BEWARE of the "Noahide Laws"

Obviously court systems can have corruption, which need to be addressed, but I would still prefer that to the alternatives (mob rule, vigilante justice, dictators)

Are you just being a regular anti-Semite in this thread or do you have some other agenda?

Hadn't heard of Noahide before this. It really became necessary at one point, because of the Sabbath. It's obvious that if the Old Testament is true History, that the people were once different than they are today, even in genotype.

To explain why the Sabbath rules were treated different, we have to go to the fact that people were different.

This is hard for modern day new age idealists to swallow. They want to call it something else, because they want to believe those people whom Israel warred with were actual human souls. That's the idea that really caused the problem.

There is a reason that traitors are godless. It's because they want to believe the enemy is good. In modern times, the enemy is fellow humans, but that's not how it was, and that's what the modernists want to sell us on, the idea that the creatures Israel were told to massacre were loving, caring human souls. That idea actually takes more blind faith than any other idea.

More on that when some "hater" decides to protest that humans are inhuman and inhuman creatures deserve better.

But the instances when God called for the total massacre of these creatures was to help keep demons away from humanity. Saul and others spared certain ones, and the fact that they chose whom to spare made those creatures even more dangerous, because fitter ones were allowed to breed. Their descendants even caused massacres in later times, as with the comrades of Esther. 

This was thousands of years ago. By now, those demonic beings have infiltrated into probably all of us. Oh, there may be a dozen or so "saints" out there who are capable of being Godly, but the divisiveness of people since then proves my point.



Now, back to the laws that Moses recorded. He was dealing with real "people". We're only a fraction of that. So when he wrote those words, it was for "real people", who could deal with each other.

The two most striking examples are "two witnesses" and "Sabbath". 

First, "two witnesses". The "lie" was just not loved as much by God's real people. There actually was a time when the word of two witnesses could mean something. That's hard to believe today. Instead, the more witnesses there are that agree today, the more likely it is to be a total lie. I say this from over sixty years experience. Never once have I seen two or more agree upon something that wasn't a total lie. Never. Whether for against me, I've never seen it.

That's because we are demon possessed to love to fabricate our own story and discard the truth. That's why forensic evidence has become so needed today in solving crimes. 

But most of what the Noahide laws is based on is the need for stopping abuse of the Sabbath on the Sabbath. If everyone obeys the Sabbath, then those who decide to murder, threaten, steal, loot, pillage, on the Sabbath, have a free hand, and while in the day of Moses this might have been a tiny fraction of invasive species, later, it grew to too large a number. Israel would have been wiped out totally if they didn't do anything to stop abuse on the Sabbath. 

Why wasn't the Holy God there to protect them supernaturally on the Sabbath against the invasive species? Because their very fathers allowed the invasive species to enter their family lines. The very gene pool was foiled, more and more. 


So actually, nearly all of us are mutants, half orc, Uruk Hai creatures, and Jesus came to save us. That's not "adding" to the law. That's fixing what was broke. Jesus was pure, in a system devised by the enemy, loved by the new species, of which we are members, and sacrificed his perfect human being to give us a Holy Ghost to cling to, or else we'd just continue to be "Uruk Hai" fools for Satan.

Looks like the speaker is speaking for those who can obey all the laws, but he doesn't differentiate. And there is a difference between intentionally murdering someone and picking up a stick on Saturday (which I think is the original Sabbath day). If no one ever disobeyed the Sabbath, everyone could have miraculous supernatural intervention, but when too many of this new species fight back the spirits of God, then we have no defense until the Holy Ghost is available. And that Holy Ghost mainly just comforts us for after this inferior experience of existence is finished. 

I don't think the Levites had much choice when their world became corrupted. The prophets had little choice. Samuel had to contend with the most pure son of Judah ordering a man to be sacrificed to die in a battle so this pure descendant of Judah could steal the man's wife (widow). A pure descendant of Judah who was unforgiving on his deathbed of a man who once threw a rock at him.

I don't think the pharisees and sadducees had much choice, either. So when Jesus was harsh on them, he meant on the spirits that made them self righteous in thinking they were actually pure spirits. He said as much in referring to how they were not true spiritual sons of Abraham.

So the Noahide laws are really just as impossible as the actual laws. They give more of an illusion of being able to keep the law, and I think that's why you and the speaker believe they are something to "beware" of. If we think we can be perfect, we're in for a big letdown.

I should have made it clear. I meant the other "Saul", the tall one, if you're thinking about that paragraph.

That is the teaching of Thelema, by Crowley.

   That is probably not a good thing then.



   And I had heard that before.

Too funny!