|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 12, 2019 14:58:34 GMT
Seems that there are plenty more plotholes in Endgame. Also, I didn't write this article. Someone else wrote this article and I'm just posting the link to it here as a public service so MCU fans here shouldn't attack me for simply posting a link to article about plotholes in Endgame written by someone else. The Biggest MCU Plot Holes Created By Avengers: Endgame (There Are A Lot) |
|
|
|
Post by poutinep on May 12, 2019 16:31:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on May 12, 2019 16:50:00 GMT
Why don't you be a little original in your life instead of finding other people arguments and latching onto them like a little leech.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 12, 2019 17:32:05 GMT
Did you know you can't blow up a shark by shooting a scuba tank?
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on May 12, 2019 17:43:07 GMT
You should really learn the difference between plot hole and nitpicking.
|
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on May 12, 2019 18:03:04 GMT
If a movie is good, plot holes don't matter. Most of these movies ONLY work because of plot contrivances anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by scabab on May 12, 2019 18:09:58 GMT
"And just how powerful is the Storm reamer?"
That's not even a plot hole...
Same with the rat and Ant-man, that's a convenience but not a plot hole.
|
|
|
|
Post by poutinep on May 12, 2019 19:24:04 GMT
"And just how powerful is the Storm reamer?" That's not even a plot hole... Same with the rat and Ant-man, that's a convenience but not a plot hole. That a small creature would walk over the quantum tunnel's button in that filthy storage place is just...inevitable.
|
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 12, 2019 22:12:35 GMT
Seems that there are plenty more plotholes in Endgame. Also, I didn't write this article. Someone else wrote this article and I'm just posting the link to it here as a public service so MCU fans here shouldn't attack me for simply posting a link to article about plotholes in Endgame written by someone else. The Biggest MCU Plot Holes Created By Avengers: Endgame (There Are A Lot)Colour me surprised, YOU, of all people you didn't come up with something and are just repeating the "thoughts" of someone else...well I will be a monkeys uncle, that utterly, completely, truly doesn't surprise me in the slightest, but hey atleast you were honest about it for once, good job dude, proud of you for that 
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 13, 2019 1:50:30 GMT
"And just how powerful is the Storm reamer?" That's not even a plot hole... Same with the rat and Ant-man, that's a convenience but not a plot hole. So basically it's not a plothole because it's just lazy writing. Either way, it's awful.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2019 2:33:29 GMT
"And just how powerful is the Storm reamer?" That's not even a plot hole... Same with the rat and Ant-man, that's a convenience but not a plot hole. So basically it's not a plothole because it's just lazy writing. Either way, it's awful. It is rather unlikely a rat would wonder over the keyboard and press the right buttons that unlock you from the quantum realm. Probably not a lot of 14,000,605 possible outcomes saw that happening. But a few did.
|
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 13, 2019 3:40:56 GMT
"And just how powerful is the Storm reamer?" That's not even a plot hole... Same with the rat and Ant-man, that's a convenience but not a plot hole. So basically it's not a plothole because it's just lazy writing. Either way, it's awful. Lots of films do this though, even the best films have plot conveniences, it becomes an issue when there are so many it becomes hard to take seriously, the rat thing is actually a needless one imo also, there would surely have been other ways to achieve the same goal, the tech is unclaimed property after the snap, surely at some point someone would have assessed it, I mean someone collected it and put in in storage, so why wouldn't the government or Stark be trying to sort through all this stuff and at best return it to the next of kin or determine if it had value, eventually someone would have brought Scott back and given 5 years passed like hours for him time wasn't much of an issue, so I wouldn't call this awful, silly and needless but not awful, also Strange seeing the future where some organisation does infact go through all the left over things from the snap makes more sense in he had faith it would happen, instead of you know having faith somehow this is the one timeline where that exact rat ran across the keyboard in that exact manner as to switch it on and bring Scott back.
Like I said silly, but not a plothole really just an odd choice to achieve that goal, again something even the best movies tend to have a few off, like Jurassic Park, quite a few conveniences for the plot, but they are done just right you don't notice much or care about them because the film is just so damn good and so much fun that those conveniences don't matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 13, 2019 3:46:25 GMT
So basically it's not a plothole because it's just lazy writing. Either way, it's awful. silly, but not a plothole really just an odd choice to achieve that goal, again something even the best movies tend to have a few off, like Jurassic Park, quite a few conveniences for the plot, but they are done just right you don't notice much or care about them because the film is just so damn good and so much fun that those conveniences don't matter.
But the film isn't good. The film is awful and that's why the lazy writing and plot conveniences stand out even more. But this is Disney so of course they're going to make a movie where the entire universe is saved by a random mouse.
|
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 13, 2019 5:48:22 GMT
silly, but not a plothole really just an odd choice to achieve that goal, again something even the best movies tend to have a few off, like Jurassic Park, quite a few conveniences for the plot, but they are done just right you don't notice much or care about them because the film is just so damn good and so much fun that those conveniences don't matter.
But the film isn't good. The film is awful and that's why the lazy writing and plot conveniences stand out even more. But this is Disney so of course they're going to make a movie where the entire universe is saved by a random mouse. According to you, but you are a terribly biased and unbalanced individual who is a hypocrite in what he regards as good or bad, plothole or not, you literally whinge in the same thread that the movies does not flat out copy near beat for beat a plot from a star trek episode then chastise it for ripping of time travel as a whole from a star trek movie, you cannot grasp that there is no single rule in time travel stories because time travel is still just theoretical and such so are any laws of time travel, yet what you hold up as proof of time travel rules or laws is a film which though a brilliant movie and a timeless classic is very much a piece of shit in regards to believable time travel.
Is the movie flawed? yes it is, most movies are in some way, but it is widely, overwhelmingly so being regarded as a really good if not great movie, you just have anything Marvel/Disney and so find faults, you are also a proven liar and as I already stated hypocrite so your opinion is near worthless in regards to the weight it carries in regards to these movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on May 13, 2019 12:53:55 GMT
silly, but not a plothole really just an odd choice to achieve that goal, again something even the best movies tend to have a few off, like Jurassic Park, quite a few conveniences for the plot, but they are done just right you don't notice much or care about them because the film is just so damn good and so much fun that those conveniences don't matter.
But the film isn't good. The film is awful and that's why the lazy writing and plot conveniences stand out even more. But this is Disney so of course they're going to make a movie where the entire universe is saved by a random mouse. Silly little DC-Fan, when will you learn that your opinion is yours alone and not fact?! |
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on May 13, 2019 12:58:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on May 13, 2019 14:34:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on May 13, 2019 14:44:02 GMT
Negates the ''past doesnt affect future'' timeline theory. iF cap was always pegys secret husband like writers are suggesting, then it becomes a closed loop paradox and contradicts Hulk when he says going into the past doesnt affect the present/future
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 13, 2019 14:52:56 GMT
Negates the ''past doesnt affect future'' timeline theory. iF cap was always pegys secret husband like writers are suggesting, then it becomes a closed loop paradox and contradicts Hulk when he says going into the past doesnt affect the present/future
From the article: Maybe you should read these article before you post them, you wouldn't look like such a dunce.
|
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on May 13, 2019 14:59:10 GMT
Negates the ''past doesnt affect future'' timeline theory. iF cap was always pegys secret husband like writers are suggesting, then it becomes a closed loop paradox and contradicts Hulk when he says going into the past doesnt affect the present/future
From the article: Maybe you should read these article before you post them, you wouldn't look like such a dunce. Its a cop out explanation. "Who knows which scenario is right" Lazy writing |
|
