|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Apr 24, 2020 21:02:41 GMT
If we pretend that Deadpool belongs to the main X-Men continuity. Well, well, well: Wade Wilson is the son of the Wade Wilson (mutant) existing in the seventies/eighties, who was part of TEAM X in the original timeline ("X-Men Origins"). In the new, revised timeline, Wade Senior just "disappeared", as explained by Wade Junior in "Deadpool 1". Given the ages of the X-Men in "Deadpool 2", I would say that "Deadpool 2" could be set 10 years after the events of "Dark Phoenix", thus: 2002. Cinematic mutants age slower and better than humans, as established before. Cable could come from... Well, Firefist is 15 years old in 2002 ("Deadpool 2"). Old Firefist is played by Sala Baker, who looks 45. Given that, we can assume that Cable comes from 2032. 9 years since the final, positive ending of DOFP. If Cable is 50 years old, then he is born in 1982. One year before the events of "X-Men: Apocalypse". He is not Scott's son, of course. Any more discrepancy to fix?
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Apr 30, 2020 4:43:34 GMT
So Wade has a son that looks exactly like him, Back to the Future style? And Wade Jr. traveled back in time to shoot his own father in the head? And Deadpool is making Justin Bieber and DCEU jokes in 2002?
Makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Apr 30, 2020 20:12:15 GMT
So Wade has a son that looks exactly like him, Back to the Future style? And Wade Jr. traveled back in time to shoot his own father in the head? And Deadpool is making Justin Bieber and DCEU jokes in 2002? Makes sense. LMAO. 1- Many sons resemble their fathers. It's normal. 2- LOL technically speaking, that was his father's counterpart living in another dimension resembling the original timeline. 3- Why not? LOL
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 5, 2020 2:37:52 GMT
So Wade has a son that looks exactly like him, Back to the Future style? And Wade Jr. traveled back in time to shoot his own father in the head? And Deadpool is making Justin Bieber and DCEU jokes in 2002? Makes sense. LMAO. 1- Many sons resemble their fathers. It's normal. Resemble doesn't mean looks like an exact clone of them, Jesus dude use you brain for once, the excuse it why not this is a common lazy movie/tv trope where the father and son look exactly alike at similar ages in their life, just as an excuse to keep using the established star for the audience to connect to, even though them looking like their clone it makes no real world sense.
But your timeline reasoning is still bat guano crazy and requires a lot of "facts" you pull from your rectal cavity, give it up dude you have no credibility, that's why the only interaction regarding them you get is sarcasm and mockery, notice how no one discusses these with you in a favourable way? take the hint you are no good at these.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 5, 2020 15:05:34 GMT
Oh yeah and the date thing makes no sense either, from multiple perspective, according to you X1-3 takes place prior to Deadpool 2, how does Hank now not look like Hank in X3 or anyone else not look like they originally did in those films instead of how they look in the FC series? hell why does Colossus now look like 30-40 year old man and not the barely legal kid he was in X3 which is meant to be what 1 or 2 years prior to Deadpool 2?
If Deadpool 2 is set in 2002 why does a mere 10 year old reference make Deadpool seem extremely old to Negasonic? The Ripley line in Deadpool 1, set atleast 6 month earlier than Deadpool 2 due to Negasonics hair length change, is less than a decade old, that wouldn't indicate Wade is significantly old to her, if the movie was meant to be set in 2012 or late then maybe that works because the reference is older than her hence the your old bit.
Out of all the times you insisted on cloning this is the one time you insist on him being Wade Jr? When Deadpool in Origins was already captured and experimented on by the government? God you are weird.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on May 5, 2020 17:20:31 GMT
LMAO. 1- Many sons resemble their fathers. It's normal. Resemble doesn't mean looks like an exact clone of them, Jesus dude use you brain for once, the excuse it why not this is a common lazy movie/tv trope where the father and son look exactly alike at similar ages in their life, just as an excuse to keep using the established star for the audience to connect to, even though them looking like their clone it makes no real world sense.
But your timeline reasoning is still bat guano crazy and requires a lot of "facts" you pull from your rectal cavity, give it up dude you have no credibility, that's why the only interaction regarding them you get is sarcasm and mockery, notice how no one discusses these with you in a favourable way? take the hint you are no good at these.
Hahahah man, you're bad again. BIPOLARISM sucks. And everyone here knows you're bipolar, trust me. Many people enjoy my discussions here. Even your good personality does! LMAO. I still think DEADPOOL is an alternate continuity. I'm just playing with the idea that it could be inserted into the mainstream universe, but it's a game. It doesn't work, and I know it. That said, it's a movie, and you can pretend that he looks like his father --- but you're supposed to buy the idea that they are not identical "in-universe". Plus, Wade from Origins was 20 years old or so.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 5, 2020 19:06:24 GMT
Resemble doesn't mean looks like an exact clone of them, Jesus dude use you brain for once, the excuse it why not this is a common lazy movie/tv trope where the father and son look exactly alike at similar ages in their life, just as an excuse to keep using the established star for the audience to connect to, even though them looking like their clone it makes no real world sense.
But your timeline reasoning is still bat guano crazy and requires a lot of "facts" you pull from your rectal cavity, give it up dude you have no credibility, that's why the only interaction regarding them you get is sarcasm and mockery, notice how no one discusses these with you in a favourable way? take the hint you are no good at these.
Hahahah man, you're bad again. BIPOLARISM sucks. And everyone here knows you're bipolar, trust me. Many people enjoy my discussions here. Even your good personality does! LMAO. I still think DEADPOOL is an alternate continuity. I'm just playing with the idea that it could be inserted into the mainstream universe, but it's a game. It doesn't work, and I know it. That said, it's a movie, and you can pretend that he looks like his father --- but you're supposed to buy the idea that they are not identical "in-universe". Plus, Wade from Origins was 20 years old or so. Yawn same old shit huh, pathetic, you said something stupid admit it, I gave an actual justifiable excuse for the same issue, admit it, no one discusses anything with you they only point out how you are wrong and stupid, admit it, you aren't even half as smart as you think you are but ten times the dickhead than you want to believe, just deal with it you spastic.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on May 6, 2020 19:06:40 GMT
If we pretend that Deadpool belongs to the main X-Men continuity. Well, well, well: Wade Wilson is the son of the Wade Wilson (mutant) existing in the seventies/eighties, who was part of TEAM X in the original timeline ("X-Men Origins"). In the new, revised timeline, Wade Senior just "disappeared", as explained by Wade Junior in "Deadpool 1". Given the ages of the X-Men in "Deadpool 2", I would say that "Deadpool 2" could be set 10 years after the events of "Dark Phoenix", thus: 2002. Cinematic mutants age slower and better than humans, as established before. Cable could come from... Well, Firefist is 15 years old in 2002 ("Deadpool 2"). Old Firefist is played by Sala Baker, who looks 45. Given that, we can assume that Cable comes from 2032. 9 years since the final, positive ending of DOFP. If Cable is 50 years old, then he is born in 1982. One year before the events of "X-Men: Apocalypse". He is not Scott's son, of course. Any more discrepancy to fix? Aren't you even the least bit tired of sharing this theory that no one else other than yourself subscribes to? Honestly, it sounds dumber the more you post it. Deadpool simply cannot line up with the other X-Men movies, it even riffs into how flimsy the continuity of them all are.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 7, 2020 4:12:46 GMT
And Deadpool is making Justin Bieber and DCEU jokes in 2002? Makes sense. This one is perfectly acceptable due to Deadpool's ability to break the 4th wall, he knows that stuff because we do, key is for no one else to understand anything he is referencing as they don't have his real world knowledge, as I pointed out though stuff like Aliens 3 being a way old reference doesn't make sense in 2002, a decade old movie isn't that old, it does work however if it's almost 25 years old and therefor far older than Negasonic hence her being like fuck you're old.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on May 8, 2020 0:34:42 GMT
If we pretend that Deadpool belongs to the main X-Men continuity. Well, well, well: Wade Wilson is the son of the Wade Wilson (mutant) existing in the seventies/eighties, who was part of TEAM X in the original timeline ("X-Men Origins"). In the new, revised timeline, Wade Senior just "disappeared", as explained by Wade Junior in "Deadpool 1". Given the ages of the X-Men in "Deadpool 2", I would say that "Deadpool 2" could be set 10 years after the events of "Dark Phoenix", thus: 2002. Cinematic mutants age slower and better than humans, as established before. Cable could come from... Well, Firefist is 15 years old in 2002 ("Deadpool 2"). Old Firefist is played by Sala Baker, who looks 45. Given that, we can assume that Cable comes from 2032. 9 years since the final, positive ending of DOFP. If Cable is 50 years old, then he is born in 1982. One year before the events of "X-Men: Apocalypse". He is not Scott's son, of course. Any more discrepancy to fix? Aren't you even the least bit tired of sharing this theory that no one else other than yourself subscribes to? Honestly, it sounds dumber the more you post it. Deadpool simply cannot line up with the other X-Men movies, it even riffs into how flimsy the continuity of them all are. It's not part of my timeline. The Deadpool films are a standalone continuity. People must not subscribe to it at all, because it's a theory I was playing with FOR FUN, not the reality of things. The Deadpool movies are not part of the mainstream X-Men universe and its two timelines: x-continuity.blogspot.com
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on May 8, 2020 5:14:03 GMT
Aren't you even the least bit tired of sharing this theory that no one else other than yourself subscribes to? Honestly, it sounds dumber the more you post it. Deadpool simply cannot line up with the other X-Men movies, it even riffs into how flimsy the continuity of them all are. It's not part of my timeline. The Deadpool films are a standalone continuity. People must not subscribe to it at all, because it's a theory I was playing with FOR FUN, not the reality of things. The Deadpool movies are not part of the mainstream X-Men universe and its two timelines: x-continuity.blogspot.com I get that, but the stretches you're making are pretty WTF territory.
|
|