|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 19, 2020 14:46:43 GMT
...according to James Gunn.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2020 15:40:50 GMT
I mean why the hell not?? Joker made over a billion and that was a hard R film. Do it Gunn!
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Apr 19, 2020 15:53:02 GMT
I could’ve sworn I remembered hearing that an R-rating was already a done deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 19, 2020 16:00:07 GMT
I mean why the hell not?? Joker made over a billion and that was a hard R film. Do it Gunn! I'm game for it. But I can see WB backing off because BoP under-performed.
|
|
|
|
Post by pennypacker on Apr 19, 2020 19:19:42 GMT
I keep forgetting that the first one wasn't rated R.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Apr 19, 2020 20:29:38 GMT
I keep forgetting that the first one wasn't rated R. Back in the day, I kept stressing on the old IMDb board how stupid I thought it was that WB insisted on a PG-13 rating for the movie. Ignoring the general premise and title of the movie, David Ayer is a guy who pretty much exclusively does R-rated films. Giving him a PG-13 tentpole movie struck me as a counterproductive idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 19, 2020 20:59:15 GMT
We could see footage in July.
|
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Apr 20, 2020 10:42:03 GMT
If it is rated R for a reason then cool, if it isn't and is just done to be edgy or some shit, like BOP rather than an actual need either for story or actual material purposes then meh.
Hopefully it's because Gunn realised that the movie is good in PG-13 but great at an R rating, and not you know shit this doesn't work we need more titties, blood and swearing to cover this shit up a little.
|
|
