|
Post by NJtoTX on Mar 26, 2019 23:54:44 GMT
offensive and defensive
Hail Marys should be fun.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 27, 2019 0:10:15 GMT
offensive and defensive Hail Marys should be fun. What about non-calls like in the Rams-Saints game? If there's an obvious PI that's not called, are coaches allowed a replay challenge for that?
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on Mar 27, 2019 0:15:47 GMT
Clubs voted to expand replay review to cover offensive and defensive pass interference. The change will be evaluated after one year. Reviews to be initiated by coaches’ challenge unless in the last 2 mins of the half or game (initiated in NY)
All offensive and defensive pass interference calls, as well as non-calls, now be challenged, per league source.
Whether the foul is called on the field or not, officials will be able to correct clear errors on impactful plays.
This rule change also expands automatic replay reviews to include scoring plays and turnovers negated by a foul, and any Try attempt (extra point or two-point conversion).
|
|
|
Post by FrankSobotka1514 on Mar 27, 2019 0:16:20 GMT
offensive and defensive Hail Marys should be fun. What about non-calls like in the Rams-Saints game? If there's an obvious PI that's not called, are coaches allowed a replay challenge for that? Calls and non-calls are both reviewable.
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on Mar 27, 2019 0:18:07 GMT
To expand protection of the player being blocked, @nfl owners voted to eliminate blindside blocks. One-third of all concussions on punts were caused by blindside blocks. With the rule change, any forcible contact by the blocker with his head, shoulder or forearm is prohibited.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 27, 2019 0:19:17 GMT
Clubs voted to expand replay review to cover offensive and defensive pass interference. The change will be evaluated after one year. Reviews to be initiated by coaches’ challenge unless in the last 2 mins of the half or game (initiated in NY) All offensive and defensive pass interference calls, as well as non-calls, now be challenged, per league source. Whether the foul is called on the field or not, officials will be able to correct clear errors on impactful plays. This rule change also expands automatic replay reviews to include scoring plays and turnovers negated by a foul, and any Try attempt (extra point or two-point conversion). So when the refs throw a bogus flag for a phantom PI (like they often do against teams that are playing against the Pats), the coach can challenge it and get the flag taken back?
|
|
|
Post by FrankSobotka1514 on Mar 27, 2019 0:20:35 GMT
Clubs voted to expand replay review to cover offensive and defensive pass interference. The change will be evaluated after one year. Reviews to be initiated by coaches’ challenge unless in the last 2 mins of the half or game (initiated in NY) All offensive and defensive pass interference calls, as well as non-calls, now be challenged, per league source. Whether the foul is called on the field or not, officials will be able to correct clear errors on impactful plays. This rule change also expands automatic replay reviews to include scoring plays and turnovers negated by a foul, and any Try attempt (extra point or two-point conversion). So when the refs throw a bogus flag for a phantom PI (like they often do against teams that are playing against the Pats), the coach can challenge it and get the flag taken back? Unless the replay official is in on the conspiracy as well.
|
|
|
Post by DrKrippen on Mar 27, 2019 0:25:03 GMT
It'll be a coaches challenge, right? You can expect all of those to be gone by the first quarter then.
|
|
|
Post by sdm3 on Mar 27, 2019 0:28:06 GMT
The milk has spilled. It can't be unspilled. I've already been well assured that Saints fans will never watch another NFL game.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Mar 27, 2019 0:29:26 GMT
Clubs voted to expand replay review to cover offensive and defensive pass interference. The change will be evaluated after one year. Reviews to be initiated by coaches’ challenge unless in the last 2 mins of the half or game (initiated in NY) All offensive and defensive pass interference calls, as well as non-calls, now be challenged, per league source. Whether the foul is called on the field or not, officials will be able to correct clear errors on impactful plays. This rule change also expands automatic replay reviews to include scoring plays and turnovers negated by a foul, and any Try attempt (extra point or two-point conversion). So when the refs throw a bogus flag for a phantom PI (like they often do against teams that are playing against the Pats), the coach can challenge it and get the flag taken back? This thread has nothing to do with Shady Brady or the New England Patriots. Why are you trolling this thread?
|
|
ctown28
Sophomore
@ctown28
Posts: 507
Likes: 391
|
Post by ctown28 on Mar 27, 2019 1:31:43 GMT
I’m glad they did something, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing. I think ALL pass interference that are called on the field should be an automatic review, just like scoring plays are, If it’s obvious it’s a quick review and really doesn’t add much time to the game. I guess the non calls, this is the only way to handle it
i also think this needs to be expanded to roughing the passer calls
All that being said, I’m not worried about the length of a game, I’ve never turned off a game because it was taking to long. I’ve turned plenty off for being boring or lopsided though
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 27, 2019 13:50:17 GMT
This is awful. What's next, reviewing holding calls? They just added 10 minutes to an already bloated broadcast of every game (giving us approximately 157 more Bud Light and Ford commercials per Sunday) which was surely the real impetus behind this.
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on Mar 27, 2019 15:33:17 GMT
This is awful. What's next, reviewing holding calls? They just added 10 minutes to an already bloated broadcast of every game (giving us approximately 157 more Bud Light and Ford commercials per Sunday) which was surely the real impetus behind this. Coaches have the same number of challenges as before. Maybe an extra couple of minutes if in the last 2 minutes when the review is initiated from the booth.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 27, 2019 15:40:43 GMT
This is awful. What's next, reviewing holding calls? They just added 10 minutes to an already bloated broadcast of every game (giving us approximately 157 more Bud Light and Ford commercials per Sunday) which was surely the real impetus behind this. Coaches have the same number of challenges as before. Maybe an extra couple of minutes if in the last 2 minutes when the review is initiated from the booth. Which is exactly when desperate teams are going to start airing it out. What's the criteria for a booth reviewed non-PI call? Every pass play where the defender was anywhere near the receiver? Then they have to go back and review the line of scrimmage to make sure it wasn't tipped? I wonder how many potential game changing receptions in the last two minutes will be called back due to questionable offensive PIs spotted during a review? I don't see how you can review non-calls. It's just crazy.
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on Mar 27, 2019 15:56:22 GMT
Coaches have the same number of challenges as before. Maybe an extra couple of minutes if in the last 2 minutes when the review is initiated from the booth. What's the criteria for a booth reviewed non-PI call? Watching the TV broadcast and see how outraged the broadcast crew is.
|
|
|
Post by hoskotafe3 on Mar 27, 2019 23:26:26 GMT
Stupid decission. Replays slow the game down enough without looking at fairly subjective calls like oass interference.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Mar 28, 2019 0:51:12 GMT
Stupid decission. Replays slow the game down enough without looking at fairly subjective calls like oass interference. What is with this crazy desire to speed up games? Nobody ever turned off a good game because it was taking too long. People are more concerned with fairness and the better team winning. Than cheating and having the worse team win, just so the game would be what --- 2 minutes shorter?
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Mar 28, 2019 0:52:05 GMT
This is awful. What's next, reviewing holding calls? They just added 10 minutes to an already bloated broadcast of every game (giving us approximately 157 more Bud Light and Ford commercials per Sunday) which was surely the real impetus behind this. What is with this crazy desire to speed up games? Nobody ever turned off a good game because it was taking too long. People are more concerned with fairness and the better team winning. Than cheating and having the worse team win, just so the game would be what --- 2 minutes shorter?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2019 2:48:44 GMT
I thought I read that roughing the passer was part of this too. Am I wrong?
Also I don't see an issue with the length of games but I'm aware that not the rest of people feel the same. People live in different time zones and may not want games finishing past midnight on a Monday or Sunday night when they have to work in the morning.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Mar 28, 2019 3:23:35 GMT
I thought I read that roughing the passer was part of this too. Am I wrong? Also I don't see an issue with the length of games but I'm aware that not the rest of people feel the same. People live in different time zones and may not want games finishing past midnight on a Monday or Sunday night when they have to work in the morning. That is a good point. But that would not be the case for Sunday day games. Or the playoffs. The Saints/Rams "no call" happened in the post season.
|
|