely my point, my Stella soaked friend.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 4:22:42 GMT
There are no reliable reports that Jesus was blond. Maybe He was, but what difference does it make? Am I supposed to abandon Him because I have red hair and He has blond? It is illogical, Goz. ...and THAT is precisely my point, my Stella soaked friend. I'm glad you agree with me that there is no good reason for a Nordic like myself to abandon Christ simply because He wasn't Nordic.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 4:25:15 GMT
...and THAT is precisely my point, my Stella soaked friend. I'm glad you agree with me that there is no good reason for a Nordic like myself to abandon Christ simply because He wasn't Nordic. *****high five*****
We are like twins/clones
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 4:27:12 GMT
*****high five*****
We are like twins/clones If that is the case, you are the evil twin/clone.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 4:33:35 GMT
*****high five*****
We are like twins/clones If that is the case, you are the evil twin/clone. OH? ...and I an sure that is JUST how you like it!
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 2, 2019 4:38:47 GMT
If that is the case, you are the evil twin/clone. OH? ...and I an sure that is JUST how you like it! In a world where everything is relative, I like better than HELL.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 2, 2019 4:41:34 GMT
|
|