|
Post by Skaathar on May 7, 2019 18:34:53 GMT
Or they simply hooked up the pym particle to the ship and made the ship itself time travel, bringing all of them along with it. After all, the Avengers were able to grab stuff from the past and time travel with them, so it shows that not everything you bring with you needs its own pym particle to travel as long as you're carrying them when you do travel. In the same way, if the ship is the one that traveled then everything it was carrying inside it should time travel with it. They're not carrying the ship. They're inside the ship. If all it took was for the ship to time travel and carry everyone inside, then an entire building could time travel and carry everyone inside the building. But that doesn't happen because the building doesn't use Pym particles and the ship doesn't use Pym particles. Each person needs their own Pym particle so Thanos had to replicate Pym particles for everyone on the ship. Yes, that's why it's the ship they send forward in time, because it's the ship carrying them. How do you know a building can't time travel?
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on May 7, 2019 18:35:33 GMT
They're not carrying the ship. They're inside the ship. If all it took was for the ship to time travel and carry everyone inside, then an entire building could time travel and carry everyone inside the building. But that doesn't happen because the building doesn't use Pym particles and the ship doesn't use Pym particles. Each person needs their own Pym particle so Thanos had to replicate Pym particles for everyone on the ship. The Russos have already confirmed Thanos made his own Pym particles. Seriously? Ugh. Not a fan of that explanation then.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 7, 2019 18:38:05 GMT
The Russos have already confirmed Thanos made his own Pym particles. So everything the OP said is valid and the Russos have confirmed that the Endgame final battle was really contrived and lazy writing. No, everything the OP said is really contrived and lazy writing, as I already explained above.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 7, 2019 18:38:07 GMT
The Russos have already confirmed Thanos made his own Pym particles. Seriously? Ugh. Not a fan of that explanation then. So everything the OP said is valid since the Russos have confirmed with that explanation that the Endgame final battle was really contrived and lazy writing.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 7, 2019 18:42:30 GMT
The Russos have already confirmed Thanos made his own Pym particles. Seriously? Ugh. Not a fan of that explanation then. This is the actual explanation. Keep in mind the it's translated from an interview with a Chinese website so use of the word 'wizard' has to be taken with a bit of context. Here's the explanation:I don't really have a problem with it. Since Thanos and his army were wiped out at the end, it's a clean sweep of the loose ends this could've left behind.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 7, 2019 18:44:02 GMT
Seriously? Ugh. Not a fan of that explanation then. So everything the OP said is valid since the Russos have confirmed with that explanation that the Endgame final battle was really contrived and lazy writing. No, everything the OP said is really contrived and lazy writing, as I already explained above. I'm the one who brought up Thanos replicating Pym particles in the first place. You clowns then wrote 20/20 hindsight fan fiction to explain what the villain could've done to win. There are countless ways Thanos could've won, we saw the one he lost.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on May 7, 2019 19:37:16 GMT
I really don't care what the Russo's said in some Chinese interview. There have been many occasions where directors and writers have said stuff in interviews that did not match what was in the movie and often they say different things in different interviews.
It is completely explained in the movie. We do not need to read interviews to find out what happened.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 7, 2019 19:44:58 GMT
I really don't care what the Russo's said in some Chinese interview. There have been many occasions where directors and writers have said stuff in interviews that did not match what was in the movie and often they say different things in different interviews. It is completely explained in the movie. We do not need to read interviews to find out what happened. Either explanation works perfectly fine. I thought it was a stretch that everyone was making the assumption Thanos brought his entire army in his ship. A lot of those guys (particularly the Chitauri, we have no idea how many of them there are) could've been given orders back in altered 2014 to attack these coordinates as soon as they receive a beacon from Thanos' ship when he arrived in 2023. There are a ton of ways it works perfectly fine, no matter how hard the emotionally stunted trolls of the board protest.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on May 7, 2019 22:08:58 GMT
Seriously? Ugh. Not a fan of that explanation then. This is the actual explanation. Keep in mind the it's translated from an interview with a Chinese website so use of the word 'wizard' has to be taken with a bit of context. Here's the explanation:I don't really have a problem with it. Since Thanos and his army were wiped out at the end, it's a clean sweep of the loose ends this could've left behind. It's not more implausible than Thanos building a suit of armor or a high-tech bow and arrow. Stark and Pymm are the smartest guys in the room when that room is on Earth. When you go cosmic with advanced alien tech, all bets are off. The only reason Thanos doesn't build himself a suit of armor with nano-tech, micro incendiaries and directed energy weapons is that he doesn't need one. The Pymm Particle is a naturally occurring subatomic particle, it not human-made. Henry Pymm is the only scientist "on Earth" who had figured out how to use them without incurring the side effects of increased physical stress and psychosis. Tony of course later figured out how to use them to traverse multiple dimensions. It's not implausible that Thanos team could have reversed engineered and weaponized PPs quickly because they had to.
|
|