|
Post by petrolino on Mar 21, 2020 22:55:26 GMT
Action Jackson
Samuel Leroy Jackson was born on 21 December, 1948 in Washington, D.C., the capital of the United States of America. He's a sagittarius, born on the shortest day of the year, like fellow counterculture icons Frank Zappa and Jane Fonda. His father, Roy Henry Jackson, lived in Kansas City, Missouri, and died from alcoholism. His mother, factory worker Elizabeth Harriett (née Montgomery), raised her son in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Jackson is of Gabonese descent and he became a naturalized citizen of Gabon in 2019 (Gabon gained independence from France in 1960).
He attended Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia. He initially planned to study marine biology, like actress Brinke Stevens, but he caught the acting bug and switched courses, earning a degree in Dramatic Arts in 1972. Jackson co-founded the 'Just Us Theatre' troupe around this time, before embarking upon an unsteady life in theatre that at times saw him living as an itinerant.
"Stutterers often start life on the back foot. But this theme seems to run even deeper with Samuel Jackson. Raised in Chattanooga in racially segregated Tennessee by his grandparents, he was born to an alcoholic father he met twice and a mother he saw sporadically for the first nine years. An only child, Jackson describes himself as shy and bookish. “I was encouraged to read when I was very small,” he remembers. “I was reading by the time I was three or four years old. I devoured books.” This was, he says, because he wanted to elevate himself through education. But, growing up, he started to develop the stutter. Concerned about his confidence, his aunt, a teacher in Chattanooga, enrolled him in speech therapy and encouraged him to act, casting him in her school plays. Looking back, Jackson says he remembers feeling “loved and encouraged” by his family. “I was very content in terms of that. But I also knew that their desires were as great as mine – you know, for me to get out. Because the only thing I knew growing up was that I was not going to live in that town or place. That was not an option.” He raises a finger. “They just had to make sure I stayed alive to get out.” He laughs. “Because they recognised the rebel in me. They were like: ‘We’d better watch this boy.’” So how did his rebellion manifest itself at such a young age? He shrugs. “Well, I asked a lot of questions. My grandfather was a janitor, so he worked for all these different people who were generally older white men. When I was around, I would answer ’em back.” He stares at me. “I was one of those direct-stare kids. And young black kids,” he says, “that’s just not what you do. You keep your head down. You answer questions. But I was looking into their eyes and the next thing I know, it was: ‘So who are you? What do you do?’ And my grandfather’s like: ‘F*cking shut up!’ But I’d say: ‘What is that? What does that mean?’ And they would say: ‘Boy, you’re asking the questions.’” “But I just wanted to know. I just wanted to identify people in this world and what they had, and why I didn’t have it. Why a man who was half my grandfather’s age could call him by his first name and why my grandfather would have to call him Mr Something.” Jackson did get out. He went to Morehouse in Atlanta – America’s Oxbridge for young black men. To start with, he studied marine biology but switched to architecture then drama and earned himself a reputation for being involved in early battles for racial equality. In 1969 he was charged and convicted for his involvement in a protest in college and suspended for two years. He subsequently got involved with the Black Power movement (he was an usher at Martin Luther King’s funeral), but before long his mother received a visit from the FBI telling her that his life was at risk. She sent him to Los Angeles. Then, after two years of being employed as a social worker, Jackson returned to college. It was here that he met his wife LaTanya, who moved with him to New York in 1976 – both actors found work in off-Broadway plays. But over the next decade, Jackson developed a problem with drugs and alcohol. When I ask him about this period – a time spent drinking bourbon and wine from 8am and smoking weed right through to his performances in the evening – he describes himself as a “functioning alcoholic”. “I enjoyed it,” he shrugs. What kind of drunk were you? “Oh…” he has to think. “Fun? I had a great time. According to most of my friends I was fun. But every now and then I’d get that phone call: ‘I didn’t know you felt that way about me…’” So you were an “I love you” drunk? “No, I’d say: ‘You an as*hole!’” he laughs. “‘F*ck you!’ Then I’d have to explain.” In 1990 he went to rehab. The story goes that Richardson and their daughter Zoe, now 31, found Jackson unconscious on the kitchen table. He’s been sober ever since. So what was his last drink? “Tequila,” he remembers instantly, in the way that recovered alcoholics do. “I got smashed at a bachelor party.” Do you miss it? “No. I guess one of my big questions when I got sober was: ‘Am I gonna be fun?’ But yeah, I still am.” Jackson has said that there is a direct correlation between getting clean and his success. Before he quit alcohol, Richardson referred to his acting as “bloodless”. Certainly, he says, his acting improved. But there’s a sense that working has also become his new addiction. With an average of five to six films a year, Jackson has an astonishing output. But at his age and with his success (let alone money), I say, nobody needs to work at the rate he does. Or do they? Jackson smiles. “Painters get up and paint. Writers get up and write. I get up and create characters. I like creating. It fuels me. And it’s doing something that keeps me from being me all day.” If you were you all day, would that be a problem? “It can be a problem, yes. I’d rather be working.”
- Megan Conner, The Guardian
Samuel Jackson & Air Force Senior Master Sergeant John Pighini
Lashana Lynch & Brie Larson greet the Marvel Military
'Ballad Of A Thin Man' - Bob Dylan
Jackson fought against segregation as a member of the civil rights movement. It's been alleged he became a member of the Black Panther Party and was heavily enagaged in the Black Power movement, but his past as a freedom-fighter remains shrouded in mystery. He plays trumpet, French horn, flute and piccolo.
Samuel L. Jackson, Dorsey Wright, Howard E. Rollins Jr., Frankie Faison & Calvin Levels in Milos Forman's 'Ragtime' (1981)
Halle Berry, Ernest Dickerson, Spike Lee & Wesley Snipes
Samuel Jackson & John Singleton
Allen Hughes & Albert Hughes
Joseph B. Vasquez
Chic member, martial arts instructor & Black Panther Nile Rodgers chats with grime singer Big Narstie
His screen career took a long time to get going, beginning with obscure independent 'Together for Days' (1972) which I've not seen. I have, however, seen nearly every film he made in the 1980s and 1990s, when he became a much sought-after character actor and worked with some of the most notable filmmakers of the day. His addictions to hard drugs are well documented and he's lucky to be alive having overdosed. He entered rehab in 1990 which enabled him to turn his life around; his portrayal of jittery crack addict Gator in Spike Lee's 'Jungle Fever' (1991) made film history when Jackson received the only Best Supporting Actor award ever given by the jury at the Cannes Film Festival.
'Skin Tight' - Ohio Players
Jackson became a key member of Spike Lee's stock company in the 1980s and Quentin Tarantino's stock company in the 1990s, leading the two fiery filmmakers to frequently lock horns in public.
Samuel Jackson & Spike Lee
'School Daze' (1988) 'Do The Right Thing' (1989) 'Mo' Better Blues' (1990) 'Jungle Fever' (1991) 'Oldboy' (2013) 'Chi-Raq' (2015)
Interview with Spike Lee
Samuel Jackson & Quentin Tarantino
'Pulp Fiction' (1994) 'Jackie Brown' (1997)
'Kill Bill : Volume 2' (2004) 'Inglourious Basterds' (2009) 'Django Unchained' (2012) 'The Hateful Eight' (2015)
Interviews with Spike Lee & Quentin Tarantino
Sam Jackson earned his franchise tag as the 1990s came to a close and his professional reputation skyrocketed. His real-life comic book obsession and lifelong passion for fashion led some studio directors to court him openly. He first got signed to George Lucas' 'Star Wars' franchise, and then later developed the recurring role of Nick Fury within the developing Marvel Universe. He's currently ranked as the highest all-time box office star (surpassing voice actor Frank Welker in 2011) with over $7.1 billion total US box office gross. Accoding to online data reporting, the worldwide box-office total of his films (excluding cameo appearances) is over $16.7 billion.
Old Friends
Jodie Foster & Samuel Jackson
Sylvester Stallone & Samuel Jackson
Samuel Jackson & Denzel Washington
Samuel Jackson, Spike Lee & John Turturro
George Lopez, Forest Whitaker & Samuel Jackson
Samuel Jackson, Dennis Hopper, James Woods, Clint Eastwood & Ray Romano
Samuel Jackson & Bill Nunn
Samuel Jackson & John Travolta
Julianne Moore, Samuel Jackson & early mentor Morgan Freeman
Roger Guenveur Smith, Giancarlo Esposito & Samuel Jackson
Samuel Jackson & Al Pacino
Will Smith, Halle Berry & Samuel Jackson
Spike Lee, Danny Aiello & Samuel Jackson
Michael Buscemi, Spike Lee & Steve Buscemi
Quentin Tarantino attends an event with my two favourite American character actors working today ... old friends Steve Buscemi & Samuel Jackson ...
'Lucky Man' - Emerson, Lake & Palmer
|
|
|
Post by cynthiagreen on Mar 21, 2020 23:46:15 GMT
yes - a compelling presence in anything - his turn in PULP FICTION is one for the ages - he was doubly robbed at Oscar time - "beaten" by M Landau as support... but I'd say it was a lead role anyway..... I always liked his refusal to participate in anti drug messaging (He had a long class A problem before he made it big), saying that he had a really good time getting high and would feel hypocritical. I believe when he caught the eye in JUNGLE FEVER as the crackhead brother of Wesley Snipes* lead, director Spike Lee was asked where he found a junkie who could act so well.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Mar 22, 2020 0:00:58 GMT
yes - a compelling presence in anything - his turn in PULP FICTION is one for the ages - he was doubly robbed at Oscar time - "beaten" by M Landau as support... but I'd say it was a lead role anyway..... I always liked his refusal to participate in anti drug messaging (He had a long class A problem before he made it big), saying that he had a really good time getting high and would feel hypocritical. I believe when he caught the eye in JUNGLE FEVER as the crackhead brother of Wesley Snipes* lead, director Spike Lee was asked where he found a junkie who could act so well.
I kept returning to the word fury. I think in part because he's now best known for playing Nick Fury, but also because of his "furious anger" speech in 'Pulp Fiction'. And he's an actor who can be genuinely scary when he turns it on.
His links to Spike Lee and Quentin Tarantino run deeper than just the 6 films he's collaborated on with each director. For example, Jackson and Bill Nunn decamped from Lee's stable to make the New York horror 'Def by Temptation' (1990) which also employed some of Lee's technical crew.
Sam Jackson's terrific as a drug-addled oral sex fiend in 'True Romance' (1993) which is based on a screenplay by Tarantino (and came a year before 'Pulp Fiction').
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Mar 22, 2020 2:24:12 GMT
The actor Ji-Tu Cumbuka could be his dad. If you watch him in Dr Black and Mr White it will be hard not to think of Jackson. Cynic as I am, Jackson (and Morgan Freeman) are beneficiaries of the diminishing returns from a shrinking Hollywood. You can't tell me that it is progress when the 70s had everyone from Jim Brown to Pam Grier to Bernie Casey to Fred Williamson starring in their own features and franchises.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Mar 22, 2020 2:42:23 GMT
The actor Ji-Tu Cumbuka could be his dad. If you watch him in Dr Black and Mr White it will be hard not to think of Jackson. Cynic as I am, Jackson (and Morgan Freeman) are beneficiaries of the diminishing returns from a shrinking Hollywood. You can't tell me that it is progress when the 70s had everyone from Jim Brown to Pam Grier to Bernie Casey to Fred Williamson starring in their own features and franchises. No idea what you're getting at. Sam Jackson's probably made more through Marvel alone than all those actors' career earnings put together.
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Mar 22, 2020 2:45:07 GMT
No idea what you're getting at. Sam Jackson's probably made more through Marvel alone than all those actors' career earnings put together. Playing supporting roles, not leads. And in the case of Nick Fury, David Hasslehoff did it first. Check out Bernie Casey's early 70s filmography. Or Fred Williamson. I wasn't talking about earnings but artistic achievement.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Mar 22, 2020 2:49:56 GMT
No idea what you're getting at. Sam Jackson's probably made more through Marvel alone than all those actors' career earnings put together. Playing supporting roles, not leads. And in the case of Nick Fury, David Hasslehoff did it first. Check out Bernie Casey's early 70s filmography. Or Fred Williamson. I wasn't talking about earnings but artistic achievement.
Artistic achievement is obviously subjective. What do you think of movies like 'South Central', 'Do The Right Thing', 'Hangin With The Homeboys', 'Colors', 'Boyz N The Hood', 'Fresh' and 'Menace II Society', films that changed cinema, building on the work of pioneers like Melvin Van Peebles and Charles Burnett?
After all, being black doesn't mean being that guy that collected Peter Cushing's bags on the set of 'The Beast Must Die', or calling for a return to apartheid in South Africa to protect white farmers.
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Mar 22, 2020 2:57:03 GMT
Artistic achievement is obviously subjective. What do you think of movies like 'South Central', 'Do The Right Thing', 'Hangin With The Homeboys', 'Colors', 'Boyz N The Hood', 'Fresh' and 'Menace II Society', films that changed cinema, building on the work of pioneers like Melvin Van Peebles and Charles Burnett?
That implies that everything that came after Melvin Van Peebles and before Spike Lee doesn't amount to much. I think Fred Williamson was a producer on some of his films.
As for the Beast Must Die, the star is Calvin Lockhart, not Cushing.
Which is my point. For big Hollywood, black actors tend to be relegated to specific supporting roles as the distribution net widened, while back in the more diverse 70s, there was a greater range of roles, just less mass market distribution.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Mar 22, 2020 2:58:34 GMT
Artistic achievement is obviously subjective. What do you think of movies like 'South Central', 'Do The Right Thing', 'Hangin With The Homeboys', 'Colors', 'Boyz N The Hood', 'Fresh' and 'Menace II Society', films that changed cinema, building on the work of pioneers like Melvin Van Peebles and Charles Burnett?
That implies that everything that came after Melvin Van Peebles and before Spike Lee doesn't amount to much. I think Fred Williamson was a producer on some of his films.
As for the Beast Must Die, the star is Calvin Lockhart, not Cushing.
Which is my point. For big Hollywood, black actors tend to be relegated to specific supporting roles as the distribution net widened, while back in the more diverse 70s, there was a greater range of roles, just less mass market distribution.
What do you think of movies like 'South Central', 'Do The Right Thing', 'Hangin With The Homeboys', 'Colors', 'Boyz N The Hood', 'Fresh' and 'Menace II Society'?
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Mar 22, 2020 3:12:28 GMT
What do you think of movies like 'South Central', 'Do The Right Thing', 'Hangin With The Homeboys', 'Colors', 'Boyz N The Hood', 'Fresh' and 'Menace II Society'? I think they are more limited in story and theme than what "blaxploitation" was doing in the 1970s. I am skeptical to consider them progress though one might say since they focus on the inner city and average people, they are more "truthful" but like you say, it is subjective. 1970s films might be considered social agitprop of the time--but having watched a number of them, I am surprised by the wide range and production values. To be true, most directors and writers were not black, and the few that were have dropped down the memory hole (especially William Crain). I was just pointing out that while Jackson gets far more exposure than perhaps any black actor before him ever has, it comes with much more content limits compared with some counterparts from the 70s.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Mar 22, 2020 3:19:26 GMT
What do you think of movies like 'South Central', 'Do The Right Thing', 'Hangin With The Homeboys', 'Colors', 'Boyz N The Hood', 'Fresh' and 'Menace II Society'? I think they are more limited in story and theme than what "blaxploitation" was doing in the 1970s. I am skeptical to consider them progress though one might say since they focus on the inner city and average people, they are more "truthful" but like you say, it is subjective. 1970s films might be considered social agitprop of the time--but having watched a number of them, I am surprised by the wide range and production values. To be true, most directors and writers were not black, and the few that were have dropped down the memory hole (especially William Crain). I was just pointing out that while Jackson gets far more exposure than perhaps any black actor before him ever has, it comes with much more content limits compared with some counterparts from the 70s.
Don't agree, myself. Roger Corman can claim to be in all phases. He offered to produce 'Mean Streets' in Harlem, but Martin Scorsese, having made 'Boxcar Bertha', understood the impositions and constraints that would be imposed upon him due to commercial concerns. Cut forward, Corman could offer a great director like Carl Franklin the stepping stones needed to set him towards a similarly uncompromising career as a filmmaker. Though of course, all filmmakers are beholden to cost, economics and producers.
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Mar 22, 2020 5:57:43 GMT
Don't agree, myself. Roger Corman can claim to be in all phases. He offered to produce 'Mean Streets' in Harlem, but Martin Scorsese, having made 'Boxcar Bertha', understood the impositions and constraints that would be imposed upon him due to commercial concerns. Cut forward, Corman could offer a great director like Carl Franklin the stepping stones needed to set him towards a similarly uncompromising career as a filmmaker. Though of course, all filmmakers are beholden to cost, economics and producers. That's Roger Corman-he was not the big Hollywood system which is what employs Jackson. The Hollywood of the 1960s literally wasted millions on films that flopped (and which, when looking at them now, were no brainers for failures because they were stories which appealed to small audiences at most). They could have spent money on any filmmaker if they had felt like it.
Corman was supposedly responsible for bringing Akira Kurosawa films to North America (we assume the larger Hollywood apparatus could have done it easily). Perhaps William Crain was ostracized because his two films were not really multicultural. Blacula was about an African prince dealing with a problem and Dr Black and Mr White, despite the white/black transformation shtick, was about a scientist who held a grudge against prostitutes for not coming to his mother's aid when he was a child. Just as we see with Hollywood and feminism (aka it's bullshit-they see actresses as whores) the same goes for race. If a black millionaire started his own production company he would be hounded out of business unless he was following the tastes of the Hollywood brass (i.e. Byron Allen distributing that film about Ted Kennedy--in fact, has Allen's company distributed any films by black directors?).
To me it feels a lot more restricted now. Anyway my first comment was going to be that Jackson would have fit well into 1970s blaxploitation but then I realized he didn't get starring roles compared with actors in the 1970s.
I did not not intend to belittle his acting or career, I was making a historical comment that there were a number of black leading men in that period and it is not the case today.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Mar 22, 2020 6:01:06 GMT
Don't agree, myself. Roger Corman can claim to be in all phases. He offered to produce 'Mean Streets' in Harlem, but Martin Scorsese, having made 'Boxcar Bertha', understood the impositions and constraints that would be imposed upon him due to commercial concerns. Cut forward, Corman could offer a great director like Carl Franklin the stepping stones needed to set him towards a similarly uncompromising career as a filmmaker. Though of course, all filmmakers are beholden to cost, economics and producers. That's Roger Corman-he was not the big Hollywood system which is what employs Jackson. The Hollywood of the 1960s literally wasted millions on films that flopped (and which, when looking at them now, were no brainers for failures because they were stories which appealed to small audiences at most). They could have spent money on any filmmaker if they had felt like it.
Corman was supposedly responsible for bringing Akira Kurosawa films to North America (we assume the larger Hollywood apparatus could have done it easily). Perhaps William Crain was ostracized because his two films were not really multicultural. Blacula was about an African prince dealing with a problem and Dr Black and Mr White, despite the white/black transformation shtick, was about a scientist who held a grudge against prostitutes for not coming to his mother's aid when he was a child. Just as we see with Hollywood and feminism (aka it's bullshit-they see actresses as whores) the same goes for race. If a black millionaire started his own production company he would be hounded out of business unless he was following the tastes of the Hollywood brass (i.e. Byron Allen distributing that film about Ted Kennedy--in fact, has Allen's company distributed any films by black directors?).
To me it feels a lot more restricted now. Anyway my first comment was going to be that Jackson would have fit well into 1970s blaxploitation but then I realized he didn't get starring roles compared with actors in the 1970s.
I did not not intend to belittle his acting or career, I was making a historical comment that there were a number of black leading men in that period and it is not the case today.
Do you support integration?
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Mar 22, 2020 6:25:52 GMT
Do you support integration?
I do not support the idea of one size fits all art. I think it absolutely offensive in its hostility to artists and societies and creative freedom to push for less choices. A black, white, asian actor or filmmaker should, in theory, be able to make films for any audience they choose (of course they have to be prepared that an audience might reject their work as alien or what not-that has always been the case with art, artists that can reach their audience will be received better--obviously if Homer had tried to compose an oral poem for Japan he would have been lost). There has always been some level of integration in art--influences of one culture on another, as well as distinctly regional styles and influences.
But some things go without saying. If Disney or Marvel is going to make a white character black, then the same should hold true for all races. So some characters in Mulan must be African or white to maintain consistency. If they feel this insults the Chinese, then why is it acceptable when done to Europeans? You can't have it both ways if the morality is to work. Of course, you could have it both ways if someone else was free to make their own high budget Norse mythology film--but that is not the case. All the gates are controlled.
It's not logical to push integration to a point where choice is eliminated and there is confusion about who the audience is supposed to be. In order for Get Out to be a box office hit, it meant preventing rival genre films from being made and distributed which could have taken away the audience (but as I have said, Hollywood Accounting is not known for its transparency, so we have no idea what the true numbers are with films. The way Hollywood has shut down without a concern about financial loss supports my belief that money is no object for them, just like Iger's first response to Scorsese was to talk about race--- which BTW--raises the point--Black Panther was not created by blacks. There was a black-created superhero in the 1940s called Lion Man--why isn't Hollywood interested in that character--the IP too expensive for Disney to purchase?).
|
|
|
Post by cynthiagreen on Mar 22, 2020 8:00:00 GMT
yes - a compelling presence in anything - his turn in PULP FICTION is one for the ages - he was doubly robbed at Oscar time - "beaten" by M Landau as support... but I'd say it was a lead role anyway..... I always liked his refusal to participate in anti drug messaging (He had a long class A problem before he made it big), saying that he had a really good time getting high and would feel hypocritical. I believe when he caught the eye in JUNGLE FEVER as the crackhead brother of Wesley Snipes* lead, director Spike Lee was asked where he found a junkie who could act so well.
I kept returning to the word fury. I think in part because he's now best known for playing Nick Fury, but also because of his "furious anger" speech in 'Pulp Fiction'. And he's an actor who can be genuinely scary when he turns it on.
His links to Spike Lee and Quentin Tarantino run deeper than just the 6 films he's collaborated on with each director. For example, Jackson and Bill Nunn decamped from Lee's stable to make the New York horror 'Def by Temptation' (1990) which also employed some of Lee's technical crew.
Sam Jackson's terrific as a drug-addled oral sex fiend in 'True Romance' (1993) which is based on a screenplay by Tarantino (and came a year before 'Pulp Fiction').
I haven't seen TRUE ROMANCE since it was on video circa 1995,,, I liked it well enough butI need another look for sure. In truth can't recall Jackson at all. Certainly it had a considerable confluence of talent in front and behind the camera. Outside of Lee/Tarantino the ones I recall him in/liked best are DEEP BLUE SEA, THE LONG KISS GOODNIGHT and SNAKES ON A PLANE. I'm sure even he himself would concede the "biggest grossing actor of all time" tag is nonsense... STAR WARS and MARVEL franchises would have been megahits with or without his presence. Such is the flaw in such a crude calculation.The same calibration tells us Carrie Fisher was a huge star... Believe me - I was there at the time and she wasn't.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Apr 3, 2020 15:20:29 GMT
Great actor. Thanks for your informative (as usual) post, petrolino.
I like your avatar, belladonna. It was sad losing Anna Karina in December, but thankfully we still have the music and the movies.
|
|
|
Post by Lebowskidoo 🦞 on Apr 4, 2020 21:40:37 GMT
I'm up to a total of 95 Samuel L. Jackson movies I've seen so far. He's still my most viewed actor. Great post petrolino!
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Apr 4, 2020 22:23:35 GMT
I'm up to a total of 95 Samuel L. Jackson movies I've seen so far. He's still my most viewed actor. Great post petrolino ! That's awesome. He's right up there for me too in terms of numbers as I've seen most of his 20th century work, but there'd be a significant drop-off this century.
I've seen about 100 Linnea Quigley movies, she's my top total by some distance, which is perfect really, as she's my favourite actress. I can't post it here but I like the coronavirus Twitter picture of her in the shower that says, "Wash your hands like you'd wash Linnea ...", encouraging fans to wash their hands for a good amount of time.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Jan 16, 2022 2:16:22 GMT
Samuel L. Jackson is set to be presented with an Honorary Academy Award (Oscar) tonight, at the Governor's Awards. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) has decided to recognise the artistic (and business) achievements of one of America's great character stars. I'm so happy for this decisio;, he will be in good company.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jan 16, 2022 14:54:01 GMT
The hardest cursing man in Hollywood.
|
|