|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Apr 3, 2019 1:50:22 GMT
Thats quantity not quailty And that's why twelve years later, Transformer movies are still being made. Money is the point of the film making. Money is important but quailty should come first if not your falling for tricks
|
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Apr 3, 2019 1:52:23 GMT
Yes, it is. That's why it's call show business. This, quality is neither here nor there if a movie is doing major business then its clearly a crowd pleaser and doing something right in the eyes of investors. Yet you Bash Venom. Very hypocritical
|
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Apr 3, 2019 3:19:32 GMT
And that's why twelve years later, Transformer movies are still being made. Money is the point of the film making. Money is important but quailty should come first if not your falling for tricks Yeah, like the DCEU tricking their fans into seeing bad movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Apr 3, 2019 3:19:52 GMT
This, quality is neither here nor there if a movie is doing major business then its clearly a crowd pleaser and doing something right in the eyes of investors. Yet you Bash Venom. Very hypocritical Venom was garbage.
|
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Apr 3, 2019 4:50:22 GMT
This, quality is neither here nor there if a movie is doing major business then its clearly a crowd pleaser and doing something right in the eyes of investors. Yet you Bash Venom. Very hypocritical I suggest to re-read my comment before response, others you would realize that I was talking about investors - As in studio executives who put out the product and those who support it in marketing like negotiated product clients. I was supporting PreachCaleb's point that money means pretty much everything in the film business, no movie ever has not been made for the money, you understand this, yes? You understand that studios need tentpole releases like superhero/comic based titles so that they can fund other sorts of productions, right? Regarding Venom I already gave my theory that a big reason why it was a popular movie was because of the interaction between Tom Hardy's Eddie Brock and the titular character - and no surprise, many have said it was the main aspect they liked about the picture. But that's besides the point - you totally misinterpreted my post.
|
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Apr 3, 2019 5:05:28 GMT
And that's why twelve years later, Transformer movies are still being made. Money is the point of the film making. Money is important but quailty should come first if not your falling for tricks I am afraid you, as well as your buddy DC-Fan, have continued to fail to grasp what Preach Caleb is saying - film making is first and foremost a business, you HAVE to make movies FOR MONEY, studios need money to continue to stay afloat in the industry and fund other productions under their name. When a person pitches a story to a company or said company is looking to acquire a property they need to determine if its really worth the investment because they do not want to waste resources and lose money. Of course quality is important, the job of delivering a good product is on the filmmakers the company hires to make the movie and if its testing well and there are major takeaways from members of the audience and what they responded towards best the company will use the information when crafting the marketing campaign for the average consumer. Critics' opinions matter which is why even if the product scores quite poor with the majority of them they still manage to find one good review and use a quote from it to try to convince movie goers it might be worth their time.
|
|
|
|
Post by merh on Apr 3, 2019 6:43:25 GMT
Great video! Points out many of the flaws that I've mentioned previously, such as the bad writing, Brie Larson's awful performance (I said Brie Larson's performance was wooden and robotic; this video says Brie Larson was like a brick), and lack of any personality or character development for the Captain Marvel character. IT'S NOT A CAT It's an alien like Rocket & Groot or Howard the Duck. Goose is a sentient being who displays intelligent thought such as swallowing the Tesseract & returning it. L.A. has smog. It has grey days. The team Carol is with in the beginning AREN'T HER FRIENDS. THEY ARE HER KIDNAPPERS. Actually, Yon-rogg is her kidnapper. Some of the team seem just as uninformed as Carol has been kept like when Yon-rogg lies to Ronan about their location. So why the FUCK should ANYONE want her to try to reunite with her kidnappers? She has plenty of personality. Why are guys so focused on Carol's emotions? So every Marvel hero has to be the same? Point-Thor didn't learn humility in the first movie. As his father said-he FORGOT what Odin taught him about being a warrior. Thor was all trying to make HIS mark as king so he forgot the wisdom he had been taught. His time on earth reminded him what was important, not unlike IM2 Tony discovering his father still had wisdom to dispense. And that his dad was trying to do right by sending him to all those schools, not get rid of him. No, the feminism isn't as blatant as all the idiot haters expected before the movie came out, but it IS very feminist. When we meet her, Vers is doing her best to fit in, even though it feels wrong in places. The nightmares. Like women fitting into the world by living by the rules men set. At the end she discovers all the odd feelings were right. She wasn't who they told her she was and she didn't have to play by the rules her kidnappers made. Feige said they went with a Robocop motif of a hero who doesnt know who she is. It's similar to Bucky, except we met him in First Avenger & knew he was Cap's very best friend, pretty much his brother. Then we see that good man has been destroyed to where he doesn't know who he is & has to set out to find out who he is at the end of Winter Soldier. So Bucky should want to reunite with those other Winter Soldier "brothers"? Return to the scientists who stole his identity? So this guy doesn't get the film.
|
|
|
|
Post by merh on Apr 3, 2019 6:51:08 GMT
Excellent I REALLY like this movie. This review really captures the good stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Apr 3, 2019 12:08:02 GMT
Yet you Bash Venom. Very hypocritical Venom was garbage. People only hate it because its not in the mcu. Captain Marvel was garbage
|
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 3, 2019 13:05:08 GMT
And that's why twelve years later, Transformer movies are still being made. Money is the point of the film making. Money is important but quailty should come first if not your falling for tricks Show business. Money comes first. That's what keeps studios making more films.
|
|
|
|
Post by merh on Apr 3, 2019 13:38:39 GMT
People only hate it because its not in the mcu. Captain Marvel was garbage I have no interest in Venom. The character's inclusion is what ruined Raimi's last Spiderman flick. The Venom movie was interesting, but not stupendous
|
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Apr 3, 2019 14:32:44 GMT
People only hate it because its not in the mcu. Captain Marvel was garbage No, people hated Venom because it was awful. People liked Captain Marvel because at the very least decent. |
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Apr 3, 2019 14:38:25 GMT
People only hate it because its not in the mcu. Captain Marvel was garbage Or because they didn't think Venom was very good, meanwhile look at all the love Into the Spider-Verse received, another Sony movie that had no ties to the MCU.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Apr 3, 2019 16:23:11 GMT
People only hate it because its not in the mcu. Captain Marvel was garbage You're not entirely wrong. Garbage was featured in the film.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Apr 3, 2019 16:24:17 GMT
Because she's a woman! She's barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen!
|
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Apr 3, 2019 20:17:00 GMT
Because she's a woman! She's barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen! Sounds like a Quiet Place. |
|
|
|
Post by James on Apr 3, 2019 20:23:56 GMT
Why don’t you post this in the Politics board, why don’t ya?
|
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on Apr 5, 2019 6:16:04 GMT
And that's why twelve years later, Transformer movies are still being made. Money is the point of the film making. Money is important but quailty should come first if not your falling for tricks They got rid of Darcy because quality is important. |
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Apr 5, 2019 6:24:08 GMT
Money is important but quailty should come first if not your falling for tricks They got rid of Darcy because quality is important. One of the many reasons for which Ragnarok is way better than Thor 1 and 2
|
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Apr 5, 2019 8:47:55 GMT
They got rid of Darcy because quality is important. One of the many reasons for which Ragnarok is way better than Thor 1 and 2 Ragnerok is the worst Thor and one of the worst thor movies. I d give it a razzie
|
|
