|
Post by Spitfire926f on Dec 18, 2020 18:01:38 GMT
I liked it. The time inversion thing didn't work for me the way time manipulation did in the other Nolan films. Excellent action and cinematography though, I'm sorry I didn't see it on the big screen. Robert Pattinson never disappoints, and John David Washington is going to be a big star. I kept thinking it's a shame he's not a Brit, he'd be a great Bond.
Inception still reigns as my favorite Nolan film. I hope he keeps them coming.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2020 18:22:14 GMT
I just watched it too and hated it. And I am a huge Nolan fan. This is the first time I have hated one of his movies.
The sci fi aspect is paper thin compared to Inception. Never properly explained or explored.
The spy thriller aspect is nothing but a wannabe James Bond movie that fails to have any coherent direction.
The action scenes are impressively shot, but lack any stakes or depth. The guy driving the plane isn’t even a character! He literally does that then leaves the movie!
And good god that sound mix was complete garbage! I had to leave the subtitles on the entire runtime!
Massively disappointed.
Also, sorry to be so negative in your thread. I was just about to create my own but I thought I’d just post my thoughts here instead.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2020 18:23:28 GMT
Oh..... is that you Marilyn? What happened to your other account?
|
|
|
Post by Spitfire926f on Dec 18, 2020 19:23:18 GMT
Oh..... is that you Marilyn? What happened to your other account? It's me. I needed a break and a change, but not making it a secret, that's why I put it in my profile. I'm fine with honest opinions positive or negative. I agree the scifi part of the story is weak. I'm not sure it will come together with subsequent viewings either, because I'm not sure Nolan fully fleshed it out. I didn't work for me, but I enjoyed the rest of it! The ending didn't make a whole lot of sense either. Pattinson was inverted the whole time, or...? I give it a 7. Inception is one of my 10 movies. I think John David Washington is the most exciting thing in this film. I'm looking forward to seeing more.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2020 19:29:15 GMT
Oh..... is that you Marilyn? What happened to your other account? It's me. I needed a break and a change, but not making it a secret, that's why I put it in my profile. I'm fine with honest opinions positive or negative. I agree the scifi part of the story is weak. I'm not sure it will come together with subsequent viewings either, because I'm not sure Nolan fully fleshed it out. I didn't work for me, but I enjoyed the rest of it! The ending didn't make a whole lot of sense either. Pattinson was inverted the whole time, or...? I give it a 7. Inception is one of my 10 movies. I think John David Washington is the most exciting thing in this film. I'm looking forward to seeing more. Have you seen The Prestige? It’s my favorite Nolan movie. It’s absolutely brilliant, and requires multiple viewings.
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Dec 18, 2020 19:39:04 GMT
I don't want to encourage anyone to risk their lives. The only reason why I saw TENET is because the cinema I went to had the proper safety measures and because I live in Rome, where the COVID-19 cases aren't as high as other places (at least for now). If your situation is similar to mine, that's a whole other conversation. Now, the plot revolves around a secret mission. So secret that, a couple of times, the agents and the employers discuss it in public, including a ferry where they're surrounded by people. Wait, what? Like most of Christopher Nolan's works, we have a complicated plot involving a lot of real science and philosophy in our hands. Unfortunately, there's something missing that was present in his previous projects: Strong emotions that drive the main characters through their journey (a husband trying to kill his wife's murderer, a father who misses his son and daughter, a father who misses his daughter and I guess his son too, etc...). Here, we learn nothing about our hero. And don't tell me that's the point, like in DUNKIRK. That was because the soldiers served as vessels for the viewers to insert ourselves into, in order to feel what it's like to be in a war zone. Not to mention that 2017 hit was designed to be a complete visual and auditory experience. This one balances the images and the audio the same way most movies do, and the protagonist is presented as a real person. Without knowing what motivates him on a personal level (instead of just wanting to save the world), I couldn't connect with him and, by extension, with the movie. Also, he and a lot of the other characters are similar in terms of personality, whether they're displaying their inner strength, their intelligence or their sense of humor, so they don't stand out, unlike INCEPTION with its group of distinct individuals. Speaking of that 2010 classic, it didn't matter that the events were written as a traditional heist film, because they took place inside people's dreams. All kinds of unpredictable and imaginative things happened in each environment. Here, a special element is introduced early on, but it's not used to the fullest until the 2nd half. The 1st half is a traditional spy film (and not a very interesting one) that occasionally turns into science fiction. It would be easy to dismiss Jennifer Lame's editing as choppy. I mean, I can't remember a shot lasting more than 5 or even 2 seconds (to be fair, I wasn't actually timing them). There are even moments where a character is doing something and in the very next shot they're doing something else in another part of the room, indicating that at least a couple of seconds have passed. However, that and the near total lack of establishing shots makes me think that her hands were tied and she was just doing her best to reduce the running time down to 150 minutes. Honestly, I would've preferred it if she had deleted full scenes. Trust me: Not all of them were indispensable. No other aspect about this production is bad at all, but without something to get invested in, what's the point? 5/10 ------------------------------------- You can read comments of other movies in my blog.
|
|
|
Post by Spitfire926f on Dec 18, 2020 20:02:16 GMT
It's me. I needed a break and a change, but not making it a secret, that's why I put it in my profile. I'm fine with honest opinions positive or negative. I agree the scifi part of the story is weak. I'm not sure it will come together with subsequent viewings either, because I'm not sure Nolan fully fleshed it out. I didn't work for me, but I enjoyed the rest of it! The ending didn't make a whole lot of sense either. Pattinson was inverted the whole time, or...? I give it a 7. Inception is one of my 10 movies. I think John David Washington is the most exciting thing in this film. I'm looking forward to seeing more. Have you seen The Prestige? It’s my favorite Nolan movie. It’s absolutely brilliant, and requires multiple viewings. Love that one! The ending always gets me. I just re-watched Memento last night. That one is also brilliant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2020 22:01:21 GMT
Have you seen The Prestige? It’s my favorite Nolan movie. It’s absolutely brilliant, and requires multiple viewings. Love that one! The ending always gets me. I just re-watched Memento last night. That one is also brilliant. Yes. Memento is fantastic too. I also love Dunkirk. It’s a really well made film. Interstellar is one I find incredibly disappointing. Though I do appreciate what Nolan was trying to do with it. And some of it works pretty well despite its flaws.
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Dec 18, 2020 22:03:25 GMT
Glad you liked it! I did too, I’m hoping to get it on Blu-ray soon.
I really liked the leading duo of Washington/Pattinson. Also has one of the best film scores in a long time.
|
|