Post by hi224 on Jun 27, 2019 7:57:36 GMT
During the summer in the 1980’s in the high society of Lyon, France, many folks left their spacious city apartments and moved to their even larger homes in the chic woodsy suburbs of les Monts d’Or (Golden Mountains) and it’s surrounding area. Less than 20 minutes from the heart of Lyon, it was easy to feel much further away. For those still working and either not yet on vacation or just back, it was the perfect solution to stay cool but not have too long of a commute.
This was precisely what 34 year old Bernard Galle, his wife Sophie, and their four children did in the summer of 1980, spending time in the small village of Lissieu. The summer extended into September and on Monday September 22nd, Bernard got up to go to work.
Bernard worked in the notarial office of his father in law, Sophie’s dad, Louis Chaine. The connotations in France of being a Notary or being related to one are that of wealth, prestige, access, and nepotism. A Notary is often a lawyer. Louis Chaine himself, in addition to having his own office, also dabbled in politics, and was a regional councilor in the Rhône-Alpes [the large region encompassing Lyon]. Bernard was being groomed to take over his Father-In-Laws’s notarial office.
Bernard gets into his white Austin Mini and heads to work. His car is found in its normal parking spot near his office, 24 hours later [note : unclear to me why it took 24 hours to find his car, when all of his family members and colleagues knew where he parked his car]
At 10am the same day, Louis Chaine receives a phone call at his office. He himself does not actually take the call, but an employee rushes to him and informs him that someone has phoned and said that he needs to check his mailbox. He sends the employee to check the mail, who comes back with a letter.
“Father, I’ve been kidnapped. This is not a political kidnapping...” [« Père, j’ai été enlevé. Ce n’est pas un rapt politique... »]
Louis immediately recognizes his son in law’s handwriting. It is later confirmed by a handwriting expert that was indeed Bernard’s handwriting.
Later in the morning, a second message is found in Bernard’s brother’s (28 year old doctor Patrick) mailbox : a ransom note demanding 5 million francs (close to 800.000€ but with inflation probably closer to 1.000.000€ / $1.100.000)
Louis gathers his inner circle - mostly family - at lunchtime. This includes Sophie. He informs them of the kidnapping and also of his decision to handle things (negotiations) himself without involving the police.
It is unclear to me how, but Police get wind of the kidnapping but have initially misunderstood thinking that it was Louis Chaine himself that had been kidnapped. Louis is furious when police arrive at his office and he has to explain that it was not him that was kidnapped but his son in law. On top of that, he has had no intention of going to the police because he wants to deal with things himself.
LE tell Louis that it would be wise of him to cooperate with them. They explain that in the vast majority of kidnapping cases where they are involved, the hostage is found safe and sound as is the ransom money. They tell him that it would be frowned upon for someone in his political position to refuses help from LE.
So Louis agrees to let the police get involved, but he is dubious and mistrustful of their capabilities.
A large police effort is engaged, with LE going door to door in Lyon to look for Bernard, checking houses and asking neighbors if they didn’t unknowingly witness a kidnapping.
Louis uses his high level contacts to ensure that while the police are acting like they were being helpful, they are more or less staying out of his hair. But the police engagement isn’t purely innocent - they also want to keep an eye on Louis and his family to make sure that he doesn’t decide to act alone. They have the family under surveillance and have all of their phones tapped. LE want to find Bernard but they also are grasping to understand why the Chaine family has been targeted.
On September 24th, the Chaine family attach a red cloth/rag to the balcony of their city home - this is apparently how they have been advised to let the kidnappers know that they are preparing the ransom money.
On September 25th, one of Louis’ sons, Hervé, abruptly leaves his parents home in the center of Lyon with a large travel bag which contains ransom money (100 and 500 francs bills). The police, who have been watching the Chaine home, are on his tail - and follow him on a cat and mouse chase throughout different isolated suburbs of the Lyon region and into the countryside, ending up in Bourg-en-Bresse, a town 80km/50 miles northeast of Lyon. More specifically, Hervé parks at the Bourg-en-Bresse train station at drops the money off in the train station bathroom, and then leaves.
Someone moves in to pick up the bag - and the police quickly arrest him. It turns out to be a small time criminal, a 19 year old named Jérôme Roche, who has taken advantage of the Chaine family turmoil to « try his hand » at extorting money out of them, pretending to be the kidnapper.
Louis Chaine is furious. Not only because of the fact that Hervé was followed, but also because of the fact that the police decided to move in so quickly to arrest the suspect. They had no idea until after his arrest that he had nothing to do with the kidnapping - so why didn’t police let him pick up the money and then discreetly follow him to see where he would go? Or did the police already suspect that Jérôme Roche had nothing to do with it?
The weekend of October 11th and 12th, the Chaine family gather at their country home, as per usual. It is on this occasion that the kidnappers reach back out to Louis (the last time had been on September 24th, the day before Hervé had dropped the money off in the Bourg-en-Bresse train station). They learn that Bernard is still alive [proof of life is apparently given but I have no further detail on this].
Louis is given instructions to wait at a friend’s house at 6am on Sunday, October 12th.
At precisely 6am, Louis Chaîne receives a phone call telling him to go to a specific location where he will find a piece of paper with further instructions. He himself embarks on a cat and mouse game throughout Lyon (with LE hot on his trail) that ultimately falls through, likely due to the kidnappers realizing that LE are also part of « the game. » The kidnappers make it known that any further attempts to drop off money must be done via a motorcycle - avoiding any surprise passengers that otherwise could be hiding in a car. The cat and mouse game with Louis had obviously been designed to see how involved LE were.
The next day, Monday October 13th, media get wind of that weekends events and the attempted ransom drop was all over the newspapers. Louis accuses LE of leaking the information.
LE is however unaware at this point of the motorcycle demand. Louis Chaine is no longer sharing information with LE and further demonstrates his strategic flair for avoiding the police by communicating to the kidnappers (unknown as to how) that 1/ from then forward, they should contact his colleague, a fellow Notary working in another office, Georges Martin, for all communication and ransom requests (Georges Martin doesn’t have a tapped phone) and 2/ that his business partner Guy Rousseau would make the next ransom drop off based on the information received by Georges Martin.
Guy Rousseau has a motorcycle and is not under the same surveillance as the Chaine family - so he seemed to be an obvious choice for Louis.
Guy Rousseau receives word from Georges Martin (who had been contacted by the kidnappers) that he needs to be on call between 4 and 5 am on Friday October 17th. Guy is indeed contacted during this timeframe and he is given instructions. He will find a first clue under a brown brick at the address 192 avenue de Jean-Jaurès, in the Lyon suburb of Décines.
It takes Guy 10 minutes on his motorcycle to get to the given address, where he finds the next clue : « behind a fire hydrant, at the intersection of route de Genas and rue Pierre-Bresset in Villeurbanne » (note : another suburb of Lyon.)
Guy is unfamiliar with these suburbs so when he gets to the next clue, which simply states « Sept Chemins in the suburb of Bron », he has to make the trip three times before realizing that to get there he needs to take the rue Élysées-Reclus in Décines (where the first clue was). At the end of this street, there is a large sign made out of cardboard with a poorly drawn arrow and one word written : HERE (« ici » in French).
Guy makes his way down a narrow path on his motorcycle and arrives in a small clearing, where he comes face to face with two masked and armed men. Calmly, the men remove the key from his motorcycle and his glasses, and throw them in the grass. They also remove his motorcycle mask, obviously in fear that it has been tapped. They take the money and leave.
Guy Rousseau will never publicly say what was discussed with the masked men.
Louis Chaine is feeling confident. Having respected his end of the agreement (no police involvement in this particular ransom drop, paying the money asked), he has no reason to believe that Bernard won’t be released.
But his confidence doesn’t last long. There is no further contact made with Georges Martin, Guy Rousseau, or any members of the Chaine family. The deal had been to release Bernard 24 hours after the ransom drop.
LE is mortified, not only because of the fact that Louis Chaine hadn’t trusted them, but also because despite their efforts to tail the Chaine family and tap their phones, they still hadn’t been capable of finding the kidnappers.
But what had LE really scratching their heads was the complete lack of witnesses to any of the events. Bernard had obviously been kidnapped in plain daylight but apparently hadn’t been a remarkable event - theories abound - perhaps he had been solicited to meet someone in a cafe or restaurant to discuss a work related issue and then easily kidnapped.
Handwriting experts who had analysed his handwriting in the two notes left on the day of his kidnapping noticed that the notes were not written hastily and seemed to have been written by someone sitting down (and not in a car). His kidnappers were not in a hurry, and in all likelihood they were written not far from Bernard (and Louis’) office. This was deduced from the fact that the first phone call that came in to Louis Chaine was around 10:00, and the note had been put in the mailbox prior to 10:00. And Bernard hadn’t been missing for that long at this point.
As for the money, some of the 100 franc bills had been marked, with hope that the money could be later traced. Bank employees in the area are on high alert in the days following the ransom drop, but then go back to their daily routines. One particularly sharp employee did notice two marked bills, a few weeks after the kidnapping, in the French department of the Loire, just West of the Lyon region - but it was next to impossible to find out where the bills came from.
Bernard Galle is never heard from again. He is declared dead by his wife Sophie and this is officialized on April 16th 1982 - a short 19 months after his disappearance.
Sophie Galle never remarried, but she did go back to school in order to become a Notary herself. Bernard, who previously had been the logical successor to his father in law, was replaced by his widowed wife.
Guy Rousseau, shaken by the events, left Lyon and moved to the south of France.
I’m left with so many questions - the first one obviously being what happened to Bernard Galle? I feel like he almost became a detail in the whole story - and I wasn’t able to find out any information about him personally.
Why was Bernard chosen to be kidnapped and not one of Louis’ sons?
It is obvious that there was no coordinated effort between LE and the Chaine family to get Bernard back - did this help or hinder things? My instinct is that it hampered things. The Chaine family thought they could handle things on their own, and as it turned out they never saw Bernard again. Would things have been different if LE had been brought in closer?
Did Bernard mastermind his own kidnapping? Apparently this line of enquiry was investigated but nothing came if it.
Did politics have anything to do with it?
Louis’ brother, Jacques, had been assassinated in 1976 by an 18 year old independent anarchist named Jean Bilski who subsequently committed suicide. Important to note that Jacques was then CEO of the large French Bank Credit Lyonnais - and it was right in front of the Credit Lyonnais headquarters that he was shot as he was getting out of his car. His wife was also hit but survived.
Louis himself had been robbed and placed in a car trunk during a recent trip to South America.
It isn’t surprising that due to these other events, he was keen on staying out of the spotlight.
In a strange twist of events, 30 years later, on February 6th 2010, Bernard’s cousin, Jean-Philippe Galle, is kidnapped by two masked men while he is filling up his tank at a gas station in southern France. He is held overnight and the kidnappers seem to think he has a lot of money in his bank accounts. They say they will let him go once they are able to get 100K EUR off of his bank cards. They finally let him go with one of the kidnappers telling him he « isn’t the right target ».
The kidnappers are found a few days later and turn out to be small time criminals who had been linked to 15 other armed robberies in the region, and were so desperate for money they had tried to sell their organs online.
Sources:
www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1980/10/21/le-sort-de-m-bernard-galle-suscite-de-vives-inquietudes_2811802_1819218.html
www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1980/09/26/l-enlevement-de-m-galle_2819151_1819218.html
www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1980/09/27/l-enlevement-de-m-bernard-galle-arrestation-d-un-faux-ravisseur_3074418_1819218.html
fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlèvement_de_Bernard_Galle
www.google.com/amp/s/www.nicematin.com/amp/faits-divers/enleve-et-sequestre-a-st-raphael-jean-philippe-galle-raconte-342346
books.google.fr/books?id=UJ9YDwAAQBAJ&q=Bernard+Galle&hl=fr&source=gbs_word_cloud_r&cad=4#v=snippet&q=Bernard%20Galle&f=false
books.google.fr/books?id=UJ9YDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT76&lpg=PT76&dq=enlevement+bernard+galle&source=bl&ots=OmasQcJIXr&sig=ACfU3U3QWAaTZ4ds9wLhtka6nWSOsympDw&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwih8qOahfviAhVGzBoKHaYLBuwQ6AEwCHoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&q=enlevement%20bernard%20galle&f=false
books.google.fr/books?id=dUH-AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4&lpg=PA4&dq=bernard+galle&source=bl&ots=zXhzsneNi0&sig=ACfU3U3X-izJtjRo7i4E2zJxT7ZROKtPyQ&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwithsPN5P3iAhWL0eAKHUU9AWc4ChDoATAIegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=bernard%20galle&f=false
books.google.fr/books?id=ta97DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT38&lpg=PT38&dq=bernard+galle&source=bl&ots=KuNpU3qHVT&sig=ACfU3U04FxDB93vN1jk3z9ecQU_jT8c93A&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwicq7bt7f3iAhW_BGMBHcG5A304FBDoATADegQIBxAB#v=onepage&q=bernard%20galle&f=false
www.larousse.fr/archives/journaux_annee/1981/327/faits_divers
This was precisely what 34 year old Bernard Galle, his wife Sophie, and their four children did in the summer of 1980, spending time in the small village of Lissieu. The summer extended into September and on Monday September 22nd, Bernard got up to go to work.
Bernard worked in the notarial office of his father in law, Sophie’s dad, Louis Chaine. The connotations in France of being a Notary or being related to one are that of wealth, prestige, access, and nepotism. A Notary is often a lawyer. Louis Chaine himself, in addition to having his own office, also dabbled in politics, and was a regional councilor in the Rhône-Alpes [the large region encompassing Lyon]. Bernard was being groomed to take over his Father-In-Laws’s notarial office.
Bernard gets into his white Austin Mini and heads to work. His car is found in its normal parking spot near his office, 24 hours later [note : unclear to me why it took 24 hours to find his car, when all of his family members and colleagues knew where he parked his car]
At 10am the same day, Louis Chaine receives a phone call at his office. He himself does not actually take the call, but an employee rushes to him and informs him that someone has phoned and said that he needs to check his mailbox. He sends the employee to check the mail, who comes back with a letter.
“Father, I’ve been kidnapped. This is not a political kidnapping...” [« Père, j’ai été enlevé. Ce n’est pas un rapt politique... »]
Louis immediately recognizes his son in law’s handwriting. It is later confirmed by a handwriting expert that was indeed Bernard’s handwriting.
Later in the morning, a second message is found in Bernard’s brother’s (28 year old doctor Patrick) mailbox : a ransom note demanding 5 million francs (close to 800.000€ but with inflation probably closer to 1.000.000€ / $1.100.000)
Louis gathers his inner circle - mostly family - at lunchtime. This includes Sophie. He informs them of the kidnapping and also of his decision to handle things (negotiations) himself without involving the police.
It is unclear to me how, but Police get wind of the kidnapping but have initially misunderstood thinking that it was Louis Chaine himself that had been kidnapped. Louis is furious when police arrive at his office and he has to explain that it was not him that was kidnapped but his son in law. On top of that, he has had no intention of going to the police because he wants to deal with things himself.
LE tell Louis that it would be wise of him to cooperate with them. They explain that in the vast majority of kidnapping cases where they are involved, the hostage is found safe and sound as is the ransom money. They tell him that it would be frowned upon for someone in his political position to refuses help from LE.
So Louis agrees to let the police get involved, but he is dubious and mistrustful of their capabilities.
A large police effort is engaged, with LE going door to door in Lyon to look for Bernard, checking houses and asking neighbors if they didn’t unknowingly witness a kidnapping.
Louis uses his high level contacts to ensure that while the police are acting like they were being helpful, they are more or less staying out of his hair. But the police engagement isn’t purely innocent - they also want to keep an eye on Louis and his family to make sure that he doesn’t decide to act alone. They have the family under surveillance and have all of their phones tapped. LE want to find Bernard but they also are grasping to understand why the Chaine family has been targeted.
On September 24th, the Chaine family attach a red cloth/rag to the balcony of their city home - this is apparently how they have been advised to let the kidnappers know that they are preparing the ransom money.
On September 25th, one of Louis’ sons, Hervé, abruptly leaves his parents home in the center of Lyon with a large travel bag which contains ransom money (100 and 500 francs bills). The police, who have been watching the Chaine home, are on his tail - and follow him on a cat and mouse chase throughout different isolated suburbs of the Lyon region and into the countryside, ending up in Bourg-en-Bresse, a town 80km/50 miles northeast of Lyon. More specifically, Hervé parks at the Bourg-en-Bresse train station at drops the money off in the train station bathroom, and then leaves.
Someone moves in to pick up the bag - and the police quickly arrest him. It turns out to be a small time criminal, a 19 year old named Jérôme Roche, who has taken advantage of the Chaine family turmoil to « try his hand » at extorting money out of them, pretending to be the kidnapper.
Louis Chaine is furious. Not only because of the fact that Hervé was followed, but also because of the fact that the police decided to move in so quickly to arrest the suspect. They had no idea until after his arrest that he had nothing to do with the kidnapping - so why didn’t police let him pick up the money and then discreetly follow him to see where he would go? Or did the police already suspect that Jérôme Roche had nothing to do with it?
The weekend of October 11th and 12th, the Chaine family gather at their country home, as per usual. It is on this occasion that the kidnappers reach back out to Louis (the last time had been on September 24th, the day before Hervé had dropped the money off in the Bourg-en-Bresse train station). They learn that Bernard is still alive [proof of life is apparently given but I have no further detail on this].
Louis is given instructions to wait at a friend’s house at 6am on Sunday, October 12th.
At precisely 6am, Louis Chaîne receives a phone call telling him to go to a specific location where he will find a piece of paper with further instructions. He himself embarks on a cat and mouse game throughout Lyon (with LE hot on his trail) that ultimately falls through, likely due to the kidnappers realizing that LE are also part of « the game. » The kidnappers make it known that any further attempts to drop off money must be done via a motorcycle - avoiding any surprise passengers that otherwise could be hiding in a car. The cat and mouse game with Louis had obviously been designed to see how involved LE were.
The next day, Monday October 13th, media get wind of that weekends events and the attempted ransom drop was all over the newspapers. Louis accuses LE of leaking the information.
LE is however unaware at this point of the motorcycle demand. Louis Chaine is no longer sharing information with LE and further demonstrates his strategic flair for avoiding the police by communicating to the kidnappers (unknown as to how) that 1/ from then forward, they should contact his colleague, a fellow Notary working in another office, Georges Martin, for all communication and ransom requests (Georges Martin doesn’t have a tapped phone) and 2/ that his business partner Guy Rousseau would make the next ransom drop off based on the information received by Georges Martin.
Guy Rousseau has a motorcycle and is not under the same surveillance as the Chaine family - so he seemed to be an obvious choice for Louis.
Guy Rousseau receives word from Georges Martin (who had been contacted by the kidnappers) that he needs to be on call between 4 and 5 am on Friday October 17th. Guy is indeed contacted during this timeframe and he is given instructions. He will find a first clue under a brown brick at the address 192 avenue de Jean-Jaurès, in the Lyon suburb of Décines.
It takes Guy 10 minutes on his motorcycle to get to the given address, where he finds the next clue : « behind a fire hydrant, at the intersection of route de Genas and rue Pierre-Bresset in Villeurbanne » (note : another suburb of Lyon.)
Guy is unfamiliar with these suburbs so when he gets to the next clue, which simply states « Sept Chemins in the suburb of Bron », he has to make the trip three times before realizing that to get there he needs to take the rue Élysées-Reclus in Décines (where the first clue was). At the end of this street, there is a large sign made out of cardboard with a poorly drawn arrow and one word written : HERE (« ici » in French).
Guy makes his way down a narrow path on his motorcycle and arrives in a small clearing, where he comes face to face with two masked and armed men. Calmly, the men remove the key from his motorcycle and his glasses, and throw them in the grass. They also remove his motorcycle mask, obviously in fear that it has been tapped. They take the money and leave.
Guy Rousseau will never publicly say what was discussed with the masked men.
Louis Chaine is feeling confident. Having respected his end of the agreement (no police involvement in this particular ransom drop, paying the money asked), he has no reason to believe that Bernard won’t be released.
But his confidence doesn’t last long. There is no further contact made with Georges Martin, Guy Rousseau, or any members of the Chaine family. The deal had been to release Bernard 24 hours after the ransom drop.
LE is mortified, not only because of the fact that Louis Chaine hadn’t trusted them, but also because despite their efforts to tail the Chaine family and tap their phones, they still hadn’t been capable of finding the kidnappers.
But what had LE really scratching their heads was the complete lack of witnesses to any of the events. Bernard had obviously been kidnapped in plain daylight but apparently hadn’t been a remarkable event - theories abound - perhaps he had been solicited to meet someone in a cafe or restaurant to discuss a work related issue and then easily kidnapped.
Handwriting experts who had analysed his handwriting in the two notes left on the day of his kidnapping noticed that the notes were not written hastily and seemed to have been written by someone sitting down (and not in a car). His kidnappers were not in a hurry, and in all likelihood they were written not far from Bernard (and Louis’) office. This was deduced from the fact that the first phone call that came in to Louis Chaine was around 10:00, and the note had been put in the mailbox prior to 10:00. And Bernard hadn’t been missing for that long at this point.
As for the money, some of the 100 franc bills had been marked, with hope that the money could be later traced. Bank employees in the area are on high alert in the days following the ransom drop, but then go back to their daily routines. One particularly sharp employee did notice two marked bills, a few weeks after the kidnapping, in the French department of the Loire, just West of the Lyon region - but it was next to impossible to find out where the bills came from.
Bernard Galle is never heard from again. He is declared dead by his wife Sophie and this is officialized on April 16th 1982 - a short 19 months after his disappearance.
Sophie Galle never remarried, but she did go back to school in order to become a Notary herself. Bernard, who previously had been the logical successor to his father in law, was replaced by his widowed wife.
Guy Rousseau, shaken by the events, left Lyon and moved to the south of France.
I’m left with so many questions - the first one obviously being what happened to Bernard Galle? I feel like he almost became a detail in the whole story - and I wasn’t able to find out any information about him personally.
Why was Bernard chosen to be kidnapped and not one of Louis’ sons?
It is obvious that there was no coordinated effort between LE and the Chaine family to get Bernard back - did this help or hinder things? My instinct is that it hampered things. The Chaine family thought they could handle things on their own, and as it turned out they never saw Bernard again. Would things have been different if LE had been brought in closer?
Did Bernard mastermind his own kidnapping? Apparently this line of enquiry was investigated but nothing came if it.
Did politics have anything to do with it?
Louis’ brother, Jacques, had been assassinated in 1976 by an 18 year old independent anarchist named Jean Bilski who subsequently committed suicide. Important to note that Jacques was then CEO of the large French Bank Credit Lyonnais - and it was right in front of the Credit Lyonnais headquarters that he was shot as he was getting out of his car. His wife was also hit but survived.
Louis himself had been robbed and placed in a car trunk during a recent trip to South America.
It isn’t surprising that due to these other events, he was keen on staying out of the spotlight.
In a strange twist of events, 30 years later, on February 6th 2010, Bernard’s cousin, Jean-Philippe Galle, is kidnapped by two masked men while he is filling up his tank at a gas station in southern France. He is held overnight and the kidnappers seem to think he has a lot of money in his bank accounts. They say they will let him go once they are able to get 100K EUR off of his bank cards. They finally let him go with one of the kidnappers telling him he « isn’t the right target ».
The kidnappers are found a few days later and turn out to be small time criminals who had been linked to 15 other armed robberies in the region, and were so desperate for money they had tried to sell their organs online.
Sources:
www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1980/10/21/le-sort-de-m-bernard-galle-suscite-de-vives-inquietudes_2811802_1819218.html
www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1980/09/26/l-enlevement-de-m-galle_2819151_1819218.html
www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1980/09/27/l-enlevement-de-m-bernard-galle-arrestation-d-un-faux-ravisseur_3074418_1819218.html
fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlèvement_de_Bernard_Galle
www.google.com/amp/s/www.nicematin.com/amp/faits-divers/enleve-et-sequestre-a-st-raphael-jean-philippe-galle-raconte-342346
books.google.fr/books?id=UJ9YDwAAQBAJ&q=Bernard+Galle&hl=fr&source=gbs_word_cloud_r&cad=4#v=snippet&q=Bernard%20Galle&f=false
books.google.fr/books?id=UJ9YDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT76&lpg=PT76&dq=enlevement+bernard+galle&source=bl&ots=OmasQcJIXr&sig=ACfU3U3QWAaTZ4ds9wLhtka6nWSOsympDw&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwih8qOahfviAhVGzBoKHaYLBuwQ6AEwCHoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&q=enlevement%20bernard%20galle&f=false
books.google.fr/books?id=dUH-AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4&lpg=PA4&dq=bernard+galle&source=bl&ots=zXhzsneNi0&sig=ACfU3U3X-izJtjRo7i4E2zJxT7ZROKtPyQ&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwithsPN5P3iAhWL0eAKHUU9AWc4ChDoATAIegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=bernard%20galle&f=false
books.google.fr/books?id=ta97DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT38&lpg=PT38&dq=bernard+galle&source=bl&ots=KuNpU3qHVT&sig=ACfU3U04FxDB93vN1jk3z9ecQU_jT8c93A&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwicq7bt7f3iAhW_BGMBHcG5A304FBDoATADegQIBxAB#v=onepage&q=bernard%20galle&f=false
www.larousse.fr/archives/journaux_annee/1981/327/faits_divers