|
|
Post by politicidal on May 4, 2020 16:58:10 GMT
Well, at least we can expect it to have better CGI than the 2016 movie. I don't even dislike that one but the effects were awful for a $180M budget.
|
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on May 4, 2020 17:00:06 GMT
Disney is planning to remake one of their own films??!!!! Let's hope this doesn't become a trend with them  . |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 7, 2020 0:11:10 GMT
Based off their 2019 remakes, I can only guess it'd follow the animated film to the letter. It's too bad, cuz something more fantastical and in the vein of the ERB novels would be cool. I want to see Tarzan journey to the center of the Earth and fight a dinosaur already.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on May 7, 2020 12:47:06 GMT
You do know that there has already been made 45 Tarzan movies since the first one in 1918 i think it was. So 1 more does not really matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 7, 2020 16:30:41 GMT
You do know that there has already been made 45 Tarzan movies since the first one in 1918 i think it was. So 1 more does not really matter. Right? It seems people already forgot about the David Yates one even though I think it made over $350M worldwide or so.
|
|
gromel
Sophomore
@gromel
Posts: 279
Likes: 119
 
|
Post by gromel on May 16, 2020 2:42:58 GMT
The Yates one had a good cast but it was just kinda boring, literally too dark in some places, and spent more time trying to apologize for/rehabilitate the concept of Tarzan for the "modern era" so the actual current story felt half-baked. Like a tribal chief hates Tarzan for killing his son, well Tarzan should be unapologetic since his son killed and ate Kala. Which was there but toned down, yet Tarzan seems to realize his own guilt.
|
|
.
