|
|
Post by movieliker on Jun 26, 2019 17:02:54 GMT
Newly elected DA is against prosecuting criminals. But she wants to prosecute ICE agents for doing their lawfully appointed jobs. She wants to not prosecute minor offenses like toll jumpers. "Cabán is running on a platform of criminal justice reform,[6] including ending mass incarceration, ending the War on Drugs, and reversing racial and economic inequalities in law enforcement by investing in education and jobs instead of prisons.[6] Cabán also calls for the decriminalization of sex work, so that sex workers can more easily inform law enforcement of unsafe working conditions.[5]Cabán has been endorsed by The New York Times,[3][7] as well as progressive politicians such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Larry Krasner, as well as several progressive members of the New York State Legislature.[7] The race drew national attention, with progressives seeing Cabán as "taking on the entire political establishment", drawing comparisons to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's upset victory in the 2018 U.S. House primary election over Joe Crowley.[4][5]"en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiffany_Cab%C3%A1nwww.thedailybeast.com/tiffany-caban-makes-history-in-queens-claims-shocking-queens-district-attorney-primary-winnypost.com/2019/06/26/tiffany-caban-confident-her-shocking-queens-da-primary-win-will-hold/What do you think? |
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jun 27, 2019 12:47:59 GMT
From the Daily Beast article:
Her platform of “people-powered justice,” including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country including the longtime Queens DA, Richard Brown.
That doesn't sound like a sweeping plan to 'de-criminalize crime'. That sounds like a plan to take the bread out of greedy and unscrupulous bail bondsmen's mouths, making law enforcement be accountable for its abuses, ending the financial onus on the taxpayer that prosecution and incarceration for victimless crimes levies, and trying to streamline an overburdened justice/penal system. Sounds like a win to me, and only the typical mouth-breathing 'law'n'order' Rightie could possibly construe it as a sinister plot to free all criminals.
Plus, of course, she's Black, so that automatically means she's pro-crime, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jun 27, 2019 15:59:13 GMT
From the Daily Beast article: Her platform of “people-powered justice,” including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country including the longtime Queens DA, Richard Brown.That doesn't sound like a sweeping plan to 'de-criminalize crime'. That sounds like a plan to take the bread out of greedy and unscrupulous bail bondsmen's mouths, making law enforcement be accountable for its abuses, ending the financial onus on the taxpayer that prosecution and incarceration for victimless crimes levies, and trying to streamline an overburdened justice/penal system. Sounds like a win to me, and only the typical mouth-breathing 'law'n'order' Rightie could possibly construe it as a sinister plot to free all criminals. Plus, of course, she's Black, so that automatically means she's pro-crime, right? It sounds like she is trying to decriminalize crime. I have always said prostitution should be legal, regulated and taxed. But not prosecuting turnstile jumping, ending cash bail, and prosecuting ICE is stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jun 27, 2019 18:55:28 GMT
From the Daily Beast article: Her platform of “people-powered justice,” including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country including the longtime Queens DA, Richard Brown.That doesn't sound like a sweeping plan to 'de-criminalize crime'. That sounds like a plan to take the bread out of greedy and unscrupulous bail bondsmen's mouths, making law enforcement be accountable for its abuses, ending the financial onus on the taxpayer that prosecution and incarceration for victimless crimes levies, and trying to streamline an overburdened justice/penal system. Sounds like a win to me, and only the typical mouth-breathing 'law'n'order' Rightie could possibly construe it as a sinister plot to free all criminals. Plus, of course, she's Black, so that automatically means she's pro-crime, right? It sounds like she is trying to decriminalize crime. I have always said prostitution should be legal, regulated and taxed. But not prosecuting turnstile jumping, ending cash bail, and prosecuting ICE is stupid. In other words, you're probably one of those who wants government off our backs, and wants your tax dollars to stop being wasted, unless these activities coincide with rabidly prosecuting largely victimless crimes (which I'm betting you assume are largely perpetrated by underclass minorities). Got it. Name anything in that list which justifies the use of a scare phrase like 'de-criminalizing crime' and explain to me how it does so.
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jun 27, 2019 20:01:04 GMT
It sounds like she is trying to decriminalize crime. I have always said prostitution should be legal, regulated and taxed. But not prosecuting turnstile jumping, ending cash bail, and prosecuting ICE is stupid. In other words, you're probably one of those who wants government off our backs, and wants your tax dollars to stop being wasted, unless these activities coincide with rabidly prosecuting largely victimless crimes (which I'm betting you assume are largely perpetrated by underclass minorities). Got it. Name anything in that list which justifies the use of a scare phrase like 'de-criminalizing crime' and explain to me how it does so. Turnstyle jumping is not a victimless crime. The subways make money off of riders paying. And it's not fair to the payers when thieves jump the turnstyles without paying. They are stealing a free ride. Judges base bail amounts on how dangerous a criminal suspect is. And how much of a flight risk a a criminal suspect is. ICE agents are doing their job ordered by the government. ICE agents are already prosecuted if they break the law. And punished if they break the rules. |
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jun 27, 2019 20:51:14 GMT
In other words, you're probably one of those who wants government off our backs, and wants your tax dollars to stop being wasted, unless these activities coincide with rabidly prosecuting largely victimless crimes (which I'm betting you assume are largely perpetrated by underclass minorities). Got it. Name anything in that list which justifies the use of a scare phrase like 'de-criminalizing crime' and explain to me how it does so. Turnstyle jumping is not a victimless crime. The subways make money off of riders paying. And it's not fair to the payers when thieves jump the turnstyles without paying. They are stealing a free ride. Judges base bail amounts on how dangerous a criminal suspect is. And how much of a flight risk a a criminal suspect is. ICE agents are doing their job ordered by the government. ICE agents are already prosecuted if they break the law. And punished if they break the rules. Really? Show me some high-profile instances if ICE agents being prosecuted for abuse. Take your time looking up instances of this, as it'll take a while. And you'd waste tax dollars and resources to prosecute and jail turnstile-jumpers? Seriously? You don't think there might be more important things to focus on? Abuses of the bail system by dishonest and shady bail bondsmen are legion. Anything that could help curb these parasites on the justice system would be a positive all the way around. As I figured, you can't come up with any valid examples that would justify the BS scare headlines that the Rightie/gutter press is indulging in to terrorize the public. Fortunately, a large proportion of the public (at least outside of Hicksville, USA) are wising up to these tactics, hence the increasing levels of victories for Left candidates around the country.
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jun 27, 2019 21:12:42 GMT
Turnstyle jumping is not a victimless crime. The subways make money off of riders paying. And it's not fair to the payers when thieves jump the turnstyles without paying. They are stealing a free ride. Judges base bail amounts on how dangerous a criminal suspect is. And how much of a flight risk a a criminal suspect is. ICE agents are doing their job ordered by the government. ICE agents are already prosecuted if they break the law. And punished if they break the rules. Really? Show me some high-profile instances if ICE agents being prosecuted for abuse. Take your time looking up instances of this, as it'll take a while. And you'd waste tax dollars and resources to prosecute and jail turnstile-jumpers? Seriously? You don't think there might be more important things to focus on? Abuses of the bail system by dishonest and shady bail bondsmen are legion. Anything that could help curb these parasites on the justice system would be a positive all the way around. As I figured, you can't come up with any valid examples that would justify the BS scare headlines that the Rightie/gutter press is indulging in to terrorize the public. Fortunately, a large proportion of the public (at least outside of Hicksville, USA) are wising up to these tactics, hence the increasing levels of victories for Left candidates around the country. Its not a waste of money to prosecute those who break the law. It's the "Broken Window Theory"; "The broken windows theory is a criminological theory that states that visible signs of crime, anti-social behavior, and civil disorder create an urban environment that encourages further crime and disorder, including serious crimes."en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theoryI am only quoting what the press is reporting. She never said she wanted to enforce existing law. She said she wanted to prosecute ICE agents for doing their jobs. If the law is not being enforced, I support enforcing it. But I don't support criminalizing law enforcement while letting real crime go unpunished. |
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jun 27, 2019 21:23:54 GMT
Really? Show me some high-profile instances if ICE agents being prosecuted for abuse. Take your time looking up instances of this, as it'll take a while. And you'd waste tax dollars and resources to prosecute and jail turnstile-jumpers? Seriously? You don't think there might be more important things to focus on? Abuses of the bail system by dishonest and shady bail bondsmen are legion. Anything that could help curb these parasites on the justice system would be a positive all the way around. As I figured, you can't come up with any valid examples that would justify the BS scare headlines that the Rightie/gutter press is indulging in to terrorize the public. Fortunately, a large proportion of the public (at least outside of Hicksville, USA) are wising up to these tactics, hence the increasing levels of victories for Left candidates around the country. Its not a waste of money to prosecute those who break the law. It's the "Broken Window Theory"; "The broken windows theory is a criminological theory that states that visible signs of crime, anti-social behavior, and civil disorder create an urban environment that encourages further crime and disorder, including serious crimes."en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theoryI am only quoting what the press is reporting. She never said she wanted to enforce existing law. She said she wanted to prosecute ICE agents for doing their jobs. If the law is not being enforced, I support enforcing it. But not criminalizing law enforcement while letting real crime go unpunished. I'm aware of the broken windows theory. It's not really applicable in this scenario, much as you're trying to heavy-breathe it into that position. Turnstile jumping hardly constitutes the sort of thing that suggests a total breakdown of social order, and one can bet that a number of these jumpers are just as apt to be white, and otherwise law-abiding sorts. But it suits your agenda to plant the notion that it's a largely minority issue and thus needs to have the most draconian force of law brought to bear on it. Nothing in any of those stories in any way suggests she's against enforcing existing law. You're trying the typical Right-wing trick of omission, where if a certain point isn't spelled out in big red letters, it must of course mean that the candidate/political figure supports anarchy and lawlessness. When the candidate or pol in question belongs to another race, that's all the 'proof' you jokers need that this is their stance. Sorry son, but an ICE agent or any other law-enforcement type who abuses or breaks the law is just as much a criminal as any other, so their illegal actions should be criminalized and punished the same as any other. Considering that the US houses the largest incarcerated population in the Western world, I don't think you need to go to bed tonight fearful that punishment isn't being applied aplenty here.
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jun 28, 2019 3:13:33 GMT
Its not a waste of money to prosecute those who break the law. It's the "Broken Window Theory"; "The broken windows theory is a criminological theory that states that visible signs of crime, anti-social behavior, and civil disorder create an urban environment that encourages further crime and disorder, including serious crimes."en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theoryI am only quoting what the press is reporting. She never said she wanted to enforce existing law. She said she wanted to prosecute ICE agents for doing their jobs. If the law is not being enforced, I support enforcing it. But not criminalizing law enforcement while letting real crime go unpunished. I'm aware of the broken windows theory. It's not really applicable in this scenario, much as you're trying to heavy-breathe it into that position. Turnstile jumping hardly constitutes the sort of thing that suggests a total breakdown of social order, and one can bet that a number of these jumpers are just as apt to be white, and otherwise law-abiding sorts. But it suits your agenda to plant the notion that it's a largely minority issue and thus needs to have the most draconian force of law brought to bear on it. Nothing in any of those stories in any way suggests she's against enforcing existing law. You're trying the typical Right-wing trick of omission, where if a certain point isn't spelled out in big red letters, it must of course mean that the candidate/political figure supports anarchy and lawlessness. When the candidate or pol in question belongs to another race, that's all the 'proof' you jokers need that this is their stance. Sorry son, but an ICE agent or any other law-enforcement type who abuses or breaks the law is just as much a criminal as any other, so their illegal actions should be criminalized and punished the same as any other. Considering that the US houses the largest incarcerated population in the Western world, I don't think you need to go to bed tonight fearful that punishment isn't being applied aplenty here. The Broken Window Theory has nothing to do with a total breakdown of social orders. So, I guess you are not as familiar with it as you thought you were. The Broken Window Theory is - minor offenses allowed to go unpunished leads to greater and greater offenses being committed. If people don't follow the rules --- and don't get punished --- there is no reason for anybody to follow the rules. And that will lead to a total breakdown of social order. Nobody said anything about race. But no surprise you are trying to make it part of this discussion because I know you flaming liberals are the biggest racists on the planet. I have already addressed your last two points. But I guess you missed it being it is obvious you have been foaming at the mouth with ideological hatred for your favorite bogeyman --- the conservative Republican . . . tsk, tsk, tsk . . . ha ha ha . . . |
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jun 28, 2019 11:17:32 GMT
I'm aware of the broken windows theory. It's not really applicable in this scenario, much as you're trying to heavy-breathe it into that position. Turnstile jumping hardly constitutes the sort of thing that suggests a total breakdown of social order, and one can bet that a number of these jumpers are just as apt to be white, and otherwise law-abiding sorts. But it suits your agenda to plant the notion that it's a largely minority issue and thus needs to have the most draconian force of law brought to bear on it. Nothing in any of those stories in any way suggests she's against enforcing existing law. You're trying the typical Right-wing trick of omission, where if a certain point isn't spelled out in big red letters, it must of course mean that the candidate/political figure supports anarchy and lawlessness. When the candidate or pol in question belongs to another race, that's all the 'proof' you jokers need that this is their stance. Sorry son, but an ICE agent or any other law-enforcement type who abuses or breaks the law is just as much a criminal as any other, so their illegal actions should be criminalized and punished the same as any other. Considering that the US houses the largest incarcerated population in the Western world, I don't think you need to go to bed tonight fearful that punishment isn't being applied aplenty here. The Broken Window Theory has nothing to do with a total breakdown of social orders. So, I guess you are not as familiar with it as you thought you were. Learn to read. I said that the theory was not as applicable to the issue of turnstile-jumping as you're trying to make it. The Broken Window Theory is - minor offenses allowed to go unpunished leads to greater and greater offenses being committed. Minor offenses don't require the sort of OTT levels of punishment your posts are clearly suggesting you believe they do.If people don't follow the rules --- and don't get punished --- there is no reason for anybody to follow the rules. And that will lead to a total breakdown of social order. So you're telling me you've never once in your life broken a rule and went unpunished for it. Somehow, I doubt that. And I'm assuming the total breakdown of the social order didn't result from it.
BTW, I'm most interested in hearing you describe this Social Order you're so keen on.Nobody said anything about race. But no surprise you are trying to make it part of this discussion because I know you flaming liberals are the biggest racists on the planet. The very fact that she's black was likely enough to set off your OP. Your fulminating about crime and the social order is nothing more than the usual codespeak the Right indulges in when doing their typical jerking off about the threat that the brown folk pose to that order. Stop being disingenuous. And try to squeeze an original thought into your head, rather than chirping that usual 'brekex-brekex' the typical Rightie resorts to with that worn-out 'liberals are the biggest racists, dah-dah-dah' line. (if you don't get the brekex reference, look it up. It applies to your sort very well.)I have already addressed your last two points. But I guess you missed it being it is obvious you have been foaming at the mouth with ideological hatred for your favorite bogeyman --- the conservative Republican . . . tsk, tsk, tsk . . . ha ha ha . . . I don't see where you've addressed anything, other than to repeat the same tired saws over and over for the length of several posts. But in the world of Alex Jones, I've no doubt that passes for scintillating thought. One thing that isn't hard to miss is that you're precisely the sort of typical RepCon who likes being the societal bogey that he's become. Tsk, tsk, tsk.
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jun 28, 2019 17:03:58 GMT
The Broken Window Theory has nothing to do with a total breakdown of social orders. So, I guess you are not as familiar with it as you thought you were. Learn to read. I said that the theory was not as applicable to the issue of turnstile-jumping as you're trying to make it. The Broken Window Theory is - minor offenses allowed to go unpunished leads to greater and greater offenses being committed. Minor offenses don't require the sort of OTT levels of punishment your posts are clearly suggesting you believe they do.If people don't follow the rules --- and don't get punished --- there is no reason for anybody to follow the rules. And that will lead to a total breakdown of social order. So you're telling me you've never once in your life broken a rule and went unpunished for it. Somehow, I doubt that. And I'm assuming the total breakdown of the social order didn't result from it.
BTW, I'm most interested in hearing you describe this Social Order you're so keen on.Nobody said anything about race. But no surprise you are trying to make it part of this discussion because I know you flaming liberals are the biggest racists on the planet. The very fact that she's black was likely enough to set off your OP. Your fulminating about crime and the social order is nothing more than the usual codespeak the Right indulges in when doing their typical jerking off about the threat that the brown folk pose to that order. Stop being disingenuous. And try to squeeze an original thought into your head, rather than chirping that usual 'brekex-brekex' the typical Rightie resorts to with that worn-out 'liberals are the biggest racists, dah-dah-dah' line. (if you don't get the brekex reference, look it up. It applies to your sort very well.)I have already addressed your last two points. But I guess you missed it being it is obvious you have been foaming at the mouth with ideological hatred for your favorite bogeyman --- the conservative Republican . . . tsk, tsk, tsk . . . ha ha ha . . . I don't see where you've addressed anything, other than to repeat the same tired saws over and over for the length of several posts. But in the world of Alex Jones, I've no doubt that passes for scintillating thought. One thing that isn't hard to miss is that you're precisely the sort of typical RepCon who likes being the societal bogey that he's become. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Obviously Amy, you have gone completely off the rails here. Sometimes it is undeniable, hostility renders some people too close-minded to have a rational discussion with. First of all, I am not a conservative Republican. I am an independent moderate who voted for Obama and Hillary. But you blew right pass that possibility with you desire to unload seething hatred based on your partisan prejudice. Secondly, I had no idea Tiffany Caban was black. I still don't. Only that you say she is. Not that that would make any difference to me. But hey, its been fun. Good luck !!! |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jun 28, 2019 21:00:34 GMT
Cabanforqueens.com
From her website it doesn’t seem to be as whacky as the bread title suggests.
Since I don’t live there I don’t have a dog in the fight but I also don’t have much issue with what she’s saying
|
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jun 29, 2019 9:59:57 GMT
Obviously Amy, you have gone completely off the rails here. Sometimes it is undeniable, hostility renders some people too close-minded to have a rational discussion with. First of all, I am not a conservative Republican. I am an independent moderate who voted for Obama and Hillary. But you blew right pass that possibility with you desire to unload seething hatred based on your partisan prejudice. Secondly, I had no idea Tiffany Caban was black. I still don't. Only that you say she is. Not that that would make any difference to me. But hey, its been fun. Good luck !!! Save your preaching for the conservative choir, where it'll go over well. You make me laugh with that "Oh, I'm not a con, I voted for Obama and Hillary before". That's like listening to the Bible - thumper who swears he used to be a godless atheist before seeing the light. Those sorts of claims always stink of disingenuous mendacity, and yours gives off the same odor. If you claim not to know she was black, you couldn't have looked too closely at your own links (not surprising, you probably just scanned the headline on each), because the Beat and Post articles both prominently feature a photo of her, which both show she's a woman of color. Or are you going to try and claim that you don't see skin tones either, because you're such a moderate, independent sort? Yet you spout the same law and order drivel any garden-variety rightwinger spews. The only 'partisan hatred' here comes from your camp, and it goes with the territory. Just as the, again, disingenuous twisting of fact does, as well. Good luck with that tactic outside of the charmed circle of your fellow cons, my friend.
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jun 29, 2019 17:39:46 GMT
Obviously Amy, you have gone completely off the rails here. Sometimes it is undeniable, hostility renders some people too close-minded to have a rational discussion with. First of all, I am not a conservative Republican. I am an independent moderate who voted for Obama and Hillary. But you blew right pass that possibility with you desire to unload seething hatred based on your partisan prejudice. Secondly, I had no idea Tiffany Caban was black. I still don't. Only that you say she is. Not that that would make any difference to me. But hey, its been fun. Good luck !!! Save your preaching for the conservative choir, where it'll go over well. You make me laugh with that "Oh, I'm not a con, I voted for Obama and Hillary before". That's like listening to the Bible - thumper who swears he used to be a godless atheist before seeing the light. Those sorts of claims always stink of disingenuous mendacity, and yours gives off the same odor. If you claim not to know she was black, you couldn't have looked too closely at your own links (not surprising, you probably just scanned the headline on each), because the Beat and Post articles both prominently feature a photo of her, which both show she's a woman of color. Or are you going to try and claim that you don't see skin tones either, because you're such a moderate, independent sort? Yet you spout the same law and order drivel any garden-variety rightwinger spews. The only 'partisan hatred' here comes from your camp, and it goes with the territory. Just as the, again, disingenuous twisting of fact does, as well. Good luck with that tactic outside of the charmed circle of your fellow cons, my friend. There you go. If you don't like the truth, just deny it. I don't know whether to laugh or feel sorry for you. But you are one angry lib. |
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jun 29, 2019 21:33:50 GMT
Save your preaching for the conservative choir, where it'll go over well. You make me laugh with that "Oh, I'm not a con, I voted for Obama and Hillary before". That's like listening to the Bible - thumper who swears he used to be a godless atheist before seeing the light. Those sorts of claims always stink of disingenuous mendacity, and yours gives off the same odor. If you claim not to know she was black, you couldn't have looked too closely at your own links (not surprising, you probably just scanned the headline on each), because the Beat and Post articles both prominently feature a photo of her, which both show she's a woman of color. Or are you going to try and claim that you don't see skin tones either, because you're such a moderate, independent sort? Yet you spout the same law and order drivel any garden-variety rightwinger spews. The only 'partisan hatred' here comes from your camp, and it goes with the territory. Just as the, again, disingenuous twisting of fact does, as well. Good luck with that tactic outside of the charmed circle of your fellow cons, my friend. There you go. If you don't like the truth, just deny it. I don't know whether to laugh or feel sorry for you. But you are one angry lib. Laugh, son. It'll make you feel better--and if you don't find this funny enough, you can always go tune in Alex Jones. Best bet is, both y'all are just feelin' a little cranky because the con poster boy, James Alex Fields, got his ass handed to him in court the other day, something I suspect you jokers never believed was really going to happen  .
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jun 29, 2019 21:36:41 GMT
There you go. If you don't like the truth, just deny it. I don't know whether to laugh or feel sorry for you. But you are one angry lib. Laugh, son. It'll make you feel better--and if you don't find this funny enough, you can always go tune in Alex Jones. Best bet is, both y'all are just feelin' a little cranky because the con poster boy, James Alex Fields, got his ass handed to him in court the other day, something I suspect you jokers never believed was really going to happen . I don't watch Alex Jones. And I don't know who James Alex Fields is. |
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jun 29, 2019 21:40:51 GMT
Laugh, son. It'll make you feel better--and if you don't find this funny enough, you can always go tune in Alex Jones. Best bet is, both y'all are just feelin' a little cranky because the con poster boy, James Alex Fields, got his ass handed to him in court the other day, something I suspect you jokers never believed was really going to happen . I don't watch Alex Jones. And I don't know who James Alex Fields is.Then pick up a freaking newspaper/watch the news/search the net, and keep abreast of current events, ostrich. If you're that out of touch you're wasting your time trying to critique anyone else. Or else you're even more full of disingenuous BS than I originally supposed.
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jun 29, 2019 21:50:52 GMT
I don't watch Alex Jones. And I don't know who James Alex Fields is.Then pick up a freaking newspaper/watch the news/search the net, and keep abreast of current events, ostrich. If you're that out of touch you're wasting your time trying to critique anyone else. Or else you're even more full of disingenuous BS than I originally supposed. Maybe you should get you head out of the liberal news once in a while and go outside and --- wait for it --- TALK TO SOME REAL PEOPLE. Then you may realize everybody is not either a right wing lunatic, or a left wing nut job (like you). Most people are moderates like me. Reasonable, fair, objective and not obsessed with --- or paranoid over --- politics. Get a life Amy. |
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jun 30, 2019 11:03:23 GMT
Then pick up a freaking newspaper/watch the news/search the net, and keep abreast of current events, ostrich. If you're that out of touch you're wasting your time trying to critique anyone else. Or else you're even more full of disingenuous BS than I originally supposed. Maybe you should get you head out of the liberal news once in a while and go outside and --- wait for it --- TALK TO SOME REAL PEOPLE. Then you may realize everybody is not either a right wing lunatic, or a left wing nut job (like you). Most people are moderates like me. Reasonable, fair, objective and not obsessed with --- or paranoid over --- politics. Get a life Amy. Maybe you should try reading your own damn links and try keeping up with current events. You have no clue as to whom Fields is (I suspect you're lying on that one), and you claimed not to know the ethnic identity of Caban, even though her photo is prominently displayed on both links you posted, indicating that you put them up over some knee-jerk response over her supposed 'soft on crime' stance without actually even looking at them. Fair and objective my ass. Every time you type in another one of those con cliche phrases, you put your foot in your mouth that much more. Try talking to some real people yourself, other than the circle-jerk of Stormfront.org rejects you clearly hang with. As to 'getting a life', a clueless twit who spouts off regarding news events that he obviously knows nothing more about than their headlines (since he's already indicated he hasn't read anything) is about as qualified to instruct others on getting a life as Paula Dean is to instruct others on how to lower their cholesterol levels. Tell you what--when you get a brain, I'll get a life. Fair deal? And if you're stupid enough to think you're a 'moderate' (funny how most Righties seem to run to that word for safety, almost as if they're ashamed of being identified as a Rightie), you'll probably rot through that first brain in a day or two, so you'd better have an extra on hand to replace it .
|
|
.