|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Apr 30, 2019 22:48:15 GMT
Oh my God, you're right. And wait, there's more. The Night King and Oberyn both used a spear! The Mountain is also a hero! And the Mountain also killed two future Mad Targaryens! Ther hero we needed! See, it's easy to make things up. NK walking out of flames Is not making things up it happened ,Dany walking out of flames is not making things up ,it happened twice , you on the other hand JUST make things UP .see the difference ?? What did I make up? Did the Night King not use a spear multiple times? Was Oberyn not known for using a spear? Did the Mountain not kill 2 baby targaryens? What from my post was made up? It is as true as your Night King-Dany connection. |
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on May 1, 2019 1:50:28 GMT
NK walking out of flames Is not making things up it happened ,Dany walking out of flames is not making things up ,it happened twice , you on the other hand JUST make things UP .see the difference ?? What did I make up? Did the Night King not use a spear multiple times? Was Oberyn not known for using a spear? Did the Mountain not kill 2 baby targaryens? What from my post was made up? It is as true as your Night King-Dany connection. re-read your what you posted you said is easy to make things up
|
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on May 1, 2019 2:30:39 GMT
What did I make up? Did the Night King not use a spear multiple times? Was Oberyn not known for using a spear? Did the Mountain not kill 2 baby targaryens? What from my post was made up? It is as true as your Night King-Dany connection. re-read your what you posted you said is easy to make things up You are right. I misspoke. I should have said "it is easy to make false equivalencies up." I substituted things instead. That was poor communication. So, see? It's very easy to make false equivalencies up. I turned the Mountain into the hero of the story using them. You turned Dany into the villain. Its the same thing, and it's very easy to do. |
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on May 1, 2019 15:26:59 GMT
re-read your what you posted you said is easy to make things up You are right. I misspoke. I should have said "it is easy to make false equivalencies up." I substituted things instead. That was poor communication. So, see? It's very easy to make false equivalencies up. I turned the Mountain into the hero of the story using them. You turned Dany into the villain. Its the same thing, and it's very easy to do. i dont care what the mountain or the other guy with the spears did , can they walk out of flames? are they unburnt? NOso my topic is about two very important characters in this story the Night KING AND DAENERYS Targaryen who cant BURN that doesnt compare with any of the other stuff you posted
|
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on May 1, 2019 18:34:24 GMT
You are right. I misspoke. I should have said "it is easy to make false equivalencies up." I substituted things instead. That was poor communication. So, see? It's very easy to make false equivalencies up. I turned the Mountain into the hero of the story using them. You turned Dany into the villain. Its the same thing, and it's very easy to do. i dont care what the mountain or the other guy with the spears did , can they walk out of flames? are they unburnt? NOso my topic is about two very important characters in this story the Night KING AND DAENERYS Targaryen who cant BURN that doesnt compare with any of the other stuff you posted You simply aren't understanding me. I am saying that just because neither character can burn doesn't mean they are both evil. Just like just because two people use a spear doesn't mean they are the same. It is called a false equivalency. I believe your theory to be wrong. If it isn't, I will say how right you were and how wrong I was. Will you pledge to do the same should your theory prove wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on May 1, 2019 22:06:56 GMT
i dont care what the mountain or the other guy with the spears did , can they walk out of flames? are they unburnt? NOso my topic is about two very important characters in this story the Night KING AND DAENERYS Targaryen who cant BURN that doesnt compare with any of the other stuff you posted You simply aren't understanding me. I am saying that just because neither character can burn doesn't mean they are both evil. Just like just because two people use a spear doesn't mean they are the same. It is called a false equivalency. I believe your theory to be wrong. If it isn't, I will say how right you were and how wrong I was. Will you pledge to do the same should your theory prove wrong? I don't think you even understand my theory I made a connection between two characters on the show that don't burn that sign or message WW left them on the wall can't simply mean nothing , unless writers are total idiots and they end the show with no answers , and I have no problem saying when I'm wrong it's not often though  I have been wrong before jorah dying I always thought he would live to kill Dany and not die in her arms so I was wrong about that however they were still together so I would say I was 50% correct on that I don't watch the show just to be proven right or wrong but when I'm right sometimes I do like rubbing it to the faces of some who put me down or my theories or my favorite characters and if jonsa happens prepare I will be decorating this board with JONSA 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗
|
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on May 1, 2019 22:38:53 GMT
You simply aren't understanding me. I am saying that just because neither character can burn doesn't mean they are both evil. Just like just because two people use a spear doesn't mean they are the same. It is called a false equivalency. I believe your theory to be wrong. If it isn't, I will say how right you were and how wrong I was. Will you pledge to do the same should your theory prove wrong? I don't think you even understand my theory I made a connection between two characters on the show that don't burn that sign or message WW left them on the wall can't simply mean nothing , unless writers are total idiots and they end the show with no answers , and I have no problem saying when I'm wrong it's not often though I have been wrong before jorah dying I always thought he would live to kill Dany and not die in her arms so I was wrong about that however they were still together so I would say I was 50% correct on that I don't watch the show just to be proven right or wrong but when I'm right sometimes I do like rubbing it to the faces of some who put me down or my theories or my favorite characters and if jonsa happens prepare I will be decorating this board with JONSA 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 And you should. But no, Jorah dying in Dany's arms is not 50% credit for saying Jorah would kill Dany. That's crazy talk. Ane I understand your theory. I'm saying you are using a false equivalency to show your theory will come true. |
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on May 2, 2019 14:53:09 GMT
I don't think you even understand my theory I made a connection between two characters on the show that don't burn that sign or message WW left them on the wall can't simply mean nothing , unless writers are total idiots and they end the show with no answers , and I have no problem saying when I'm wrong it's not often though I have been wrong before jorah dying I always thought he would live to kill Dany and not die in her arms so I was wrong about that however they were still together so I would say I was 50% correct on that I don't watch the show just to be proven right or wrong but when I'm right sometimes I do like rubbing it to the faces of some who put me down or my theories or my favorite characters and if jonsa happens prepare I will be decorating this board with JONSA 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 And you should. But no, Jorah dying in Dany's arms is not 50% credit for saying Jorah would kill Dany. That's crazy talk. Ane I understand your theory. I'm saying you are using a false equivalency to show your theory will come true. its not crazy talk at all it makes sense for someone loyal and in love with dany to betray her when it happened before by the same man Jorah! it made perfect sense but since jorah wont be the one- someone close to her will betray her for love and that love is for someone else if its tyrion love for his family jamie/ (child cersei is carrying ) if it s jon he will kill her for his love for sansa/ its not false equivalency , when one of the original plotlines was having jon fall in love with one of his sisters ,political jon was shown may times over the course of this season they made a point to highlight jon would do anything for the starks if he knows they are in danger sam being swaped by wights jon didnt even stop to help because his goal was saving bran he will do the same and will betray dany
|
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on May 2, 2019 20:33:51 GMT
And you should. But no, Jorah dying in Dany's arms is not 50% credit for saying Jorah would kill Dany. That's crazy talk. Ane I understand your theory. I'm saying you are using a false equivalency to show your theory will come true. its not crazy talk at all it makes sense for someone loyal and in love with dany to betray her when it happened before by the same man Jorah! it made perfect sense but since jorah wont be the one- someone close to her will betray her for love and that love is for someone else if its tyrion love for his family jamie/ (child cersei is carrying ) if it s jon he will kill her for his love for sansa/ its not false equivalency , when one of the original plotlines was having jon fall in love with one of his sisters ,political jon was shown may times over the course of this season they made a point to highlight jon would do anything for the starks if he knows they are in danger sam being swaped by wights jon didnt even stop to help because his goal was saving bran he will do the same and will betray dany What? That post gives me a headache. |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 2, 2019 20:46:33 GMT
NK pretty much revealed in this scene who the true enemies are Oh my God, you're right. And wait, there's more. The Night King and Oberyn both used a spear! The Mountain is also a hero! And the Mountain also killed two future Mad Targaryens! Ther hero we needed! See, it's easy to make things up. The Mad Targaryen theory that Dany haters frequently spread seems not likely to happen as indicated by D&D. I do be willing to apologise if that actually happens. But don't think it will. D&D have hinted previously that Dany is not like her father and so I do be very surprised if you get to see a "Mad Dany". Excerpt from an article by Business Insider. To be honest at this point of time Sansa/Cersei fans have developed an alternate model of interpreting the show. Good thing is that only two more weeks and we are done. Most of their beliefs will never go canon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leo of Red Keep on May 3, 2019 3:57:44 GMT
To be honest at this point of time Sansa/Cersei fans have developed an alternate model of interpreting the show. Good thing is that only two more weeks and we are done. Most of their beliefs will never go canon. Here goes another dumbass with "canon" considerations. There is no "interpreting" the show, which has proven to be aimless entertainment making use of popular stupidities and tendencies. There is no going back to some holy original truth like book wankers seem to do all the time. I do not take this story as the word of some deity, some lesson in wisdom or a moral compass. Whatever the authors decide to say has bearings only on what I'll think of them. I use it to bring out my thoughts and opinion to the fore and I couldn't be bothered with theirs beyond showing how they stink. That's right, Daenerys is not portrayed as mentally ill, she has full control on what she does or decides. That's what makes her most repulsive because she is an assumed tyrant, not some deranged paranoid fool. But if the story ends by revealing her as one of the intended villains, it will mostly be for shock value, with the fat man giggling at his "good joke". 
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 3, 2019 4:18:09 GMT
To be honest at this point of time Sansa/Cersei fans have developed an alternate model of interpreting the show. Good thing is that only two more weeks and we are done. Most of their beliefs will never go canon. Here goes another dumbass with "canon" considerations. There is no "interpreting" the show, which has proven to be aimless entertainment making use of popular stupidities and tendencies. There is no going back to some holy original truth like book wankers seem to do all the time. I do not take this story as the word of some deity, some lesson in wisdom or a moral compass. Whatever the authors decide to say has bearings only on what I'll think of them. I use it to bring out my thoughts and opinion to the fore and I couldn't be bothered with theirs beyond showing how they stink. That's right, Daenerys is not portrayed as mentally ill, she has full control on what she does or decides. That's what makes her most repulsive because she is an assumed tyrant, not some deranged paranoid fool. But if the story ends by revealing her as one of the intended villains, it will mostly be for shock value, with the fat man giggling at his "good joke". ^^Here goes the fucktard who keeps interpreting the show and even raises questions & says the exact opposite here. This moron pwns himself on the spot. Further, nobody gives a fuck about what a stupid wanker like you thinks of Martin or for that matter about anyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leo of Red Keep on May 3, 2019 4:21:45 GMT
Here goes another dumbass with "canon" considerations. There is no "interpreting" the show, which has proven to be aimless entertainment making use of popular stupidities and tendencies. There is no going back to some holy original truth like book wankers seem to do all the time. I do not take this story as the word of some deity, some lesson in wisdom or a moral compass. Whatever the authors decide to say has bearings only on what I'll think of them. I use it to bring out my thoughts and opinion to the fore and I couldn't be bothered with theirs beyond showing how they stink. That's right, Daenerys is not portrayed as mentally ill, she has full control on what she does or decides. That's what makes her most repulsive because she is an assumed tyrant, not some deranged paranoid fool. But if the story ends by revealing her as one of the intended villains, it will mostly be for shock value, with the fat man giggling at his "good joke". ^^Here goes the fucktard who keeps interpreting the show and even raises questions & says the exact opposite here. This moron pwns himself on the spot. Further, nobody gives a fuck about what a stupid wanker like you thinks of Martin or for that matter about anyone. Stick to your own opinion, dumbshit. You're not speaking for anyone nor ever will.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 3, 2019 4:25:52 GMT
^^Here goes the fucktard who keeps interpreting the show and even raises questions & says the exact opposite here. This moron pwns himself on the spot. Further, nobody gives a fuck about what a stupid wanker like you thinks of Martin or for that matter about anyone. Stick to your own opinion, dumbshit. You're not speaking for anyone nor ever will. Shut up, wanker. The only person who frequently speaks for others is you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leo of Red Keep on May 3, 2019 4:42:36 GMT
Everyone is saying this and I'm afraid it must be seen from the symbolic side. The whole Bran nonsense sticks out badly because the rest has felt so real all along. It seems like the whole north (of the Wall) story-line is a dream sequence of sort, an allegory, an idea while everything south of Winterfell is real. It's a hard proposition to sell and it clearly isn't bought by anyone who's not an unconditional fan. thats how i felt all along , i love fantasy shows but when they are explained right i do not think George martin knew what to do with the WW He must have known exactly what he wanted to do. They were not an afterthought. I read he hesitated about having dragons. If the hints converge, if Ice and Fire really turn out to be the main villains intended from the start, it will have been a twist in plain sight all along and the fat man will giggle himself to death. And honestly, it really is just like him to drive the whole thing to one big final twist. There have been rumours or statements for years that the very end is a big twist. I don't know how serious they are but I fear it's true.
|
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on May 3, 2019 18:08:17 GMT
thats how i felt all along , i love fantasy shows but when they are explained right i do not think George martin knew what to do with the WW He must have known exactly what he wanted to do. They were not an afterthought. I read he hesitated about having dragons. If the hints converge, if Ice and Fire really turn out to be the main villains intended from the start, it will have been a twist in plain sight all along and the fat man will giggle himself to death. And honestly, it really is just like him to drive the whole thing to one big final twist. There have been rumours or statements for years that the very end is a big twist. I don't know how serious they are but I fear it's true. and we figured it out  i heard too he hates when readers figures out his plotlines this is why he hates jonsas
|
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on May 3, 2019 18:10:47 GMT
Oh my God, you're right. And wait, there's more. The Night King and Oberyn both used a spear! The Mountain is also a hero! And the Mountain also killed two future Mad Targaryens! Ther hero we needed! See, it's easy to make things up. The Mad Targaryen theory that Dany haters frequently spread seems not likely to happen as indicated by D&D. I do be willing to apologise if that actually happens. But don't think it will. D&D have hinted previously that Dany is not like her father and so I do be very surprised if you get to see a "Mad Dany". Excerpt from an article by Business Insider. To be honest at this point of time Sansa/Cersei fans have developed an alternate model of interpreting the show. Good thing is that only two more weeks and we are done. Most of their beliefs will never go canon. no shes not her father SHE IS WORSE Did her father have dragons??
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 3, 2019 18:17:49 GMT
The Mad Targaryen theory that Dany haters frequently spread seems not likely to happen as indicated by D&D. I do be willing to apologise if that actually happens. But don't think it will. D&D have hinted previously that Dany is not like her father and so I do be very surprised if you get to see a "Mad Dany". Excerpt from an article by Business Insider. To be honest at this point of time Sansa/Cersei fans have developed an alternate model of interpreting the show. Good thing is that only two more weeks and we are done. Most of their beliefs will never go canon. no shes not her father SHE IS WORSE Did her father have dragons??
The writer dismissed any claims of her being anything near her father. Yes, she could be worse in a minds of jealous people. Are you still hoping your Jonsa theory will come true? This hope is admirable but will be shattered in a couple of weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on May 3, 2019 18:35:47 GMT
no shes not her father SHE IS WORSE Did her father have dragons??
The writer dismissed any claims of her being anything near her father. Yes, she could be worse in a minds of jealous people. Are you still hoping your Jonsa theory will come true? This hope is admirable but will be shattered in a couple of weeks. omg why are you being so tacky? LOL relax seriously , no im not jealous of a fictional character however jonsa maybe happening soon did you read the latest? you may just burst Kit Harington : The next episode is pretty Shakespearean , either way im happy and content  and you didnt answer my question
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 3, 2019 18:45:31 GMT
The writer dismissed any claims of her being anything near her father. Yes, she could be worse in a minds of jealous people. Are you still hoping your Jonsa theory will come true? This hope is admirable but will be shattered in a couple of weeks. omg why are you being so tacky? LOL relax seriously , no im not jealous of a fictional character however jonsa maybe happening soon did you read the latest? you may just burst Kit Harington : The next episode is pretty Shakespearean , either way im happy and content and you didnt answer my question You didn't have any valid question. I can't help if you assume certain things that even the writers deny. Some Targs have been bad ( especially Dany's father) and some good. Overall Targs have done pretty well and there have been many good developments under them. Dany is not among the bad Targs.
As for your latest reveal or bomb reveal - well nothing actually happens. You claimed Jonsa and so far we have seen Jonerys. It's rather amusing that you still hope. Most of the Jonsas have mostly disappeared from the mainstream web. Good that you are still here because I will like to know your thoughts on the series after it concludes. You are a nice person anyway. Most Jonsas are good folks. I think some of them raised money for women in the UK. Just that they are jealous of Dany and propose a theory that will never go canon.
|
|
I have been wrong before jorah dying I always thought he would live to kill Dany and not die in her arms so I was wrong about that however they were still together so I would say I was 50% correct on that I don't watch the show just to be proven right or wrong but when I'm right sometimes I do like rubbing it to the faces of some who put me down or my theories or my favorite characters and if jonsa happens prepare I will be decorating this board with JONSA 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗
i heard too he hates when readers figures out his plotlines this is why he hates jonsas