|
Post by charzhino on Mar 15, 2019 13:16:40 GMT
screencrush.com/rotten-tomatoes-verify-audience-score-users/Protecting Captain Marvel campaign still going strong. One has to wonder why this specific movie is getting so much attention from Fandango execs. Who by the way in the bolded quote is clearly saying, we are disappointed that you disliked Captain Marvel EVEN if you did see it. What a shameless thing to suggest.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 15, 2019 13:24:57 GMT
You don't find this suspicious?
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Mar 15, 2019 13:31:45 GMT
You don't find this suspicious? Yes but this isnt the first time this has happened. For some reason they are changing the whole system because of Captain Marvel. And what the Fandango exec said at the end is the most concerning part.
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Mar 15, 2019 13:32:15 GMT
You don't find this suspicious? Someone worked out what they did. They took all the positive want to see votes and added those to the audience score. It's pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 15, 2019 14:08:19 GMT
You don't find this suspicious? Yes but this isnt the first time this has happened. For some reason they are changing the whole system because of Captain Marvel. And what the Fandango exec said at the end is the most concerning part. The author of the article envisioned a scenario where somebody actually bought a ticket. All the fandango exec said was, The executive doesn't make any assumptions about who bought tickets through Fandango, he's only commenting on those leaving negative reviews on RT (which is also owned by Fandango). I don't really follow this stuff but I'm sure this isn't the first time it's happened. I'm just glad the site is finally doing something about trolls trying to rig the game against a film. Every film deserves a level playing field.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 15, 2019 14:24:41 GMT
That 62% audience score is actually hilarious.
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on Mar 15, 2019 14:28:09 GMT
You don't find this suspicious? Well it fits his narrative, doesn't it?
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Mar 15, 2019 14:43:35 GMT
That 62% audience score is actually hilarious. Given RT have rigged the score as much as they can and it's still only 62%, I have to agree with you there.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 15, 2019 14:48:38 GMT
That 62% audience score is actually hilarious. Given RT have rigged the score as much as they can and it's still only 62%, I have to agree with you there. That's why it's so amazing, yeah. I didn't think anything could be more cringe and hilarious than BP getting 97%. Here I go again! Where's that recipe for cooking crow?
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Mar 15, 2019 14:54:19 GMT
Yes but this isnt the first time this has happened. For some reason they are changing the whole system because of Captain Marvel. And what the Fandango exec said at the end is the most concerning part. The author of the article envisioned a scenario where somebody actually bought a ticket. All the fandango exec said was, The executive doesn't make any assumptions about who bought tickets through Fandango, he's only commenting on those leaving negative reviews on RT (which is also owned by Fandango). I don't really follow this stuff but I'm sure this isn't the first time it's happened. I'm just glad the site is finally doing something about trolls trying to rig the game against a film. Every film deserves a level playing field.
You dont find what the fandango exec said worrying? Hes admitting he is disappointed that people have given negative reviews to Captain Marvel. Not sure how you can interpret it any other way
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Mar 15, 2019 14:57:16 GMT
You don't find this suspicious? Well it fits his narrative, doesn't it? I know you aren't one of the smarter users on this board but if you have decent reading skills, you will find out that I agreed with Reys suspicions in the following sentence typed by myself
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 15, 2019 15:02:47 GMT
The author of the article envisioned a scenario where somebody actually bought a ticket. All the fandango exec said was, The executive doesn't make any assumptions about who bought tickets through Fandango, he's only commenting on those leaving negative reviews on RT (which is also owned by Fandango). I don't really follow this stuff but I'm sure this isn't the first time it's happened. I'm just glad the site is finally doing something about trolls trying to rig the game against a film. Every film deserves a level playing field.
You dont find what the fandango exec said worrying? Hes admitting he is disappointed that people have given negative reviews to Captain Marvel. Not sure how you can interpret it any other way
He flat out says he was disappointed that they gave it a negative review even if they didn't see it. I specifically bolded that quote. He finds it disturbing that people are giving negative reviews to movies even if they haven't seen the film. " ...whether they saw it or not." For whatever reason you're twisting the intent of his comments here. It speaks volumes that you admit you can't interpret it any other way.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Mar 15, 2019 15:08:52 GMT
You dont find what the fandango exec said worrying? Hes admitting he is disappointed that people have given negative reviews to Captain Marvel. Not sure how you can interpret it any other way
He flat out says he was disappointed that they gave it a negative review even if they didn't see it. I specifically bolded that quote. He finds it disturbing that people are giving negative reviews to movies even if they haven't seen the film. " ...whether they saw it or not." For whatever reason you're twisting the intent of his comments here. It speaks volumes that you admit you can't interpret it any other way.
Im going to reword your quote and listen to how it sounds when you read it back
Im not twisting anything. He said whether they saw it or not. Implying, even if they did go and watch Captain Marvel legitimatley, he is STILL disappointed they are giving the movie negative reviews. Even the people who saw it. You dont find this troubling coming from a executive who is part responsible for audience rating mechanisms and is openly admitting he doesnt like the fact people are leaving thumbs down reviews...
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Mar 15, 2019 15:20:15 GMT
You would think that the trolls-who-swear-they-aren't-trolls would take a break after their no-it's-totally-legit 27% "want to see" RT rating preceded one of the biggest CBM openings of all time.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 15, 2019 15:21:50 GMT
You would think that the trolls-who-swear-they-aren't-trolls would take a break Have you forgotten what ryboto politely explained to you on the Star Wars board?
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 15, 2019 15:23:02 GMT
He flat out says he was disappointed that they gave it a negative review even if they didn't see it. I specifically bolded that quote. He finds it disturbing that people are giving negative reviews to movies even if they haven't seen the film. " ...whether they saw it or not." For whatever reason you're twisting the intent of his comments here. It speaks volumes that you admit you can't interpret it any other way.
Im going to reword your quote and listen to how it sounds when you read it back
Im not twisting anything. He said whether they saw it or not. Implying, even if they did go and watch Captain Marvel legitimatley, he is STILL disappointed they are giving the movie negative reviews. Even the people who saw it. You dont find this troubling coming from a executive who is part responsible for audience rating mechanisms and is openly admitting he doesnt like the fact people are leaving thumbs down reviews... Taking it as read, regardless of my opinions on the subject, I personally did not read it as you see it. Break it down and yes I agree it doesn't sound right, but as read/said I ceratinly do not think that is the intention. I can imagine myself using similar wording and not intending to say what you have broken it down to mean.
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Mar 15, 2019 15:26:40 GMT
You would think that the trolls-who-swear-they-aren't-trolls would take a break Have you forgotten what ryboto politely explained to you on the Star Wars board? I guess I should hesitate before ruining ebverybody's good time on the Star Wars board complaining about "SJWs" and "the feminazi agenda". I'm ashamed of myself. Now, if i could just figure out how a movie that only 27% of people wanted to see made so much money...
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 15, 2019 15:28:01 GMT
Have you forgotten what ryboto politely explained to you on the Star Wars board? I guess I should hesitate before ruining ebverybody's good time on the Star Wars board complaining about "SJWs" and "the feminazi agenda". I'm ashamed of myself. Good. You should be. Nobody likes you over there.
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Mar 15, 2019 15:31:25 GMT
Have you forgotten what ryboto politely explained to you on the Star Wars board? I guess I should hesitate before ruining ebverybody's good time on the Star Wars board complaining about "SJWs" and "the feminazi agenda". I'm ashamed of myself. Now, if i could just figure out how a movie that only 27% of people wanted to see made so much money... What do you get out of being a SJW douchebag?
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 15, 2019 15:57:09 GMT
He flat out says he was disappointed that they gave it a negative review even if they didn't see it. I specifically bolded that quote. He finds it disturbing that people are giving negative reviews to movies even if they haven't seen the film. " ...whether they saw it or not." For whatever reason you're twisting the intent of his comments here. It speaks volumes that you admit you can't interpret it any other way.
Im going to reword your quote and listen to how it sounds when you read it back
Im not twisting anything. He said whether they saw it or not. Implying, even if they did go and watch Captain Marvel legitimatley, he is STILL disappointed they are giving the movie negative reviews. Even the people who saw it. You dont find this troubling coming from a executive who is part responsible for audience rating mechanisms and is openly admitting he doesnt like the fact people are leaving thumbs down reviews... That isn't what he's implying at all. He's disappointed that people are leaving negative reviews even if they haven't seen the film. For example: "I think it's stupid if people walk into the middle of the road whether they looked both ways or not." See what I just said? I'm saying it's disappointing if sometimes people walk into the road without looking. And no, I don't find it troubling. You know why? The Black Panther audience rating. If that rating is as bogus as some have claimed, why didn't the powers that be do the same thing for Captain Marvel? If the fix is in as you suggest, these guys sure are shitty at their jobs. Captain Marvel has an average rating, which as a Marvel fan I can say is exactly what the film deserves. Instead of the 97% or whatever BP had, CM is all the way down at 62%. And you still think there's a conspiracy to get it to 62%? The only conspiracy is the one that has more people voting on CM in a week than they did for IW-- a film that made $2B-- in its entire theatrical run.
|
|